Xi Jinping Takes Aim At US "Protectionism" In Phone Call With Brazil's Lula
A readout from Brazil's government said the two leaders spoke for about one hour and exchanged views on international affairs, including recent developments around the Russia-Ukraine war. Brazil's president, known universally as Lula, and Chinese leader Xi Jinping also agreed on "upholding multilateralism" through the Group of 20 and BRICS.
During the phone conversation on Tuesday morning in Beijing, Xi called for coordinated efforts against unilateralism and protectionism - language usually used by China to criticize US trade policy. He said China supports the Brazilian people in safeguarding their country's legitimate rights, describing ties between the two nations as being "at their best in history," according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV.
China is willing to work with Brazil to strengthen coordination and set an example of "unity and self-reliance among Global South nations," CCTV cited Xi as saying.
The call caps an effort by Lula to build solidarity across the BRICS club of major emerging nations, of which Brazil is a founding member along with Russia, China and India. Lula spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the past few days, as Brazil came under pressure from the US.
Brazil has become a target of Trump's trade war after he imposed higher tariffs in an effort to end the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro on charges that he attempted a coup. Lula's government has responded by seeking to expand trade with other partners, especially with China, India and Southeast Asia.
Xi's conversation with Lula also followed Trump's demand on Monday that China massively step up its purchases of US soybeans. Beijing has bought more of the legume from its top supplier Brazil in recent months, and is also testing trial cargoes of soybean meal from Argentina, to secure supplies of the animal feed ingredient.
Trump on Tuesday extended a pause of sky-high levies on Chinese goods for another 90 days into early November. Even so, BRICS countries are among the nations that were hit the hardest by higher US tariffs that went into effect last week. Brazil holds the BRICS rotating presidency this year.
Trump has slammed BRICS as being anti-US. The group, established in 2009, expanded last year and now also includes Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia and Egypt.
Lula met Xi in May during a state visit to Beijing, where he signed more than 30 agreements for Chinese investment in mining, transport infrastructure and ports, among other deals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Opening India's agriculture to a free-for-all would have serious repercussions for the sector
It is not enough to say that agriculture contributes only 16 per cent to India's GDP. Nor is it sufficient to state that small farmer households earn about one lakh rupees annually. These statistics do not capture the full extent of the story. For those, particularly outside India, who are unfamiliar with the agricultural and rural heartlands of India, this data conceals a larger narrative. I say this both as a farmer and as a former finance minister: The impacts go far beyond the economy. What is at risk is social stability and what it could bring is a cultural upheaval that we are not prepared for. For instance, 250 million people are directly dependent on farming, and there are 700 million Indians who are directly or indirectly connected to farming and the rural sector. Protecting the farm sector is not just a policy. It is a survival mechanism for millions, crucial to maintaining economic, social, political and cultural stability. The argument around agricultural subsidy and tariffs often centres on the Minimum Support Price (MSP) provided to select crops. In the US and much of the EU, the terminoogy and approach vary, but the issue remains the same. If India has MSP, the US has ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC. Let me elaborate. ERP is the Effective Reference Price, analogous to the MSP. In the US, farmers receive direct payments from the government if market prices fall below this level, and it is called PLC or Price Loss Coverage. Both PLC and ARC (Agriculture Risk Coverage) cover 22 major crops, ranging from wheat and corn to soybean and cotton. These systems are not restricted to farming alone as they also extend to the dairy sector under the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) programme. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides income support via direct payments if prices fall below intervention levels, which are akin to MSPs. The crucial difference is that, while in India, the government procures crops at the MSP, in the US the government does not procure crops but instead pays farmers directly if prices fall below the minimum. Given the literacy levels, or lack thereof, and the paperwork involved with enrolling in these various EU and US policies, asking Indian farmers to transition to these systems would create another level of bureaucracy. Moreover, rolling out the US and EU models in India would take years, if not decades. The pressure on India to dismantle its farm mechanisms, whether MSP or tariffs, and open up to international market forces would be justifiable, if the US and EU were not subsidising their own agricultural sectors. The US spends about $20 billion and the EU about $50 billion on agricultural subsidies. In fact, many of these subsidies remain hidden, while the Indian MSP system is much more transparent. The focus of US subsidies is large farms, whereas Indian farm policy centres on small farmers. US policy priorities include market stabilisation, income protection, and climate adaptation, while India focuses on supporting small farmers and landholderscol, ensuring regular upliftment of the rural economy. EU subsidies are targeted more toward income support, environmental goals, climate and biodiversity targets. In the US and much of Europe, 80 per cent of subsidies go to large farms, while in India, it is the reverse with 80 per cent going to small and medium farmers. The EU, in its latest budget provisions, is trying to move away from the US approach towards the Indian model, by targeting small farmers. In fact, the EU's latest provision in its Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is 387 billion euros ($451 billion) for 2021-2027, and as recently as last month, they proposed a cap of 1,00,000 euros per year per farmer, in an attempt to shift support from larger farmers to smaller ones. That translates to a cap of one crore of subsidy per farmer. For India, the real issue is that of equitable and development-centred agreements. Just as the Indian MSP is clear, transparent and focused on the Indian context, the alphabet soup of CAP, ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC is tailored to the US and EU contexts. This perspective arises not only from economics, but also from society, politics and culture. Opening the entire agriculture sector to a free-for-all, when US and EU subsidies distort the market in their favour, would create a kind of asymmetric warfare, with tumultuous consequences for Indian society. The upheaval would be massive. This stance has been clearly articulated at the highest levels. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently said: 'For us, the interest of our farmers is top priority. India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, dairy farmers and fishermen. I know I will personally have to pay a heavy price but I am prepared for it.' The writer is the former Finance Minister of Punjab
