
Half of New Orleans clergy abuse claims could be tossed in US bankruptcy court
Church officials said Wednesday they won't necessarily seek that, though the eligibility of claims will be determined by a court-appointed examiner. If the investors' arguments prevail, it could have major effects on whether the US's second-oldest Catholic archdiocese settles its expensive, five-year-old bankruptcy case – or if victims of abuse by its clergy will pursue their claims individually in civil court.
Meanwhile, documents filed in court on Tuesday outlined how the church has agreed to pay at least $180m into a settlement trust, with the total growing to between $210m and $235m million if a number of affordable apartment complexes owned by a church affiliate can be sold.
After the eligible claimants are determined, they will get to vote to approve or reject the settlement by 29 October.
If two-thirds of the voting claimants do not approve the settlement, judge Meredith Grabill has said she'll have no choice but to throw the church out of bankruptcy.
Attorneys representing a bloc of about 180 claimants are already urging their clients to vote 'no'.
That group alone wouldn't be large enough to derail the settlement if there are more than 600 claimants voting on it. But it would be easily large enough to kill the deal if claims questioned by the church's bondholders are thrown out.
The archdiocese has previously noted that 154 claims were filed after a March 2021 deadline set by the bankruptcy court. But it hasn't asked to have those claims thrown out.
The church also argued in court filings that 142 more claims turned out to be duplicates, named abusers who were part of religious orders or other groups not under the archdiocese's authority or came from victims who were already paid individual settlements.
If all those claims in question are thrown out, it would leave 337 claimants – not 633.
While a smaller number of claimants would make it easier for opponents of the plan to muster enough 'no' votes to get the church tossed from bankruptcy, it would also mean a higher average payout for each claimant.
With 633 claimants, a $235m settlement would yield an average payout of about $370,000. With 337 claimants, the average would jump to almost $700,000. That would dwarf the average payment of $540,000 by the Catholic diocese in Rockville Centre on Long Island, New York which many claimants pointed to as a fair standard for the New Orleans settlement terms.
On Tuesday, the church and a committee that negotiated the settlement on behalf of abuse victims filed a joint settlement plan and disclosure statements. The central terms of the agreement were announced in May, but there were a few surprises.
A key one is about what the church will disclose in a public archive of its files about child sexual abuse. The agreement says the archive will include claims against clergy already found by the archdiocese to be credibly accused of abuse – or clergy or church staff named in at least three verified claims. Those named by one or two claimants would not be included in the archive.
Also, as WWL Louisiana and the Guardian first reported in June, archdiocesan bondholders accused the church of securities fraud for refusing to make $1m in interest payments to the investors after repeatedly promising all debts would be fully paid.
In new court documents, the bondholders further alleged that the church set a cap of $20m on real estate sales as a measure to protect itself from being forced to sell property to pay abuse claims.
The church took that step in 2020, back at a time when it believed most of the abuse claimants would have no standing to file lawsuits against the church in court because of how long they had waited to come forward. But the Louisiana state legislature passed a so-called lookback law that allows victims to file lawsuits no matter how long ago the abuse occurred, and the church's efforts to strike down the law failed.
