logo
Powell's Successor May Struggle to Deliver the Rate Cuts Trump Wants

Powell's Successor May Struggle to Deliver the Rate Cuts Trump Wants

Yahoo4 days ago
(Bloomberg) -- Close Federal Reserve watchers have a message for anyone who thinks the next leader of the US central bank will deliver lower borrowing costs on a silver platter: Don't count on it.
Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back
Can Americans Just Stop Building New Highways?
Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort
Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA
Philadelphia Trash Piles Up as Garbage Workers' Strike Drags On
While it's an unlikely outcome, some investors have staked out positions in futures markets that will profit if interest rates drop immediately after Jerome Powell's term as chair ends in May 2026. The trade has been fueled by President Donald Trump's pledge to nominate 'somebody that wants to cut rates.'
Those investors have targeted futures contracts linked to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, which closely tracks the benchmark federal funds rate. They've sold off contracts that expire prior to Powell's exit and piled into contracts that expire just after the expected arrival of a Trump-appointed chair.
It's a trade that takes a chance on Trump getting his way, shrugging off how the central bank goes about setting rates.
A chair 'can't act like a dictator,' said Mark Gertler, an economics professor at New York University who has co-authored papers with former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke and former Vice Chair Richard Clarida. 'He can't call in the Marines or anything like that.'
Adjusting rates, Gertler pointed out, requires the support of a majority on the Federal Open Market Committee. Nineteen policymakers participate in FOMC meetings and 12 vote. In other words, the new chair will have to win over their colleagues with a reasonable case for cutting.
So far this year, Fed officials have agreed to hold borrowing costs steady in a range of 4.25% to 4.5%. But, as rate projections reveal, policymakers appear split over the outlook for cuts over the rest of the year, largely over differing views on how Trump's tariffs might affect inflation.
Ten policymakers — those more inclined to see the impact of tariffs on prices as temporary — expect two or three cuts by year's end. Two others see just one cut as appropriate and seven expect the benchmark rate to stay where it is. For next year, the range widens, with the upper boundary of the federal funds rate projected to finish 2026 anywhere from 2.75% to 4.25%.
The projections, being anonymous, can't be linked with certainty to individual policymakers.
'It's obviously a concern that the Fed will be less independent, certainly,' said Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. 'Whether one person, even if that's the chair, can immediately get the committee to agree to a big change in policy, I think that might be more difficult.'
Lining Up Votes
Trump's pick to replace Powell won't be the only person inclined to support his call for cuts. Fed Governor Michelle Bowman — whom Trump placed on the board in 2018 and promoted to the central bank's top regulatory job last month — has so far this year supported holding rates steady, but recently said it might be appropriate to cut later this month. So, too, has Governor Christopher Waller, another Trump appointee.
The president may use the vacancy created in January when Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's term expires to place his pick for chair on the Board of Governors. He'll then get one more opening to fill if Powell resigns from his underlying post as a governor. That's what outgoing chairs typically do, but Powell has declined to say whether he'll exit altogether.
But even if Powell departs, that doesn't add up to enough votes to make additional cuts. Whether others go along with lowering rates will depend more on what actually happens in the economy. And it could be difficult to peel away other policymakers one-by-one.
Dissents aren't especially rare, but in an institution that values broad-based agreement, especially when policy shifts, votes are rarely deeply split.
'At the end of the day it's a committee decision, and whoever the next chair is, he is going to have to build a consensus,' said Brett Ryan, US senior economist at Deutsche Bank Securities.
Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub?
'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions
'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom
Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate
SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's EU, Mexico Tariff Threat to Test Stocks' Resilience
Trump's EU, Mexico Tariff Threat to Test Stocks' Resilience

Bloomberg

time13 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's EU, Mexico Tariff Threat to Test Stocks' Resilience

By Good morning. Donald Trump challenges market resilience with latest tariff salvo. Apple isn't letting Tim Cook go anytime soon. And Superman is off to a heroic start at the box office. Listen to the day's top stories. Donald Trump continued his tariff barrage. The president threatened a 30% rate for the European Union and Mexico from August if they can't negotiate better terms, setting up a test for financial markets that have taken many recent trade developments in stride. The EU postponed its countermeasures against the US to allow for further talks and is said to be weighing coordination with other countries. Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned a 30% levy would hit the country's exporters ' to the core,' while President Claudia Sheinbaum projected confidence that Mexico would reach a deal to avert the duties.

Return of the Housing Monsters
Return of the Housing Monsters

Wall Street Journal

time15 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Return of the Housing Monsters

America in the 21st century sometimes seems destined to repeat all of the mistakes of the 20th. The latest is President Trump's desire to release Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from government captivity—along with a government guarantee. Didn't we learn this was a bad idea the first time? The President teased on social media recently that 'I am working on TAKING THESE AMAZING COMPANIES PUBLIC,' referring to Fannie and Freddie. 'I want to be clear, the U.S. Government will keep its implicit GUARANTEES, and I will stay strong in my position on overseeing them as President.' Their share prices surged. Investors are elated that Mr. Trump plans to re-privatize these firms—especially because he has now made their government backstop explicit. The President may think the feds can keep the housing monsters on a regulatory leash, but the political and financial incentives mean they will invariably revert to their reckless ways.

Now Trump Says Forget Jeffrey Epstein
Now Trump Says Forget Jeffrey Epstein

Wall Street Journal

time17 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Now Trump Says Forget Jeffrey Epstein

Donald Trump has traded in conspiracy stories for years: Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Ted Cruz's father had a link to JFK's killer. The 2020 election was stolen. Migrants are barbecuing people's pets. He seems to think this is good show business, with appeal in certain niches of a fragmented culture. Yet now he's upset that the Jeffrey Epstein theories he fanned are proving hard to tamp down. Mr. Trump lamented online Saturday that his Administration is taking heat 'over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again.' His advisers are suggesting this was a snipe hunt, but the MAGA base is in furious disbelief, since the same people pledged to catch some snipe. Asked on a podcast in 2024 about Epstein's 'list of clients,' Mr. Trump said he'd have 'no problem' releasing it. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in February that 'it's sitting on my desk right now to review.' FBI Director Kash Patel has been on this beat, too. 'Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are,' he told a podcast two years ago. But Ms. Bondi's and Mr. Patel's review 'revealed no incriminating 'client list,'' the Justice Department and FBI said last week. At a cabinet meeting Tuesday, the AG insisted that in February she only meant the Epstein case files were on her desk. Alleged videos, she said, 'turned out to be child porn downloaded' by Epstein. Mr. Patel, wearing official FBI big boy pants, agrees. 'If there was a video of some guy or gal committing felonies on an island, and I'm in charge,' he recently said, 'don't you think you'd see it?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store