Energy future: Paying up front should lead to tangible savings ahead
Ofgem's approval of a £24bn investment in expanding the energy grid, and the £102 bill increase that will pay it, is an acknowledgement that cleaner, more predictable and hopefully cheaper prices in future will only come at a price today.
The investments given the green light today, £10bn of which will be spent by the three electricity grid operators in England, are fundamental to the UK's energy transition.
They will pay for new high-voltage cables, on pylons, underground and undersea, along with new substations and circuitry required to connect new renewable sources, primarily offshore wind, to the people who need it.
It is a massive and ambitious project that will ultimately cost £80bn with the goal of delivering a clean power grid.
The aim is to reduce both emissions and the UK's reliance on volatile wholesale gas markets, which both underpin electricity supply today, and set the price in the market, even when renewables provide the majority of supply.
That volatility saw domestic bills rise above £4,000 in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, prompting Liz Truss to authorise a £40bn state subsidy to cap bills at £2,500 for every household in the country.
1:57
An expansion of renewables and storage capacity alongside new nuclear should at some point in the future tip the balance so gas is no longer king in the UK market.
To get there however we are all going to have to pay upfront, in the shape of subsidies and price guarantees to incentivise the building of renewables, and the increase in "network costs" announced by Ofgem today.
Over time these investments should deliver tangible savings. These will include an end to "constraint payments" paid to power stations and wind farms to switch off in times of excess supply because the grid can't handle the load. They cost customers more than £1bn last year and are forecast to more than double before new infrastructure brings them down.
Ofgem say that will save around £80 per household, cutting the net cost expansion to just £24 per-household per-year.
The private companies delivering the investment meanwhile - National Grid in England and SSE and Scottish Power in Scotland - will receive a return on their investments of 6% on equity, an average of 5.57% on debt, and be permitted to take dividends of 3%.
A fair return says Ofgem. Consumers will want service and prices to match if they are to agree.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action
The home secretary is coming under increasing pressure to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action, as UN experts and hundreds of lawyers warned that proscribing the group would conflate protest and terrorism. In two separate letters to Yvette Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers said that proscribing the group would set a dangerous precedent. Additionally, several UN special rapporteurs, including those for protecting human rights while countering terrorism and for promoting freedom of expression, said they had contacted the UK government to say that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. On Tuesday two people were arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. Avon and Somerset police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. The Netpol lawyers' group letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, was signed by 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, including 11 KCs and 11 law professors. 'Proscription of a direct-action protest group is an unprecedented and extremely regressive step for civil liberties,' they write. 'The conflation of protest and terrorism is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. Our government has stated that it is committed to respecting the rule of law: this must include the right to protest. 'To use the Terrorism Act to ban Palestine Action from direct action would be an abuse of this legislation and an interference with the right to protest. Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Signatories of the Haldane Society letter, which will be handed to Cooper before MPs vote on Wednesday, include Michael Mansfield KC and Imran Khan KC – who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence and victims of the Grenfell Tower fire – and the Labour peer John Hendy KC. It has been signed by thousands of people including the politicians Caroline Lucas, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, the actors Adeel Akhtar and Juliet Stevenson, teachers and vicars. The letter says: 'It [a ban] would leave many ordinary members of the public vulnerable – for example, simply wearing a T-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action' would be seen as violating the proscription and action would need to be taken. 'There are many dangers to proscribing peaceful direct action groups, even if their objectives are those some of us may disagree with. Current and future governments may misuse this precedent to attack other interest groups in future, offering no avenues for peacefully venting dissent.' The prime minister, Keir Starmer, was a member of the Haldane Society but left when he became director of public prosecutions in 2008. The UN experts said: 'Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism … Protest actions that are not genuinely 'terrorist', but which involve alleged property damage, should be properly investigated as ordinary crimes or other security offences.' The Home Office referred the Guardian to Cooper's statement last week announcing the proposed ban, and comments in a press release issued on Monday in which she said that Palestine Action's acts 'do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000'.
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
No new policies in next year's budget, says Mark Drakeford
Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will try to avoid political wrangling before next year's Senedd election by writing a "neutral" told Senedd members his final budget before the election will repeat this year's spending will not pay for new policies because that "will be for political parties to put before the Welsh electorate", Drakeford said it showed the "fragility" of Labour, which runs a minority government and has lost support in recent opinion polls. A draft budget for 2026/27 will be published in October, with MSs voting on a final budget in a statement, Drakeford said he did not want to tie the hands of the next parliament by publishing spending plans in the final weeks of a five-year Senedd the cabinet had agreed to plan "a business-as-usual budget", rising in line with he added he was "open to the possibility of working with other political parties who believe a more ambitious budget could be agreed".Taxpayer funding for public services falls if the Senedd cannot pass a budget - something that would have a "catastrophic impact", Drakeford cabinet's decision to restate this year's budget "is designed to maximise the chances that that risk can be avoided", he said."The politically neutral approach I have set out this afternoon is an attempt to secure stability and certainty for our public services and for our constituents," he said. 'Loss of authority' Drakeford said the next government will inherit a £400m fund to spend on what it wants after the Labour one seat short of a majority in the Senedd chamber, Drakeford needed the support of the Senedd's sole Liberal Democrat MP to pass a budget for this financial year. The Conservatives and Plaid Cymru voted against it in polls suggest a hung parliament is likely again after next May's election, with no party winning an outright MS Sam Rowlands said the "roll-over budget" was "an acknowledgement that there is a real risk of Labour not being in government after the next Senedd election"."I believe that's an admission of fragility and loss of authority by the Labour Party here in Wales," he Cymru MS Heledd Fychan said some voluntary groups and charities "are facing perhaps closure, so will be concerned and looking to next year's budget to see if they can survive or not".
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zero-hours contacts will be illegal in two years
The government's landmark Employment Rights Bill, described by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as a significant upgrade to workers' rights, will be implemented through a phased rollout extending until 2027. Key provisions, such as a ban on exploitative zero-hours contracts and 'day-one' protections against unfair dismissal, are scheduled to come into full effect in 2027. Immediate changes upon the Bill's royal assent include the repeal of Conservative-era industrial action restrictions and new protections for striking workers. Further reforms, including enhanced sick pay, 'day-one' paternity leave, and measures to end 'fire and rehire' practices, are slated for April and October 2026. The phased approach aims to give businesses ample time to prepare, a move welcomed by business groups, while union leaders urge earlier adoption of the changes and the Conservative opposition criticises the delay.
