Gov. Gavin Newsom proposes $125 million in mortgage relief for California disaster victims
On Wednesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a proposed $125 million program geared at helping wildfire victims.
The program will be for homeowners whose homes have been destroyed or damaged, and who are at risk of foreclosure, in natural disasters dating back to 2023. This means victims of the Park, Franklin, Palisades and Eaton fires could be eligible for relief.
"As survivors heal from the trauma of recent disasters, the threat of foreclosure should be the last thing on their minds. This disaster mortgage relief program would help lift this burden and give families more time to focus on recovery," Newsom said in a statement about the proposal.
Newsom's office also noted that the relief package would use existing mortgage settlement funding, meaning no impact to his already proposed 2025-26 budget for the state.
The California Housing Finance Agency would be administering the package, if it's approved.
In the wake of the historically destructive Los Angeles wildfires, California officials have already postponed the individual tax filing deadline for Los Angeles County residents. Newsom has also extended the state property tax deadline for LA wildfire victims.
At the same time, California homeowners are still facing financial uncertainty in the wake of the LA fires. State Farm, the state's largest insurer, has asked for an emergency insurance rate increase as high as 22% for some homeowners.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
California's wildfire safety net is getting thin. Now what?
Presented by CASH ON FIRE: California's safety net for wildfire liabilities is tearing just as it enters peak fire season. The Eaton Fire, which tore through Altadena in January after sparking near Southern California Edison equipment, is forcing a reckoning over the wildfire liability fund for utilities, which lawmakers stood up in 2019 to avoid another Pacific Gas & Electric style bankruptcy. With insured property losses estimated at $15 billion and a rising price tag, the Eaton Fire alone could drain what's left in the fund. Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed an $18 billion refill over the next decade, evenly split between utility shareholders and ratepayers. The Legislature is now racing the clock to strike a deal before the end of the session next month. California's three investor-owned utilities are pushing hard, with a seven-figure ad blitz announced on Monday. Their business depends on it: Southern California Edison is facing the possibility of a credit downgrade, and all three utilities saw their stock prices drop following news of the fire. But the scale of the Eaton Fire has exposed an underlying fragility in the fund that is giving legislators pause. Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, chair of the Assembly Energy Committee, warned in an interview that the fund could be depleted even faster than imagined by distress and smoke damage claims that are not counted in property loss estimates. She also raised a flag about hedge fund speculators who have bought up insurance claims with the goal of getting an inflated payout from the fund. To stretch the pot of money further, Newsom has floated capping payouts to insurers at 40 percent of claims. The insurance industry, however, is fighting back hard. Rex Frazier, head of the Personal Insurance Federation of California, said the cap would just shift the cost onto insurance customers. 'Our longer-term view is, if we just keep looking for pockets to reach into, we're going to run out of pockets,' he said. Petrie-Norris said lawmakers may have to kick more in-depth deliberations to next year. For Michael Wara, the Stanford energy scholar who helped design the fund in 2019 as a temporary Senate consultant, the problem is larger. He said internal modeling at the time showed the pot of money would need $38 billion to have a 90 percent chance of lasting a decade. Since then, utilities have outperformed his expectations in lowering the odds of sparking a wildfire by spending heavily on trimming vegetation and putting power lines underground (and passing those costs along to ratepayers). Society, however, has not: vegetation management, home retrofits and state spending are far below what's needed, he said. 'Usually when you buy really, really expensive insurance, the other thing you do is spend a lot of money to reduce the risk,' Wara said. 'But we are not yet spending enough in a serious way to reduce the risk that structures will ignite, and that is ultimately what this is all about.' — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! NOT SO FAST: The Assembly's joint committee hearing on Newsom's draft bill to avert refinery closures was still going at press time, but it was clear some Democrats aren't ready to rubber-stamp the plan. Multiple lawmakers, including Assembly Natural Resources Chair Isaac Bryan, pushed back on a piece of the bill that would create a temporary exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act — which requires environmental reviews of most construction projects — for new drilling permits in existing oil fields. 