Gavin Newsom Gets Into War of Words With Ted Cruz Over Texas Democrats
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has locked horns with Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz over Texas Democrats leaving their state to avoid a redistricting vote.
Posting on X, formerly Twitter, the two politicians traded barbs with each other, referencing old political controversies, as the state's redistricting conflict intensifies.
Why It Matters
Republicans want to redraw the districting map to bolster their chances in next year's midterm election. It was thought the new map would give the party the opportunity to gain five seats in the midterms.
Their efforts were thwarted when more than 51 Texas Democrats traveled to Chicago last Sunday to stop the vote, causing anger from critics and praise from political allies who accused Republicans of gerrymandering and voter suppression. Votes can only take place in the Texas legislature when two-thirds of the 150 members are present. In the days that followed, some Democrats also traveled to California and other Democratic states.
Newsom and Cruz's interventions epitomize how far-reaching the Texas saga is and its broader significance in national politics.
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in support of the Texas Democratic lawmakers for their walkout to block a vote on a congressional redistricting plan sought by Republicans, during a news conference in Sacramento, California on...
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in support of the Texas Democratic lawmakers for their walkout to block a vote on a congressional redistricting plan sought by Republicans, during a news conference in Sacramento, California on August 8, 2025. More
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli
What To Know
Posting on X, Newsom, who has spoken out in support of the fleeing Democrats, responded to Speaker of the Texas House Dustin Burrows and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filing a legal complaint in California to enforce arrest warrants for Texas Democrats who had gone to the Golden State to avoid voting.
"You should definitely use ALL resources looking for them here, Ken," Newsom wrote in what appeared to be a sarcastic tone. "You will TOTALLY find them here."
This prompted Cruz to reply: "I assume they're having inner with you at the French Laundry," referencing an incident in 2020 when Newsom attended a dinner party at the French Laundry restaurant during the coronavirus pandemic. This was not against the rules at the time, but sparked a backlash given that the governor had encouraged people to stay distanced to contain the fast-spreading virus.
Newsom replied to Cruz: "To be fair, he knows a lot about fleeing" and posted an image of the senator pulling a suitcase through an airport. This referenced a viral image of Cruz leaving his home state for Cancun, Mexico, in 2021 in the middle of a record-breaking cold snap in Texas.
What People Are Saying
Texas Governor Greg Abbott said of the redistricting furor in an X post on Friday: "We have an agenda to pass priorities critical to Texans, and we will get it done. I'll call special session after special session—no matter how long it takes—until the job is finished."
Texas State Representative Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement: "This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity. We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent."
What Happens Next
The Texas House is scheduled to meet again on Monday. The FBI has been called in to find the lawmakers.
Meanwhile, redistricting issues are also taking place in other states. The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a dispute over redistricting in Louisiana, and earlier this year overturned a lower court decision that ruled South Carolina's congressional map was unconstitutional.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How US Pilots Trained to Fight Russia Will Soon Help Protect Putin
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As Russian President Vladimir Putin prepares to make his first visit to the United States in a decade, U.S. warplanes that have intercepted Russian aircraft as recently as two weeks ago will soon play a key role in escorting the Kremlin chief to U.S. soil. "It is an interesting irony that the fabric used to intercept and defend North America from military incursions like those that Russia has done three times so far this year, will be used to protect the Russian president for this upcoming summit," Scott Clancy, a retired Royal Canadian Air Force major general who served as deputy commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)'s Alaska Region, told Newsweek. NORAD is a unique joint U.S.-Canadian military organization tasked with enforcing security throughout North American airspace. For the U.S., this includes not only the mainland but also Alaska, where NORAD fighters most recently intercepted Russian Tu-95 bombers and Su-35 fighters flying within the state's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) on July 22. "NORAD conducts aerospace warning, aerospace control and maritime warning in defense of North America," NORAD spokesperson Captain Rebecca Garand told Newsweek. Yet "in addition to these critical mission sets," Garand pointed out another lesser known role for NORAD—and it's not just tracking Santa Claus. "NORAD is also responsible for working in coordination with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the U.S., and Transport Canada and NAV CANADA in Canada, to support and enforce Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) areas as well as airspace over National Security Special Events (NSSE), when required or requested," Garand said. In doing so, she said "NORAD employs a layered defense network of radars, satellites, and fighter aircraft to identify and respond to