Time for Israel to take out ‘head of the snake,' target members of Iranian regime, says former IDF intel chief
The former head of Israeli military intelligence and one of the architects behind the legendary 1981 strike on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor said Israel should expand its sights not just military targets, but political ones.
"Israel took the decision that, on one hand, it's time to end the leadership of the Axis of Evil — the head of the snake," Yadlin told Fox News Digital. "At the same time, deal with the main problems there. Which is the nuclear."
Yadlin didn't say how long he thought the conflict would drag on. While he didn't openly call for regime change, Yadlin suggested the IDF take out regime targets "beyond the military level."
"It's not a one-day operation. It seems more like a week, two weeks. But when you start a war, even if you start it very successfully, you never know when it is finished."
"I hope that the achievements of the IDF, which are degrading the Iranian air defense, degrading the Iranian missile, ballistic missile capabilities, drones capabilities, and maybe even some regime targets beyond the military level that Israel started with, will convince the Iranians that it is time to stop. And then they will come to negotiation with the Trump administration much weaker."
While Secretary of State Marco Rubio initially insisted it was not involved in the initial strikes on Tehran, President Donald Trump seemed to suggest he hoped Israel's strikes would pressure a weaker Iran to acquiesce at the negotiating table.
The two sides are at loggerheads over the U.S.'s insistence that Iran cannot have any capacity to enrich uranium and Iran's insistence that it must have uranium for a civil nuclear program.
"The military operation is aimed, in my view, to a political end, and the political end is an agreement with Iran that will block a possibility to go to the border," Yadlin said.
"We need a stronger agreement" than the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, he said.
Yadlin, who in 1981 flew one of the F-16s that destroyed Iraq's nuclear facility in a single-night operation, made clear that Israel's latest campaign is far more complex.
"This is not 1981," he said. "Iran has learned. Their facilities are dispersed, buried in mountains, and protected by advanced air defenses. It's not a one-night operation."
He added, "There are sites that I'm not sure can be destroyed."
He said the recent attack was the result of years of intelligence gathering – and brave Mossad agents on the ground in Iran. Israel lured top Iranian commanders into a bunker, where they coordinated a response to Israel's attacks, then blew up the bunker.
"All of the intelligence that Israel collected, from the time I was chief of intelligence 2005 to 2010, enabled this operation against the Iranian nuclear program to be very efficient, very much like the good intelligence enabled Israel to destroy Hezbollah. Unfortunately, the same intelligence agencies missed the seventh of October, 2023."
Indeed, Israel's past preventive strikes — 1981's Operation Opera and the 2007 airstrike on Syria's suspected reactor — were rapid, surgical and designed to neutralize a singular target. In contrast, Yadlin suggested the current campaign could last weeks and involve broader goals.
"It's not a one-day operation. It seems more like a week, two weeks. But when you start a war, even if you start it very successfully, you never know when it is finished."
The operation is being framed by Israeli defense officials as a continuation of the Begin Doctrine, established after the 1981 Osirak strike, which declared that Israel would never allow a hostile regime in the region to obtain weapons of mass destruction.
Yadlin himself is a symbol of that doctrine. As one of the eight pilots who flew into Iraq over four decades ago, he helped define Israel's policy of preemptive action — a legacy that is now being tested again under radically different circumstances.
"This campaign," Yadlin emphasized, "is unlike anything the country has done before."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Air Force tightens rules on transgender airmen; supporters say it prioritizes readiness: report
The U.S. Air Force has issued updated guidance that centralizes and standardizes separation boards for service members who no longer meet military requirements, including those affected by transgender policy changes. The Associated Press first reported the change, citing an internal memo dated Aug. 12, 2025. According to the memo, once a board confirms a member meets the policy's criteria, "the board must recommend separation."Hearings are closed and will not be recorded. Instead, the case file includes an abbreviated transcript prepared after the hearing. The policy narrows the board's role to a single factual SECRETARY PUSHES REVIEW BOARD TO PURGE DEI FROM NAVAL ACADEMY AND RESTORE 'WARRIOR ETHOS' Supporters of stricter readiness standards argue the change avoids drawn-out cases and clarifies discipline. The AP notes that, in the past, boards sometimes retained members despite serious infractions, discretion critics said led to Secretary Pete Hegseth has made "restoring the warrior ethos" and tougher physical standards central to his tenure. In his Jan. 25 message to the force, he vowed to "restore the warrior ethos … rebuild our military and reestablish deterrence," then directed a rapid, department-wide review of fitness, body composition and grooming standards.'RED TAPE': TRUMP ADMIN UNLEASHES DOGE-ALIGNED PROCESS TO FIRE FEDERAL WORKERS FOR MISCONDUCT In July, he tightened medical waiver rules for new recruits, writing that America's warfighters must be physically and mentally capable of performing in the harshest conditions. The memo says the rules apply across the Department of the Air Force, including the Space Force, under a single Consolidated Disposition Authority to ensure uniform process and oversight. The AP also reported last week that the Air Force moved to end early retirement benefits for those who do not meet service requirements.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian ignores Hiroshima, Nagasaki bombings on 80th anniversary
