logo
RBI's record banking system fund infusion is not boosting loan growth

RBI's record banking system fund infusion is not boosting loan growth

Indian Express19-07-2025
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) began pumping money into the banking system in December 2024, while the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) started cutting interest rates in February. However, the MPC's 100 basis points (bps) of rate cuts and the lakhs of crores of money provided by the RBI to the banking system has had little impact on demand for loans. In fact, credit growth has almost halved from the middle of 2024. And economists think loan growth may fall further in the coming months.
According to data released on June 30 by the RBI, non-food credit extended by Indian banks was up 9.8 per cent year-on-year (YoY) as at the end of May, down from 11.2 per cent in April and 16.2 per cent a year ago, after excluding for the impact of the merger of HDFC Bank with Housing Development Finance Corporation in July 2023.
The sector-wise breakdown makes for similar reading. Take loans to industry, for instance, which showed a growth of just 4.9 per cent YoY at the end of May, down from 6.7 per cent in April and 8.9 per cent a year ago.
At the same time, the amount of money the RBI has pushed into the banking system has ballooned. It first cut banks' Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) by 50 bps in December 2024, after which — through a variety of instruments, such as purchases of government bonds — the Indian central bank added nearly Rs 10 lakh crore into a system that was tight on cash starting the second half of 2024 due to tax outflows and the RBI's own operations in the foreign exchange market.
And while the rupee stabilised before the RBI loosened its grip somewhat in 2025, demand for bank loans has continued to weaken even as borrowing costs have fallen. According to RBI data, new bank loans were around 20 bps cheaper in May compared to a year ago.
Wasted liquidity surplus?
According to J.P. Morgan economists, the continued addition of liquidity into the banking system by the RBI is a futile attempt to bring down lending rates of banks — beyond a point.
In a note published earlier this month, the investment bank's economists said 'there is no evidence that liquidity 'causes' credit or deposit growth. If anything, the causality is reversed, with credit driving liquidity growth, through the deposit and Cash Reserve Ratio channel.' As per its analysis, J.P. Morgan found that the entire impact on banks' lending rates from changes in banking system liquidity is because of movements in the interest rate at which banks lend to each other — the 'call rate'. As such, once the call rate declines to a certain level, there is no incremental benefit in terms of a further decline in banks' lending rates from the provision of additional liquidity by the RBI.
The central bank, seemingly, has taken note of this too, and in recent days looked to suck out the excess money it has pumped into the banking system. Since June 27, the central bank has removed almost Rs 7 lakh crore. However, given the temporary nature of these operations, much of these removed funds are already back with banks.
But even before the RBI began conducting these temporary operations — called variable rate reverse repos — to drain out excess money, banks were already keeping them at a central bank facility in return for a fixed rate of interest of 5.25 per cent. However, the amount banks were choosing to keep at this so-called Standing Deposit Facility has more than quadrupled in the last one year — from a daily average of Rs 58,817 crore in June 2024 to Rs 2.59 lakh crore in June 2025. Clearly, there are few takers for loans from banks.
Will the weak loan growth continue?
Weakness in demand for loans has been a concern for the MPC, which cut the policy repo rate by a larger-than-expected 50 bps to 5.5 per cent on June 6 to push banks to cut their lending rates faster. But this 'transmission' of policy rate cuts to lending rates of banks — which can take up to one year, although the RBI over the years has tried to make this process faster — depends on a variety of factors.
According to Nomura economists Sonal Varma and Aurodeep Nandi, a faster and more complete transmission of changes to the policy repo rate requires not just excess money in the banking system but also a lower credit-deposit (CD) ratio, which is an indicator of the proportion of a bank's deposits sent out as loans.
'The periods of maximum pass-through of policy rate cuts have typically happened in periods when the credit-deposit ratio was much lower in the 70-74 per cent range,' Varma and Nandi said in a report on July 8, adding that the ratio was currently just below 80 per cent. According to them, the RBI's latest bank lending survey is indicative of moderating demand for loans, especially for retail and personal loans, while the global trade uncertainty coupled with rising imports from China is keeping industrial capacity utilisation subdued. As a result, Varma and Nandi see credit growth falling even further to 7-8 per cent by March 2026.
Need for loan demand
As RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra noted on June 6, for banks to lower their lending rates, there needs to be demand for loans. And demand for loans depends on the macroeconomic conditions and appetite for credit. Clearly, the fact that the RBI has felt the need to inject so much money into the banking system and reduce the policy repo rate by 100 bps in a matter of months is a sign of weakness in macroeconomic conditions — even if the annual GDP growth rate is seen stable around 6.5 per cent.
'…credit demand follows the momentum in economic activity and often continues to rise despite a rise in interest rates. The reverse is also empirically observed. If credit demand is moderate, a reduced interest rate may not boost it over the next 12-24 months. For any impact, it is critical to hold the rate steady for 18-24 months,' the Boston Consulting Group said in a report this month.
Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy.
... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reliance remains highest-ranked Indian firm on Fortune Global 500 list
Reliance remains highest-ranked Indian firm on Fortune Global 500 list

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Reliance remains highest-ranked Indian firm on Fortune Global 500 list

Billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries has retained its position as the highest-ranked Indian company on the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list, according to the latest rankings released by the publication. The oil-to-telecom-and-retail conglomerate has been ranked at No.88 on the latest list, down from 86th position in 2024. However, the company has gained a whopping 67 places in the last four years, from No.155 in 2021. US retail giant Walmart continues to be the top-ranked company in the world, followed by Amazon. The top 10 has three Chinese companies - state-owned electric utility State Grid at No.3, China National Petrol at No.5 and oil and gas giant Sinopec Group at No.6. World's largest oil exporter Saudi Aramco is ranked at No.4 and Apple at No.8. India has 9 companies in the Fortune's Global 500 list this year - 5 of them from the public sector and 4 from the private sector. Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is ranked at No.95, unchanged from last year. Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) slipped 11 slots to be ranked No.127 in the 2025 ranking. Country's largest lender State Bank of India (SBI) gained 15 slots to be ranked at 163, while HDFC Bank soared 48 places to come in at No.258. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) lost one place to be ranked at 181. Other Indian firms on the list included Tata Motors at No.283 (down 12 positions from 2024), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) at No.285 (down 27 position) and ICICI Bank at No.464 (unchanged). It is now the 22nd year of Reliance being a part of the Fortune Global 500 list - much longer than any other private sector company in India. The Fortune Global 500 list ranks companies by total revenues for their respective fiscal years ended on or before March 31, 2025. The Indian rupee's depreciation against the USD from 83.35 in March 2024 to 85.45 in March 2025 had a negative impact on Reliance's revenues when converted to USD. Reliance closed FY25 with record high consolidated gross revenues of Rs 1,071,174 crore, up 7.1 per cent year-on-year, and EBITDA of Rs 183,422 crore, up 2.9 per cent, with each of the oil-to-chemical (O2C), oil and gas, retail and digital services businesses posting healthy growth.

Qualcomm India eyes vehicle-linked smart glasses in under 3 yrs: President
Qualcomm India eyes vehicle-linked smart glasses in under 3 yrs: President

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Qualcomm India eyes vehicle-linked smart glasses in under 3 yrs: President

Chipmaker in talks with Indian automakers to co-develop AI-powered glasses for two- and four-wheeler riders premium Deepak Patel New Delhi Listen to This Article US-based Qualcomm, a fabless semiconductor company, is currently in discussions with Indian two-wheeler as well as four-wheeler automakers to develop AI-powered smart glasses that are integrated with their vehicles and can assist their riders, and these products should be in the market in not more than three years, Savi Soin, president, Qualcomm India, told Business Standard in an interview on Wednesday. 'We can see these smart glasses, which are integrated with four-wheelers and two-wheelers, in the market in less than three years,' Soin said.

Jane Street yet to resume F&O trade; market vigilance up: Sebi chief
Jane Street yet to resume F&O trade; market vigilance up: Sebi chief

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Jane Street yet to resume F&O trade; market vigilance up: Sebi chief

Jane Street has not resumed trading in futures and options (F&O) since the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) lifted the bar imposed on July 3, said Tuhin Kanta Pandey, the regulator's chairman, in an interview with BusinessWorld. Pandey said that Sebi and exchanges are maintaining 'aggressive surveillance' of the market since the regulator's order against the US-based trading company. He defended the decision to impose only a temporary ban on the company, noting that a permanent one without a show-cause notice or a final order would be 'arbitrary and legally unsustainable.' Sebi lifted Jane Street's trading ban after the firm deposited Rs 4,844 crore in an escrow account and gave an undertaking to refrain from manipulative or fraudulent trading. Addressing concerns about market surveillance, Pandey said, 'Technology is evolving at a breakneck pace, and no regulator can claim to be superhuman. The Jane Street case highlighted the need to upgrade our surveillance systems, and we're actively doing so.' He added that Sebi has introduced new surveillance parameters and is exploring tools that use artificial intelligence to spot anomalies in F&O trading, including unusual delta exposures or spikes in out-of-the-money options. Sebi is also open to external expertise to keep pace with sophisticated market participants. 'Staying ahead of HFT [high-frequency traders] is a cat-and-mouse game, and we're committed to evolving dynamically,' he said. Sebi's ex-parte interim order on July 3 directed the impounding of alleged illegal gains from market manipulation, specifically on index expiry days. 'Our jurisprudence doesn't allow us to treat someone as guilty without due process. The $597 million deposit is a strong signal — unprecedented in itself — that Sebi means business. We're not here to play hero; we're here to build trust through consistent, lawful regulation,' said the Sebi chairman. He clarified that Jane Street was compliant with foreign portfolio investor (FPI) regulations, including disclosures of ultimate beneficiary ownership for stakes above 10 per cent. 'Their trades in F&O don't involve equity ownership,' Pandey noted. The July 3 order was based on surveillance reports provided by the NSE. Sebi has since broadened its investigation to include other indices and trading strategies. Addressing questions about potential data delays from the BSE, Pandey said, 'I wasn't aware of specific delays in BSE's data sharing, but I'll verify this. The Jane Street order focused on the manipulation evidence we already had, primarily from our surveillance and NSE data, which was sufficient for the interim action.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store