
Andrew Bailey risks making Reeves's Budget nightmare even worse
The Chancellor will, however, be keeping a close eye on the Bank of England's next Monetary Policy Committee meeting this Thursday.
That is because interest rates, inflation and UK gilt yields are all key components, or 'conditioning assumptions' as they are referred to in the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) economic and fiscal forecast.
This is the key forecast that determines what fiscal headroom the Chancellor will have in the autumn Budget. At the moment, economists are expecting Rachel Reeves to miss her rules by somewhere between £10bn to £30bn.
Everyone is therefore braced for further tax rises. But this figure could move significantly either up or down depending on what the Bank of England says and does on Thursday.
The market is expecting another interest rate cut this week, and one more later in the year. So unless there is a big surprise, the Treasury will obviously be hoping for, and then welcoming, some rare good news.
Most attention will therefore be on what is said about the pace of future cuts, and the Bank's forecasts for inflation, GDP and unemployment.
But the most useful comparison we can make for determining how the Budget might look is not really assessing what the Bank says versus the market's expectations. Instead, we should look at how the Bank's actions on Thursday match up to the OBR's forecasts published alongside the Spring Statement back in March.
At that point, the OBR thought that Bank Rate would average 4pc this year and then fall slightly to 3.8pc for the rest of the forecast. This would be in line with what markets are now expecting, and the interest rate cut likely on Thursday would bring the forecasts into line. So far so good for the Chancellor.
Inflation tells a different story. The OBR forecasts the consumer prices index (CPI) measure of inflation to be 3.2pc this year, and then fall to 1.9pc next year before drifting back up to target for the rest of the Parliament.
The latest figures published by the Office for National Statistics show inflation to be higher than this at 3.6pc at the moment. It is this upward pressure on inflation that would be worrying me most if I were still in the Treasury.
While it will not be enough to stop this week's rate cut, if it persists over the next few months, it may bring into doubt further cuts. In May, the Bank predicted CPI would reach 3.7pc this year, so around about what we're at now. It will be interesting to see what they say in this week's policy report.
Alongside inflation forecasts and what that might mean for future interest rate levels, Treasury officials will be watching gilt yields closely.
I developed a bit of an obsession with these when I worked there, monitoring the daily and weekly updates provided to the Chancellor on how yields compared to the OBR forecast. If they are even slightly out, this can drive up government debt interest payments, and cost billions of pounds in fiscal headroom.
Reflecting the significant amount of additional borrowing the Government has undertaken, the OBR has baked in average market gilt rates of 4.5pc this year rising to 5pc by 2028-29.
In actual fact, if you look at 10-year gilts since the February window the OBR used in their last forecast, yields have been higher than 4.5pc, reaching 4.75pc in recent months. If the market reacts to whatever the Bank says on Thursday by increasing yields still further, the Chancellor could have a major problem on her hands.
Once the formal Budget process has kicked off by the Chancellor commissioning the OBR for their economic and fiscal forecast, a window is set for various market determinants to be taken from to inform this forecast. If yields are elevated when this window happens, then the public finances will be impacted significantly.
An obvious point to state is that things can move in the opposite direction. If there are hints of a third cut to interest rates this year, then some of the fiscal issues the Chancellor is facing will be eased considerably.
But with inflation remaining higher than hoped, and the Government demonstrating a complete inability to deliver any welfare or spending cuts, the pressure on gilt yields seems pretty one way to me.
There remains a chance then that the Bank throws the Government's economic and fiscal plans into further disarray on Thursday. The short-term welcome of a rate cut could quickly be overtaken by increased worries about what else the Bank has said.
