‘Are you a chemistry professor?': 60-year-old woman accused of husband's murder stuns judge with scientific talk
Mamta Pathak was representing herself in court in April after she was accused of murdering her husband, Neeraj Pathak, by electrocuting him in 2021. Pathak was found guilty of murder and sentenced to a life term in 2022, but she approached the High Court with an appeal. A short clip of her defending herself in court recently has surprised many on social media.
"You are accused of murdering your husband by electrocution. The doctor who conducted the post-mortem said that the body had clear signs of being electrocuted," Madhya Pradesh High Court Justice Vivek Agarwal tells the former teacher in the clip, recorded in April this year.
Dressed in all white, the professor rejects the finding and boldly claims that the determination of such burn marks was not possible. She delivers a brief lesson on how electricity and tissue interact and explains how acids are used to analyse whether the burns are thermal or electrical. She dismisses the claim that a determination of electrocution can be made just visually.
The answer surprised the judge, who stopped her halfway to confirm that she was a chemistry professor. Surprised by her explanation, he nodded to a lawyer seated behind her, who reciprocated his reaction.
Pathak presented her case in front of the division bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Devnarayan Mishra. After the last hearing, the Bench reserved judgment while the professor remained on bail.
The Madhya Pradesh police had arrested Mamta Pathak for killing her husband, 63-year-old Neeraj Pathak, a retired government doctor 63, by giving him sleeping pills and allegedly inflicting electric shocks on him.
She had then left Jhansi and claimed that she had found her husband dead when she returned. However, the police found audio of Neeraj Pathak, which went viral on social media, claiming his wife tortured him.
'Mamta came to know that Neeraj Pathak was in a relationship with another woman. Mamta had also filed a complaint with the police in January 2021 that her husband used to give her sedative pills by mixing them in food so that he could meet another woman. However, she withdrew the complaint later,' the police had said in the chargesheet.
A sessions court had found her guilty of murder and sentenced her to a life term. She then approached the High Court to appeal the decision and got bail last year.
(Also read: Who is Jonas Masetti, Brazilian Vedic teacher walked barefoot to receive Padma Shri)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Children's park, affiliated institutions handed over to Ernakulam CWC
KOCHI: Indira Priyadarshini Children's Park and other affiliated institutions near Marine Drive were handed over to the State Child Welfare Committee (CWC) as per a High Court order on Saturday. The park was illegally occupied by an Ernakulam-based independent organisation, claiming to be the CWC, for around 25 years. The CWC approached the HC as the organisation was mismanaging the huge income generated from the facility. 'We demanded to hand over the administration of the park to the District CWC. Though the government had renovated the park, several areas are currently lying uninhabited due to a lack of proper maintenance,' said State CWC general secretary G L Arun Gopi. The day-to-day administration of the children's park, theatre and other facilities has now been handed over to the Ernakulam District CWC. Former Ernakulam district collector N S K Umesh issued an order on the same on July 23 based on the interim order of the High Court and the legal advice of the advocate general. The facility was handed over to the district committee in the presence of State Administrative Committee member Adv Yesudas Parappally, District CWC secretary Adv Sunil Hareendran, vice-president Adv K S Arun Kumar and others. Meanwhile, Arun made allegations of financial fraud. 'We have evidence showing that the independent organisation has been committing financial fraud under the guise of maintaining the children's park for years. An investigation is under way,' said Arun, adding that the children's theatre and childcare centre attached to the children's park will be operational within a month.
