logo
Promoting content on social media in the UAE? Get your permit first

Promoting content on social media in the UAE? Get your permit first

Economic Times2 days ago
Agencies Social media content creators in the UAE will soon need a new permit to post advertisements online, whether they are paid or not. The Advertiser Permit is part of the country's effort to modernize media regulations, enhance the quality of advertising content, attract investment, and draw skilled professionals to the growing digital media sector.The UAE Media Council has introduced the permit, making it mandatory for anyone creating advertising content on social media, whether paid or unpaid.
What is the Advertiser Permit?
The Advertiser Permit is mandatory for anyone promoting or advertising products, services, or content on social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, or Facebook. The UAE Media Council says the permit will help create a 'trustworthy, professional, and creative media landscape' while protecting audiences from misleading or false content.The initiative is part of the UAE's broader strategy to modernize media regulations, raise content standards, and encourage the growth of the digital advertising sector.
Who needs the permit?
The permit applies to: Individuals aged 18 and above (exceptions may be made by the Media Council).
Applicants with a clean record and no previous media content violations.
UAE citizens and residents holding a valid trade licence for electronic media. Applications must be submitted through the official UAE Media Council website at uaemc.gov.ae.
Validity and fees
For UAE citizens and residents, the permit is valid for one year and renewable.
For visitors, the permit is valid for three months and can be renewed.
For the first three years, the permit is free of charge for UAE citizens and residents, supporting creators in the sector.
Visiting advertisers
Foreign content creators visiting the UAE must apply for a Visiting Advertiser Permit through licensed advertising or talent management agencies approved by the Media Council.Key details for visiting advertisers: Valid for up to three months, extendable for another similar period.
Issued only through accredited agencies operating within the UAE.
Who is exempt?
Certain individuals do not need the Advertiser Permit: Users promoting their own products or services via personal accounts or accounts belonging to their company.
Minors under 18 involved in educational, cultural, sports, or awareness content, provided the content aligns with age classifications in existing legislation.
Why does the permit matter
The Advertiser Permit is part of the UAE's strategy to ensure media regulations keep pace with global digital trends. By formalizing a framework for social media advertising, the UAE aims to attract high-quality investment in the digital advertising sector, protect audiences from misleading or harmful content, and encourage professional and creative growth among content creators.
(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. IndiGo's GIFT City unit: Simple expansion or is there more to it than meets the eye?
GST cut to benefit; but who gains the most?
Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you?
Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs.
Stock Radar: This hotel stock is showing signs of bottoming out; time to buy?
Logistics sector: Be tactical in the face of head & tailwinds; 6 logistics stocks with an upside potential of over 30%
Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 25% in 1 year
History of wealth creators: Everything should be in context, whether it is PE or PEG; on a standalone basis they mean nothing
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms
White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms

Business Standard

time4 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms

The first video posted by the White House features a montage of Trump and other administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Bloomberg The White House launched its own TikTok account on Tuesday, the latest signal of support as President Donald Trump continues to seek a sale of the social video app's US operations from Chinese company ByteDance Ltd. The first video posted by the White House features a montage of Trump and other administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and encourages viewers to follow the account. 'The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Reuters, which first reported the creation of the account. Trump has embraced TikTok after his latest presidential campaign, crediting the platform with helping him to reach young voters who backed his candidacy at higher rates compared to his previous efforts. It's a stark departure from his first term, when the president signed an executive order attempting to ban the app if ByteDance didn't divest its US operations over concerns it could endanger users' personal data. Lawmakers subsequently passed legislation forcing the sale of the app's US operations during former President Joe Biden's administration. But Trump has repeatedly delayed implementation of provisions in the law mandating the shutdown of the service as he's sought to broker a deal. It's not clear how the White House is complying with a separate law, passed during the Biden administration, which bans the use of TikTok on government devices except for law enforcement and national security research and activities. The legislation also requires the development of risk mitigation actions for any authorized use. In the Biden administration, TikTok was banned from officials' government phones — including at the White House — though the former president's campaign created an account using a staffer's personal device. In June, Trump said he had identified a buyer but that he believed a sale would be contingent on approval from Beijing and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News. 'It's a group of very wealthy people.' A deal was said to be close earlier this year, led by a consortium of US investors including Oracle Corp., Blackstone Inc. and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. But Trump has said he believes that his implementation of tariffs on Chinese goods has complicated the effort. Under Trump's latest executive order, ByteDance has until Sept. 17 to divest, though the president has extended the deadline repeatedly.

Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit
Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit

Economic Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit

Reuters A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?'The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's say minors can access gun content on InstagramMeta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.''They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022.'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.'Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. "The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all," Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.'Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post.'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. ... They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.'The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus adds Rajnikanth fan to script India AI-commerce play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India

Who is Peter Goodwin? Virginia billionaire who cheated on wife with young nanny, now in bitter divorce battle
Who is Peter Goodwin? Virginia billionaire who cheated on wife with young nanny, now in bitter divorce battle

Hindustan Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Who is Peter Goodwin? Virginia billionaire who cheated on wife with young nanny, now in bitter divorce battle

Billionaire heir Peter Goodwin has won a court battle to seal his high-stakes divorce case from public view. An Albemarle County Circuit Court judge granted his request to seal all documents related to his split from wife Cara Goodwin, a child psychologist and mother of his four children. Peter Goodwin and his wife Cara are currently in the midst of a bitter divorce. The ruling comes ahead of a scheduled August 27 hearing in Charlottesville, where the estranged couple is set to face off over allegations of adultery, money, and custody in one of Virginia's most bitter divorce fights. Court filings reveal Cara accused Peter of abandoning her on Christmas Day 2023 while she held their newborn baby, just months before more favorable terms in their prenuptial agreement were due to kick in, according to a report in The New York Post. Who is Peter Goodwin? Peter Goodwin, aged 40, is the son of billionaire businessman and philanthropist William H. Goodwin Jr. He grew up in Virginia and currently resides in Charlottesville, where the family estate is valued at $9 million. He is known for his passion for fast cars, luxury watches, and an extravagant lifestyle, with his Instagram account '@timetodrive5' showcasing sports cars, race cars, and Rolexes to nearly 17,000 followers. He married Cara in 2014, and the couple share four children together. He has been described in luxury lifestyle features as 'a real guy's guy' with a taste for classic racecars and rare Rolexes. His father: William Goodwin Jr William Goodwin is a Virginia business magnate who made his fortune through computer leasing, hospitality, and investments. He co-owned AMF Bowling, and his company, Riverstone Group, holds assets including Richmond's Jefferson Hotel, Charlottesville's Keswick Hall, and Kiawah Island Golf Resort in South Carolina. He has been a major philanthropist, donating tens of millions to education and cancer research, including a $250 million family foundation gift for medical research in 2021. Though retired, he remains active in philanthropy and land development deals across Virginia. Business holdings and net worth Peter Goodwin holds a 20 percent stake in his family's investment company, valued at just over $922 million. Additional assets push his total net worth to more than $1 billion, according to court filings reported by the Daily Mail. His wealth and inheritance put him among the richest heirs in Virginia, with access to high-end real estate, private clubs, and luxury travel. Peter Goodwin's affair with the nanny Court documents allege that Peter had an affair with Annette Lombard, who is now 27 years old. Lombard first worked for the family in 2019 as a babysitter while she was 21 and an undergraduate at the University of Virginia. During the pandemic in 2020, she moved into the Goodwin household to help care for the children, who came to view her as 'a sister.' Later that year, Peter hired her in his office and eventually promoted her to vice president. After announcing his split, Peter and Lombard allegedly 'engaged in adulterous acts' at luxury destinations including the Four Seasons in Surfside, Florida, Jackson Hole in Wyoming, and the Goodwins' Palm Beach estate. Cara Goodwin's allegations Cara, also aged 40, is a respected child clinical psychologist and author who runs the parenting advice platform Parenting Translator. In her filings, she accused Peter of announcing their divorce on Christmas Day 2023 as she held their four-month-old daughter, in front of their other three children. She also alleged he abused prescription medication and struggled with mental health during the marriage. Texts exchanged between Peter and Cara Court papers reveal bitter text exchanges between the estranged couple. Cara wrote: 'Did your family find out what really happened and that you were lying to them, too?' Peter responded: 'I offered you $45 million and a lot of custody for years of marriage. You trounce around your palace with 2 housekeepers and nanny and still think I owe you more. You can't even engage in conversation unless it's 100% what you want.' He added: 'I am far from perfect and have surely made some mistakes. I felt I didn't like the way you treated me or made me feel. People get divorced because of anger and resentment, not for some one-time thrill. You have no idea how to coparent… instead you threaten me about the schedule. Disparage me. Restrict my time with the kids… stomp on my boundaries.' The prenup battle Peter and Cara married in April 2014, and their prenuptial agreement entitled Cara to $10 million if they split before the 10-year mark. The prenup included an additional $1 million for every year beyond 10 years, capped at $50 million. By filing for divorce in January 2025—just after announcing the split—Peter ensured Cara did not reach the higher payout threshold. Despite the prenup, Cara has contested the divorce and is seeking more assets in court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store