logo
The new middle-class tax revolt

The new middle-class tax revolt

Times5 days ago
Hundreds of thousands of savers are making big changes to the way that they make and spend money for one simple reason: tax.
Some are cutting the hours they work, while others are turning down promotions, giving their pensions away to family members or even considering leaving the country — all because of frozen tax thresholds and upcoming tax changes.
The phenomenon known as fiscal drag — where more people pay more tax as wages increase because tax thresholds remain frozen — means that 6 million more people will pay income tax this tax year than in 2021-22. Almost 7.1 million workers are now in the higher income tax band, up 2.6 million since 2021-22, and the number of additional-rate payers has almost doubled to 1.2 million.
Collectively, we're set to pay £298.6 billion in income tax in 2025-26 — an extra £89 billion compared with four years ago, the latest government figures show, and this is set to rise further because income tax thresholds will remain frozen until at least 2028. We're also on track to pay £6 billion in tax on our savings and £18.6 billion on dividends.
'Fiscal drag has had a devastating impact on the tax we pay. These figures show just how much damage is being done to our finances by this horrible stealth tax — and there is plenty more to come,' said Sarah Coles from the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown.
So it's no wonder that some families are shaking up their financial behaviour to avoid bigger tax bills. We spoke to four to find out how.
Income tax thresholds have been frozen since 2021, and even those on relatively modest wages are now being dragged into the higher-rate 40 per cent band that is applied to earnings above £50,270 a year.
For families this comes with an added sting in the tail because they start to lose their child benefit entitlement not far above this threshold. Child benefit is worth £26.05 a week for the first child and £17.25 a week for other children, but once one parent earns above £60,000 a year of adjusted income, you have to repay 1 per cent for every £200 earned over that threshold. Once one parent earns £80,000 you get nothing.
Justin King, 55, a financial planner from Christchurch in Dorset, reduced his working hours to ensure that he was still eligible for child benefit, worth about £2,250 a year for Olivia, 16, and Amy, 14.
'I had the option to work more, but the extra income would have been largely eroded by higher tax and the loss of child benefit. When I weighed it up, it just didn't seem worth missing out on time with my family,' he said.
Because eligibility for child benefit is based on adjusted net income — your earnings after pension contributions and certain tax reliefs have been deducted — there are ways you can avoid this trap. Dean Butler from the life insurer Standard Life said: 'Higher earners could consider increasing their pension contributions to reduce their adjusted net income below £80,000. This way you could get some or all of your child benefit back, while also saving for your future.'
• Why high earners are cutting their pay (clue: it's about 600% tax)
There is evidence that more people are doing exactly this. There has been a steep increase in the number of taxpayers with adjusted earnings that are between £1 and £3,000 below the threshold — almost 1 million, up from 893,000 a year earlier, according to HM Revenue & Customs data.
King has started to increase his working hours again now his children are older and the child benefit threshold has been raised — it was £50,000 until April 2024 and went up to £60,000. He said: 'As a financial planner, I often encourage clients to make life choices based on their values, and at that point, family time mattered more to me than extra income. You need to do your sums and work out whether that extra day's work may be more valuable to you and your family than contributing to the Treasury.'
Salary sacrifice is another way to reduce your earnings. Offered by some workplaces, it means agreeing to reduce your salary by a certain amount in exchange for extra benefits such as pension contributions. It means you also save on national insurance payments because you 'give up' part of your salary to go into your pension.
'It's important to note, however, that salary sacrifice can harm mortgage applications and reduce payments based on salary, such as maternity pay, so it might not be right for everyone,' Butler said.
• How free nursery hours for more children backfired
The £100,000 cliff-edge is the most punitive threshold in the UK tax system, with workers in this band facing a marginal tax rate (the amount you pay on the next £1 earned) of 62 per cent.
For every £2 you earn above £100,000 you lose £1 of your £12,570 personal allowance (the amount you can earn each year before paying tax), with the allowance cut to nothing by the time you earn £125,140.
It gets worse for families: once one parent earns above £100,000 a year in adjusted net income, they are no longer eligible for tax-free childcare (a government-backed savings account for nursery fees worth up to £2,000 a year per child) and they lose entitlement to free childcare hours.
Parents with children aged between nine months and two years can get between 15 and 30 hours of childcare funded by the government during term time (rising to 30 for all children aged nine months and up from September). Parents of three and four-year-olds can get 30 free hours. With an average full-time nursery place for a child under two costing £341 a week in England, this can be a vital lifeline.
Once you earn more than £100,000 in adjusted net income you lose the free hours for younger children entirely, and only get 15 hours for three and four-year-olds.
Emily Farmer, 32, from Hampshire, had always aimed to earn £100,000 in her career in marketing, but since her daughter Olivia was born 11 months ago, she has reduced her working hours because it's simply not worth earning more.
'Reaching £100,000 always felt like a career milestone for me, but after having my daughter and nearing this threshold, I made the strategic decision to move to a four-day week,' Farmer said. 'It's a shame to have to sacrifice career progression to make my family finances work.'
Making extra pension contributions can also help workers at this cliff-edge reduce their take-home pay and avoid punitive marginal tax rates, Butler said. 'This could also help you recover some or all of your personal allowance, depending on how much you put in.'
Savers can put up to £60,000 a year into a pension, including tax relief, or 100 per cent of their earnings, whichever is lower. This can be particularly valuable when employer contributions are factored in. However, it is important to consider whether you may need the money early because it is not usually possible to get at your pension savings before 55 (rising to 57 from April 2028) without incurring a large tax bill.
• I spend £200 a week on summer holiday childcare
From April 2027 pensions are set to be included as part of an estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes, and this has upended many peoples' financial plans.
Defined contribution pensions (when your pot is based on what you pay in plus investment growth) are exempt from inheritance tax, but with this set to change, many savers are rushing to give away their wealth to avoid a 40 per cent IHT bill when they die.
The tax is paid on estates worth more than £325,000 (£500,000 if they include a main home left to a direct descendant on estates worth up to £2 million). Couples who are married or in a civil partnership can inherit each other's allowances, meaning up to £1 million can be passed on IHT-free. Just under 5 per cent of estates pay IHT in the UK, but this is expected to rise to 8 per cent after 2027, according to HMRC.
Alistair Dickson is concerned that the changes could leave his children with an unwelcome tax bill and is making plans to pass his wealth on as tax-efficiently as possible, including considering putting his house into trust.
Dickson, 57, who lives in Glasgow, is also spending more, using his annual gifting allowance, and is even exploring the idea of moving to Portugal, which has a favourable tax set-up.
Everyone in the UK can give away up to £3,000 a year and it won't count as part of your estate for IHT purposes. You can also make small gives of up to £250 per person, as long as they also haven't benefited from the £3,000 allowance. It is possible to give away much larger sums IHT-free as long as you live for seven years afterwards, after which the gift will no longer be counted as part of your estate.
• Surge in wealthy using insurance to beat inheritance tax hit
You can also give away unlimited regular amounts out of surplus income, as long as it does not affect your standard of living and you keep records to show a pattern of giving. The money must come from income such as earnings, rent, pensions or an annuity, and not from savings.
Adrian Murphy from the financial advice firm Murphy Wealth said: 'For years it was assumed that pensions would be the last port of call for income in retirement — or might never be touched at all — and most of it would find its way to your children,. But that has now changed. This will only drive more people to give assets away or look at alternative strategies.'
Proposed changes to the Isa system are causing more savers to alter their plans. Adults can save up to £20,000 a year into an Isa, in cash or investments, or a mix of both, but it is thought that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, may slash the cash Isa limit in her October budget, in a bid to encourage more people to invest.
The uncertainty could be having the opposite effect. Savers poured a record £14 billion into cash Isas in April, according to the Bank of England.
Rob Mack usually invests about £500 a month but has been funnelling any spare money into his cash Isa in case the allowance is cut. Mack, 50, from north London, has saved £5,000 so far this tax year and hopes to use as much of the £20,000 allowance as possible before the budget.
'We've made some adjustments to our family finances, moving savings into cash Isas to keep them accessible and tax-efficient. It's essential to have quick access to funds when unexpected expenses arise, like a car repair or a boiler breakdown,' he said.
Murphy is advising clients to use the changes as a starting point to review their investments: 'Cash saving in most cases should be for emergencies and short-term liabilities or expenditure.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liverpool complete signing of Hugo Ekitike after seeing off late Man United interest
Liverpool complete signing of Hugo Ekitike after seeing off late Man United interest