Ramon Antonio Vargas contributed reporting
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Trump slump' blamed as fewer tourists visit Las Vegas
Las Vegas is experiencing a significant downturn in tourism this summer, with officials attributing the decline, particularly among international visitors, to policies enacted by the Trump administration. The iconic city, famed for its lavish entertainment and round-the-clock gambling, saw just under 3.1 million tourists in June, marking an 11 per cent decrease compared to the same time in 2024. Data from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority further reveals a 13 per cent reduction in international travellers and a roughly 15 per cent fall in hotel occupancy. Mayor Shelley Berkley highlighted the drastic drop in visitors from Canada, Nevada 's largest international market, describing the flow as having diminished "to a drip" from a torrent. She noted a similar trend with Mexico, stating: "We have a number of very high rollers that come in from Mexico that aren't so keen on coming in right now. And that seems to be the prevailing attitude internationally." Ted Pappageorge, who leads the influential Culinary Workers Union, has dubbed the situation the "Trump slump". He also pointed to a decline in visits from Southern California, a region with a substantial Latino population, suggesting that fears surrounding the administration's immigration enforcement are deterring travel. 'If you tell the rest of the world they're not welcome, then they won't come,' Pappageorge said. Canadian airline data shows fewer passengers from north of the border are arriving at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. Air Canada saw its passenger numbers fall by 33 per cent in June compared to the same time a year ago, while WestJet had a 31 per cent drop. The low-cost carrier Flair reported a whopping 62 per cent decline. Travel agents in Canada said there's been a significant downturn in clients wanting to visit the US overall, and Las Vegas in particular. Wendy Hart, who books trips from Windsor, Ontario, said the reason was 'politics, for sure.' She speculated that it was a point of 'national pride' that people were staying away from the US after President Donald Trump said he wanted to make Canada the 51st state. 'The tariffs are a big thing too. They seem to be contributing to the rising cost of everything,' Hart said. At downtown's Circa Resort and Casino, international visits have dipped, especially from Canada and Japan, according to owner and CEO Derek Stevens. But the downturn comes after a post-COVID spike, Stevens said. And while hotel room bookings are slack, gaming numbers, especially for sports betting, are still strong, he said. 'It's not as if the sky is falling,' he said. Wealthier visitors are still coming, he said, and Circa has introduced cheaper package deals to lure those with less money to spend. 'There have been many stories written about how the 'end is near' in Vegas,' he said. 'But Vegas continues to reinvent itself as a destination worth visiting.' On AAA 's annual top ten list of top Labor Day destinations, Las Vegas slipped this year to the last spot, from number six in 2024. Seattle and Orlando, Florida — home to Disneyworld — hold steady in the top two spots, with New York City moving up to third for 2025. Reports of declining tourism were news to Alison Ferry, who arrived from Donegal, Ireland, to find big crowds at casinos and the Vegas Strip. 'It's very busy. It has been busy everywhere that we've gone. And really, really hot,' Ferry said. She added that she doesn't pay much attention to U.S. politics. Just off the strip, there's been no slowdown at the Pinball Museum, which showcases games from the 1930s through today. Manager Jim Arnold said the two-decade-old attraction is recession-proof because it's one of the few places to offer free parking and free admission. 'We've decided that our plan is just to ignore inflation and pretend it doesn't exist," Arnold said. 'So you still take a quarter out of your pocket and put it in a game, and you don't pay a resort fee or a cancelation fee or any of that jazz.' But Arnold said he's not surprised that overall tourism might be slowing because of skyrocketing prices at high-end restaurants and resorts, which 'squeezes out the low end tourist.' The mayor said the rising cost of food, hotel rooms and attractions also keeps visitors away. ' People are feeling that they're getting nickeled and dimed, and they're not getting value for their dollar,' Berkley said. She called on business owners to 'see if we can't make it more affordable' for tourists. 'And that's all we want. We want them to come and have good time, spend their money, go home,' the mayor said. 'Then come back in six months.'


