790,000 Jobs, $160 Billion GDP: Shocking Costs Of Inflation Reduction Act Repeal
Gas Power Plant Behind Fence and Locked Gate, Shutterstock ID#1694681248
In 2022, Hyundai announced it was investing $5.5 billion to build a 'Metaplant' manufacturing electric vehicles and batteries in Bryan County, Georgia. It promised more than 3,500 good-paying jobs first building the massive manufacturing facility, then making electric vehicles that cut consumer bills by providing cheaper transportation choices.
'This is the largest investment in the state of Georgia's history, one that will diversify and expand our economy while providing strong job opportunities for Georgians today and for generations to come,' said Congressman Buddy Carter (GA-1).
When the Metaplant opened in October 2024, months ahead of schedule, it started shipping Hyundai Ioniq 5 EVs, the fourth-best selling EV in America. It also started generating millions in salaries, tax revenue, and economic activity across Southeast Georgia.
This is just one example of how the Inflation Reduction Act's federal clean energy tax credits and government funding programs have supercharged America's economy. Through January 2025 these policies have attracted $600 billion in new private investment across roughly 750 projects and created more than 406,000 new jobs.
But Trump administration proposals to repeal IRA federal policies to pay for tax cuts to benefit the wealthiest Americans – now being considered by Congress, which passed the IRA in 2022 – could halt this economic engine. That's ironic considering 77% of the IRA's clean energy and deployment investment have gone to Congressional districts represented by Republicans, and likely the reason 21 GOP Members of the House of Representatives oppose repealing them.
New Energy Innovation modeling shows that if the IRA is repealed, America's economy and its households, will pay a staggering price. The United States is already facing a potential recession – we simply can't afford to grind the clean energy economic engine to a halt.
If the IRA is repealed by Congress, in 2030 our economy would lose nearly 790,000 jobs and $160 billion in GDP. Between 2025 and 2035, American households would be forced to pay $32 billion in higher cumulative household energy bills. In 2035, we'd lose $190 billion from national GDP.
These economic damages would be a result of companies cancelling announced factories and expected private investment drying up as the federal government signals to corporations that America's clean energy economy is no longer open for business. As fewer clean energy manufacturing facilities are built, construction activity dries up, costing jobs and cutting income across the board.
PASADENA, CA - MAY 14: Job seekers look over job opening fliers at the WorkSource exhibit, a ... More collaborative effort by governmental agencies to offer jobs and job training resources at the Greater Los Angeles Career Expo at the Pasadena Convention Center on May 14, 2009 in Pasadena, California. Nineteen exhibitors offer job and educational opportunities as well as advice from the Board of Equalization at the event that is open to the general public. (Photo by)
This economic slowdown isn't theoretical. Hundreds of billions in private investment and state funds could be wasted on projects that may now be cancelled – more than 42,000 jobs and $57 billion in investment have already been stopped or stalled by Trump administration proposals since January 2025 alone.
And the economic slowdown isn't surprising. Financial services company Moody's analyzed President Trump's campaign policy platform in June 2024 and found that it would increase inflation and weaken economic growth, threatening a recession as soon as mid-2025.
As fewer clean energy technologies like solar panels, EVs, and batteries are deployed, energy costs would rise as consumers are forced to pay volatile power prices from utilities and oil companies whose commodities are traded on a global market.
Average U.S. household electricity prices rose nearly 22% from 2018-2023, and could rise another 7% in 2025, especially if gas prices rise 91% by 2026 as predicted by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
IRA repeal would throw fuel on that fire. A recent analysis for the right-leaning group ConservAmerica estimates repealing just two of the IRA's tax credits would spike consumer electricity costs $51 billion annually by 2035. John Ketchum, CEO of NextEra, one of the country's largest utilities warned, 'if you take renewables and storage off the table, we're going to force electricity prices to the moon.'
Every state in the country would suffer economically if federal clean energy policies are repealed – they'd face higher consumer costs and job losses, along with lower GDP and less private investment. But five states would be America's biggest losers, and they're not liberal bastions.