potential threats." "NORAD's response to air activity within a NORAD-enforced TFR that is not in compliance with authoritative law demonstrates the Command's execution of aerospace warning and control missions for the United States and Canada," Garand said. A NORAD F-35 intercepts a Russian Su-35 fighter and Tu-95 bomber over the Bering Sea, off of Alaska, on July 22, 2025. A NORAD F-35 intercepts a Russian Su-35 fighter and Tu-95 bomber over the Bering Sea, off of Alaska, on July 22, 2025. Alaskan NORAD Region/11th Air Force/U.S. Department of Defense Advanced Firepower Separated by just two miles at their closest point across the Bering Strait, Alaska effectively serves as the U.S. front line with Russia. As such, the state is also a hub for NORAD firepower stationed at two primary bases of Fairbanks and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, where President Donald Trump is set to receive Putin on Friday. In fact, "Alaska is the largest concentration of operational Gen 5 aircraft in the world between these two bases with F-22 Raptors at JBER and F-35s at Fairbanks," Clancy, who is today a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said. "These bases also are the location for the E-3 AWACS aircraft which does airborne surveillance and tactical battle management for the fighters, and the ever-crucial tanker aircraft without which, due to the extreme distances in the Arctic, nothing happens," he added. It's not just Russia that NORAD looks out for on this Arctic frontier. Last year, Chinese H-6 bombers joined Russian Tu-95 counterparts for the first time, prompting NORAD to scramble U.S. F-16s and F-35s, along with Canadian CF-18 fighters. Such encounters, which take place over international airspace designated as Alaska's ADIZ, have also inspired new exercises on the part of NORAD, including a March drill that saw an American B-1 bomber join F-16s and Canadian C-18s showcasing both nation's "readiness to defend North America and respond to global security challenges in partnership," according to a statement by NORAD's Alaska Command. The following month, in April, Alaska National Guard Major David Bedard reported on how the 176th Air Defense Squadron fielded a "state-of-the-art" third-generation battle command center known as the AN/FYQ-156 Tactical Command and Control System in order to ward off the combined patrol "careening toward the [ADIZ] and bringing the nuclear-capable long-range bombers closer to U.S. sovereign airspace." How It Works The precise details of the logistics surrounding the summit are not publicly disclosed for security reasons. But Clancy spoke of his previous experience during Trump's May 2019 visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. While then-NORAD Alaska Region commander U.S. General Boussiere greeted Trump on the tarmac, Clancy "was in the command center directing the intercept of potential threats." "NORAD's procedures and systems would work alongside the FAA to identify any deviation from the stringent protocols of the TFR, in order to delineate between normal air traffic and that which is suspicious," Clancy said. "NORAD would then use its fighter aircraft to further delineate between negligent contacts, and those which could be more nefarious." "They would do so by intercepting the aircraft," he added. "All of this is supported by a complex web of systems and conference calls set to provide decision makers the best chance of getting all the required information to make decisions pertaining to the aircraft and the safety of and security of the principles, especially POTUS." As for Putin, the protocol for his arrival was even more opaque, not least because his trip will mark the first time a Russian leader steps foot in Alaska since the territory was sold by Russia to the U.S. in 1867. Clancy suspected that Putin may opt to travel to Alaska without a Russian military escort in order to reduce the likelihood of any "antics" that may "take away from the newsworthiness of the summit" at a time when the Russian leader was "trying to own the narrative and portray himself as the driver of long-term peace in Ukraine." At the same time, he raised the possibility that the U.S. could also deploy aircraft to escort Putin's flight and potentially do so in coordination with Russian counterparts if necessary. "If Russian fighter aircraft were escorting President Putin's plane to the edge of or into the ADIZ," Clancy said, "this is where things get interesting." President Donald Trump speaks in front of an F-22 fighter jet during a visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on February 28, 2019. President Donald Trump speaks in front of an F-22 fighter jet during a visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on February 28, 2019. Staff Sergeant Westin Warburton/U.S. Air Force 'Our Highest Priority' In any case, the primary agency involved in orchestrating the security protocols surrounding the summit will be the U.S. Secret Service. The Secret Service, known primarily for protecting the president, also offers security to visiting heads of state. This practice was confirmed in relation to Putin's upcoming visit by former Secret Service agent Robert McDonald in comments shared Tuesday with the official TASS Russian News Agency. Putin is also expected to bring his own security detail from Russia's Presidential Security Service. In the U.S., the role of the Secret Service has been in the spotlight over the past year as Trump survived two assassination attempts, one in which he was injured by a sniper's bullet while on the 2024 campaign trail. Reached for comment, a Secret Service spokesperson told Newsweek that "the safety of the President is our highest priority." "In order to maintain operational security," the spokesperson said, "the Secret Service does not discuss the specific means and methods used to conduct our protective operations."