Eighty years ago, the world entered the nuclear age when Enola Gay, a modified U.S. Army Air Corps B-29 Superfortress, dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, on Aug. 9, 1945, a second atomic strike hit Nagasaki. The Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum, despite holding the Enola Gay in its collections, is not hosting any events or special exhibits to mark the anniversary on Aug. 6, a spokesperson confirmed to USA TODAY. The museum will instead share information and existing web content about the bombings on social media. The otherwise unmarked anniversary comes as the nation's museums stand at a crossroads after President Donald Trump's March executive order aiming to restore what he called 'truth and sanity' to museums and history education. More: Trump sets sights on national African American history museum Trump's executive order is but the most recent offensive in long-running wars over America's past, including the mid-1990s when a planned exhibit of Enola Gay for the bombings' 50th anniversary sparked a major clash between the Smithsonian, politicians, and veterans' organizations. Trump White House officials blasted Lonnie Bunch III, secretary of the Smithsonian and founding director of the institution's National Museum of African American History and Culture, as 'a Democrat donor and rabid partisan' in April comments to the New York Times. (The White House did not comment for this story.) In June, the Smithsonian, in response to Trump's order, initiated a content review for its 19 museums. The National Museum of American History recently removed references to Trump's impeachments from an exhibit on the presidency but said it will soon restore them. More: Trump fires director of Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery for allegedly promoting DEI A 'duty' to history Two nuclear disarmament advocates with personal connections to the atomic bombings told USA TODAY that they would've liked to see the Smithsonian tackle the anniversary − likely one of the final major anniversaries where a significant number of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors remain alive − in a more prominent and even-handed manner. Ari Beser, a multimedia storyteller and author, is the grandson of 1st Lt. Jacob Beser, an Army Air Corps radar specialist who was the only person to fly on both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing missions. 'I think that the Smithsonian has a duty to memorialize history from every angle,' said Beser, a member of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. 'It's really important to understand the historical context in which these decisions are made, but that doesn't mean we can't learn from the negative consequences of what they did.' More: Trump targets the Smithsonian. Why? He's afraid and insecure about US history. | Opinion North Carolina author Kathleen Burkinshaw, whose Japanese mother survived the Hiroshima strike before immigrating to America with her Air Force father, lives today with chronic pain from reflex sympathetic dystrophy that she believes is related to her mother's radiation exposure. She expressed concern about potentially oversimplified narratives that focus on the war-winning nature of the bombs without acknowledging the human suffering they caused. 'They just hear that (the bomb) wins wars,' Burkinshaw said of the students to whom she speaks about her mother's experience. 'Well, at what cost?' The Enola Gay controversy But when the Smithsonian planned a special Air and Space Museum exhibition featuring the Enola Gay ahead of the bombing's 50th anniversary in 1995, attempts to broach the impact and legacy of the weapons set off a political firestorm. The proposed exhibit, initially entitled 'Crossroads' and later dubbed 'The Last Act,' was to include photos and artifacts from both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as information about survivors' experiences. One proposed centerpiece: a dead 12-year-old Hiroshima girl's lunchbox, deformed by the heat of the blast, with charred rice and peas still inside. The draft exhibit would have asked visitors to consider historical debates over whether the bomb was necessary to end the war before a planned (and surely bloody) American invasion of Japan's home islands. Museum patrons also would have wrestled with the dawn of the nuclear age that began in August 1945. Air and Space Museum director Martin Harwit, a Czech-American astrophysicist, told USA TODAY that his 1950s stint in the U.S. Army as a technician monitoring massive thermonuclear weapons tests in the Pacific made a 'significant difference' to his approach at the Smithsonian. However, veterans groups – most notably the Air Force Association and American Legion – believed the exhibit script painted Imperial Japan as victims rather than as the initial aggressor in the Pacific War. Despite a committee review in early 1994, the revised script failed to satisfy both the veterans and members of Congress, who believed it still didn't focus enough on Japanese forces' brutality. Ultimately, the Smithsonian pulled the plug on the exhibit. Instead, the Enola Gay was displayed with very little contextual material; now the plane sits at the museum's off-site Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center near Dulles International Airport in northern Virginia. That did not satisfy the critics. More than 80 members of Congress, predominantly Republicans, publicly demanded Harwit's resignation, which he submitted just before Senate hearings weeks before the plane went on display. Tom Crouch, a key Smithsonian figure involved in producing the scuttled 1995 exhibit, declined comment when reached by USA TODAY. 'I am sure you understand the sensitivity of the topic, particularly now,' Crouch wrote via email. 'I would not feel comfortable commenting on the subject given the current pressures on the Secretary (of the Smithsonian). Sorry.' 'Greater calamities' Harwit, now 94, argued that Americans need more than just feel-good history about the war. He fears 'people have forgotten all about' the threat of nuclear war. 'As we celebrate the end of World War II, nobody will wish to be reminded that the very nuclear weapons which ended (the war) could someday lead to even greater calamities,' he said. Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 80 years after Hiroshima bombing, Smithsonian stays silent