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Liverpool complete signing of Hugo Ekitike after seeing off late Man United interest

The Frenchman, whose fee could rise to £79m depending on bonuses, has signed a six-year contract at Anfield after passing a medical. Liverpool saw off late interest from Manchester United for the 23-year-old, while Newcastle had offered £70m for Ekitike, which Eintracht rejected. The former Paris Saint-Germain forward, who told United he had no interest in joining them when director of recruitment Christopher Vivell contacted Frankfurt, was a long-term target for Liverpool, who had been in contact with his representatives for six months, while Arne Slot spoke to him at the end of the season. Ekitike becomes Liverpool's fourth major summer signing and takes their spending to £250m – and up to £300m, including potential add-ons and the deal for Giorgi Mamardashvili, which was sealed last summer. and full-backs Milos Kerez and Jeremie Frimpong. Liverpool had also made an inquiry for Alexander Isak, who Newcastle did not want to sell, but believe they were pursuing Ekitike before the Carabao Cup winners turned to him after failing in attempts to sign Liam Delap and Joao Pedro, who both joined Chelsea instead. But they were reluctant to get involved in an auction and waited before making a late move, as they had when they took the Tottenham target Luis Diaz from Porto in 2022. Liverpool see Ekitike as a multi-functional forward who, though largely a No 9, can also play in deeper and wider roles and think that only Erling Haaland and Kylian Mbappe have shown more potential among strikers of such age. Ekitike scored 22 goals for Eintracht last season, though Liverpool believe his impact was greater than that and he has the potential to become more prolific.

