Sustainable Finance: From Ethical Choice to a Key Driver of Profitability in Global Markets
Sustainable finance is defined as the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into investment decisions, fostering long-term investments in sustainable economic activities and projects.
With the growing risks of climate change and heightened investor awareness of environmental and social responsibility, it is clear that ignoring sustainability standards is no longer a regulatory oversight, but a strategic mistake that could cost companies and investors dearly.
This reality raises fundamental questions about the relationship between profit and sustainability, and whether sustainable finance can truly balance financial performance with social responsibility.
Adopting Sustainable Practices
Mohammed Al-Faraj, Senior Head of Asset Management at Arbah Capital, stressed that sustainable finance has evolved from an ethics-driven choice reliant on corporate goodwill or government support into an effective investment tool and long-term profitability driver.
He explained that this shift stems from investors realizing that companies adopting sustainable practices are built on stronger, more stable foundations. The growing economic value of sustainability is now the primary driver behind corporate adoption.
Studies show that companies integrating sustainability standards attract top talent, build stronger brands, and reduce long-term operating costs through efficient resource and energy use. Over the past five years, sustainable finance instruments - such as green bonds and sustainable investment funds - have outperformed traditional ones. These funds also proved more resilient during economic crises, showing less volatility, reflecting sustainable companies' stronger risk-management capabilities.
Al-Faraj noted that sustainable investment is less risky in the long term, as it accounts for factors often missed in traditional financial analysis, such as climate change, human rights risks, and corrupt governance. This approach acts as a 'risk shield' by helping companies comply with increasing environmental and social regulations, avoid fines or penalties, and remain resilient to market shocks.
While the initial costs of sustainability may affect short-term competitiveness, they provide a lasting advantage over time. Al-Faraj concluded that sustainable finance is a natural evolution in investment philosophy, redefining the link between profit and responsibility, and guiding smart investors toward building wealth on solid, sustainable foundations in a risk-laden world.
Global Shifts
Financial and economic consultant Dr. Hussein Al-Attas echoed this view, saying sustainable finance is no longer merely an ethical stance or a marketing framework, but is now an investment option driven by pure economic logic. Amid climate shifts, global regulatory changes, and evolving investor behavior, market indicators in recent years have shown that companies and funds applying sustainability standards achieve better long-term financial performance with lower volatility and risk.
The consultant noted that while government support remains helpful, it is no longer the sole factor. Institutional investors, pension funds, and global asset managers are adopting sustainability strategies to achieve higher returns with reduced risk.
He continued that sustainable investment enables early regulatory compliance, reduces environmental damage that could lead to lawsuits or penalties, builds strong market reputations that boost customer and investor loyalty, and improves operational efficiency through innovation, energy efficiency, and resource management.
Al-Attas further emphasized that sustainability is no longer an operational burden but a strategic investment in corporate continuity and growth. He concluded that sustainable finance has become a prerequisite for profitability and success in global markets, and ignoring it could leave companies behind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Climate security is energy security
For all the uncertainties generated by Donald Trump's administration over the past six months, one thing is clear: 'climate' technologies are out and 'energy' technologies are in. But while going along with this rhetorical shift may appease some, it should be recognized for what it is: a change in wording. The fundamental economic and technological forces that are pushing the world away from oil, coal and gas and toward low-carbon, high-efficiency technologies have not abated. Over the past two decades, climate change has been a leading item on the global agenda, driving efforts to deploy technologies that will reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Those efforts are now facing headwinds, and not just in the US. Geopolitical developments elsewhere, like Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, have called attention to the importance of energy affordability and security over other considerations. Policymakers in the US, Europe and elsewhere initially responded to the war by doubling down on the shift from fossil fuels, and for good reason. Oil, coal and gas are commodities whose prices will always be linked to geopolitical vagaries (that goes for not only global oil markets but also regional gas markets, which are increasingly linked by trade in liquefied natural gas). As a case in point, the summer of 2022 brought massive inflation, largely driven by fossil fuel price spikes. Europe's gas prices peaked at 10 times their long-term average and US gas prices at around triple their long-term average. While the US Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 is widely considered a misnomer, history will judge the name kindly: The only permanent way to address such bouts with 'fossilflation' is to stop using fossil fuels. Though the blowback against climate policies has been particularly strong at the federal level in the US, Europe, too, has undergone a retrenchment. This is somewhat understandable, even if it is shortsighted. Germany, Europe's largest economy, has been in a recession for more than two years, with high energy prices a chief culprit. Climate technologies that are already commercially viable could help, of course. But taking full advantage of the lower prices of solar, wind and (increasingly) batteries requires a willingness to reform power markets and pass these savings to households and industrial consumers. It also calls for more upfront public investment, an area where climate priorities compete with other priorities like national security that are often perceived to be more immediate. In grappling with these trade-offs, the EU delivered the kinds of efficiency measures that Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency' had promised but failed to achieve. For example, Europe dialed back its carbon border adjustment mechanism by requiring 90 percent fewer companies to comply. On the surface, this seems like a decisive blow to the goal of establishing a carbon tariff for imports, commensurate with Trump's DOGE hatchet. But unlike Trump and Elon Musk, the EU ensured that the remaining 10 percent of importers still accounted for more than 90 percent of emissions. This outcome is far from ideal when viewed solely through a climate lens. But viewed from a broader climate-economic perspective, it is exactly the kind of surgical intervention