Operation Sindoor Signals New Era in Counter-Terrorism, Says Manoj Tiwari
New Delhi: Following the Indian Army's press conference on Monday regarding Operation Sindoor, a military action targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan, BJP Member of Parliament Manoj Tiwari issued a statement lauding the briefing as a source of national encouragement.Tiwari described the Army's address as 'an introduction to a new country,' noting that every word of the press conference offered inspiration and conveyed important truths to the citizens of India.
Watch: BJP MP Manoj Tiwari says, "Just now the Indian Army's press conference happened. Every word of it was filled with energy and enthusiasm, it presented a new image of India. The press conference began with a few powerful lines, a poem that I want to recite in full..." pic.twitter.com/g4PL4BgNY4 — IANS (@ians_india) May 12, 2025
During his remarks, Tiwari also recited a poem that emphasized resilience and the country's resolve to confront terrorism. The poem reflected themes of bravery, sacrifice, and a collective national awakening against prolonged suffering and acts of terror.
'Now there will be no pleading, but war; the battle will be fierce,' he began. The verses evoked imagery of historical and mythological strength, referencing the disrobing of Draupadi and the steadfastness of Bheem, symbolizing a shift from endurance to action. The poem concluded with a call to uphold the national anthem, Jana Gana Mana, across the land.
Tiwari also highlighted key points from the Army's briefing, including the mention of a Turkish-Chinese drone missile, which he referred to as 'important information.' He contrasted the Indian Army's communication with the reaction of the Pakistani military, stating that 'the world is laughing at their press conference.'
He urged citizens to grasp the full depth and significance of the Army's message. 'There is a preparation to root out terrorism. Operation Sindoor is ongoing, and this is a critical moment for the nation to unite and stay informed,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
US hyphenating India, Pakistan; PM must drop 'stubbornness' and call special session of Parliament: Congress
Recently, the head of the US Central Command also stated that Pakistan is a "great partner" of America in the fight against terrorism, Ramesh said. "The Modi government is saying that Operation Sindoor is still going on. In such a situation, the Pakistani army chief's participation as a guest in the US Army Day is definitely a matter of serious concern," he said. Ramesh said the Trump administration is constantly making statements which can only be interpreted to mean that it is "hyphenating" India and Pakistan. "The prime minister is welcoming the delegation that returned after informing the entire world, including the US, about Pakistan's role in supporting terrorism, and at the same time, such news is coming from Washington DC makes India's diplomatic position even more uncomfortable," Ramesh said. "The prime minister should now leave aside his stubbornness and concern for prestige and call an all-party meeting and a special session of Parliament, so that the nation can clearly express its collective will and a concrete roadmap can be presented to the country," he said. Decades of diplomatic progress cannot be allowed to be weakened so easily, he added. With US Army General Michael Kurilla, Commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM), calling Pakistan a "phenomenal partner" in the counterterrorism world, the Congress on Wednesday asked what PM Modi had to say about this and whether it was not a "diplomatic setback".
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump , but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Jaishankar says India, China ‘civilisational states'; dubs bilateral ties as ‘incredibly complicated matrix'
Jaishankar said there was a parallel rise of the Indian and Chinese economies, but he acknowledged that China started reforms and modernisation much ahead of India read more Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said Wednesday (June 11) that India and China were two rising powers that helped create a new equilibrium between them and the world. He also accused previous governments of not doing 'what they should have done' in terms of market modernisation. '… The Chinese began their modernisation earlier than us, largely because our governments at the time did not do what they should have done… India and China are both rising powers that are creating a new equilibrium…" Jaishankar said while speaking at the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Brussels Forum 2025. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The foreign minister was asked how New Delhi sought to take advantage of China's economy while navigating tensions, and how Beijing's actions affected policies in India. Jaishankar in response said both India and China were civilisational states and dubbed bilateral ties as an 'incredibly complicated matrix". '…China is an immediate neighbour. It's a neighbour with whom we've had unsettled boundaries. So that's a big factor in our relations. We have a situation where China and India stand out because they're the only two countries with over a billion people but also because they are two civilisational states in a way," Jaishankar said. Jaishankar said there was a parallel rise of the Indian and Chinese economies, but he acknowledged that China started reforms and modernisation much ahead of India. 'You have the rise of China, you have the rise of India. Now, each one is creating a certain new equilibrium between them and the world. And then much more complex equilibrium between the two rising powers, who also happen to be neighbours that sometimes have common neighbours as well. So, it is an incredibly complicated matrix and there are different dimensions to it," he said. 'There is the boundary dimension to it, there's the balances if you would, there are economic issues, trade issues, there are concerns – we have different economic social values, political models." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When asked about Europe's perception towards China, Jaishankar said there has been an evolution and change in stance. 'But I would also make the point that not all of Europe is obviously moving at the same speed and wavelength, so there are some who have different views, some who are more hard-headed. I would make that distinction vis-a-vis China," the top diplomat added.