'A CEQA exemption for oil drilling, even in existing fields, feels very concerning to me,' Bryan said. Assemblymembers Rick Zbur, Ash Kalra and Chris Rogers also peppered California Department of Conservation Director Jennifer Lucchesi, whose department regulates oil wells, with questions about why Newsom's proposal includes a CEQA exemption instead of other options to streamline in-state crude oil production. 'This is a starting point for the conversation, and I hope that we can have additional conversations around this,' Lucchesi said, in an acknowledgment that negotiations are just heating up around the state's response to the planned closures of Phillips 66's Wilmington facility by the end of the year and Valero's Bencia refinery in April. Still to come: testimony from environmental groups, the oil industry and labor about the state's transition away from fossil fuels, and another round of questions from lawmakers. — AN CARDS ON THE TABLE: Business and environmental groups are already sparring over the first detailed cap-and-trade proposal to come out of the Legislature — and lawmakers have only three weeks left in the session to finalize a deal. Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin's proposal, released Monday, would extend the state's signature carbon market to 2045 and make a handful of changes she said seek a middle ground between affordability and climate ambition. Environmental groups were celebrating the inclusion of some of their priorities in the proposal, including linking the program to the state's 2045 goal of being completely carbon neutral. But they were already pushing back against another component of the proposal that would increase how much businesses can rely on offset projects that reduce emissions elsewhere, like carbon dioxide removal technology or forest restoration, to meet their carbon allowances. 'We are disappointed to see the Assembly rushing to embrace climate dead ends like carbon offsets and, implicitly, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage — both falsely claim to be climate negative, and thus limit our ambition for direct emissions reductions,' said Katie Valenzuela, the director of policy and advocacy at Everyday Impact Consulting. Business groups, meanwhile, remain aligned with Newsom, who proposed reauthorizing the program as-is. They were quick to object to some of what they view as overly ambitious reforms, most notably a measure that would keep surplus permits off the market in an effort to prop up weaker-than-expected credit auctions. Doing so, they argued, will increase their costs. 'Cap-and-trade has been successful because it was designed to cost effectively balance environmental achievements with economic necessities,' said John Myers, a spokesperson for the California Chamber of Commerce. 'The prudent path forward would be for lawmakers to pass a 'clean' reauthorization of the program in its current form, giving businesses some much needed certainty about the impacts on their bottom lines.' — CvK KNOCK KNOCK: A broad coalition of environmental activists hit the halls of the Capitol en masse on Wednesday for Green California Advocacy Day. The goal: get the 100 climate activists, representing 140 organizations, meetings with 100 legislators. Last year, environmentalists scored a major win as a special session focused on cracking down on oil refiners. Now, with Sacramento saturated with talk of affordability, green groups are on their heels as they fight an uphill battle against plans to expand oil drilling, delay refinery regulations, and roll back CEQA. 'Legislative leaders and the governor have said that they want to tackle affordability issues, but they've forgotten that smart climate policy is about protecting voters from having to pay the price of inaction on climate with their health, their homes, and their lives,' said Raquel Mason, senior legislative manager of the California Environmental Justice Alliance. The coalition's top priorities include: pressuring Newsom to turn heel on his recent oil-friendly stance, reversing the CEQA exemptions to high-tech manufacturing facilities in the already-passed SB 131 and pushing for passage of SB 601, which would expand the state's ability to regulate its waterways. 'Every day the federal administration continues to slash environmental laws and funding for the agencies in charge of enforcing them,' said Asha Sharma, state policy manager for the Leadership Council for Justice and Accountability. 'State leaders are walking back our own state environmental protections at the exact moment we need them most.' — NB DON'T FORGET: A coalition of advocacy groups filed a petition with the California Public Utilities Commission on Wednesday pressuring the agency to expand a pilot program to provide affordable clean energy in the San Joaquin Valley. AB 2672, which became law in 2014, launched the program with the intent of offering more affordable appliances in a region, in which some communities were forced to rely on propane or wood for cooking and heating because homes were not hooked up to the state's natural gas system. The CPUC identified 170 disadvantaged communities that met the program criteria and in 2018 launched the pilot program to replace propane and wood-burning appliances with electric appliances in about 2,000 homes in some of those communities. Now, advocates from the Center for Biological Diversity, Leadership Counsel for Justice & Accountability and Central California Asthma Collaborative say that the CPUC has let the program languish. The agency must expand it to the rest of the communities, they argue, due to language in the original law instructing the PUC to 'take appropriate action and determine appropriate funding sources' regarding options that would increase access to cost-effective affordable energy. 