logo
Tom Kerridge his business is 'losing a lot of money' as he shares financial difficulties

Tom Kerridge his business is 'losing a lot of money' as he shares financial difficulties

Edinburgh Live13-05-2025
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Tom Kerridge, the culinary maestro behind six dining spots including the two-Michelin-starred The Hand and Flowers, has opened up about his financial woes.
Despite his star-studded reputation, Tom confessed that managing his empire is no piece of cake. He revealed the delicate juggling act required to keep his establishments afloat.
In a candid chat with the Guardian, the Great British Menu icon, despite his prestige in the industry, admitted to a "constant battle".
Tom, who conceded that three sites did indeed run at a profit, explained that this isn't the case with them all. In fact, he has to engage in the practice of "spinning plates" to keep things "bubbling".
Tom told the Guardian: "We have six sites and I would say three operate at a very minor profit, two just about break even, and one's losing a lot of money. It's a constant battle of spinning plates and moving money to keep it bubbling along."
(Image: Getty Images)
Meanwhile, Jamie May, head chef and butcher at Kerridge's Butcher's Tap and Grill in Marlow, shared his own insights into tackling the industry's ups and downs, saying: "I prepare every day like I'm going into war."
Tom isn't shy about voicing his concerns over the hospitality sector's hurdles, having previously penned his insights for a Guardian article in 2024.
The chef, who was writing before the general election, spoke about rising food prices, including olive oil and eggs, energy bills, business rates and 20 per cent VAT rates, saying that it's "no surprise" that so many restaurants were closing.
Following Labour's ascension to power, in a fresh interview, Tom offered a "six out of 10" for the new government but criticised the National Insurance increase (declared in April) as "slightly ill thought out".
(Image: Getty Images)
On a lighter note, Tom has also recently divulged his top tip for an impeccable barbecue, which essentially boils down to picking superior charcoal. He suggests opting for "bigger", which retains heat for extended periods.
While in a conversation with the Western Mail, Tom went on to emphasise that investing in some high-quality charcoal can be incredibly beneficial. According to him, it could "last twice as long" as the budget-friendly options and provide a more consistent cook on your barbie.
And when it comes to burger preparation, Tom also championed homemade versions, with the chef encouraging the use of freshly minced beef. He recommends using some lean mince, with seasonings incorporated post-shaping.
With meats, he recommended slow-cooking: "It's quite good to braise things and slow-cook them in the oven first, in a dry rub or marinate, then leave them to cool and reheat them on the smokiness of the barbecue - the best of both worlds."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HMRC Child Benefit warning as families face losing £1,300
HMRC Child Benefit warning as families face losing £1,300

