logo
Hundreds more CSIRO jobs on the chopping block as experts raise fears over impact on science

Hundreds more CSIRO jobs on the chopping block as experts raise fears over impact on science

The Guardian10 hours ago
Hundreds more jobs could be axed at Australia's national science agency, sparking concerns the country is gutting its research capability just as the Trump administration makes deep cuts into the sector in the US.
The latest potential research job losses at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) follow 440 positions being cut last financial year and earlier deep reductions under the Coalition government, including 300 in 2016.
They coincide with the Trump administration slashing science agencies in the US, with warnings the loss of expertise could have global ramifications in health, climate science and weather forecasting.
The Community and Public Sector Union said the Australian cuts were at odds with the Albanese government's promise to prioritise economic productivity and urged the government to instead increase investment in the CSIRO.
Susan Tonks, the union's CSIRO spokesperson, said: 'There's a clear disconnect between the government's talk about boosting productivity and their failure to support the very institution that helps deliver it.'
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
A CSIRO spokesperson confirmed the agency was 'reshaping its research portfolio' with a goal of making it more financially sustainable, but did not indicate how many jobs might be lost. They said the changes were in part due to the end of Covid-19 'safety net' funding and other government savings measures, and would 'ensure we are focused on delivering the science Australia needs now and into the future'.
David Karoly, a University of Melbourne emeritus professor who previously worked at CSIRO, said the cuts were not being offset elsewhere. He said Australia had lower levels of industry funding in research than comparable countries.
'There's a dilemma as to whether Australia wants to support the research infrastructure that's needed to support ongoing research activities in science,' he said. 'The simple answer is Australia doesn't appear to want to do that.'
The latest cuts were understood to primarily affect the CSIRO's agriculture and food research unit, with reductions in health and safety, IT and business development. Research unit staff were expected to be informed about funding and staffing changes by October.
The May federal budget papers showed an expected 450 person reduction in CSIRO staff, from 5,945 in 2024-25 to 5,495 this financial year.
The union said the cuts were the worst since 2014, when the Abbott government oversaw an estimated 20% reduction in staff.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Tonks said the agency's staff were experiencing 'deep anxiety' over the CSIRO's strategic direction and the cuts were 'directly undermining Australia's ability to innovate, compete and grow'.
'This will continue to be the case as long as this government sits on its hands while hundreds of staff at the CSIRO are shown the door with little to no explanation,' she said. 'If this government is serious about productivity, it must step in, stop the cuts, and back our country's peak science institution.'
The CSIRO also confirmed it would sell its stake in the Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, in Perth's northern suburbs, by the end of 2025. The agency said it was a 'small partner', owning about 15% of the Watermans Bay site.
A spokesperson said the agency remained 'committed to the Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre partnership'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judy, 89, worked hard all her life and lives in one of Australia's richest suburbs. She has launched a stunning bid to stop new homes being built nearby - and Gen Z is FURIOUS
Judy, 89, worked hard all her life and lives in one of Australia's richest suburbs. She has launched a stunning bid to stop new homes being built nearby - and Gen Z is FURIOUS

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Judy, 89, worked hard all her life and lives in one of Australia's richest suburbs. She has launched a stunning bid to stop new homes being built nearby - and Gen Z is FURIOUS

