logo
Nvidia and AMD to pay US 15% of China AI chip sales

Nvidia and AMD to pay US 15% of China AI chip sales

Irish Timesa day ago
Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices agreed to pay 15 per cent of their revenues from Chinese AI chip sales to the US government in a deal to secure export licenses, an unusual arrangement that may unnerve both US companies and Beijing.
Nvidia plans to share 15 per cent of the revenue from sales of its H20 AI accelerator in China, according to a person familiar with the matter. AMD will deliver the same share from MI308 revenues, the person added, asking for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
The arrangement reflects US president Donald Trump's consistent effort to engineer a financial pay-out for America in return for concessions on trade.
His administration has shown a willingness to relax trade conditions like tariffs in return for giant investment in the US – as with Apple Inc.'s pledge to spend $600 billion (€514 billion) on domestic manufacturing. But such a narrow, select export tax has little precedent in modern corporate history.
READ MORE
Beijing, which has grown increasingly hostile to the idea of Chinese firms deploying the H20, is unlikely to warm to the idea of a chip tax.
Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with state-run China Central Television that regularly signals Beijing's thinking about trade, on Sunday slammed the chip's supposed security vulnerabilities and inefficiency.
'This seeming quid pro quo is unprecedented from an export control perspective. The arrangement risks invalidating the national security rationale for US export controls,' said Jacob Feldgoise, a researcher at the DC-based Centre for Security and Emerging Technology.
It 'will likely undermine the US' position when negotiating with allies to implement complementary controls,' he added. 'Allies may not believe US policymakers if they are willing to trade away those same national security concerns for economic concessions – either from US companies or foreign governments.'
An Nvidia spokesperson said the company follows US export rules, adding that while it hasn't shipped H20 chips to China for months, it hopes the rules will allow US companies to compete in China. AMD didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Financial Times earlier reported the development. It followed a separate report from the same outlet that the Commerce Department had begun issuing H20 licenses last week, days after Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang met with Trump.
Huang has lobbied long and hard for the lifting of restrictions, arguing that walling China off will only slow the spread of American technology and encourage local rivals such as Huawei Technologies.
'It's a strategic bargaining chip' that tightens Washington's grip on a critical tech sphere during trade negotiations with China, said Hebe Chen, an analyst with Vantage Markets in Melbourne.
'Over time, this hurdle for chips entering China will likely deter Nvidia and AMD from deeper expansion in the world's largest chip-importing market, while giving local Chinese producers a clear edge to capture market share and accelerate domestic semiconductor innovation.'
If Washington goes ahead with the tax, it should funnel some capital to the US – but not an enormous amount in relative terms. Both Nvidia and AMD have said it'll take time to ramp back up production of their China-specific products – even if order levels return to previous levels, which is uncertain.
Nvidia raked in $4.6 billion of revenue from the H20 in the fiscal quarter ended April 27 – days after new restrictions on shipping the AI accelerator to China were imposed.
It also said it had been unable to ship $2.5 billion of H20 China revenue in that period because of the new rules. That implies it would have got more than $7 billion in H20 sales to China during the period. If it can return to that level, the US government will stand to get about a billion dollars a quarter from its deal.
AMD could generate $3 billion to $5 billion of 2025 revenue if restrictions were lifted, Morgan Stanley estimates. Chinese alternatives such as Huawei's Ascend chips now account for 20 per cent to 30 per cent of domestic demand, it reckoned.
'The US government clearly needs the money given its deficits and eagerness to collect tariffs,' said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee in Singapore.
'But the complication is China's accusations about H20 chips containing backdoors, which could be a negotiation tactic to highlight that the country is not 'hard up' for US chips.' – Bloomberg
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC after Trump order
National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC after Trump order

RTÉ News​

time10 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC after Trump order

Members of the National Guard have arrived in Washington DC a day after US President Donald Trump announced he was deploying 800 troops to the capital and temporarily taking over the city's police department. The president cast his actions as necessary to "rescue" Washington from a purported wave of lawlessness. Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since. It is the second time this summer that the Republican president has deployed troops to a city governed by Democrats. A federal trial began yesterday in San Francisco on whether Mr Trump violated US law by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom. "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," Mr Trump said yesterday. The Republican president has dismissed criticism that he is manufacturing a crisis to justify expanding presidential authority in a heavily Democratic city. Hundreds of officers and agents from over a dozen federal agencies, including the FBI, ICE, DEA and ATF, have fanned out across the city in recent days. Mr Trump said he would also send in the US military "if needed". The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Mr Trump's claims that the city is a "hellscape", saying it is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime fell 26% in the first seven months of 2025 after dropping 35% in 2024, and overall crime dropped 7%, according to the city's police department. Over the past week, Mr Trump has intensified his messaging, suggesting he might attempt to strip the city of its local autonomy and implement a full federal takeover. The District of Columbia, established in 1790, operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council. Mr Trump said last week that lawyers are examining how to overturn the law, a move that would likely require Congress to revoke it. In taking over the Metropolitan Police Department, Mr Trump invoked a section of the act that allows the president to use the force temporarily when "special conditions of an emergency nature" exist. Mr Trump said he was declaring a "public safety emergency" in the city. The deployment of National Guard troops is a tactic the president used in Los Angeles, where he dispatched 5,000 troops in June in response to protests over his administration's immigration raids. State and local officials objected to Mr Trump's decision as unnecessary and inflammatory.

What deal might emerge from the Trump-Putin summit?
What deal might emerge from the Trump-Putin summit?

RTÉ News​

time10 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

What deal might emerge from the Trump-Putin summit?

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky plan to speak with Mr Trump tomorrow amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. What kind of deal could emerge from summit? Mr Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior US diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Mr Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Mr Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Mr Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Mr Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Mr Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Mr Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Mr Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Mr Putin. What if Ukraine objects to any Trump-Putin deal? Mr Trump would face strong resistance from Mr Zelensky and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Mr Zelensky says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Mr Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Mr Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy US weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of US intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. How might a deal affect Trump's support at home? There would be big political risks in the US for Mr Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former US ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice" in Putin's attack on Ukraine. "I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure," he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Mr Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. How might Ukraine's European allies respond? EU member states have said that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store