Egg Drop Challenge: Physicists surprise in finding on how eggs break
Is a raw egg more fragile when it falls upright or lying on its side? It's a question that's relevant not only for kitchen mishaps, but above all for anyone taking part in the so-called Egg Drop Challenge.
This popular classroom experiment is often used in physics lessons. The challenge: students are tasked with using everyday items like straws, paper and string to build a protective capsule for the egg, allowing it to be dropped from various heights without breaking.
To aid students, a team of researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge have officially addressed the question of whether an egg breaks more easily when it falls upright or sideways. To investigate, they dropped eggs 180 times from different heights.
The findings, published in May by the team in the journal Communications Physics, reveal that eggs are - counter to physics classroom teachings - less fragile when they fall horizontally rather than vertically.
"We contest the commonly held belief that an egg is strongest when dropped vertically on its end," the authors write, arguing to have disproved what they say is a widespread assumption found in tutorials and physics teaching materials.
In the experiment, more than half of the eggs that fell upright from a height of eight millimetres broke, regardless of which end of the egg was pointing downwards. In contrast, fewer than 10% of the eggs that fell from a horizontal position broke.
Even at slightly greater heights, the proportion of broken eggs was significantly smaller when the eggs were aligned horizontally. The team also conducted additional tests using a specialized device to determine the amount of pressure required to break the eggs.
The researchers explained the observed effect by noting that eggs are more flexible in the middle, allowing them to absorb more energy before breaking.
On average, eggs can absorb about 30% more energy when falling horizontally, according to the study. This essentially makes them more durable, by the study's definition.
The team believes this confusion between physical properties is one reason for the common misconception that eggs are more stable when oriented vertically.
Most physics teachers understand that an egg is stiffer in one direction, the authors say. "But they equate this with 'strength' in all other senses. However, eggs need to be tough, not stiff, in order to survive a fall."
Humans know this only too well, if only instinctively, when jumping from a height.
"When we fall we know to bend our knees rather than lock them straight, which could lead to injury. In a sense, our legs are 'weaker', or more compliant, when bent, but are tougher, and therefore 'stronger' during impact, experiencing a lower force over a longer distance."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mysteriously Magnetic Moon Rocks Might Have an Explosive Origin Story
Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't have much of a magnetic field – and yet, a strange pile of rocks on the far side seems mysteriously magnetized. A new study suggests that a major cataclysm, over and done in under an hour, left a lasting imprint. A team led by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has found that a massive impact may have generated a huge amount of plasma that temporarily strengthened the Moon's tiny, ancient magnetic field. According to lead author Isaac Narrett, a planetary scientist at MIT, this theory could explain the presence of highly magnetic rocks detected on the Moon's far side in a region near the south pole. "There are large parts of lunar magnetism that are still unexplained," he says. "But the majority of the strong magnetic fields that are measured by orbiting spacecraft can be explained by this process – especially on the far side of the Moon." In 1959, the Soviet Luna 1 spacecraft conducted the first magnetic measurements of the Moon and found that unlike Earth, it did not have a strong, intrinsic magnetic field. Later research showed that the Moon had weak fields largely confined to the lunar crust, which seem to be created by interaction with charged solar particles. However, the analysis of samples brought back by astronauts on the Apollo missions showed that some rocks formed in magnetic fields that were much stronger. This led to the general consensus that while the Moon does not have an intrinsic magnetic field today, it once did. In a previous study, MIT planetary scientists simulated how a giant impact could have amplified solar-generated magnetic fields on the Moon. However, their results indicated that this would not generate a field strong enough to explain the highly magnetic measurements of surface rocks. In the new study, Narrett and associates took a different approach and assumed the Moon once had a dynamo that produced a weak lunar magnetic field. Given the size of the Moon's core, they estimated that such a field would have been about one-50th the strength of Earth's field today. They then simulated a large impact and the cloud of plasma that would result as the force of the impact vaporized material on the surface. They also ran simulations on how the resulting plasma would flow and interact with the Moon's existing magnetic field. This entire process would have been incredibly fast, lasting around 40 minutes from when the field was amplified to when it decayed back to baseline. This is consistent with the fact that one of the Moon's largest impact basins, Mare Imbrium, is located exactly opposite the far side southern polar region. According to their simulations, an impact powerful enough to create the Imbrium basin would have sent a pressure wave through the Moon that converged on the other side. The researchers suspect that this shock coincided with the plasma cloud amplifying the Moon's magnetic field. Rocks can contain records of the magnetic fields they formed under, thanks to the orientation of the electrons inside them. In this case, the shock waves could have temporarily disrupted electrons in the rocks at the point of convergence, and as they settled back down they could have taken a snapshot of the short-lived, strong magnetic field. "It's as if you throw a 52-card deck in the air, in a magnetic field, and each card has a compass needle," says study co-author and planetary scientist Benjamin Weiss at MIT. "When the cards settle back to the ground, they do so in a new orientation. That's essentially the magnetization process." According to the researchers, these findings have effectively settled the debate between the competing schools of thought. Instead of the Moon's magnetic field being the result of a dynamo or a massive impact, their results show that a combination of a dynamo and a large impact with a resulting shockwave could be responsible for the Moon's highly magnetized rocks, especially on the far side. This theory could be tested in the coming years as astronauts travel to the lunar south pole and collect rock samples, as part of the Artemis Program. The paper detailing their findings was published in Science Advances. Fiery Orange Gems From The Moon Reveal Secrets of Its Violent Past A Giant Hole Just Opened in The Sun – And It's Blasting Earth With Solar Wind The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Put the paintbrush down – AI can restore artworks quicker and better
Artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of art restoration by humans after MIT showed that damaged paintings can be repaired in just a few hours. Typically, conservators spend months or years researching and matching paints, colours and techniques to ensure the finished product is as close to the original as possible. But Alex Kachkine, an engineering graduate at MIT, has shown it is possible to use AI to fill in the damaged areas digitally, then print the restored layers onto a thin film to attach on top of the painting. It means the painting appears restored even though the original is still intact beneath. The method was applied to a highly damaged 15th-century oil painting, and AI immediately identified 5,612 separate regions in need of repair, and filled in these regions using 57,314 different colours. The entire process, from start to finish, took just three and a half hours. 'There is a lot of damaged art in storage that might never be seen,' said Mr Kachkine. 'Hopefully with this new method, there's a chance we'll see more art, which I would be delighted by.' In recent years, digital restoration tools have allowed conservators to create virtual representations of restored works. AI algorithms can quickly sift through huge amounts of data about artists and time periods to generate a digitally restored version of a particular painting, in a way that closely resembles the correct style. However, digital restorations are usually displayed virtually or printed as stand-alone works and until now there has never been a way to translate the digital restorations on to the original work. The new technique involves first scanning the painting and then using software to create maps of the areas that require repair, before matching the correct colours. The maps are then inkjet printed onto two sheets of a film. One film, which sits underneath, is printed in white so that the colours overlaid on the second sheet are not muddied by the colours of the original painting. The layers are carefully aligned and overlaid by hand onto the original painting and adhered with a thin spray of varnish. The printed films are made from materials that can be easily dissolved with conservation-grade solutions, in case conservators need to reveal the original, damaged work. The digital file of the mask can also be saved as a detailed record of what was restored. For the painting that Mr Kachkine used, the method was able to fill in thousands of losses in just a few hours. 'A few years ago, I was restoring this baroque Italian painting with probably the same order magnitude of losses, and it took me nine months of part-time work,' he said. 'The more losses there are, the better this method is.' The new technique may even help restore botched restorations such as Elias Garcia Martinez's Ecce Homo, which was restored so badly it was dubbed Monkey Christ, because of the Simian features of Jesus. Mr Kachkine acknowledges that there were ethical issues to consider, in terms of whether a restored version was an appropriate representation of an artist's original style and intent. He said the process should be carried out in consultation with conservators with knowledge of a painting's history and origins to check the AI programme was not going off-piste. 'Restoring a painting is fun, and it's great to sit down and infill things and have a nice evening,' he added 'But that's a very slow process.' The research was published in Nature. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
UMass, MIT team tune up WMass bridge with new 3D-printing tech
AMHERST — A UMass Amherst and MIT team have successfully strengthened an aging bridge in Great Barrington with cutting-edge 3D printing, the university announced Thursday. The 3D-printing technique is called cold spray, and it was applied to the bridge last month in a proof-of-concept demonstration. The technique is expected to reduce the cost of repair key structures, like bridges, while also minimizing traffic disruptions. Led by the University of Massachusetts Amherst with researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology mechanical engineering department, the team worked on the 1949 'Red Bridge,' formerly called the 'Brown Bridge.' 'Now that we've completed this proof-of-concept repair, we see a clear path to a solution that is much faster, less costly, easier, and less invasive,' said Simos Gerasimidis, UMass associate professor of civil and environmental engineering and a principal investigator on the project. The cold spray technique involves an on-site 3D printer spraying high-velocity metal particles onto bridge beams. Repeated spraying restores thickness and structural integrity. This method has used on submarines, airplanes and ships. The bridge test was a first, the researchers say. Bridges present unique challenges due to their size and because the 3D printer must be brought on site. About half of American 623,218 bridges are deteriorated. Other project partners include the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 'Any time you drive, you go under or over a corroded bridge,' Gerasimidis said. 'They are everywhere. It's impossible to avoid, and their condition often shows significant deterioration. We know the numbers.' Across the U.S. 49% of the nation's bridges are only in 'fair' condition and 6.8% are rated 'poor,' according to the 2025 Report Card for America's Infrastructure. The projected cost to restore them exceeds $191 billion. Roughly 9% of Massachusetts's 5,295 bridges are structurally deficient and require repair—a need that far outpaces available funding. Read the original article on MassLive.