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security is 90. Can It Be Saved for Future Generations?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. August 14 marks Social Security's 90th anniversary - an achievement underscored by both its longevity and the scale of its impact. Social Security was created during the Great Depression to provide financial security for Americans. Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14 1935, as part of the New Deal, it established a federal safety net funded through payroll taxes. It initially offered retirement benefits for workers aged 65 and older, with later expansions adding disability insurance and survivor benefits. The program's goal was to reduce poverty among the elderly and stabilize the economy by ensuring a basic income. More than 73 million Americans now receive benefits from the program, making it one of the most significant pillars of the nation's social safety net. But its future is far from secure. According to the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, the program's two trust funds - the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) funds - are projected to reach insolvency by 2034. At that point, benefits would be funded solely through incoming payroll taxes, triggering an automatic cut of around 21 percent unless Congress acts. This is not the first time Social Security has faced a funding cliff. In the early 1980s, the trust funds were similarly close to depletion. Lawmakers responded with reforms that included faster payroll tax increases, a gradual rise in the retirement age, and taxation of some Social Security benefits. Those measures extended the program's life, but four decades later, a new crisis looms. Today, as the crunch point sits less than a decade away, three distinct approaches have been tabled by lawmakers. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty The Fair Share Act Introduced by Democrats Sheldon Whitehouse and Brendan Boyle, the Fair Share Act is aimed at shoring up Social Security and Medicare by targeting the highest earners. The bill would require taxpayers with incomes over $400,000 to pay Social Security taxes on all wage, self-employment, and investment income above that threshold. Under the current system, most taxpayers pay Social Security taxes on all their income - but because of the $160,200 wage cap, wealthier Americans stop contributing once they pass that amount in earnings. "This legislation would significantly extend Social Security solvency and would extend Medicare solvency by an estimated 20 years," Whitehouse and Boyle said. Tax attorney Nik Agharkar, owner and managing member of Crowne Point Tax, called the Fair Share Act "the clearest path to achieving long-term solvency" of the three options, noting that it could fund the program for 75 years. "Since the proposals made in the Fair Share Act increase taxes on our highest earners, which reverses decades of erosion to our payroll tax bases, while leaving middle- and lower-income workers untouched, it would likely be considered the most 'fair,' but certainly high-earners would disagree," Agharkar told Newsweek. A New Investment Fund A bipartisan offering comes from Republican Senator Bill Cassidy and Democratic Senator Tim Kaine. Their plan would create an additional investment fund separate from the existing trust funds. Unlike Social Security's current assets - which are invested exclusively in special-issued U.S. government bonds - the new fund would diversify into stocks, bonds, and other investments to secure higher returns. The proposal envisions an up-front $1.5 trillion investment to give the fund 75 years to grow. During that time, the Treasury would temporarily provide the cash needed, to be repaid once the new fund matures and begins supplementing payroll tax revenue. "There is a nationwide appetite to implement a bipartisan, commonsense plan like ours," Cassidy and Kaine wrote in a Washington Post op-ed. "Waiting until the Social Security Trust Fund is on the eve of crisis would have difficult and preventable consequences. Congress should seize the moment." Michael Montgomery, a political scientist at the University of Michigan-Dearborn, said this approach could represent the political middle ground. "Because it neither takes from future beneficiaries - something Democrats will oppose - nor requires high earners to contribute more - something Republicans will oppose - Cassidy-Kaine may be 'just right' for addressing Social Security and Medicare funding if our profoundly-divided Congress has the will to act," Montgomery told Newsweek. Raising the Retirement Age Another idea comes from the Republican Study Committee, which in March 2024 proposed "modest adjustments" to the retirement age for future retirees to reflect rising life expectancy. While not an official administration policy, the group includes 170 GOP lawmakers, among them allies of President Donald Trump. The committee said current seniors and those near retirement would not be affected. But analysis by the Congressional Budget Office shows that raising the age to 69 - up from the current 67 - could cut lifetime benefits by up to 13 percent for anyone born after 1971. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said it would only close 35 percent of the funding gap, meaning that if implemented, it would need to be used in tandem with other policies to make a meaningful impact. Political "Goldilocks" Michael Montgomery framed the three proposals as a "political 'Goldilocks' scenario," and that political realities remain a significant barrier in a "deeply divided Congress." The Fair Share Act's reliance on higher taxes for the wealthy could likely face stiff resistance from Republicans, while the investment fund requires a massive one-time outlay that could be politically unpalatable in Congress. Raising the retirement age, while less costly in budget terms, could be politically toxic given its impact on working-class Americans. Nik Agharkar cautioned that none of the options are ideal. "We should do more to get Congress to increase spending on Social Security through budget negotiations," he said, warning that political gridlock could push the issue to the brink. How Do Americans Feel? Social Security is often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics due to its enduring popularity. So it comes as no surprise that Americans want a say in how to fix the funding crisis. A July 2025 survey from The Senior Citizens League (TSCL), one of the nation's largest nonpartisan seniors groups, shows that the most popular solution, backed by 50 percent of respondents, is eliminating the cap on earnings subject to payroll taxes, like in the Sheldon-Whitehouse proposal. Other favored options include creating a fast-track process for Congress to vote on Social Security legislation (38 percent), increasing the payroll tax rate (31 percent), and applying the 6.2 percent tax to investment income for high earners (29 percent). More drastic or market-linked proposals received far less support: only 19 percent backed investing payroll taxes in stocks or other assets, 18 percent supported raising the retirement age to 70, and just 1 percent favored reducing cost-of-living adjustments.
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russia Reveals Plans for Trump-Putin Alaska summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Kremlin has confirmed the names of those who will attend the summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska this Friday, August 15, among other details about the schedule. Alongside Putin will be Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrey Belousov, presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Special Envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who heads Russia's sovereign wealth fund. The summit, to be held at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage and centred on agreeing a settlement on Ukraine, will begin at 11:30 a.m. local time, the Kremlin said, according to state-run news agency RIA. It will begin with a head-to-head meeting between Trump and Putin, the Kremlin said, leading into negotiations between the two delegations and a working breakfast. Trump and Putin will then hold a press conference after the talks. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
