Why is Malaysia's 1MDB scandal still casting long shadow over its economy?
Seventy per cent of the US$10 billion stolen from
Malaysia in the
1MDB corruption scandal has been recovered by Malaysia, the country's anti-corruption agency announced on Monday, following the return of US$3.2 million in assets from associates of Jho Low, the scheme's larger-than-life alleged mastermind.
Advertisement
Nearly seven years after the scandal unravelled with Low's co-conspirator and former Prime Minister
Najib Razak losing in the 2018 election, Malaysia is still seeking to recover its stolen assets linked to the sovereign wealth fund.
Authorities say the nation faces formidable legal and financial hurdles as it hunts down the balance of pilfered funds to settle 1MDB-linked repayments, which the country is burdened with until 2039.
The 1MDB logo on a billboard at the funds flagship Tun Razak Exchange under-development site in Kuala Lumpur in 2015. Photo: AFP
Background
What began as a government initiative to drive economic development through global partnerships became one of the largest financial frauds in history. Instead of boosting investment in Malaysia, 1MDB became a conduit for massive corruption and money laundering, with over 42 billion ringgit (US$9.45 billion) siphoned off.
Among the most extravagant purchases was a US$250 million 300-foot yacht Equanimity for Jho Low's personal use. Seized in Indonesian waters and later sold to recoup losses, it became a symbol of the scandal's excesses. Even more audacious was the use of stolen 1MDB funds to finance The Wolf of Wall Street, Martin Scorsese's film about financial fraud and corporate greed.
Low's lavish spending extended to giving diamond jewellery to Australian model Miranda Kerr and organising extravagant parties attended by celebrities, including American socialite Paris Hilton.
Advertisement
In June 2024, he and his family returned US$100 million worth of artwork – including pieces by famous artists Andy Warhol and Claude Monet – along with a luxury apartment in Paris as part of a settlement with US authorities. The assets were liquidated and repatriated to Malaysia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Xi sends condolences to Modi and Charles over crash
Xi sends condolences to Modi and Charles over crash Narendra Modi visits the sole crash survivor Vishwash Kumar Ramesh at a hospital in Ahmedabad. Photo: AFP Relatives try and console each other at a mortuary in Ahmedabad. Photo: AFP President Xi Jinping on Friday extended condolences to Indian President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the heavy casualties caused by the crash of an Air India flight. He also sent a message of condolences to Britain's King Charles III over the heavy British death toll. Xi's condolences came as rescue teams with sniffer dogs combed the crash site of the London-bound passenger jet that ploughed into a residential area of India's Ahmedabad city on Thursday, killing at least 265 people on board and on the ground. The airline said there were 169 Indian passengers, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian on board the flight bound for London's Gatwick airport, as well as 12 crew members. Only one person aboard the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner – carrying 242 passengers and crew – miraculously survived the fiery crash, which left the tailpiece of the aircraft jutting out of the second floor of a hostel for medical staff from a nearby hospital. The nose and front wheel landed on a canteen building where students were having lunch, witnesses said. Deputy Commissioner of Police Kanan Desai said 265 bodies had so far been counted – suggesting at least 24 people died on the ground – but the toll may rise as more body parts are recovered. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who on Friday visited the devastated neighbourhood where Air India flight 171 went down, earlier described the crash as "heartbreaking beyond words". In an unrelated development, an Air India flight from Phuket to New Delhi received an onboard bomb threat on Friday and made an emergency landing on the island, airport authorities said. All 156 passengers on flight AI 379 had been escorted from the plane, in line with emergency plans, an Airports of Thailand official said. The aircraft took off from Phuket airport bound for the Indian capital at 9.30am but made a wide loop around the Andaman Sea and landed back on the southern Thai island, according to flight tracker Flightradar24. (Xinhua/AFP/Reuters)
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Former top diplomat takes over the helm in Mongolia