Of all 48 states modeled, Texas is America's biggest loser if federal clean energy policies are repealed, followed by California (the world's fifth-biggest economy), Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania.
Americans have the right to choose the cheapest energy technologies like solar energy and EVs instead of being forced to stay hooked on expensive and outdated forms of energy.
POMONA, CALIFORNIA - OCTOBER 19: GRID Alternatives employees Sal Miranda (R) and Tony Chang install ... More no-cost solar panels on the rooftop of a low-income household on October 19, 2023 in Pomona, California. GRID Alternatives has installed no-cost solar for over 29,000 low-income households located in underserved communities which are most impacted by pollution, underemployment and climate change. They are the country's biggest nonprofit clean energy technologies installer and operate in California, mid-Atlantic states and Colorado. (Photo by)
Clean energy was a $2 trillion global market in 2024, and abandoning that market means we cede economic opportunity to countries like China while factories once again close their doors and workers lose their jobs.
The policy choices Congress makes today will reverberate across our economy for decades. Repealing policies that create jobs, fight inflation, and increase GDP isn't how we do business in this country. Or, at least, it's not how we should do things.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
11 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
FTC Warns of Rising Student Loan Scams, Says Fraudsters Took Millions From Borrowers
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is The warning, issued June 6, comes as part of a broader push by the FTC to raise awareness about deceptive debt-relief schemes targeting Americans with student loans.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cheerleaders for Violence: The Troubling Defense of Terror in Boulder
It was supposed to be a peaceful demonstration. Instead, it ended in flames. But what came after the attack in Boulder may be even more incendiary, especially online, where some users in their teens and 20s were not condemning the violence. They were endorsing it. On a clear afternoon in late May, a pro-Israel demonstration on Boulder, Colorados iconic Pearl Street Mall turned into a scene of terror. An Egyptian citizen, wielding improvised firebombs, attacked the crowd, injuring 15 people and igniting panic in a city more often associated with peaceful protests and college town calm. Authorities swiftly arrested the suspect, now charged with multiple felonies including attempted murder and arson. Law enforcement has labeled the incident an act of terrorism. But while the violence rattled the city and the Jewish community in particular, a very different response was unfolding online. Videos posted by major outlets such as ABC News, Daily Mail, and MSNBC quickly amassed thousands of views on TikTok and Instagram. In the comment sections, a disturbing trend emerged: Rather than denouncing the attack, many young users applauded it. "He just wanted freedom for Palestine." "Keep up the good work brother! Hero." "Free him, he did no wrong. He did what we all wanted." "I was about to comment about how terrible this is and then I realized it was a pro-Israel rally and I suddenly didnt feel bad anymore." Some expressed outright Jew-hatred, writing things like, "Reduce their population" and "We owe Germany an apology." Others painted the attacker as a martyr or revolutionary. Several claimed the incident was staged entirely, a so-called "false flag" to build sympathy for Israel. This chorus of justification, denial, and celebration is jarring but not entirely surprising given the current climate. Recent polling shows a dramatic shift in how young Americans view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to Pew Research Center, 53% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavorable view of Israel. Support for the Palestinian cause has grown, particularly among Democrats and younger voters. In one RealClearPolling analysis,respondentsunder 28 years old were more likely than any other age group to sympathize with Palestinians over Israelis and to view Israels military actions in Gaza as unjustified. As someone from this generation, and from Boulder, Ive watched these sentiments evolve online, where politics blur with memes and moral lines often collapse under the weight of outrage or irony. Seeing this unfold in my own hometown made it feel less like an aberration and more like a wake-up call. Whats chilling isnt just the cruelty of the comments. Its how natural they seem to the people posting them, many of whom are my peers. Layered atop this political shift is a deepening distrust of institutions. A significant share of younger Americans express skepticism toward government narratives, traditional news media, and even the legitimacy of domestic law enforcement. According to the spring 2025 Harvard Youth Poll, fewer than one in three express trust in major institutions. But when that skepticism is applied to something as clear and violent as the Boulder attack, is it truly thoughtful or is it