An 89-year-old resident of one Sydney 's most exclusive areas has sparked controversy by launching a landmark legal challenge against the construction of high-rise apartment buildings in her suburb. Judith Pearson, who has lived near Balmoral Beach in Mosman for over three decades, is challenging the NSW Government's sweeping new housing reforms as a private citizen in court. The state government is trying to encourage the construction of housing in the Harbour City with a policy known as the Low and Mid-Rise Housing SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy). The SEPP overrides local council planning controls and removes their ability to assess developments on a case-by-case basis. Mosman - one of the wealthiest suburbs in Australia, with a median weekly family income of $4,500 - has been given a relatively modest target of constructing 500 new homes by 2029, compared to Ryde's 11,600 and North Sydney's 5,900. Even the posh eastern suburbs council of Woollahra is taking on more than three times the number of homes than Mosman, with 1,900 new builds - but that hasn't stopped Pearson from taking drastic action. Pearson, an accountant who says she supports the need for more housing, argues the reforms enforce a 'one-size-fits-all' model that strips councils and communities of their ability to shape local development and protect heritage-listed homes. 'I couldn't just stand by and watch the value and character of what makes the area special being destroyed,' she told The Sydney Morning Herald. 'I thought somebody has got to stop this.' 'Someone asked me if (the court challenge) is about being 'entitled' and my reply to that was: 'Yes, we are entitled because we've worked hard to live here'. I am entitled to live here'," she told the Herald. The Daily Mail took to the streets to ask locals how they really feel about high-density builds popping up in their suburb. Amanda, a young professional currently hunting for a rental in the area, said she supported new planning rules if it helped to improve housing supply. 'If it helps people break into the market, that'd be better, and make it easier to live around here,' she said. 'At the moment, it's pretty restricted.' Former Sydney University student Tom, who grew up on the city's northern beaches and north shore, slammed Ms Pearson's legal bid as 'entitled and selfish'. 'There are lots of people who have grown up around this area and have dreams of owning a place where they grew up someday,' he said. 'If you look at places in Auckland, it's very clear that building more homes makes rents cheaper and homeownership possible for people my age.' But not everyone agrees, with Virginia, a baby boomer, arguing building high-rise buildings would damage the character of the suburb. 'Three or four storeys max, but nothing more than four,' she said. Her friend Gabriel agreed. 'Four to six is too high. Six is way too much for this area,' she said. Titia said the government should reconsider height allowances. 'It's not good. There should be a regulated height limit,' she said. Housing advocate group Sydney YIMBY was scathing of the legal challenge. 'Sydney YIMBY calls upon Pearson to donate her $500,000 to a homelessness charity instead of fighting homes for people who weren't lucky enough to buy in for pennies 40 years ago,' Chairman Justin Simon told the Daily Mail. 'Mosman is one of the richest, highest demand areas in the country and it's an absolute joke that they only have to deliver 100 homes a year. We hope this draws attention to the matter and the next target is 10x higher.' Only two development applications have been lodged with the Mosman Council under the Low and Mid-Rise Housing Policy. One of the proposals is for a four-storey build on Muston Street, Ms Pearson's street, which would feature four spacious three-bedroom residences. The second is for a larger six-storey development on nearby Awaba Street, which if built would comprise 29 units. On Tuesday, Mosman Council voted to hold an urgent meeting with Ms Pearson, her legal team and community supporters, to discuss the case and consider whether the suburb should formulate its own strategic housing plan. The motion was moved by Mosman councillor Simon Menzies, who has been contacted by Daily Mail for further comment. Supporters of Ms Pearson's campaign point to Kuring-Gai Council, where the SEPP was paused to allow for a localised planning approach. They argue Mosman should be afforded the same opportunity. In a surprising twist, it can be revealed Ms Pearson is no stranger to luxury property development and previously worked with four business associates to acquire land to build high-end homes. The group's first development, completed in 2006, reportedly sold for $5.4million, according to a 2008 article by the Australian Financial Review. A second property was expected to fetch around $12million.

Donald Trump's war on statistics is an authoritarian attack on democracy and countries like Australia should call it out
Donald Trump's war on statistics is an authoritarian attack on democracy and countries like Australia should call it out

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Donald Trump's war on statistics is an authoritarian attack on democracy and countries like Australia should call it out

