Details behind Lucca deal as Italy striker has Napoli medical
Udinese striker Lucca will undergo medical tests with Napoli today. The Italian striker will complete a loan deal with an obligation to buy in a transfer package worth €35m.
Napoli received Lucca discount
Napoli convinced Udinese to lower their demands, as the Bianconeri initially asked for €40m, including easily achievable bonuses.
The Partenopei, however, managed to secure a slight discount and tie the bonuses to more challenging targets that could be achieved at a team level.
Surely, the defending champions would be happy to pay those bonuses at the end of the season as it would mean they have achieved important objectives in the 2025-26 season.
Busy summer transfer window for Napoli
The towering striker is expected to undergo medical tests with the Partenopei today.
Napoli have had a busy transfer window so far, having already welcomed Kevin De Bruyne and Luca Mariannucci, with Noa Lang and Sam Beukema set to be announced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Bryan Mbeumo to Manchester United: Everything you need to know
Manchester United have signed Bryan Mbeumo from Brentford for £65million with a further £6m in potential add-ons. The 25-year-old has signed a five-year deal at Old Trafford with the option of a further year. As part of this summer's transfer coverage on The Athletic, in addition to breaking news, tactical analysis and in-depth reads, our Transfers TLDR series (you can read them all here) will bring you a quick guide to each of the key deals. When he was a 14-year-old, Mbeumo, who was born in Avallon, France, a three-hour drive south from Paris, joined Troyes. He would spend the next six years at the now-Ligue 2 side making 42 senior appearances, including four games in Ligue 1. Brentford called in 2019 and it was a perfect fit. Mbeumo contributed 70 goals and 51 assists in 242 games as Thomas Frank's team won promotion to the Premier League via the play-offs in 2021 and have consolidated their place in the top flight since. Advertisement Mbeumo represented France through the age groups before committing to Cameroon, playing for them at the 2022 World Cup. Caoimhe O'Neill Now here is a player who loves being part of a sweeping counter-attacking move. Mbeumo likes pushing the ball past players before finding space for a shot or working a pass for a team-mate. He is a creator. And while he can, has and will score spectacular goals, don't expect each and every one to be so. Mbeumo has got the traditional winger-cutting-in finish on lock. He won't get past his marker every time, but when he does expect a goalscoring opportunity to emerge from a player who played in all 38 Premier League games for Brentford last season scoring 20 goals and completing eight assists. Caoimhe O'Neill In Mbeumo, United are getting a versatile, left-footed forward who is comfortable using his weaker right foot too. He is excellent at driving forward with the ball, using a combination of sprints, pauses and deft touches to outmanoeuvre defenders. Coupled with his awareness and ability to create from the half-spaces and wide areas, Mbeumo fits into the right No 10 role in Ruben Amorim's system and could play as a centre-forward if required. Mbeumo is an efficient operator. Among the 25 players who scored 10 or more Premier League goals last season, his 2.2 shots per 90 ranked 19th. But his 22.7 touches per shot and 24 per cent shot-to-goal conversion rate both ranked third, while his xG overperformance of 7.7 (20 goals from 12.3xG) was the highest. Anantaajith Raghuraman Mbeumo was sidelined for three months from December 2023 to March 2024 with an ankle problem that needed surgery. Other than that, he has been consistently available for Brentford and did not miss a match through injury in 2024-25. Cerys Jones Thomas Frank has said Mbeumo will be impossible to replace given his goal contributions in the past six seasons. 'He's a top player,' Frank said in a September 2024 press conference. 'I'm convinced he will play for a bigger club. I'd buy him if I was at a bigger club.' When Mbeumo joined Brentford for a club-record fee of £5.4million ($6.6m), Pontus Jansson, his former team-mate, remembers speaking about him to then co-director of football Rasmus Ankersen. 'He said, 'We are going to buy a young player from France, and if he is not a world-class player in a couple of years, I'm going to be very disappointed',' Jansson told The Athletic in February. 