reflexive, corrosive doubt - the kind that opens the door to conspiracism and moral disengagement? That mindset helps explain the abundance of conspiracy-laden responses: "Yeah they set this up. Dont believe it at all," read one comment. Another called it a "planned distraction," while others insisted it was staged with actors. Though many of these reactions remain anonymous and ephemeral, they point to a generational divide not just in foreign policy, but in the moral frameworks through which violence is interpreted. Zoe Mardiks, a recent graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder and a Jewish student leader, was at her apartment when she learned of the attack. "My first reaction was to text some of my other Jewish friends to check in and ensure that everyone was okay and safe," she said. "I felt very scared that this had happened in my community." What disturbed her just as much as the attack itself was the flood of online comments defending it. "The ongoing justification for violence significantly downplays the rights of Jews and Israel to exist," Mardiks said. In her view, social media has warpedher generations sense of moral clarity. "Because of how the war has been broadcast on social media, everyone feels they have a say in the issue and believes they possess all the knowledge," she said. Mardiks said her response to those defending the attacker is simple: "If you truly care about saving or freeing anyone, we can only do that by educating each other in a non-attacking way … the line is drawn when you praise violence." The Boulder attack marks a grim milestone: a foreign conflict spilling onto American soil in the form of violence, and met, in some corners of the Internet, with tacit approval. That many of those corners are populated by Americans under 30 raises hard questions about what this generation, my generation, believes, whom they stand with, and what they consider justifiable resistance. For us, the line between protest and terrorism used to feel clear. Now, for too many, that line seems negotiable. "He did what we all wanted." If thats true, we may need to start asking what "we" really means now. Adair Teuton is a 2025 intern with RealClearPolitics.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Evers responds to Republicans' decision to back out of bipartisan budget negotiations
MADISON, Wis. (WLAX/WEUX) – Republicans in the Wisconsin State Legislature on Wednesday backed out of months' worth of bipartisan budget negotiations with Gov. Tony Evers toward reaching bipartisan compromise on the 2025-27 Biennial Budget. Despite having secured the governor's support for Republicans' half of the proposal, which included an income tax cut targeting Wisconsin's middle-class and working families and eliminating income taxes for certain retirees, Republican lawmakers are unable to reach consensus with their caucuses in order to support the governor's half of the proposal, which included meaningful increased investments in child care, K-12 schools, and the University of Wisconsin (UW) System. Republicans' decision to cease discussions comes after meetings between Gov. Evers and Republican leaders, as well as several staff-level meetings with leaders, have occurred over the span of several months and ramped up in recent weeks, including meetings every day this week. Gov. Evers Wednesday released the following statement responding to Republican leaders' decision: 'I am grateful to the legislators and legislative staff for their efforts over the past several weeks to reach a bipartisan agreement that would have delivered on key priorities for Wisconsinites. 'The concept of compromise is simple—everyone gets something they want, and no one gets everything they want. 'I told Republicans I'd support their half of the deal and their top tax priorities—even though they're very similar to bills I previously vetoed—because I believe that's how compromise is supposed to work, and I was ready to make that concession in order to get important things done for Wisconsin's kids. 'Unfortunately, Republicans couldn't agree to support the top priorities in my half of the deal, which included meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families, and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System. So, today, Republicans decided not to move forward with any more bipartisan negotiations with me. 'We've spent months trying to have real, productive conversations with Republican lawmakers in hopes of finding compromise and passing a state budget that everyone could support—and that, most importantly, delivers for the people of Wisconsin. I am admittedly disappointed that Republican lawmakers aren't willing to reach consensus and common ground and have decided to move forward without bipartisan support instead. 'I will always try to do the right thing—and compromise in order to get good things done. Wisconsinites expect their elected officials to show up, act in good faith, and work together across the aisle to get things done—that's what I've been committed to doing in these bipartisan negotiations from the get-go, and that remains my commitment.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
