logo
UK warns author Sally Rooney after pledge to fund banned Palestine Action

UK warns author Sally Rooney after pledge to fund banned Palestine Action

The National2 days ago
The UK government has warned the award-winning Irish author Sally Rooney that she would be committing a terrorist offence if she funds Palestine Action.
Ms Rooney, who has twice had novels adapted into BBC dramas, said she would use the earnings of her work and her platform to 'go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide'.
'If this makes me a supporter of terror under UK law, so be it,' she wrote in The Irish Times, deliberately avoiding any legal risk if she published her support in a UK publication.
Responding to Ms Rooney on Monday, No 10 Downing Street said 'support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act' and no one should be backing the group.
Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organisation in July for a string of direct action protests against weapons manufacturers, an RAF airbase and universities, which caused millions of pounds worth of damage.
But the move has caused outcry from campaigners who fear it ignores a long-standing tradition of direct action in the UK dating back to the Suffragettes and that it risks undermining terrorism laws.
More than 700 people who came out in support of the group have since have been arrested, with dozens charged.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended her decision to proscribe the group on Sunday, accusing them of conducting 'an escalating campaign involving … criminal damage, intimidation, violence, weapons and serious injuries to individuals".
Ms Rooney said she would have liked to publish her statement in a UK newspaper but that this would now be illegal under the law.
Regarding her intention to use the royalties earned from UK publishers and the BBC to fund the group, she said: 'If the British state considers this 'terrorism', then perhaps it should investigate the shady organisations that continue to promote my work and fund my activities, such as [retailer] WH Smith and the BBC."
The BBC has already faced backlash this year after it emerged that the child narrator of one of its Gaza documentaries was the son of a minister in Gaza's Hamas-led administration.
Questions were raised at the time as to whether payments made to the son's family for his participation could have been used to fund Hamas.
A BBC representative said of Ms Rooney's remarks: "Matters relating to proscribed organisations are for the relevant authorities."
'Selective enforcement'
Palestine Action – whose co-founder Richard Barnard was a member of Extinction Rebellion – once represented a small minority of people campaigning for the Palestinian cause in the UK.
But support for the group has grown exponentially since its proscription – with civil rights campaigners also joining the cause. More than 500 people were arrested for supporting the group in one day this month.
Labour peer, Shami Chakrabarti, warned the government ban is at risk of becoming an 'I am Spartacus' moment, which could lead to more people taking to the streets to support the group.
Ms Rooney claimed the recent arrests – which include Irish citizens in the UK – were a "selective enforcement of anti-terror law".
She highlighted the activities of supporters of another proscribed organisation, the Ulster Volunteer Force, who had repainted a loyalist mural in north Belfast after it was damaged by a storm last year.
'No arrests were made on that basis, nor has the mural been taken down, though the UVF is a proscribed terrorist organisation responsible for the murders of hundreds of civilians," she said.
'Palestine Action, proscribed under the same law, is responsible for zero deaths and has never advocated the use of violence against any human being. Why then are its supporters arrested for wearing T-shirts, while murals celebrating loyalist death squads are left untouched?'
Celebrity donations
Ms Rooney is not the first high-profile donor to Palestine Action. James 'Fergie' Chambers, an American communist and heir to a multibillion-pound conglomerate, said in a 2023 interview that he was paying Palestine Action's legal fees.
Ms Cooper has previously spoken of her suspicions that Palestine Action was receiving funding from Iran, a claim the group dismissed as a ' sham '.
Palestine Action previously told The National its donations came from 'ordinary people' who support the movement. It does not publish the names of its major donors and still takes them in the form of cryptocurrency on its website.
Mick Napier, the founder of Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (which is not linked to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign), said he had seen a 'groundswell' of public support for the group since the proscription came into effect.
He said his group was currently raising the funds to cover legal fees for people arrested for attending demonstrations in support of Palestine Action in recent weeks, and that donations ranged from £5 to £1,000 ($6.80 to ($1,355).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asia shares slip, dollar steadies ahead of Jackson Hole
Asia shares slip, dollar steadies ahead of Jackson Hole