South Wales Argus

time28 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

HMRC Child Benefit warning as families face losing £1,300

Last year, 870,000 parents extended their Child Benefit payments, with most applying on the HMRC app or the digital service, but this year it's estimated more than 214,000 eligible families are missing out on this vital support, with many unaware of the hidden perk that comes with it. Child Benefit automatically stops on 31 August after a child turns 16 unless parents confirm their teenager is staying in full-time education or approved training. The payment is worth £26.05 a week for the eldest or only child (£1,354.60 a year) and £17.25 a week for each additional child (£897 a year). Fiona Peake, Personal Finance Expert at Ocean Finance, explains: "Missing the renewal deadline means you're turning down free money your family is entitled to. For lower-income families already juggling bills, losing over £100 a month can mean cutting back on essentials or relying on credit to get by. 'The bigger, hidden cost is the loss of National Insurance credits that count towards your state pension. Missing just one year could mean losing around £342 a year in retirement income, and missing the full eligibility period could cost more than £4,000 a year. If you take time out of work to raise children and don't claim, you could be short-changing yourself by thousands in later life.' HMRC sent letters between May and July to remind parents to renew, but if they miss the deadline, payments will stop from September. 5 ways for parents to make the most of HMRC child benefits Renew early: "As soon as you know your child's plans after GCSEs, renew your claim. Use the HMRC app, go online at or scan the QR code on your letter," says Fiona. "Do not wait until the last week of August, you could lose out on September's payment.' Check your claim: "Even if you earn over £50,000 and repay the High Income Child Benefit Charge, still make the claim. You'll keep the National Insurance credits that count towards your pension, which could be worth thousands later on." Track deadlines: 'Put HMRC renewal dates in your phone calendar. This small step can protect over £1,300 a year for your first child plus pension credits.' Adjust if you missed it: "If payments have stopped, review your spending now so you don't turn to costly borrowing to cover essentials.' Get help for money worries: 'If losing Child Benefit has left you struggling, check if you're eligible for other benefits like Universal Credit or programs run through your local council. If you have other debts that run up your monthly expenses, debt consolidation could be an option.' Is your 16-19 year old planning to stay in education or training in September? Extend your Child Benefit claim now. Find out how 👇 — HMRC Press Office (@HMRCpressoffice) May 13, 2025 How much is Child Benefit? Child Benefit is currently worth £26.05 per week - or £1,354.60 a year - for the eldest or only child and £17.25 per week - or £897 a year - for each additional child. More than 870,000 parents extended their Child Benefit claim for their teen last year with the majority confirming online or via the HMRC app in minutes. Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC's Director General for Customer Services, says: "Child Benefit is an important boost to families. As soon as you know what your teenager is planning to do, extend your claim in minutes to guarantee your payments continue in September. Simply go to or the HMRC app to confirm today." Child Benefit can continue to be paid for young people who are studying full time in non-advanced education as well as unpaid approved training courses. Visit the HMRC Child Benefit website to check full eligibility. Rebecca Fagan, benefit and welfare information officer at Advice Direct Scotland, says: 'Child Benefit is really important for many households, particularly at a time when budgets are being stretched by the cost of living and energy. 'Our message to parents is not to delay, but to act now. Extending your child benefit claim is easy, and it could put thousands of pounds in your pocket. "Our free, impartial service at is here to help anyone who is confused about child benefit. People can visit or call 0800 756 3381 for support.' What about the High Income Child Benefit Charge? If either the claimant or their partner has an individual income of between £60,000 and £80,000, the higher earner will be subject to the High Income Child Benefit Charge. For families who fall into this category, the online Child Benefit tax calculator provides an estimate of how much benefit they will receive, and what the charge may be. Recommended reading: From this summer, as part of the government's Plan for Change, families will have the option to use a new digital service to pay the charge directly through their PAYE tax code instead of filing a Self Assessment tax return. The new service will cut red tape for eligible employed parents who are liable to the High Income Child Benefit Charge but those who choose to pay the charge through their Self Assessment can continue to do so. Families who have previously opted out of Child Benefit payments can opt back in and restart their payments quickly and easily online or via the HMRC app. There's also an HMRC reminder for the Child Trust Fund - don't miss out Teenagers turning 16 can take control of their HMRC Child Trust Fund savings account, which could be worth thousands of pounds, and can withdraw the money once they turn 18. Child Trust Funds were set up for every child born between 1 September 2002 and 2 January 2011. If teenagers or their parents and guardians know who their Child Trust Fund provider is, they can contact them directly. If they don't know where their account is, they can use the free online tool on to find out who their Child Trust Fund provider is.