Hans India
20 minutes ago
- Hans India
Prioritise women empowerment this I-Day
Every citizen will have a sense of pride on August 15 when India commemorates its 79th Independence Day on Friday. It is a day when we must remember the struggle and sacrifice of our freedom legends, show a sincere expression of gratitude for our freedom fighters with a spirited display of national pride as a measure of celebrating Independence. Freedom is a basic human right that comes with obligation and compulsion. It is not about being for or against an ideal but creating one's own existence from scratch. This privilege to me means freedom to choose and act and fulfill my desires according to my will, if my freedom does not trespass and impinge upon somebody else's. Freedom to me is annihilation of caste and creating a nation where fellow human beings are treated equally. It is to live and let others live. Being liberated neither means licence to unleash mayhem and carry out anti-national or anti-social activities nor show disrespect to others' sentiments or emotions. Your freedom ends where that of the others' starts. Indians are all seven-day wonders; when a new issue crops up, we conveniently forget the old and move on. We chase shadows, comforts and ephemeral pleasures. It's time we give a clarion call to find meaning, purpose, goals and dreams for ourselves. However, despite significant progress since achieving independence, the country's women still face various challenges. Their slogans stress the importance of freedom from patriarchy. The Indian woman irrespective of her class, caste and society suffer discrimination under the garb of culture. Women-abuse, physical, mental and sexual harassment is everyday headlines in the media. Dowry deaths, honour killings and parading women in a humiliating way to take revenge has become a daily affair in recent times. They are victimized even after crimes against them and suffer silently as they lack support from society and even family members. People should raise a collective voice against all every sort of indiscrimination. The fact of the matter is that freedom for women is still a long way to go. Even today, stepping out of homes, seeking employment or dealing with domestic issues has remained a bigger hurdle for them. Governments change but women still need to think twice before stepping out regarding their safety. Improved safety and security, with stricter enforcement of laws against gender-based violence, harassment and discrimination, is the need of the hour. Access to quality healthcare, including reproductive health care, menstrual health, hygiene and nutrition and mental health support, support for caregivers and working mothers such as childcare facilities and flexible work arrangements need to be addressed by the government. Access to digital literacy, technology and online safety, skill development and entrepreneurship opportunities need priority. It is the responsibility of all of us to bring women power to the fore in the form of national power. Every obstacle that prevents them from progressing needs to be removed. Over the last decades, women voters have turned into a decisive force that can make or break the fate of the electoral contenders. The gap between female voter turn- out and male voter turn -out has not only closed but reversed. After 18 general elections since independence women voter participation now outshines male participation. This is because of self-empowerment, gaining more political knowledge, literacy and media exposure. It is essential to acknowledge the progress made towards women's empowerment, while also recognizing the ongoing challenges and needs. Addressing these will help create a more inclusive and equitable society for all. Let women not be caged birds whose freedom is clipped despite being gifted with wings. The greatness of a country totally depends on the undying ideals of love and sacrifice that inspire the women of the race. A roof over every head, food in every household plate, basic health care and amenities and education for all is what we all want. Respect for women, love and care and educational opportunities for every girl should be the priority of all. Modi's Amrit Kal vision and Viksit Bharat-2047 aim to shape India's future and transform it into a developed entity. Addressing these needs is crucial for women empowerment and inclusive nation building will continue to be the primary focus.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Putin's Personal Victory': Zelensky Jibes Trump But Report Reveals Kyiv's ‘Secret Surrender' Plan
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is reportedly showing more flexibility about giving up some territory in negotiations to end the war with Russia in secret. Although publicly Zelensky has refused to accept losing land or giving up claims on Russian-held areas, The Daily Telegraph reported that Ukraine could agree to freeze the current front lines — meaning not trying to retake some areas controlled by Russia, including parts of eastern Ukraine (Luhansk and Donetsk), Crimea, and parts of the southern regions Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. In return, Ukraine would demand strong security guarantees from Western countries, such as continued military support and a clear path to joining NATO. This shift comes ahead of a planned summit between Russian President Putin and U.S. President Trump, where a land swap deal might be discussed, which Trump said could benefit both countries. On Tuesday, Zelensky said that the Alaska summit was a personal victory for Putin. Watch for more details.#Zelensky #UkraineWar #RussiaUkraineConflict #LandConcessions #NATOSecurity #PutinTrumpSummit #UkraineTerritory #EasternUkraine #Crimea #Zaporizhzhia #Kherson #UkraineNegotiations #PeaceTalks #RussiaUkraineWar #Geopolitics Read More