Zawya

time37 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Asia shares slip, dollar steadies ahead of Jackson Hole

SINGAPORE: Shares in Asia fell on Wednesday, weighed down by a tech-led selloff on Wall Street, while the dollar gained some ground ahead of a key meeting of central bankers later in the week. Oil prices inched higher after falling in the previous session, as traders bet that talks over a possible agreement to end the war in Ukraine could ease sanctions on Russian crude oil, boosting global supply. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 0.47%, as did stock futures in Europe and the U.S.. EUROSTOXX 50 futures slid 0.55%, while DAX futures lost 0.5% and FTSE futures eased 0.14%. S&P 500 futures dipped 0.2% and Nasdaq futures lost 0.34%, extending its fall from the cash session overnight. "The S&P 500 and Nasdaq slumped overnight as investors ditched high-flying tech stocks with their lofty valuations," said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG. Adding to headwinds for the sector, news that Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of the revenues from chip sales in China, as well as reports that the U.S. is considering taking a 10% stake in Intel, have stoked investor worries of the Trump administration's growing influence on tech companies. Sources also told Reuters that U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive CHIPS Act funding to build factories in the country. "These developments signal that U.S. government is heading in a concerning and more interventionist direction," said Sycamore. Other bourses in Asia were similarly in the red on Wednesday, with Japan's Nikkei down 1.2%, while China's CSI300 blue-chip index fell 0.5%. Much of investors' attention at the start of the week was on a meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and a group of European allies over the Russia-Ukraine war. While the talks concluded without much fanfare, Trump said the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He later said on Tuesday that the United States might provide air support to Ukraine, while ruling out putting U.S. troops on the ground. "The U.S. is not categorically underwriting anything, any security for Ukraine, even if they're open to provide some, because we don't know the conditions under which they will. So there's quite a bit of risk left out there," said Vishnu Varathan, head of macro research for Asia ex-Japan at Mizuho. Oil prices recovered after a fall in the previous session, with Brent crude futures last up 0.46% at $66.09 a barrel. U.S. crude advanced 0.6% to $62.72 per barrel. AWAITING JACKSON HOLE All eyes are now on the Kansas City Federal Reserve's August 21-23 Jackson Hole symposium, where Fed Chair Jerome Powell is due to speak on the economic outlook and the central bank's policy framework on Friday. Focus will be on what Powell says about the near-term outlook for rates, with traders almost fully pricing in a rate cut next month. "Given the apparent tensions between U.S. CPI and PPI data, (it) does come across as... premature to declare one way or the other. And most importantly, given this kind of dilemma embedded within the data, it is hard to decipher whether the Fed would take or would emphasise the risks that start to mount on the job side of the equation or (the) need to sit firm," said Mizuho's Varathan. Ahead of the gathering, the dollar firmed slightly, pushing the euro down 0.13% to $1.1633, while sterling fell 0.16% to $1.3470. The New Zealand dollar eased 0.17% to $0.5885 ahead of a rate decision by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand due shortly on Wednesday, where a rate cut is expected. Elsewhere, spot gold fell 0.07% to $3,312.89 an ounce. (Reporting by Rae Wee Editing by Shri Navaratnam)

Microsoft workers protest at company HQ against Israeli ties
Microsoft workers protest at company HQ against Israeli ties