'The commission needs to follow the law, relaunch this program and provide affordable energy to the thousands of Valley residents who've been waiting for more than a decade,' said Roger Lin, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity's energy justice program. The CPUC did not reply to a request for comment. — NB SUBSCRIBER ZONE: Join one of your daily climate newsletter writers, Camille von Kaenel, and POLITICO reporters Tyler Katzenberger and Rachel Bluth for a live virtual briefing Thursday, Aug. 21, at 10 a.m. on the key political and policy forces shaping Sacramento right now. Register here. SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. Come see the Golden State's most prominent political figures — including Sen. Alex Padilla and gubernatorial candidates Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra — share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas at the forefront of the state's most critical policy debates. The live event is currently at capacity, but will be streamed. Advance registration is required. Stay tuned for more on speakers and discussion topics, and request an online invite here. — A new study determined that private timber lands in Northern California burn at higher intensity than public lands. — Colorado beat California to the punch in passing a first-in-the-nation law that requires health warnings on gas stoves. — Women and people of color are under-represented among the boards of California's public water agencies, according to new research by UC Davis and Water Education for Latino Leaders.
New York Times
10 hours ago
- New York Times
Gavin Newsom's Latest Role: Social Media Troll
Just a few months ago, the X account run by Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office was pushing out anodyne content that was barely noticed in the social media landscape. It touted Mr. Newsom's effort to improve vocational education in California. It announced that a new steel mill was breaking ground. It assured Californians that the state was preparing for incoming winter storms. It was official, routine and easily overlooked. In other words, as President Trump might say, SAD! No more. Last week, the account morphed into a Democratic imitation of Mr. Trump's Truth Social musings, hyping Mr. Newsom as 'AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR.' Dismissive nicknames, grandstanding boasts and long, winding tangents ARE WRITTEN IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. They are peppered with an inordinate number of exclamation points!!! Perhaps most strikingly, the posts have been written in a scathing tone and at times have been intentionally offensive. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Bed Bath & Beyond won't open new stores in California
(NewsNation) — Bed Bath & Beyond is aiming for a comeback, but it says not to expect any new stores in California. Executive Chairman Marcus Lemonis said the decision isn't political — it's a response to the state's unfriendly business environment. 'California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive, and risky environments for businesses in America,' Lemonis said in a statement. 'It's a system that makes it harder to employ people, harder to keep doors open, and harder to deliver value to customers.' Bed Bath & Beyond to reopen brick-and-mortar locations with slightly different name Lemonis said the retailer will have stores in 'almost every other state' in a response on X. Wednesday's announcement comes as the housewares store tries to stage a comeback two years after filing for bankruptcy. Earlier this month, the first revamped Bed Bath & Beyond Home store opened in Nashville. It's been a multi-year journey for the popular home goods brand that went defunct in 2023. After the chain went bankrupt, acquired the intellectual property, rebranded as Beyond, Inc. and relaunched the Bed Bath & Beyond domain online. Bed Bath & Beyond bankruptcy: What happened to the retailer? Earlier this year, Beyond took an ownership stake in Kirkland's Inc., a home decor chain with around 300 stores nationwide. Kirkland's has since rebranded as The Brand House Collective and plans to roll out Bed Bath & Beyond Home stores by converting existing Kirkland's stores. Depending on how things go in Nashville, the company plans to convert approximately 75 stores through 2026. Lemonis, a Lebanese American businessman who is also the CEO of Camping World, said Californians can continue to buy Bed Bath & Beyond products online. 'We're taking a stand because it's time for common sense,' Lemonis said regarding Bed Bath & Beyond. 'Businesses deserve the chance to succeed.' Beyond his business ventures, Lemonis is a popular TV personality, starring in the CNBC reality show The Profit. He also appeared on two episodes of Donald Trump's Celebrity Apprentice back in 2012. He was at odds with local government officials in Northern California last year over a flag flying at a Camping World location. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
