Nepa Rudraksha Collaborates with Ajay Devgn: Exploring Authentic Spirituality
Speaking about the collaboration with Ajay Devgn, Sukritya says,
'This is not a celebrity endorsement—it's a spiritual alignment. Ajay Devgn brings authenticity to the message we're trying to deliver. He's a devotee of Shiva, and that devotion reflects in how he connects with Rudraksha.'
Nepa Rudraksha which has roots in Vedic tradition since 1973, is embarking on a new phase with actor Ajay Devgn's involvement.
This collaboration is presented as a meaningful partnership built on shared values, trust, and a personal connection upholding the commitment to authenticity and service established by the company's founder, Mr. Balaram Khatiwada, a priest at the revered Pashupatinath Temple, and the current Chairman, Mr. Mukunda Khatiwada..
Ajay Devgn, known for his compelling screen presence, is also a devoted follower of Lord Shiva. His spiritual inclination is described as private and grounded. With a Shiva tattoo and a personal reverence for Rudraksha, Devgn resonates with Nepa's focus on authenticity, inner strength, and conviction.
A brand spokesperson indicated that Devgn's association reflects the brand's identity, with his devotion aligning with the values Nepa has maintained for over five decades.
Nepa Rudraksha has always aimed to prioritise sincerity. The brand's initial goal was to provide authentic Rudraksha beads globally. They currently serve customers in over 100 countries, aiming to make spiritual tools accessible, traceable, and meaningful.
Each Rudraksha bead from Nepa is sourced from the Arun Valley in Nepal and is certified through X-ray testing and quality standards like IRL and ISO 9001:2005. The brand's AAA Standard is presented as a guarantee of purity,giving spiritual seekers confidence in what they're receiving.
The partnership with Ajay Devgn is supported by a short film that depicts a seeker's inner journey. The Siddha Mala, Rudra bracelet, and the Dhanveer Bracelet featured in the film are presented as elements of spiritual practice.
How This Campaign Stands Apart
This campaign is described as taking a different approach from typical marketing efforts. It is rooted in what is called Sanatana, an inner conviction.
While Rudraksha remains Nepa's primary offering, the brand has expanded its range to include malas customised to individual needs, bracelets designed for daily wear, and spiritual tools like yantras and puja kits. These offerings are supported by educational resources, including books authored by Sukritya Khatiwada, Nepa's CEO and a third-generation Vedic Expert.
Nepa has also introduced a members-only Sadhana app, a digital digital platform for practitioners to deepen their spiritual practice. This is intended to provide long-term spiritual support beyond products.
This collaboration is viewed as reaffirming Nepa's belief that spirituality can be both timeless and personal when approached thoughtfully.
With Ajay Devgn's involvement, Nepa Rudraksha aims to invite individuals to explore the meaning of a sacred bead as a companion on a spiritual path.
Note to the Reader: This article is part of Mint' promotional consumer connect initiative and is independently created by the brand. Mint assumes no editorial responsibility for the content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
11 hours ago
- Business Standard
Prayag India Adds Colour to Kitchens and Bathrooms with New CP Faucets
VMPL New Delhi [India], July 30: PRAYAG INDIA, a leading manufacturer of premium bath and kitchen fittings and plumbing solutions, announces the launch of its latest innovation--the CP Faucet Colour Range. This new collection brings a refreshing twist to traditional chrome-plated designs, offering customers an elegant spectrum of colour options that are as functional as they are visually striking. With an increasing demand for personalised and design-forward spaces, Prayag's CP Faucet Colour Range has been thoughtfully curated to meet the evolving tastes of homeowners, architects, and interior designers. Available in a selection of sophisticated finishes--including classic chrome, matte black, and brushed tones--the range is designed to complement a wide variety of interior themes, from minimalistic to bold and contemporary. These faucets not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of bathrooms and kitchens but also maintain the high standards of quality and durability that Prayag is known for. Crafted using state-of-the-art manufacturing technology, the faucets are engineered for long-lasting performance. The advanced colour coatings are resistant to corrosion and wear, ensuring that the finish retains its brilliance over time. The design philosophy behind this new launch emphasises both beauty and practicality, with every product tested to meet rigorous quality benchmarks. With over four decades of experience, Prayag India continues to shape the future of Indian bath and kitchen solutions through innovation, quality craftsmanship, and sustainable practices. The launch of the CP Faucet Colour Range is another step in this journey, reaffirming the brand's commitment to creating products that are both contemporary in style and uncompromising in performance. The complete CP Faucet Colour Range is now available across Prayag's retail network and can also be explored online at About PRAYAG INDIA: Prayag India, established in 1986 under the visionary leadership of Late Shri V.K. Aggarwal, has evolved into a leading manufacturer of sanitaryware and plumbing solutions in India. Headquartered in New Delhi, the company operates two state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities in Bhiwadi, Rajasthan, each spanning 12,000 square meters. These facilities are equipped with advanced machinery, including core shooter machines, IMR casting furnaces, multi-head machining centers, injection moulding machines, and an in-house chrome plating plant, ensuring the production of high-quality products that meet international standards. Prayag's dedication to excellence is further demonstrated by its adherence to ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004 E certifications, reflecting its commitment to quality management and environmental responsibility.