'He wasn't wrong.' Caoimhe O'Neill Manchester United have spent £65m on bringing Mbeumo to Old Trafford, with a further £6m in potential add-ons. The Cameroon forward has joined on a five-year deal, agreeing terms until June 2030 with an option of a further year. United will pay the initial £65m fee in four instalments. Mbeumo's arrival marks the second £60m-plus signing of the summer at United, after Matheus Cunha's move from Wolves in June. Mbeumo is the sixth most expensive signing in the club's history, trailing Paul Pogba, Antony, Harry Maguire, Jadon Sancho and Romelu Lukaku. Advertisement The sale represents a club record for Brentford, surpassing the £34m received from Al Ahli for Ivan Toney a year ago. Brentford have now generated over £80m in sales this summer, with Mbeumo joining Christian Norgaard and Mark Flekken in leaving. Chris Weatherspoon Assuming agent fees of 10 per cent plus a four per cent transfer levy, Mbeumo's signing adds £14.1m to United's amortisation bill in 2025-26, then £15.0m per season until the end of the 2029-30 season. While United will pay the fee in four instalments, the timing of payments doesn't materially impact their PSR calculation. The full £65m is still spread across Mbeumo's five-year contract. Mbeumo's wage at United has not been confirmed, though reports last month claimed a £250,000 weekly salary was the forward's desire. After employment-related costs, that equates to £15m in annual expenditure. Whatever the true figure, it's clear the cost of signing him will go well beyond the £74.1m in estimated fees; signing and then employing Mbeumo over his five-year contract will cost United well over £100m. For Brentford, the deal results in substantial profit. Mbeumo was signed from French side Troyes for a little under £6m in August 2019 on an initial five-year deal. He signed a four-year extension in January 2022 taking him to the end of June 2026, but his book value has reduced to less than £1m. We estimate his old club will book £64.3m in profit into their 2025-26 financial year. Chris Weatherspoon
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Premier League season tickets assessed: Most expensive? Cheapest? Do price rises affect transfer spend?
The Premier League returns next month and stadiums will be full for another season. Attendances continue to hold up, with waiting lists for season tickets across many clubs, while broadcasting revenues remain lucrative. But for regular matchgoing fans, the cost of watching their team will be difficult to stomach. Advertisement Prices for season tickets have increased markedly since the resumption of matches after the Covid-19 pandemic. This season, there has been a change in attitude, with seven clubs freezing prices for attending their 19 home league matches. However, all but one club — Crystal Palace — raised prices last term. Still, attending football remains an expensive hobby, with nine clubs charging more than £1,000 for their most expensive offerings and several others coming close to that mark. Clubs had previously expressed sympathy with fans and referenced the cost-of-living crisis while simultaneously increasing prices. This year, those reasons are less prominent, with the latest argument being that the increased cost of national insurance employer contributions has necessitated an increase in prices. Season tickets entitle fans to attend all of their club's 19 home fixtures. They are cheaper than purchasing individual match tickets, which in many cases have again been subject to price rises. Ten Premier League clubs have some form of minimum usage policy. Arsenal, Aston Villa, Brentford, Brighton & Hove Albion, Leeds United, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Sunderland and Tottenham Hotspur require a certain number of games to either be attended, the ticket to be resold via a ticket exchange, or it be transferred. West Ham United monitor non-attendance. Here, The Athletic looks at clubs' prices. This is based on the cost for a new buyer, or, in the case of clubs where there are no new tickets available, the final renewal phase. For consistency, we have used non-hospitality season ticket pricing that can be purchased via the clubs' ticketing portal. The hefty outlay many fans will have to cope with continues to raise eyebrows. At Fulham, where season tickets have reached general sale and there remains availability, the most expensive season ticket will set you back £3,084 in the Riverside Stand — an increase of £84 from last year. Arsenal (£1,726), Bournemouth (£1,164), Brighton (£1,035), Chelsea (£1,095), Tottenham (£2,223), and West Ham (£1,720) all significantly breach the £1,000 mark. Advertisement Manchester City have a premium, but not hospitality, option at £1,600 in their 93:20 area, similar to Brentford, whose Dugout seating comes in at £815, more than elsewhere in the ground but still general admission. Chelsea's Westview prices come under their 'Club Chelsea' hospitality banner, but are similar to Fulham's Riverside in that it offers the best views and access to superior facilities. These are priced between £1,745 and £4,300 and are only available on a waiting list system. Fulham, again in the Riverside Stand, charge £2,570 for juniors, although their lowest-priced under-18 ticket in the stadium is £154. West Ham's £1,720 junior ticket is also eye-watering, but they have a much cheaper option at £109. There continues to be a blurring of the lines over general admission season tickets, with more premium options being offered by clubs with small added benefits as clubs seek to increase their revenue. Burnley's prices are notable and they have been frozen. Their most expensive adult season ticket costs £525, £70 less than Ipswich Town's equivalent last season. The under-22 age band has been changed to under-21 at Turf Moor, though. Brentford