Court reserves decision on Indira Gandhi's appeal against ex-IGP, govt
PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on M Indira Gandhi's appeal in her suit against former inspector-general of police Abdul Hamid Bador and the government for allegedly failing to arrest her former husband and return her daughter, who was abducted by him in 2008.
A three-member panel, chaired by Justice Zaini Mazlan, said the court needed time to deliberate on submissions from Indira's lawyers and the Attorney-General's Chambers, which represents the police and the government.
The court set Aug 25 for case management.
Indira's lawyer, Rajesh Nagarajan, had earlier argued that the police failed to enforce the committal warrant according to the law.
He said they did not file any affidavits updating the court on their efforts to find K Pathmanathan, who converted to Islam and took the name Riduan Abdullah.
'It was only in 2020, after we (current lawyers) took over, that we wrote to the court to ask them for updates,' he said.
Justice Radzi Abdul Hamid, who also sat on the panel with Justice Faizah Jamaludin, questioned if Indira had standing to bring the claim, as contempt is an administrative matter between the court and Riduan.
He said the court sympathises with Indira, but the proceeding may not bring her daughter, Prasana Diksa, back.
'The contempt was due to his (Riduan's) action (in not handing over Prasana),' Radzi said.
Rajesh maintained that Indira has indirect rights relating to Prasana's whereabouts, justifying her claim.
Senior federal counsel Nur Ezdiani Roleb said Riduan is on the police's wanted list and will be arrested if found.
Ezdiani said the High Court only ordered the police to file progress affidavits after the current lawyers took over in 2020.
She contended that the police owe no duty of care to Indira beyond executing the committal order.
Last year, the High Court dismissed Indira's lawsuit, ruling that the police had properly performed their duty, and that it found no bad faith. The court also noted ongoing investigations to locate Riduan.
In her suit filed in 2020, Indira, 49, alleged that Hamid deliberately and negligently disregarded a mandamus order issued by the Federal Court in failing to investigate or take appropriate action to return Prasana, now 16, to her.
She claimed that Hamid and the government had a role to play in making decisions or ordering the police to execute the committal warrant against Riduan as ordered by the Federal Court on April 29, 2016.
The mother of three contended that the defendants' behaviour directly caused her continued separation from her youngest daughter until today, and that their behaviour also caused Riduan to flee.
Indira sought RM100 million in general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as a declaration that Hamid had committed tort of nonfeasance in public office.
She said the government was also vicariously liable for the tort of nonfeasance committed by the police.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
Decision October 3 on 40pc case: High Court
Published on: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 Published on: Wed, Aug 13, 2025 By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: On Nov 11, 2022, the High Court granted SLS leave to proceed with the judicial review, while the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), acting for the Federal Government, later secured a stay order to halt the High Court from hearing the merits of the case, pending appeal. Kota Kinabalu: The High Court will deliver on Oct 3 its decision on the Sabah Law Society's (SLS) substantive judicial review over Sabah's 40 per cent special grant. According to SLS counsel Dr David Fung, Judge Datuk Celestina Stuel Galid informed this during a Zoom hearing Tuesday. The decision will be delivered at 9am in open court. The court had, on July 7, heard oral arguments by the parties on the substantive merits of the judicial review and fixed Aug 7 for an e-review of the matter. The SLS filed a judicial review leave application on June 8, 2022, after the Federal Government announced on April 14, 2022 that an agreement had been reached with the State Government, and named the Federal and State governments as the first and second respondents. On Nov 11, 2022, the High Court granted SLS leave to proceed with the judicial review, while the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), acting for the Federal Government, later secured a stay order to halt the High Court from hearing the merits of the case, pending appeal. On June 18, 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Federal Government's appeal against the leave granted to SLS and directed the High Court to fix a date for the full hearing. The Federal Government then applied for leave to appeal the ruling to the Federal Court, but on Oct 17, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed the application. The SLS is seeking a declaration, among others, that the Federal Government's failure to hold a second review in 1974 with the State Government was a breach and contravention of its constitutional duty stipulated under Article 112D, Clauses (1), (3) and (4) of the Federal Constitution. It said the 40 per cent entitlement remained due and payable by the Federal Government to the State Government for each consecutive financial year for the period of 1974 to 2021, in which a failure to pay the entitlement was a breach of the fundamental right to property of the Sabah Government and ultimately, of the people of Sabah, as enshrined under Article 13 of the Federal Constitution. SLS also sought an order of mandamus directed to the respondent to hold another review with the State Government under the provisions of Article 112D of the Federal Constitution, to give effect to the payment of the 40 per cent entitlement for each consecutive financial year from 1974 to 2021 within 30 days, and to reach a decision within 90 days from the date of the order, and that the respondent pays the entitlement to the State Government or as constitutional damages for breach of Article 13 of the Federal Constitution, or both. Counsel Dr David Fung and Jeyan Marimuttu represented SLS, Senior Federal Counsel (SFC) Ahmad Hanir Hambaly @ Arwi represented the Federal Government and Sabah State Attorney-General Datuk Brenndon Soh represented the State Government. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘A wound that will never heal': Victims of AI porn speak out in Hong Kong