Indian Express
16 hours ago
- Indian Express
With AI plan, Trump keeps chipping away at a foundational environmental law
When President Donald Trump rolled out a plan to boost artificial intelligence and data centers, a key goal was wiping away barriers to rapid growth. And that meant taking aim at the National Environmental Policy Act — a 55-year-old, bedrock law aimed at protecting the environment through a process that requires agencies to consider a project's possible impacts and allows the public to be heard before a project is approved. Data centers, demanding vast amounts of energy and water, have aroused strong opposition in some communities. The AI Action Plan Trump announced last week would seek to sweep aside NEPA, as it's commonly known, to streamline environmental reviews and permitting for data centers and related infrastructure. Republicans and business interests have long criticized NEPA for what they see as unreasonable slowing of development, and Trump's plan would give 'categorical exclusions' to data centers for 'maximum efficiency' in permitting. A spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality said the administration is 'focused on driving meaningful NEPA reform to reduce the delays in federal permitting, unleashing the ability for America to strengthen its AI and manufacturing leadership. 'Trump's administration has been weakening the law for months.'It's par for the course for this administration. The attitude is to clear the way for projects that harm communities and the environment,' said Erin Doran, senior staff attorney at environmental nonprofit Food & Water Watch. Here's what to know about this key environmental law, and Trump's effort to weaken it: NEPA is a foundational environmental law in the United States, 'essentially our Magna Carta for the environment,' said Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, another environmental group, referring to the 13th century English legal text that formed the basis for constitutions worldwide. Signed into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970, NEPA requires federal agencies proposing actions such as building roads, bridges or energy projects to study how their project will affect the environment. Private companies are also frequently subject to NEPA standards when they apply for a permit from a federal agency. In recent years, the law has become increasingly important in requiring consideration of a project's possible contributions to climate change. 'That's a really important function because otherwise we're just operating with blinders just to get the project done, without considering whether there are alternative solutions that might accomplish the same objective, but in a more environmentally friendly way,' Park said. But business groups say NEPA routinely blocks important projects that often take five years or more to complete.'Our broken permitting system has long been a national embarrassment,' said Marty Durbin, president of the U.S. Chamber's Global Energy Institute. He called NEPA 'a blunt and haphazard tool' that too often is used to block investment and economic development. The White House proposal comes as Congress is working on a permitting reform plan that would overhaul NEPA, addressing long-standing concerns from both parties that development projects — including some for clean energy — take too long to be approved. NEPA's strength — and usefulness — can depend on how it's interpreted by different a Republican, sought to weaken NEPA in his first term by limiting when environmental reviews are required and limiting the time for evaluation and public comment. Former Democratic President Joe Biden restored more rigorous reviews. In his second term, Trump has again targeted the law. An executive order that touched on environmental statutes has many agencies scrapping the requirement for a draft environmental impact statement. And the CEQ in May withdrew Biden-era guidance that federal agencies should consider the effects of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions when conducting NEPA reviews. Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court in May narrowed the scope of environmental reviews required for major infrastructure projects. In a ruling involving a Utah railway expansion project aimed at quadrupling oil production, the court said NEPA wasn't designed 'for judges to hamstring new infrastructure and construction projects.' 'It's been a rough eight months for NEPA,' said Dinah Bear, a former general counsel at the Council on Environmental Quality under both Democratic and Republican presidents. John Ruple, a research professor of law at the University of Utah, said sidelining NEPA could actually slow things down. Federal agencies still have to comply with other environmental laws, like the Endangered Species Act or Clean Air Act. NEPA has an often overlooked benefit of forcing coordination with those other laws, he said. Some examples of cases where NEPA has played a roleA botanist by training, Mary O'Brien was working with a small organization in Oregon in the 1980s to propose alternative techniques to successfully replant Douglas fir trees that had been clear-cut on federal lands. Aerially sprayed herbicides aimed at helping the conifers grow have not only been linked to health problems in humans but were also killing another species of tree, red alders, that were beneficial to the fir saplings, O'Brien said. The U.S. Forest Service had maintained that the herbicides' impact on humans and red alders wasn't a problem. But under NEPA, a court required the agency to redo their analysis and they ultimately had to write a new environmental impact statement. 'It's a fundamental concept: 'Don't just roar ahead.' Think about your options,' O'Brien said.O'Brien, who later worked at the Grand Canyon Trust, also co-chaired a working group that weighed in on a 2012 Forest Service proposal, finalized in 2016, for aspen restoration on Monroe Mountain in Utah. Hunters, landowners, loggers and ranchers all had different opinions on how the restoration should be handled. She said NEPA's requirement to get the public involved made for better research and a better plan.'I think it's one of the laws that's the most often used by the public without the public being aware,' said Stephen Schima, senior legislative counsel at environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. 'NEPA has long been the one opportunity for communities and impacted stakeholders and local governments to weigh in.'Schima said rolling back the power of NEPA threatens the scientific integrity of examining projects' full impacts. 'Decisions are going to be less informed by scientific studies, and that is one of the major concerns here,' he said. Ruple said uncertainty from NEPA changes and competing opinions on how to comply with the law's requirements may invite even more litigation.'And all of this will fall on the shoulder of agencies that are losing the staff needed to lead them through these changes,' he said.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