that DOGE promised but never delivered. Still, fiddling at the climate policy margins ignores the bigger picture. While Europe and America are taking steps back, China is leaping forward. It alone accounted for more than 40 percent of the record $2.1 trillion of global investment in the energy transition last year — more than the EU, the UK and the US combined. China's dominance is the result of a concerted green industrial policy, in which innovation plays a key role Gernot Wagner The balance is even more lopsided for specific clean-energy technologies. China produces about 75 percent of the world's solar panels and 80 percent of its lithium-ion batteries. That dominance is the result of a concerted green industrial policy, in which innovation plays a key role. The claim that China only manufactures and assembles is woefully outdated. China's electric vehicles, for example, are second to none. BYD, the country's leading carmaker, recently unveiled a groundbreaking charging system capable of adding 470 km of range in just five minutes, putting the company in a league of its own globally. China's dominance extends to technologies that are not yet competitive without price support. LONGi, one of the world's top solar manufacturers, formed LONGi Hydrogen in 2021 to pursue green hydrogen production. It now leads the world in electrolyzer manufacturing capacity. These are not isolated examples. China's ambitious industrial policy has helped lift five other Chinese hydrogen companies into the global top 10. Have Europe and the US already lost this race for the future? While the US now seems hellbent on turning itself into a petrostate, the EU has a chance to revive its clean energy fortunes. It is even starting with a significant policy advantage: a carbon dioxide price hovering at about $100 per tonne means that most low-carbon technologies — from clean electrons and electrification to clean molecules like biofuels — are already economically viable. Others, like green hydrogen, will need further support to help climb the learning curve and slide down the cost curve. According to Bernd Heid, a senior partner at McKinsey & Company who leads its Platform for Climate Technologies, about 90 percent of climate technologies will be in the money by 2030 with a $100 carbon price. While China dominates with six top-10 global players, three of the others are European. The Swedish startup Stegra is building the world's first low-carbon steel plant using electrolyzers made by ThyssenKrupp Nucera, in which the German steelmaker has a majority stake. Despite recent political developments, the US, too, has shown that rapid change is possible. Although breaking China's solar manufacturing dominance will be difficult, the US has made significant inroads over the past three years. Earlier this year, it exceeded 50 gigawatts of panel manufacturing capacity, a fivefold increase since 2022. These 50 GW in panel supply roughly matched US demand. True, onshoring the solar supply chain comes with costs that can be justified only by priorities other than the climate, such as national security or promoting domestic manufacturing. But that is the point. If political conditions require stronger emphasis on technologies like geothermal and nuclear, and if technologies formerly known as 'climate tech' must be relabeled as the more neutral-sounding 'energy tech,' then so be it. The larger forces propelling us toward decarbonization remain the same. • Gernot Wagner is a climate economist at Columbia Business School. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Argaam
12 hours ago
- Argaam
Municipalities Ministry updates rules for advertising, signboards
The Ministry of Municipalities and Housing issued updated regulatory requirements for permanent and temporary advertising and signboards in cities across the Kingdom, aimed at encouraging investment and easing procedures for investors and beneficiaries. The move is expected to have a positive impact. The new rules cover advertising and signboards under the ministry's supervision, with the goal of attracting investment, regulating both permanent and temporary displays, and enhancing compliance standards to combat visual pollution. The requirements do not apply to advertising and signboards directed at customers inside commercial establishments, ads on mobile vehicles, screens and boards displaying product or currency prices, boards inside cinemas, or signboards for government announcements. Licensing procedures—including issuance, renewal, modification, suspension, and cancellation—must comply with the Law of Municipal Licensing Procedures and its executive regulations. Approval from the General Directorate of Traffic is required for licenses related to vehicles or trucks. Temporary promotional discount ads must be cleared by the Ministry of Commerce, while temporary real estate advertising boards require approval from the Real Estate General Authority (REGA).
Al Arabiya
15 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
India, China eye resuming border trade
India and China are discussing resuming border trade five years after it was halted, foreign ministry officials on both sides have said, as US tariffs disrupt the global trade order. Past trade across the icy and high-altitude Himalayan border passes between the neighbors was usually small in volume, but any resumption is significant for its symbolism. The two major economic powers have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia. But caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump's tariff regime, the countries have moved to mend ties. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected for talks in New Delhi on Monday, according to Indian media, after his counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar visited Beijing in July. That, as well as agreements to resume direct flights and issue tourist visas, has been seen as an effort to rebuild a relationship damaged after a deadly border clash in 2020 between their nations' troops. 'For a long time, China-India border trade cooperation has played an important role in improving the lives of people living along the border,' China's foreign ministry said in a statement to AFP on Thursday. It added that the two sides have 'reached a consensus on cross-border exchanges and cooperation, including resumption of border trade'. New Delhi's junior foreign minister, Kirti Vardhan Singh, told parliament last week that 'India has engaged with the Chinese side to facilitate the resumption of border trade'. No restart date was given by either side. Successive US administrations have seen India as a longstanding ally with like-minded interests when it comes to China. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, as well as Australia and Japan. But ties between New Delhi and Washington have been strained by Trump's ultimatum for India to end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine. The United States will double new import tariffs on India from 25 percent to 50 percent by August 27 if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to Indian media, might also visit China in late August. It would be Modi's first visit since 2018, although it has not been confirmed officially. Beijing has said that 'China welcomes Prime Minister Modi' for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit opening on August 31.