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major airline to face lawsuit over selling 'windowless' window seats
A major American airline is facing a class action lawsuit for selling seats without windows to plane passengers in California. The lawsuit accuses United Airlines of misleading customers by advertising a window seat without a window being present - and charging passengers extra for it. The plaintiff claims the practice counts as false advertising and a violation of passenger rights. They also demanded the airline compensate all California passengers who were forced to pay an extra fee for a windowless window seat in the past four years. The issue with windowless seats being sold as window seats often arises from misaligned windows and cabin panels, as reported by Top Class Actions. Many planes do not have windows installed in every row, most notably in seats that are located next to a cabin sidewall. On United Airlines aircraft, these seats are normally found in rows that fall between two windows, which in turn leaves a blank wall. Internal structures, such as air conditioning ducts, wiring and joints, can also interfere with spaces that require a window. The main problem United currently faces is that its online seating chart does not inform passengers of seats that are missing windows. Only once passengers board and locate their seats do they find themselves staring at a wall for the remainder of the flight, despite unknowingly shelling out extra to secure a 'window' seat. It's widely known that United charges passengers for seat assignments - even those flying standard economy are often required to dole out at least $24 (£17) extra for Economy Plus or 'preferred' seating. While aisle and middle seats have clear definitions - with aisle being located next to the aisle and middle being between the two - window seats are generally defined as any seat that is not a middle or aisle. The lawsuit might be targeting United practices in California, but it's a known industrywide issue. Should the suit gain momentum, it could force United to re-design its entire seating plan, with flags or disclaimers added to clearly highlight to passengers where windowless seats are located. It could also lead to a domino effect of suits being filed against other airlines, as many major carriers continue to advertise window seats as those with windows. Meanwhile, United Airlines has quietly resumed charging single passengers more than those travelling in pairs or groups. The controversial policy, dubbed the 'single tax' by its critics, was exposed by a consumer rights website earlier this year. An investigation by Thrifty Traveler found that United, Delta and American were all charging solo fliers higher fares for the same route than those who booked two tickets or more together. After the report sparked backlash, United and Delta promised to scrap the pricing model and charge the same rates for singles and couples. American Airlines, however, kept the policy. Now United – the US's largest airline – has gone back on its promise, according to an analysis by The Economist. It is once again charging weekday solo travelers a premium on at least 8 percent of its flights.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Applied Nutrition shares bulk up as protein group flexes bumper profits
Applied Nutrition shares rose sharply on Tuesday after the protein powder and supplements firm upgraded annual profit guidance. The sports nutrition group, which listed on the London Stock Exchange in October last year, told investors a 'strong' second half performance has put revenues on track to rise by nearly a quarter to £107million this year. Revenue had been previously guided at £100million for the year, meaning the refreshed numbers are 7 per cent ahead of projections. Buoyed by higher sales and profits, the company said its 2025 results look set to come in 'ahead of market expectations'. Adjusted earnings before nasties are expected to rise 19 per cent year-on-year to £30.94million, while Applied Nutrition forecasts a net cash position of around £18.5million for the period. Founder and chief executive Tom Ryder said: 'Our focus and ambition remain as strong as ever - in delivering for our shareholders, customers and team - and we are excited about the opportunities we have in the pipeline for the year ahead.' Applied Nutrition, which is a traditional bricks-and-mortar wholesale business, currently boasts among the strongest profit margins in the health and beauty sector. The group has been able to withstand record high whey prices and the impact of US tariffs by effectively managing costs and passing on higher prices to consumers. A report by retail research group Kantar found that sales of sports nutrition products surged by 45 per cent in the first five months of this year compared with the same period in 2024. They were the 'biggest winners' as customers shaped their diets around lifestyle choices 'with health, wellbeing and exercise apparently top of many people's minds', Kantar said. The Liverpool-based business, which has collaborated with Coleen Rooney, also expects bumper results for the financial year ending 31 July 2026. Applied Nutrition said: 'The board remains confident that the Group's core strengths, including its B2B-focused business model, breadth of high-quality products and industry leading new product development, will continue to drive sustained revenue growth and strong profitability over the long-term.' Applied Nutrition shares jumped 9.38 per cent or 12.30p to 143.50p, having risen around 12 per cent in the past month. Ryder said: 'We are proud to report that we have exceeded the guidance we gave at our IPO, with our first full-year results expected to come in ahead of market expectations.' Bumper IPO windfall for founder Applied Nutrition, which is backed by JD Sports, initially raised £157.5million from its 2024 IPO at a price of 140p per share, valuing it at £350million. It is currently valued at approximately £320million. Ryder netted £67million when shares in Applied Nutrition were listed last year. Raised by his grandparents on a Kirkby council estate following his father's death, Ryder opened his first store, Body Fuel, when he was 18, selling muscle-bulking protein powder, creatine and other supplements while working as a scaffolder for the local council. After six years juggling two jobs, Ryder created Applied Nutrition in 2014 and began working from a small factory in nearby Knowsley. The group, which operates primarily business-to-business, sells products in more than 85 countries under four ranges – Applied Nutrition, ABE, BodyFuel, and Endurance. The business will release its official results for the year ended 31 July 2025 on 10 November.