With AI plan, Trump keeps chipping away at a foundational environmental law
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills When President Donald Trump rolled out a plan to boost artificial intelligence and data centers, a key goal was wiping away barriers to rapid that meant taking aim at the National Environmental Policy Act - a 55-year-old, bedrock law aimed at protecting the environment though a process that requires agencies to consider a project's possible impacts and allows the public to be heard before a project is approved. Data centers, demanding vast amounts of energy and water, have aroused strong opposition in some AI Action Plan Trump announced last week would seek to sweep aside NEPA, as it's commonly known, to streamline environmental reviews and permitting for data centers and related infrastructure. Republicans and business interests have long criticized NEPA for what they see as unreasonable slowing of development, and Trump's plan would give "categorical exclusions" to data centers for "maximum efficiency" in permitting.A spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality said the administration is "focused on driving meaningful NEPA reform to reduce the delays in federal permitting, unleashing the ability for America to strengthen its AI and manufacturing leadership."Trump's administration has been weakening the law for months."It's par for the course for this administration. The attitude is to clear the way for projects that harm communities and the environment," said Erin Doran, senior staff attorney at environmental nonprofit Food & Water is a foundational environmental law in the United States, "essentially our Magna Carta for the environment," said Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, another environmental group, referring to the 13th century English legal text that formed the basis for constitutions into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970, NEPA requires federal agencies proposing actions such as building roads, bridges or energy projects to study how their project will affect the environment. Private companies are also frequently subject to NEPA standards when they apply for a permit from a federal recent years, the law has become increasingly important in requiring consideration of a project's possible contributions to climate change."That's a really important function because otherwise we're just operating with blinders just to get the project done, without considering whether there are alternative solutions that might accomplish the same objective, but in a more environmentally friendly way," Park business groups say NEPA routinely blocks important projects that often taken five years or more to complete."Our broken permitting system has long been a national embarrassment,'' said Marty Durbin, president of the US Chamber's Global Energy Institute. He called NEPA "a blunt and haphazard tool" that too often is used to block investment and economic White House proposal comes as Congress is working on a permitting reform plan that would overhaul NEPA, addressing long-standing concerns from both parties that development projects -- including some for clean energy -- take too long to be strength - and usefulness - can depend on how it's interpreted by different a Republican, sought to weaken NEPA in his first term by limiting when environmental reviews are required and limiting the time for evaluation and public comment. Former Democratic President Joe Biden restored more rigorous his second term, Trump has again targeted the executive order that touched on environmental statutes has many agencies scrapping the requirement for a draft environmental impact statement. And the CEQ in May withdrew Biden-era guidance that federal agencies should consider the effects of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions when conducting NEPA the US Supreme Court in May narrowed the scope of environmental reviews required for major infrastructure projects. In a ruling involving a Utah railway expansion project aimed at quadrupling oil production, the court said NEPA wasn't designed "for judges to hamstring new infrastructure and construction projects.""It's been a rough eight months for NEPA," said Dinah Bear, a former general counsel at the Council on Environmental Quality under both Democratic and Republican Ruple, a research professor of law at the University of Utah, said sidelining NEPA could actually slow things down. Federal agencies still have to comply with other environmental laws, like the Endangered Species Act or Clean Air Act. NEPA has an often overlooked benefit of forcing coordination with those other laws, he examples of cases where NEPA has played a role A botanist by training, Mary O'Brien was working with a small organization in Oregon in the 1980s to propose alternative techniques to successfully replant Douglas fir trees that had been clear-cut on federal lands. Aerially sprayed herbicides aimed at helping the conifers grow have not only been linked to health problems in humans but were also killing another species of tree, red alders, that were beneficial to the fir saplings, O'Brien US Forest Service had maintained that the herbicides' impact on humans and red alders wasn't a problem. But under NEPA, a court required the agency to redo their analysis and they ultimately had to write a new environmental impact statement."It's a fundamental concept: 'Don't just roar ahead.' Think about your options," O'Brien said.O'Brien, who later worked at the Grand Canyon Trust, also co-chaired a working group that weighed in on a 2018 Forest Service proposal, finalized in 2016, for aspen restoration on Monroe Mountain in Utah. Hunters, landowners, loggers and ranchers all had different opinions on how the restoration should be handled. She said NEPA's requirement to get the public involved made for better research and a better plan."I think it's one of the laws that's the most often used by the public without the public being aware," said Stephen Schima, senior legislative counsel at environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. "NEPA has long been the one opportunity for communities and impacted stakeholders and local governments to weigh in."Schima said rolling back the power of NEPA threatens the scientific integrity of examining projects' full impacts."Decisions are going to be less informed by scientific studies, and that is one of the major concerns here,'' he said uncertainty from NEPA changes and competing opinions on how to comply with the law's requirements may invite even more litigation."And all of this will fall on the shoulder of agencies that are losing the staff needed to lead them through these changes," he said.