The lost art of political oratory
The lost art of political oratory

New Statesman​

time29 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

The lost art of political oratory

LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 17: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks at a civil society summit on July 17, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Frank Augstein -) I am writing this from a crammed Edinburgh Festival where the appetite for live shows is close to insatiable. Everywhere there are insane queues for the latest performances. Evidently people ache to be away from their phones and social media for a bit and gather to watch a performance or a performer. There are limits to being on X alone. I am one of those who ache. I perform my own show in Edinburgh and elsewhere on the dramas and characters that shape the current wild world of politics. But above all I am a spectator. I watch fascinated as a single person alone on a stage can hold an audience for an hour or more. For the best solo performers there are no props or music. They have words and their voices to mouth them. The audience is bound together by the simple magic. I watch the best stand-ups throughout the year and only recently have I realised why I do so. They fill a big gap. I used to travel fair distances to watch the great political speakers at live events, often for work but not always. Now the orators have disappeared. The political stage is silent as their stand-up equivalents flourish. I would not rush to the end of my road to see many contemporary political speakers. Keir Starmer will never cast a spell over an audience, a problem for him and one reason why he is accused of lacking purpose. His cabinet has qualities but a capacity to hold an audience with a speech is not one of them. There are no Michael Heseltines on the Tory benches to excite activists and those that might be vaguely interested in politics. Currently only Nigel Farage holds big meetings that captivate his audiences but he is not an especially impressive speaker. He stands out because he is better than anyone else at the moment. Jeremy Corbyn might start to pack out halls again with his new party but he is not remotely in the same league as his hero, Tony Benn. The so-called mainstream parties that once erupted with powerful speakers are bereft of such public advocates. Most are cautiously robotic. A few, like Wes Streeting, are brilliant interviewees but do not make memorable speeches. Others try too hard to excite but in their transparent effort become less interesting as speechmakers. Robert Jenrick springs to mind. His speech at last year's Tory conference was dismal on many levels. The decline in oratory is relatively recent. As a student in the early 1980s I was a regular attender, like Corbyn, of Benn's live events, each of them packed. I never heard Benn make a bad speech. I used to take girlfriends to them for a night out, though the relationships did not last long. But Benn was funny, seeking to make the connections between disparate current events and historical ones. Before long he had moved from Jesus Christ to the Chartists, then the suffragettes, before his prediction that if Labour followed his ideas it would win the next election. The rapturous response was part of the theatre of it all. I was not necessarily converted to Bennism but his rallies made me hugely excited about politics. I saw it could be as thrilling as any rock gig or conventional theatre. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe My view was reinforced when, as a student journalist, in 1983 I saw Neil Kinnock speak at a make-or-break by-election in Darlington, a contest Labour had to win for various highly charged reasons. The hall was so crammed, there was a huge overspill gathering. Kinnock's style was very different from Benn's and by then he had defined himself against 'Bennism'. He was speaking as a loyalist whereas Benn had the advantage of being the romantic rebel taking on the leadership. This did not stop Kinnock from holding the voters in thrall, his style that of a funny, passionate revivalist preacher. The crowds left resolved to vote for Kinnock's party in that crucial by-election. This was before he became leader. Kinnock did not win a general election but some of his speeches as leader will be cited forever, while tedious addresses by those moving carefully up the ministerial ladder are forgotten as they are being delivered. There was a similar charge of electricity when Michael Heseltine spoke at Conservative conferences. He still possesses the magic. A couple of months ago I interviewed him at the Cambridge Book Festival. They cheered when he walked in and when he left, captivated throughout. There were others to the right of Heseltine who could light up the stage, most famously Enoch Powell, though I never saw him live. The recordings show how he did it: the mannered intensity, a sense of heightened anticipation as he developed his provocative arguments. The speedy decline in oratory and huge public events began in the 1990s. There was a growing recognition that most voters only saw politicians delivering a soundbite on TV bulletins. That was therefore what mattered, politics compressed to 15 seconds. Tony Blair was a good speaker and an even better interviewee but he was part of the era where live events began to disappear. Only a few voters would attend. The rest would not be swayed by a mesmerising speech, so why bother making one? The current government's favoured form of communication seems to be allowing Sky's Beth Rigby to warn Keir Starmer how useless he is in near weekly exchanges between political editor and prime minister. Another favoured vehicle is the daily broadcasting round where an exhausted minister wakes at 5am and prepares for eight interviews in two hours where they are told by self-obsessed interviewers that 'all our viewers/listeners' want to know why the government has let them down. This is unlikely to inspire voters to engage in politics, let alone be excited by it. The deep disillusionment and boredom with democratic politics point to why the loss of great political performers matters. Not many can attend live events, but the sense of political vitality they generate goes well beyond the confines of the physical gathering. Naive broadcast editors agonise about how to attract younger audiences. Stand-ups do so with ease in Edinburgh and elsewhere. Meanwhile others are drawn into politics by the excitement. Years ago I recall Sadiq Khan hosting a gathering where Kinnock was the guest speaker. The future London Mayor said it was hearing a Kinnock speech that made him want to enter politics. He was by no means alone. Tories have said the same of Heseltine. Who would say that about a current politician? For big political figures the live event has a big advantage. It forces them to frame arguments for a speech. Governments or opposition parties cannot be shapeless if key figures are required to impress audiences by conveying their sense of purpose. This speechless Labour administration would have no choice but to think more attentively about what they are for. The live event should be only a small part of the political repertoire. Many other outlets matter too. But its disappearance altogether outside the party conference season is a terrible loss. It leads to a drab politics without colour. No wonder voters turn away. All the energy in Edinburgh is available for politics. But that requires big politicians to come to life fearlessly and address voters with the art of the great political teachers of the recent past. Technocratic proclamations are dull. Boredom is dangerous. Meanwhile in the absence of any great political speeches I plan to see Stewart Lee several times this autumn. He can cast a spell. Steve Richards presents 'Rock N Roll Politics' at the Edinburgh Festival… a different show each day [See also: Visions of an English civil war] Related

Mercure Hotel Newport not housing asylum seekers
Mercure Hotel Newport not housing asylum seekers

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Mercure Hotel Newport not housing asylum seekers

These rumours, gaining traction across local Facebook groups and comment threads, echo similar misinformation that has circulated about other hotels, including some as nearby as Bristol. Despite the online noise surrounding the hotel, both the Mercure Hotel and Newport City Council have issued clear statements refuting the claims. A spokesperson for the Mercure Hotel said: 'We confirm that this property is operating as a hotel as usual, and as such it remains fully open to guests. The property has not been designated for any alternative use. Any suggestions to the contrary are incorrect.' Newport City Council also clarified its position. 'Accommodation for people seeking asylum is provided by the Home Office and their housing partners. We do not have any hotels in Newport operating under these arrangements,' a spokesperson said. A suggestion that the hotel was being used in this way had been posted as a comment on an Argus story online, before being removed. Visitors come and go from the Mercure Hotel in Newport as the premises is open for business as usual. (Image: NQ) On Friday, August 8, The Argus reported on a demonstration and counter-demonstration at the Holiday Inn, Rhoose, over suggestions it was being used to house asylum seekers. In fact, the hotel in the Vale of Glamorgan is housing Afghans who supported the British military efforts in their home country and are now in danger from the Taliban. They are in the UK not as asylum seekers but as entitled persons who have been granted the right to live here. The Mercure Hotel in Newport, meanwhile, continues to operate as normal, welcoming guests and serving the community, not as a facility for asylum accommodation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store