News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Rupali Ganguly Visits Court To Record Statement In Defamation Case Against Stepdaughter
Last Updated: Rupali Ganguly appeared in Andheri court to record her statement in a defamation case against her stepdaughter, Esha Verma, seeking Rs 50 crore in damages for false claims. Television actress Rupali Ganguly appeared before a court in Andheri, Mumbai, this week to record her statement in a defamation case she has filed against her stepdaughter, Esha Verma. The case, filed in November 2024, alleges that Verma made a series of false and damaging claims against Ganguly, including remarks about her family and minor son. The Anupamaa star was accompanied by her lawyer, celebrity advocate Sana Raees Khan, who has been representing her in both civil and criminal proceedings related to the dispute. Speaking to Instant Bollywood outside the court, Sana Raees Khan confirmed that both civil and criminal defamation actions are underway. 'Jaise ke aap sab log jaante ho High Court mein humne civil defamation suit file kiya hai, jaha pe hame interim relief mil chuki hai. Yaha pe criminal defamation complaint file hui thi, jaha par aaj Rupali bhi aayi thi," she said. Khan added, 'Unhone court mein bayan diya aur unhone bataya ke kis tarah se unke saath jo traumatic experience hua hai, jis tarah se woh defame hui hai, unka reputation tarnish hua hai maliciously, woh sab unhone bataya court mein." She further noted the severity of the allegations made against her client. 'Rupali ke against waise bahot saari defamatory baatein kahi gayi hai. Not just Rupali, even her son, unke son ko illegitimate kaha gaya hai. She is a bold woman; she has come out and legal action le rahi hai." Details of the case According to court filings, Ganguly's defamation suit was lodged on November 11, 2024, seeking Rs 50 crore in damages. The complaint alleges that Verma engaged in a deliberate campaign to harm the actress's reputation through social media posts, media interviews, and public statements. The matter gained renewed attention after a 2020 social media post by Verma resurfaced online. In that post, Verma claimed Ganguly was romantically involved with her father, Ashwin K Verma, while he was still married to her mother. She also accused the actress of being 'controlling" and 'abusive" and alleged that Ganguly had issued death threats toward both her and her mother. Verma is the daughter of Ashwin Verma and his ex-wife, Sapna Verma, who divorced in 2008. Ashwin later married Ganguly in 2013, and the couple welcomed their son, Rudransh, the same year. Khan's legal team issued an official statement outlining why Ganguly chose to take the matter to court. 'We have issued a defamation notice to her stepdaughter in response to her false and damaging statements as Rupali Ganguly firmly stands against the use of defamatory tactics for publicity and she has taken this legal step to protect her reputation from unfounded claims. These baseless allegations were clearly intended to harm Rupali Ganguly's reputation and capitalise on her public standing. Such actions have not only caused emotional distress but have also unfairly tarnished her personal and professional integrity," the statement read. The filing also cites remarks made by Verma about Rudransh, Ganguly's 11-year-old son, as a major factor behind the decision to pursue legal action. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
a day ago
- News18
Bombay HC Quashes Woman's Complaint Against Husband: 'Comments On Cooking, Attire Not Cruelty'
The woman alleged that about a month after her marriage in March 2022, she was harassed mentally and physically by her husband and her in-laws. The Bombay High Court on Friday quashed a criminal case against a man and his family filed by his estranged wife, observing that remarks on a wife's attire or cooking skills did not constitute grave cruelty or harassment. 'Making annoying statements that the informant was not wearing proper clothes, was not able to cook food properly, cannot be said to be acts of grave cruelty or harassment," said a bench of Justices Vibha Kankanwadi and Sanjay Deshmukh. The court further said, 'When the relationship gets strained, it appears that exaggerations are made. When everything was disclosed prior to the marriage and allegations are omnibus or of not so grave for befitting in the concept of cruelty contemplated under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, it would be an abuse of process of law if the applicants are asked to face the trial." The woman alleged that about a month after her marriage in March 2022, she was harassed mentally and physically by her husband and her in-laws. She claimed her husband's mental condition was concealed before marriage and he was undergoing psychological treatment. The complainant also accused her in-laws of insulting her for not bringing gifts, demanding Rs 15 lakh during Diwali for a flat and driving her out of the house in June 2023. The husband and his family moved the High Court to quash the case. The woman and her counsel argued that the acts amounted to cruelty under Section 498A, and alleged a pattern of physical and mental harassment, including monitoring her phone and questioning her character. However, the court said that the allegations were 'omnibus" in nature and lacked corroborative evidence, and that the investigating officer had not even questioned the couple's neighbours. It also observed that the wife was aware of the husband's health condition prior to marriage, based on chat records. Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) pertains to cruelty inflicted on a woman by her husband or his relatives. It is classified as a cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable offence. This means that police can arrest the accused without a warrant, bail is not granted as a matter of right, and the case cannot be resolved through a private settlement outside the court. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