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
From bromance to bitterness, Trump-Putin relationship full of twists and turns
WASHINGTON − After a summer of phone calls and public outbursts against Vladimir Putin, President Donald Trump is ready to take their relationship offline. Each will fly more than 4,000 miles to a United States military base in Anchorage, Alaska, for a summit Trump hopes will be a prelude to ending Russia's war on Ukraine. It won't be easy after a summer of increased Russian attacks and mounting threats by Trump against Russia's economy. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly,' Trump told reporters on Aug. 14. 'And if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace.' More: It was sold in 1867, but some Russians want Alaska back from the US The presidents will meet one-on-one, followed by a Russian-American lunch. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have conducted days of panicked diplomacy in the lead-up to the high-stakes summit, which they were not invited to attend. Trump has said repeatedly that territorial concessions will be necessary to end the war. But he says he won't cut a deal when he sits down with Putin that forces Ukraine to give up land. Instead, he says, he'll 'feel out' Putin and see if there's an agreement to be had. More: Why is Alaska the 'most strategic place' for Trump-Putin meeting? It will be their seventh time meeting as the leaders of their respective countries; the first six of those happened during Trump's first term. Trump has also contradicted himself over the years about when he first met the Russian leader. Here's a look at the two leaders' journey from bromance to 'bulls----,' tracing how the Trump-Putin relationship started and stopped: 'Stablemates' Trump pondered whether Putin could become his 'new best friend' in a social media post on June 18, 2013, before the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow. The real estate mogul told NBC : 'I do have a relationship, and I can tell you that he's very interested in what we're doing here today.' But the news outlet later reported that a meeting between the two never came to fruition. Trump then claimed during a presidential primary debate in 2015 that they got to know one another as 'stablemates' on an episode of CBS' '60 Minutes' that Trump taped in New York − and Putin taped in Moscow. More: Putin-Trump 'bromance' broadens post-sanctions 'I got to know him very well because we were both on '60 Minutes.' We were stablemates,' Trump said. Nevertheless, Trump would go on to say on the campaign trail, in February 2016, that he had 'no relationship' with Putin. "I'm saying that I'd possibly have a good relationship. He's been very nice to me," Trump said on April 28, 2016. Dmitry Peskov, a longtime spokesman for the Russian president, said in August 2016 that Putin had never had 'any contacts with Trump.' Trump rejects Russian meddling in 2016 At a news conference on July 27, 2016, Trump asked Russia 'to find' deleted emails of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, during comments about allegations of Russian hacking. 'I will tell you this, Russia: If you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,' Trump said. At the same news conference, Trump said: 'I never met Putin, I don't know who Putin is.' 'I've never spoken to him. I don't know anything about him other than he will respect me,' Trump said. Trump routinely dismissed reporting that Russia had hacked the Democratic National Committee throughout the general election – and beyond. He said during a presidential debate with Hillary Clinton on Sept. 27, 2016: 'I don't think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC. She's saying Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia. But it could also be China. But it could also be lots of other people. It also could be someone sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?' Trump at his second debate with Clinton on Oct. 27, 2016, said, 'Maybe there is no hacking." 'But they always blame Russia. And the reason they blame Russia, because they think they're trying to tarnish me with Russia. I know nothing about Russia,' Trump said. But he acknowledged, on Jan. 11, 2017, as president-elect that Putin's government was involved. 'As far as hacking, I think it was Russia. But I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people.' Trump's complicated relationship with Putin his first term The Justice Department appointed a special counsel on May 17, 2017, to investigate alleged ties between Trump campaign officials and Moscow as part of a probe into Russian meddling in the U.S. election. Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein tapped former FBI director Robert Mueller to lead the investigation. "As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know: There was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity," Trump said in response. Trump's first in-person meeting with Putin took place nearly two months later in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. They met again in Helsinki, Finland, at a July 16, 2018 summit. At a joint news conference with Putin in Helsinki, Trump emphasized that there was 'no collusion' between his campaign and Russia. He said the allegations 'had a negative impact upon the relationship of the two largest nuclear powers in the world.' At that press conference Trump notably, rejected the intelligence community's assessment that Russia hacked the DNC. 'I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia,' Trump said. 