Liverpool confirm £79m signing of striker Hugo Ekitike as Reds' summer spending passes £290MILLION
Liverpool confirm £79m signing of striker Hugo Ekitike as Reds' summer spending passes £290MILLION

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Liverpool confirm £79m signing of striker Hugo Ekitike as Reds' summer spending passes £290MILLION

Liverpool have confirmed the £79million signing of striker Hugo Ekitike. The Eintracht Frankfurt No 9 is expected to join up with the squad in Hong Kong in the next 48 hours for training sessions but is unlikely to play in Saturday's fixture against AC Milan. Ekitike, 23, joins on a six-year contract and has been on Liverpool's radar for some years, with Mail Sport first revealing in March that he was a top target. Liverpool have been in contact with Ekitike since January and Arne Slot informed the Frenchman of his intention to sign him at the end of the season just gone. The Reds' data tests showed that no one other than Erling Haaland and Kylian Mbappe scored higher in their data tests for No 9s. Slot's men do see him as a central striker but acknowledge that he can play off the wings too. The package is a £69m base fee plus £10m in add-ons which are based on team and player performance. The Frenchman has joined on a six-year deal and underwent his medical on Tuesday. Sporting director Richard Hughes has remained in the UK for now to finalise this transfer after Arne Slot's squad departed for the Far East on Sunday night after beating Stoke 5-0 in a behind-closed-doors game at the AXA Training Base in Kirkby. The champions played two different starting line-ups before and after half-time and Florian Wirtz, the club record addition, got his first competitive action for the club following his £116million move from Bayer Leverkusen. The likes of Jeremine Frimpong, Milos Kerkez and Giorgi Mamardashvili have also featured, having joined for £29.5m, £40m and £29m respectively. Those four signings have taken the Reds' summer spending past £290m as they continue to splash the cash and look to improve on a season that saw them become Premier League champions for a second time. Last week, Newcastle had an offer of £70m rejected for Ekitike, which fell £16m short of his release clause. Liverpool have also been linked with a move for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak but that move remains in question, especially after the major outplay for the France Under 21 international. Last season Ekitike scored 22 goals in 48 games for Frankfurt in all competitions, with 15 of those strikes coming in the Bundesliga. He was also named in the Bundesliga team of the season following a hugely impressive campaign. Ekitike was previously at Paris Saint-Germain, initially on loan from Reims before joining permanently. However, he only made 33 appearances for PSG in total and scored four goals. Liverpool have already been heavily active in the transfer market this summer, with several familiar faces leaving Anfield in a summer of churn. Trent Alexander-Arnold joined Real Madrid, while Jarell Quansah signed for Bayer Leverkusen and Caoimhin Kelleher made the switch to Brentford. The Reds are also expected to sell a number of stars before the window closes, with the likes of Darwin Nunez, Luis Diaz and Harvey Elliot all heavily linked with moves away.

Wise's U.S. move proposals face fresh opposition from shareholder advisers
Wise's U.S. move proposals face fresh opposition from shareholder advisers

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Wise's U.S. move proposals face fresh opposition from shareholder advisers

July 23 (Reuters) - A shareholder adviser group, Glass Lewis, expressed new concerns about UK-based money transfer company Wise's plans to change its primary listing to the U.S., just days before a shareholder meeting, and another adviser, PIRC, said that it opposed the plans. In a statement made public on Monday, Wise's (WISEa.L), opens new tab second-biggest shareholder, Skaala Investments, urged other shareholders to vote against proposals to move the company's primary listing to the U.S. from London, because the plans also included an extension to its dual share structure, which it said was "buried" in the proposals. On Tuesday, shareholder adviser Glass Lewis updated its report in light of Skaala's statement, and added its own concerns about the proposed extension of the dual share structure, according to a copy of the report seen by Reuters. Glass Lewis said in its report that share structures with unequal voting rights are "typically not in the best interests of common shareholders" and that it was "concerned" by the structure being extended. But, it said, the governance issue alone was not enough for it to recommend voting against Wise's U.S. move proposal overall, which it still supported. Skaala had said that the changes to the shareholder structure would entrench "disproportionate power in the hands of a few", including Wise's CEO. A spokesperson for Wise said on Monday that shareholders were "overwhelmingly in favour" of the proposal and that its process was fair. Wise cited the backing of proxy advisors including ISS, Glass Lewis and PIRC, and said that the dual-class share structure is essential for the company's success. On Wednesday, a spokesperson for PIRC said that Wise's statement was incorrect, and that it had expressed its opposition to Wise's plans in a report on July 15. PIRC's report recommends voting against the proposals, on the grounds that the move "raises concerns about a reduced commitment to UK corporate governance standards." "UK listing regime offers strong shareholder protections, disclosure requirements, and board accountability. Relocating to jurisdictions with less stringent oversight may weaken these safeguards," said PIRC's report, which was seen by Reuters. A spokesperson for Wise said that the company only became aware of PIRC's opposition on Wednesday, and that it maintains that shareholders are still "overwhelmingly in favour" of the plans. ISS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Shareholders are voting on the issue ahead of a meeting on Monday 28 July.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store