HONG KONG, Aug 13 — For Hong Kong law student 'C', AI-made pornography was a distant danger until a university classmate created graphic images of her and multiple other women. 'At first I was shocked, then it turned into panic,' said the 20-year-old, describing the ordeal as a 'wound that will leave a scar'. C was one of three women who exposed an AI porn scandal at Hong Kong's oldest university last month, sparking huge debate around what had largely been seen as an overseas phenomenon. The victims, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity, and experts said the city was ill-prepared to counter the fast-growing threat. In the University of Hong Kong (HKU) case, hundreds of images of at least 20 women were discovered on the student's laptop. 'B', another of those who spoke out, said she felt betrayed as she had considered the perpetrator a friend. 'I felt like my privacy was violated... like I couldn't trust the people around me,' she said. The university's initial response was to give the student a warning letter and make him apologise. The third woman, 'A', said she was told by staff the case couldn't be heard before a disciplinary committee. 'They were concerned but didn't know what they could do... We felt that was a bit ridiculous.' HKU told AFP it 'has been in contact with the students involved' but cannot comment further with the case under active review. 'Damage may 'never end' While the HKU case has thrust AI-made porn into the spotlight, it is not the city's first. Janice, a woman in her late 20s who also asked to use a pseudonym, told AFP she was devastated a few years ago when fake obscene images were sent to her friends. She never found the culprit and worried that the damage might 'never end'. 'I tried skipping work and didn't dare to go out on the street,' she said, adding that she had suicidal thoughts and would suddenly burst into tears. 'I couldn't sleep because I was afraid I would wake up to see the whole internet filled with (pornographic) images of me.' Hong Kong's Association Concerning Sexual Violence Against Women received 11 similar requests for help in 2024-25. 'We have observed an uptick... Some cases may be hidden if (victims) don't know how to seek help,' executive director Doris Chong said. Janice doubted she had enough evidence to persuade police to help, adding that she felt society will 'never find a way' to punish canny offenders. This photo taken on August 7, 2025 shows a woman standing in front of signage at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in Hong Kong. In July 2025 three women exposed an AI porn scandal at Hong Kong's oldest university, sparking huge debate around what had largely been seen as an overseas phenomenon. The victims -- who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity — and experts said the fallout had laid bare the city's lack of preparedness to counter the fast-growing threat. — AFP pic Type of 'sexual violence' An estimated 90 per cent of AI-made porn victims are women, Susanne Choi from the Chinese University of Hong Kong told AFP, 'suggesting that it is a form of gender-based sexual violence'. Asked for the number of recent cases involving deepfake pornography, police said they did not maintain such figures. Lawmakers and universities need to 'expand and revise existing laws and procedures to better cope with... technology-facilitated sexual harassment', Choi argued. Discussions in Britain and Singapore show a growing willingness to penalise its creation, though opinion is split on possession, according to Hong Kong barrister Stephen Keung. Hong Kong currently criminalises the distribution of 'intimate images', including AI-made ones, but not their creation or possession. That made legal action in the HKU case difficult as there was no evidence that the pictures were circulated. After the women went public with the scandal, however, Hong Kong's privacy watchdog launched a criminal investigation, and the Equal Opportunities Commission is handling a related complaint. Dignity 'undermined' The three students said they have had to deal with public backlash. Once an avid social media user, C temporarily stopped posting, worried about who else 'would screengrab my photos for what purpose'. 'Many commenters said... 'You are ruining the guy's future, you should apologise to him',' she said, saying she endured periods of self-doubt. The student has not been named and AFP was unable to reach him for comment. B said the trio did not want to 'play judge' but believed offenders should face long-term consequences. 'The mere creation (of AI porn) is a problem... My bodily autonomy, my privacy, my dignity were undermined by it,' B said. 'If a line must be drawn, it should be drawn at creation.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Bersatu wing tells govt Indian MPs to quit over Mitra's failure
Bersatu associate wing vice-chief R Sri Sanjeevan called for a forensic audit to be conducted on all of Mitra's expenditure since its establishment. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : A Bersatu associate wing leader says government Indian MPs who lack the courage to speak up about the Malaysian Indian Transformation Unit (Mitra) should resign immediately following a DAP lawmaker's view that Mitra had failed to help Indians most in need. Earlier today, Klang MP V Ganabatirau told the Dewan Rakyat that Mitra had been hampered by frequent leadership changes, bureaucracy and the lack of long-term planning. He also said funds often failed to reach those most in need and accused some ministries of treating Mitra as an 'emergency fund' rather than a proper development agency. In a statement, Bersatu associate wing vice-chief R Sri Sanjeevan said Ganabatirau's admission confirmed that Mitra had become a 'political tool and a crony project hub, not a saviour for the community'. 'This is not just Mitra's failure – this is a moral failure of all Indian elected representatives in the government,' said Sanjeevan. 'They were chosen to be the voice of the people, but in the end, they have become enablers of weaknesses and abuse of power. 'Indian MPs in the government who lack the courage to speak up should immediately resign. Don't put on a show pretending to speak out about Mitra just to gain popularity and votes from the Indian community.' Apart from calling for a forensic audit to be conducted on all of Mitra's expenditure since its establishment, Sanjeevan also said all Mitra projects that had failed to meet their objectives should be made public. Last week, Mitra chairman P Prabakaran said the agency's past failures were due to a lack of continuity, which he said disrupted long-term efforts to uplift the Indian community. Prabakaran told the Dewan Rakyat that over the past decade, Mitra and its predecessor, the Socioeconomic Development of the Indian Community Unit, had seen frequent changes in leadership and policies. However, Prabakaran said under his tenure, he had ensured that Mitra's direction was aligned with national policies – and not individual preferences. The Batu MP took over as Mitra chairman in February 2024.