'I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' The following year, the Department of Justice released a redacted version of Mueller's report on April 18, 2019. The investigation did not find evidence that Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia to meddle in the election. More: Trump said he'd end Ukraine war in 24 hours. Now his patience with Putin is wearing thin. Roughly two months later, Trump met with Putin during another G20 Summit. 'We have had a very, very good relationship. And we look forward to spending some pretty good time together,' Trump said at a meeting with Putin in Osaka, Japan, on June 28, 2019. Trump's relationship with Putin, and Zelenskyy was complicated in his first term. He was impeached on Dec. 18, 2019, by the House of Representatives for a July phone call, in which he was asked Zelenskyy to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden. He was acquitted by the Senate on Feb. 5, 2020 and lost the presidential election that year to Biden. Trump says he'd solve Ukraine war in one day Trump's relationship with Putin came under scrutiny again during the 2024 presidential campaign, this time over concerns that he'd abandon Ukraine and would not defend America's allies from Russian aggression. At a Conservative Political Action Conference appearance on March 4, 2023, Trump said that if he were elected, he'd resolve the war in one day. 'I'll meet with Putin, I'll meet with Zelenskyy. They both have weaknesses, and they both have strengths. And within 24 hours, that war will be settled. It will be over. It will be absolutely over,' Trump said at a CNN town hall on May 10, 2023. Trump told Biden at their debate on June 27, 2024, that if he won, he'd have the Ukraine war settled before he was inaugurated. Trump also pledged during his only debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, on Sept. 10, 2024, that he would end the Ukraine war before he took office, if elected. On Jan. 7, said he'd resolve the war within his first six months in office. Trump's relationship with Putin takes a dive Trump said he was considering sanctions on Russia on his second day in office, in response to a question from USA TODAY. Of a possible meeting with Putin, Trump told reporters: "Anytime they want." Trump spoke to Putin for the first time since returning to office on Feb. 12, 2025. It was the first time any American president had spoken to Putin since his February 24, 2022, invasion of Ukraine. The president berated Zelenskyy on live TV a little more than two weeks later in the Oval Office. But by April 24, 2025, it was Putin who he was blasting in a Truth Social post. 'I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP!' Trump wrote. After meeting with Zelenskyy in the Vatican while both men were in town for Pope Francis' funeral, Trump openly questioned whether Putin was deceiving him about ending the war. 'It makes me think that maybe he doesn't want to stop the war, he's just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently, through 'Banking' or 'Secondary Sanctions?' Too many people are dying!!!' Trump wrote on April 26, 2025. Trump told reporters the next month that he'd be willing to fly to Turkey to participate in direct talks between Putin and Zelenskyy. But after Putin declined to attend, Trump indicated on May 15. 2025 on Air Force One that the war would not be resolved until he and Putin held their own summit. 'Look, nothing's going to happen until Putin and I get together, OK?" Trump said. Days later, on May 19, 2025, the president held a two-hour call with Putin that left Trump feeling optimistic. He said Russia and Ukraine would 'immediately' begin negotiations toward a ceasefire. Yet, after Russia continued aerial attacks on Kyiv, Trump lit into Putin on May 25, 2025. 'I'm not happy with what Putin is doing. He's killing a lot of people, and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've known him a long time. Always gotten along with him, but he's sending rockets into cities and killing people, and I don't like it at all,' Trump said. That same day Trump said on Truth Social that Putin had 'gone absolutely CRAZY.' Trump's last known conversation with Putin took place on July 3, 2025. Trump told reporters it did not yield progress. At a Cabinet meeting on July 8, Trump exploded. 'We get a lot of bulls---- thrown at us by Putin,' he said. Six days later, at meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Trump gave Russia 50 days to make a peace deal with Ukraine or face secondary tariffs and new sanctions. Trump later changed the deadline to Aug. 8 and put a higher tariff on India, which he linked to that country's purchase of Russian oil. But instead of announcing additional sanctions that day, Trump said an Alaskan summit with Putin had been planned. Strained relations with Putin, 25% chance of success As he prepared for the summit, Trump said on Aug. 13 that he did not expect Putin to quit attacks on civilian infrastructure, just because he'd asked him to. "I've had that conversation with him. I've had a lot of good conversations with him. Then I go home and I see that a rocket hit a nursing home, or a rocket hit an apartment building, and people are laying dead in the street," Trump told reporters. He blamed past allegations of Russian collusion for his inability to deter Putin and suggested Mueller's investigation was the beginning of the end of his positive relationship with Putin. "I knew him very well. I got along with him great, actually. I had to go through the Russia, Russia hoax. And it was actually, it was a strain on the relationship," Trump said. Trump said in an Aug. 14 radio interview with Fox News that he thought the summit had a 25% chance of success. 'This meeting sets up the second meeting. The second meeting is going to be very, very important because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal," he said. Of the talks with Putin, he said: 'It's like a chess game.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump's relationship with Putin is full of twists and turns