The National

time6 hours ago

  • The National

Microsoft workers protest at company HQ against Israeli ties

Microsoft employees rallied at the company's Redmond, Washington, headquarters to try to increase pressure on the company to stop doing business with Israel over its war in Gaza. Protesters started gathering on Tuesday afternoon at a plaza at the centre of a recently redeveloped part of the company's main base, which covers about 200 hectares in the suburban town. They set up tents and declared the space a 'liberated zone". Addressing 'friends and colleagues' through a microphone, former Microsoft employee and protest leader Hossam Nasr said: 'We are here because over 22 months of genocide, Israel — powered by Microsoft — has been killing, maiming Palestinian children every hour.' About an hour after the activists arrived, a Redmond police officer used his SUV speaker to warn they were trespassing and subject to arrest if they stayed. Soon after, the about three dozen demonstrators packed up their tents, rolled up their banners and departed the plaza. They reassembled on a slice of sidewalk that organisers said was public property. For more than a year, the Microsoft employee group No Azure for Apartheid, has been pushing Microsoft to end its relationship with Israel, saying use of the company's products is contributing to civilian deaths in Gaza. Azure, the company's cloud-computing division, sells on-demand software and data storage to businesses and governments, including Israeli government and military agencies. A handful of No Azure for Apartheid organisers have been fired for holding what Microsoft said was an unauthorised event on campus and disrupting speeches by executives. 'Microsoft is the most complicit digital arms manufacturer in Israel's genocide of Gaza,' Nisreen Jaradat, a Microsoft employee, said in a statement on Tuesday. Microsoft did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a blog post published in May, the company said it had 'found no evidence to date that Microsoft's Azure and AI technologies have been used to target or harm people in the conflict in Gaza". But Microsoft said this month that it had enlisted the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct a further review after a report that Israel's military surveillance agency intercepted millions of mobile phone calls made by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and stored them on Azure servers. That trove helped the military choose bombing targets in Gaza, according to reporting by The Guardian newspaper and other outlets. The activists took their inspiration from protests staged on at least 100 US university campuses since the war in Gaza began. Students at schools such as Columbia University pitched tents and called for their colleges to divest financial holdings tied to Israel and US weapons makers, in many cases sparking disciplinary action from administrators.

Apple defeats UK order that would give law enforcement access to encrypted user data
Apple defeats UK order that would give law enforcement access to encrypted user data

The National

time13 hours ago

  • The National

Apple defeats UK order that would give law enforcement access to encrypted user data

Apple has secured a victory in defeating a proposed mandate from the British government that would have required the company to provide backdoor access to user data uploaded to the cloud. The February order from the British government that mandated access to data, including encrypted data on cloud services, provoked fury from the US tech industry, which has accused the UK of Orwellian practices in policing online content. 'Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside President Trump and Vice President Vance to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,' Tulsi Gabbard, US director of National Intelligence, announced on X on Tuesday. 'As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens.' Technology tycoon and entrepreneur Elon Musk responded to Ms Gabbard's post with an arm flex emoji. Mr Musk has been highly critical of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his Labour Party over the backdoor data access policy. Apple has not yet responded to The National's requests for a comment on this story. According to The Washington Post, which first broke the story about the law colloquially known as the 'Snoopers' Charter', the proposed legislation would have made it a criminal offence for a company to reveal that the government had made a request to access data. The policy push is not unique to the UK, with police and security services around the world advocating for more access to encrypted communications in recent years, warning that encryption can benefit criminals. For Apple, the matter has proven to be particularly sensitive, given the company's significant marketing emphasis on user privacy. In 2016, the US-based consumer technology company challenged a federal magistrate's order to unlock an iPhone used in the San Bernardino, California, terrorist attack. At the time, Apple chief executive Tim Cook argued that such a move would undermine encryption by creating a backdoor that could potentially be used on other future devices. 'The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers – including tens of millions of American citizens – from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals,' he said. 'We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack.' He added that the demand threatened the security of Apple's customers and had 'implications far beyond the legal case at hand'. During prosecution, the FBI announced that it had found its own way to access the iPhone data for the accused terror suspects. As far back as 2010, when Apple's co-founder Steve Jobs was still at the helm of the company, Apple was considered to be significantly more stringent than other Silicon Valley companies when it came to protecting user privacy. 'A lot of people think we're old fashioned about this,' Mr Jobs said during the D8 conference that same year. 'We take privacy extremely seriously.' Some, however, have questioned whether Apple's commitment to privacy is more style than substance, and whether it is just an attempt to sell more devices and services. 'Privacy … that's iPhone,' the advertisement concludes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store