Former top diplomat takes over the helm in Mongolia New Mongolian Prime Minister Gombojav Zandanshatar addresses parliament in Ulaanbaatar after being sworn in. Photo: AFP Mongolian lawmakers on Friday confirmed former top diplomat Gombojav Zandanshatar as the country's new prime minister after his predecessor resigned following weeks of anti-corruption protests. Thousands of young people have demonstrated in the capital Ulaanbaatar in recent weeks, venting frustration at wealthy elites and what they see as pervasive corruption and injustice. They called for then-prime minister Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene to step down and got their wish when he announced his resignation last week. Zandanshatar – also from Oyun-Erdene's ruling Mongolian People's Party (MPP) – was elected as his replacement in the early hours of Friday, with 108 out of 117 present voting in favour. In a speech to lawmakers following his election, he stressed "the urgent need to stabilise the economy" and "improve the income and livelihood" of citizens, according to a readout from the parliament. The 52-year-old has been a fixture on Mongolia's fractious political scene for around two decades and is seen as close to President Ukhnaa Khurelsukh. He previously served as foreign minister and chief of staff to the president, as well as parliamentary speaker when the country passed key constitutional reforms in 2019. Before its recent political crisis, Mongolia had been ruled by a three-way coalition government since elections last year resulted in a significantly reduced majority for Oyun-Erdene's MPP. But last month, the MPP evicted its second-largest member, the Democratic Party, from the coalition after some of its younger lawmakers backed calls for Oyun-Erdene's resignation. That pushed Oyun-Erdene to call a confidence vote in his own government, which he lost after Democratic Party lawmakers walked out of the chamber during the ballot. (AFP)
Asia Times
4 hours ago
- Asia Times
The power calculus driving Trump's tariffs
Despite dire predictions that US President Donald Trump's foreign policy, dominated by real and threatened manipulations of American tariffs and trade practices, US inflation rates and other measures of American economic vigor do not yet give cause for alarm. Indeed, at this writing US-China trade talks seem productive enough so that spokespersons for the European Union say they hope their trade talks take on a similar format. Trump's approach to tariffs has been anything but static—shifting abruptly like a spotlight sweeping across a stage. Yet beneath the political theater lies a calculated strategy with far-reaching implications. While critics assume tariffs invariably raise consumer prices, the reality is more nuanced. Trump's policies appear designed not just for economic leverage but as an extension of his foreign policy vision, particularly in Asia and the Western Hemisphere. Whether this constitutes strategic brilliance or overreach is debatable, but the mechanics of tariffs—and who ultimately bears their cost—demand closer scrutiny. The impact of a tariff hinges on market dynamics, competition and geopolitical leverage. Consider a US$100 product imported from Country X. If the US imposes a $25 tariff, the seller faces a choice: absorb the cost by cutting their price to $75 (keeping the consumer's total at $100) or pass the expense to buyers and risk losing market share. In competitive markets—like coffee from Colombia, Brazil, or Mexico—sellers often absorb tariffs to retain customers. But the calculus shifts when alternatives are scarce. A monopolist, such as OPEC in the oil markets, can dictate prices precisely because competitors lack the capacity to undercut them without facing ruin. This imbalance of power invites broader consequences: nations disadvantaged by such asymmetries may resort to political or even military retaliation, as nearly occurred during the 1970s oil crises. Tariffs also reshape local economies. A Mexican manufacturer facing US tariffs might offset losses by raising prices for domestic consumers or slashing wages. A Canadian auto supplier could lobby for government subsidies to preserve jobs while lowering export prices. Meanwhile, China's state-influenced exporters might reduce prices to maintain access to the elastic US market, repurposing tariff revenue for Chinese domestic projects. Trump's tariffs align with a modern revival of the Monroe Doctrine, which asserts US hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. Recent maneuvers, such as discouraging Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, signal that the administration views tariffs as both economic tools and geopolitical signals. The message is clear: the US will enforce its sphere of influence, and trade policy is one lever to do so. It is possible to imagine Trump's 'super big picture' plan as a compressed version (spanning three years) of the 150-year evolution of the British Empire, beginning with Mercantilism and culminating in free trade. At first, Trump treats the rest of the world as composed of client states, whose economies are tied tightly together with the 'mother ship', the dependent states all at first directed by force majeure to contribute to the greatness of the Metropolitan Authority. Later on, when the dependencies have grown to maturity, a managed form of free trade emerges, and wealth becomes more widely shared. Ultimately, outcomes will be determined by raw power—economic, military and diplomatic. While Trump's aggressive posture may yield short-term gains, inconsistency risks undermining his objectives. China, the primary challenger to this strategy, may currently perceive his actions as domestically focused rather than existential. But if tariffs become an erratic flicker rather than a steady beam, the US could squander its leverage. In an era where trade is war by other means, Trump's tariffs are less about economics than they are about reasserting American primacy. The question isn't whether the world will adapt—it's who will blink first.