have frozen their prices and outside of their slightly more premium offering of the Dugout, which provides a padded seat and access to a bar and concourse, their highest-priced adult ticket is £605. The Dugout pricing is £815. Newly promoted Sunderland, who have sold all of their season tickets, top out at £780 for their priciest adult ticket, although they have increased prices for renewals by 9.5 per cent. For the cheapest adult tickets, West Ham charge £345, slightly below Burnley (£352), Newcastle United (£362) and Bournemouth (£423). Brentford offer the lowest-priced junior ticket at just £80, Newcastle provide £81 tickets for juniors, and Bournemouth's cheapest comes in at £86. Some clubs have restrictions on where juniors can sit and use a ratio of adults to juniors in their family stands. Last season, Palace were the only club to freeze their prices, but for the new campaign, seven clubs — Brentford, Burnley, Manchester City, Liverpool, Tottenham, West Ham and Wolverhampton Wanderers — have done so. At Everton, supporters have seen prices increase by up to 21 per cent, the highest increase, but with the club moving out of Goodison Park and into the Hill Dickinson Stadium, a rise in costs for supporters was to be expected. Palace's most expensive adult ticket has risen by 9.5 per cent. Chelsea's rises are between 6.9 per cent and 15 per cent, while Brighton have raised prices by between 2.5 and 7.3 per cent for adults. For 82.5 per cent of season ticket holders at Bournemouth, there will be a 6.5 per cent increase. Nottingham Forest's are up by seven per cent. Newcastle, Manchester United and Villa have risen by five per cent. Leeds have increased theirs by four per cent, but their cheapest adult ticket has risen by 14 per cent. Aston Villa, Manchester United, Newcastle and Forest froze junior concessions in all or part of the stadium. Brentford, Burnley, Liverpool, Manchester City, West Ham and Wolves froze prices across all categories. That depends, but outside of the top Premier League clubs, the total income from gate receipts is relatively small when compared with overall turnover. Excluding the promoted clubs, Arsenal's takings from ticketing account for the highest proportion of income at 21.4 per cent. Manchester United are second with 20.7 per cent, Tottenham's is 20.4 per cent, and Chelsea's is 17.1 per cent. Advertisement Unsurprisingly, clubs with smaller stadiums have a lower proportion of their overall income made up by ticket sales. Bournemouth's is just four per cent, Brentford 6.8 per cent, Palace 7.2 per cent, Forest 7.6 per cent, while Wolves (9.1 per cent) are the final non-newly promoted club whose matchday income accounts for less than 10 per cent of their overall turnover. 'Matchday income is still a core revenue function,' Dr Dan Plumley, senior lecturer in sport finance at Sheffield Hallam University, told The Athletic last year. 'If you drop down a little bit into the lower tier of the Premier League, you'll find that broadcasting money makes up probably 60 to 70 per cent of some clubs' income. 'If you're looking at how you can generate a little bit more revenue, then moving the age brackets around, offering fewer concessions and making more people fall into what we might term a 'general bracket' — which is normally the highest priced tickets, depending on where you sit in the stadium — is one way of doing that.' Increasingly, clubs are implementing minimum usage policies for season tickets. This is done by mandating that supporters attend a certain number of games, or if they cannot attend, then sell on a ticket exchange platform. It is a policy first introduced in the Premier League by Brentford for the 2023-24 season and has now been further adopted. The rules and ramifications vary between clubs, with Manchester City's being the strictest. They require season ticket holders to personally attend at least 10 Premier League matches — something their supporters are challenging under the Equality Act. Bournemouth, Burnley, Chelsea, Palace, Everton, Fulham, Forest and Wolves have no such monitoring in place this season. Advertisement At Leeds, existing season-ticket holders were only able to renew online if they met the 80 per cent attendance threshold — 18 or more home league games in the 2024-25 season, having played in the Championship, in which you play 23 home games in a season. Spurs have reduced the senior discount by 5 per cent and the qualifying age was raised to 66, which meant a 10 per cent rise for those affected. Arsenal have introduced a 19-game Premier League season ticket to sit alongside their 23-game option, which automatically includes their four guaranteed home European matches in the Champions League, marking a change from previous years where it was opt-out only. Season-ticket holders at the Emirates who post their tickets on the ticket exchange on the day of the match will only receive their credit if the ticket is sold, but if they do so before the day of the game, they will receive their credit regardless of whether it sells. West Ham, who last year removed concession tickets from bands one to four — those seats closest to the