Whether it be the judicial system, universities, or health organisations, Donald Trump cannot abide by anything that does not confirm his world view. So it was not a shock when late last week he came for statistics – or, more pointedly, the person in charge of the economic statistics. On Friday, the US's Bureau of Labor Studies released the July US employment figures. They were not good. Just 73,000 non-farm jobs were added and annual employment growth was the worst it has been since the GFC years (excluding the pandemic): If the graph does not display click here In response, Trump did what any autocrat would do when told bad news: he shot the messenger – at least only figuratively. Trump argued that Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, had faked bad figures purely to hurt him. And so he fired her. But this should not be dismissed as 'oh that's just Trump', nor should we just sigh and say we have been in a fact-free era for nearly a decade. Reality might be hanging on to the political debate for dear life, but this move threatens to fling it off the cliff. The BLS data is vital for understanding not just what is going on in the USA but to guide other nations – like here in Australia. For example, Australia is doing very well compared with the US. Unlike the US, our employment rate is higher now than it was before the pandemic: If the graph does not display click here These comparisons can influence future policies. For example, we did very well during the GFC; the US did not. We also did much better during the pandemic than the US. They also give insight into the future. The US is still the world's biggest economy and – as we have seen with inflation – what happens there, often happens here, in Australia: If the graph does not display click here If Trump doesn't like weak employment growth numbers, you think he'll be happy with inflation data that shows his tariffs are causing higher prices? And this is not just some academic exercise. US welfare payments are indexed to inflation, so the official data vitally affects the livelihood of many people. Trump thinks when he closes his eyes the rest of the world disappears. But not measuring inflation or unemployment or global temperatures doesn't disappear the problems. And loss of trust in official data will affect business investment decisions, borrowing costs and – as with all attacks on institutions – faith in democracy. For example, in Australia, the Australian Bureau of Statistics has revealed that in the past year the cost of living for all households except 'self-funded' retirees rose faster than did inflation: If the graph does not display click here This is not the greatest news for the Australian government – no politician likes data that says things might be worse than what they previously argued. Cost of living, unlike inflation, includes mortgage repayments. Despite falling interest rates, repaying a mortgage is still around 4.4% higher than it was a year ago, and since March 2022 mortgage repayments have accounted for nearly half of the increase in cost of living: If the graph does not display click here Does it help the Australian government for the ABS to reveal this? Not really. It could blame our Reserve Bank, but generally governments are blamed for high interest rates. It certainly doesn't help the government for the ABS to release figures that some journalist like me can use to show that the value of wages are 8.6% lower than they were in March 2021 when you use cost of living rather than CPI: If the graph does not display click here That type of information makes life hard for the government – but so it should! In a democracy you have to face your critics, argue your case and convince voters you have the best plans and way forward. Political parties are already working hard to make you question reality. But at least till now, even in the US, where Trump would like there to be a new kind of maths where prices can fall by more than 100% (1,000%, 1,100, 1,200, 1,300!!), reality has been counted and presented. The end of impartial economic data would not just be another case of Trump 'flooding the zone'. It would be a fundamental attack on democracy, designed to ensure those who are suffering from his polices are not able to demonstrate that things are worse – either for them or for the nation. They are the actions usually associated with authoritarian regimes, and we should not shy away from making that clear. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work

Major Australian transport company goes bust - with millions owed to workers
Major Australian transport company goes bust - with millions owed to workers

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Major Australian transport company goes bust - with millions owed to workers

Two hundred jobs are set to be axed as a major trucking company that had been in business for more than three-decades has plunged into liquidation with more than $40 million in estimated debts. Transport and logistic company XL Express had operated along the east coast, delivering freight and packages between Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane The closure has sent shockwaves across a number of industries that the company did business with as concerns grow over shipping orders going unfulfilled. XL Express owes up to $41.9 million, with $5.3 million due to 200 ex-staff and $3.4 million to the tax office, administrators reveal. Speaking to Daily Mail Australia, an insider in the publishing industry said it would impact their business. 'This is a disaster. We have outstanding customer orders, and now they're stuck in limbo.' they said. XL's demise follows just weeks after the collapse of another truck company Don Watson Transport. After running for more than 77 years, that company ceased operating in June. The trucking industry has been under pressure in recent years as global tensions cause an increase in fuel prices, which is combining with labour shortages and increased government regulation. Scott's Refrigerated Logistics also collapsed in 2023, as did by Austrans Container Services in 2024. Managing Partner of WA Insolvency Solutions, Jimmy Trpcevski, said he's seen an increase in insolvency appointments and inquiries from transport operators. 'Businesses are being squeezed from every direction, whether that's rising costs, labour shortages, or compliance pressures. Margins are incredibly thin.' Don Watson Transport covered an estimated 22million kilometres per year and operated depots in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, and Wodonga. It also held coldstore facilities in Sydney, Melbourne, and Wodonga. The group's 140 trucks and 170 refrigerated trucks will be sold off, according to Beef Central. Managing director Lyndon Watson confirmed the closure to staff in a memo. 'Due to current economic conditions, the Don Watson Group of companies has made a definite decision to leave the warehousing and road transport industries,' the memo read. 'We understand that this may come as a shock but we have formed the view that is simply no longer possible to continue to operate. 'To be clear, all employees will be impacted by this decision. 'All employees (that are made redundant) will receive all of their entitlements in full in accordance with the terms of relevant legislation and enterprise agreements.' Financial year 2024-2025 was the worst on record for insolvencies, with 14,105 businesses going under, up 26.8 per cent from the last financial year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store