With the OBR getting ready to produce its judgment, that might be enough to spoil the Chancellor's summer holiday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wall Street gains, as oil prices reverse course
NEW YORK/LONDON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Wall Street indexes gained on largely upbeat corporate earnings, and U.S. yields also rose on Wednesday, while European shares closed flat and broke a two-day winning streak. U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, saying the country has imported Russian oil. Oil prices reversed earlier gains and touched fresh lows after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated there would be an announcement later on Wednesday regarding potential sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab rose 0.72% to 933.94. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab rose 0.32% to 44,254.95, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab gained 0.76% to 6,347.26 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab added 1.16% to 21,160.02. "Earnings are seeing a mixed reaction. Particularly for a few of the AI names, expectations were just extremely high, but by and large, the earnings in aggregate have been good enough to keep a floor under the market," said Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird. Europe's broad STOXX 600 index (.STOXX), opens new tab closed 0.06% lower, dragged down by healthcare stocks after Trump announced a tariff plan for the pharmaceutical sector. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS), opens new tab closed lower by 0.08% to 654.33, while Japan's Nikkei (.N225), opens new tab rose 0.60% to 40,794.86. The health of the U.S. economy is a major focus for markets, and Wall Street closed lower on Tuesday after data showed services sector activity unexpectedly flatlined in July. That reinforced the message from Friday's soft jobs data, which caused markets to significantly increase bets on the Federal Reserve cutting rates in September. "There's this tug-of-war going on between the more concrete signs that we have seen that the U.S. economy is slowing and the fact that rate cuts are coming, which removes some of the pressure on valuations," said Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier. Traders have been focused on tariff impacts. "The market is more focused on the fact that we're not getting maximalist tariffs, but I wonder if it isn't focusing enough on the fact that we are still getting something moderate, and more could be coming, pharmaceuticals for example," Chaar said. Trump on Tuesday said he would announce tariffs on semiconductors and chips in the next week or so, while the U.S. would initially impose a "small tariff" on pharmaceutical imports before increasing it substantially in a year or two. He said the U.S. was close to a trade deal with China, and he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement was struck. Brazil's government has filed a consultation request at the World Trade Organization over U.S. tariffs. In the government bond market, Treasury yields gained ground. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 4.2 basis points to 4.238%, from 4.196% late on Tuesday. Fed funds futures imply a 94% chance of a rate cut next month, with at least two cuts priced in for this year, according to the CME's FedWatch. Investors are waiting for Trump's pick to fill a coming vacancy on the Fed board of governors. Trump said the decision will be made soon, while ruling out Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as a contender to replace current chief Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. The euro was 0.71% higher at $1.1656. The dollar index , which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, fell 0.53% to 98.20. Brent oil futures lost 0.95% to $67 a barrel and U.S. crude fell 1.14% to $64.43. Spot gold prices fell 0.33% to $3,369.62 an ounce. U.S. gold futures settled flat at $3,433.4.


Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Kashkari: Fed needs to respond to slowing economy, two cuts this year would be reasonable
WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve may need to cut interest rates in the near term in response to a slowing U.S. economy, even though it remains unclear whether tariffs will continue to push inflation higher, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said on Wednesday. "The economy is slowing, and that means in the near term it may become appropriate to start adjusting," Kashkari said in an interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, adding that two quarter-percentage-point rate cuts by the end of the year "seems reasonable to me." Kashkari said concerns about rising inflation remain valid, but that it will take time to know whether that poses a problem for the Fed reaching its 2% inflation target or not. Meanwhile a weak jobs report and downward revisions to prior months' employment data add to a developing set of statistics that show the economy slowing to a degree the Fed cannot ignore, Kashkari said. Recent data "suggests the real underlying economy is slowing. I've got confidence that that is happening," Kashkari said. "How long can we wait until the tariff effects become clear? That's just weighing on me right now." Kashkari does not have a vote on interest rate policy this year, but his arguments are similar to those voiced by two Fed governors who dissented at the Fed's decision last week to hold the policy rate steady while awaiting more clarity on how rising import tariffs will feed through to consumer prices. A slowdown in job creation and rise in the unemployment rate in July have begun shifting the narrative, however, to put more focus on risks to the Fed's other goal of maintaining maximum employment.


Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Bureaucracy is a spoke in wheel of e-bike revolution
Every day, thousands of Londoners choose to travel by e-bike. Whether for commuting, meeting friends or exploring the capital, e-bikes are opening up green, affordable and accessible cycling to a much wider audience. This demand is borne out in the data. Just last month Forest, the e-bike company I co-founded in 2021, reached a record-breaking 1.5 million rides across London, a 60 per cent increase from last year. While the upsides of getting more people cycling are obvious — it promotes healthier lifestyles, eases congestion and is better for the environment — we are acutely aware of the challenges that come with rising demand. No one benefits from e-bikes cluttering pavements or being parked irresponsibly. We know that. E-bikes should complement London's streets, not complicate them. So, what is the issue? Cities like Oxford and Bristol have one coherent operating area, but London has a tangled web of conflicting rules across different boroughs. One council bans parking in certain areas, another permits it freely. Some impose strict fines, others barely enforce regulations at all. This patchwork means riders are often confused about what they can and can't do. And it undermines public confidence in an otherwise transformative mode of transport. • Cut parking for second cars to make room for e-bikes, says rental firm We need consistency across all boroughs. Without it, we're opening the door to operators more focused on market share than street harmony. We're not advocating for fewer rules, in fact we're calling for more of them. London urgently needs a single regulatory framework. One set of parking standards, one enforcement model, and one operational rulebook should apply from Brent to Bromley. A coherent approach would allow riders to enjoy the benefits of cycling without worrying how to end their journey. Part of the challenge lies in Whitehall. The stalled English Devolution Bill has left London, not to mention other major British cities, without the powers to govern its mobility infrastructure effectively. That must change. Transport for London needs the authority to plan and implement a city-wide strategy across borough boundaries. • Chris Hoy joins e-bike revolution . . . but can 'weekend warriors' catch up? Forest is ready to work with regulators, not around them. We want higher standards, better accountability and smarter city planning. But that future cannot be built one borough at a time. Londoners are ready for a change. Let's give them the infrastructure and clarity they need to use e-bikes safely, confidently and responsibly. One city. One set of rules. Agustin Guilisasti is co-founder and CEO of Forest