pitch — have now reinstated those options after facing significant fan discontent. Every club is required to offer fans the chance to spread the cost of their ticket over a period of time. Half of the 20 Premier League clubs still partner with external firm V12 Retail Finance, whereas the other 10 have taken this process in-house. Generally, those using this option will end up paying more for their ticket, either by being excluded from early renewal phases or by paying interest on what is effectively a loan. Arsenal, who use V12, offer four or 10 payments with an interest rate of 4.65 per cent and 6.31 per cent; Chelsea's eight-month plan with the same company is at 6.64 per cent; Everton's in-house option for 10 or 12 months has a £55 'facility fee'; Fulham have plans between four and 10 months with an interest rate of between 4.46 per cent and 7.32 per cent. Advertisement Leeds' offering for six or 10 payments with V12 is charged at 5.36 per cent and 7.32 per cent. Liverpool's 10-month plan has a 7.32 per cent interest rate, while Manchester United's is 6.31 per cent — both via V12. Forest's four and 10-month plans with V12 have a 9.80 per cent rate. At West Ham, the same options have a fee of 4.46 per cent and 7.32 per cent. Palace offer a 10 equal payment plan with no administration fees or interest. However, those supporters are only eligible to renew from phase two, where prices are approximately 7.5 per cent higher. But this is not a price hike for those who buy for the first time, as they are only eligible after renewals close. All other Premier League clubs do not charge a fee for their payment plan options. Most clubs have moved to a digital-first or digital-only approach. This is the direction of travel, initiated by the Premier League, which stipulated that it will be mandatory — 70 per cent of all tickets must be delivered digitally — by the start of the 2026-27 season. Newly promoted clubs will have two years to implement its use. Clubs must provide reasonable adjustments for fans who, through disability, are unable to use digital ticketing, meaning a small subset of supporters will still use physical or e-tickets, but many face the hurdle of an application process. Environmental concerns are occasionally cited, but more prominently, the Premier League and its clubs argue the shift to digital ticketing is to better determine who is in the ground and reduce touting. When approached by The Athletic, the Premier League offered no hard evidence that touting has been reduced by digital ticketing. However, it says it is reviewing support for clubs' anti-touting operations. It says physical tickets are easy to sell on, while print-at-home tickets with barcodes can be printed multiple times and sold to people who then can't access a stadium. The Premier League points out rotating or hidden barcodes mean digital tickets can't be screenshotted and sold multiple times, as they must be refreshed before going into the stadium. The direction of travel with season tickets is clear. Clubs continue to find ways to maximise revenue at the cost of matchgoing supporters. Changes to pricing structures this year have been minimal and far less controversial, but more clubs have introduced minimum attendance rules and sought to make their offerings more attractive without pricing supporters out completely. For a small but important section of season ticket holders, digital ticketing is a major concern. Supporters will question whether there is a genuine need to increase prices, but clubs seem destined to keep finding ways to raise more income from match-going supporters.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What number will Von Miller wear for the Commanders and why?
Von Miller's one-year deal with the Washington Commanders became official on Monday when he reported to Ashburn to sign his contract ahead of training camp. So, what number will Miller wear for the Commanders in 2025? Miller will wear No. 24 next season, the same number he shared on his Instagram page last when he broke the news that he signed with Washington. Why No. 24? Miller spoke with Nicki Jhabvala of The Washington Post and explained. Miller gave three reasons for wanting to wear No. 24. In a way to acknowledge his mentor and friend, Hall of Fame cornerback Champ Bailey, he'll wear the number that Bailey wore for his entire career, which included five years in Washington. Miller's first three NFL seasons coincided with Bailey's final three seasons with the Broncos. Miller wore No. 58 for the first 11 seasons of his career until he was traded to the Los Angeles Rams at the 2021 NFL trade deadline. He wore No. 40 during his time with the Rams and with the Buffalo Bills, where he played the last three seasons. It will be strange to see an edge rusher wearing No. 24 for the Commanders. Several players have worn No. 24 since Bailey departed after the 2003 season, most notably Shawn Springs, Josh Norman and Antonio Gibson. Cornerback Michael Davis wore the number in 2024, his only season with the Commanders. This article originally appeared on Commanders Wire: Von Miller picks his number for the Commanders and explains why
