Naga Students' Federation protests court-allowed medical seat for ‘non-indigenous' candidate
Addressing the gathering, NSF president Medovi Rhi said the federation was "deeply discouraged" to learn that a non-indigenous candidate had applied for a seat reserved for indigenous inhabitants of the state.
He asserted that the 42 MBBS seats allotted to the state "belong to Nagaland," and that the rights and future of the Nagas must not be taken away by outsiders.
"This is our right and our future cannot be decided by outsiders," Rhi said, urging all sections of society to stand in solidarity with the NSF.
Vatsala had scored 455 with All India Rank 1,13,803 and state Rank 1 under Category-III in the recently conducted NEET exams.
He clarified that the federation was not targeting any individual but defending the rights of Naga students.
However, NSF said, "While the candidate has listed an address in Kohima owing to her father's current posting, it is an established fact that she is from Haryana. She is not an indigenous to Nagaland and does not belong to any recognised tribe of the state."
Rhi expressed dismay that an army officer was "fighting for his daughter's candidature".
"One person cannot decide the future of our Naga community," he said.
The NSF president thanked students, medical aspirants, and members of the All Nagaland College Students' Union for supporting the protest.
He announced that the federation will continue to oppose the candidature and prevent the nominee from collecting admission forms from the technical education department.
The protest comes in the backdrop of ongoing legal proceedings.
On July 28, the Kohima Bench of the Gauhati High Court issued an interim order permitting Phangal to provisionally participate in counseling for the NEET-UG 2025 Nagaland State Quota, while directing the authorities to keep one medical seat vacant until final disposal of the petition.
The technical education department had earlier rejected Phangal's application, citing that she is not a Scheduled Tribe candidate and does not belong to any indigenous Naga community.
According to official guidelines, state medical quota seats are reserved exclusively for indigenous inhabitants of Nagaland who can produce the requisite indigenous inhabitant certificate and Scheduled Tribe certificate.
However, Phangal's family, led by her father—an Army officer—challenged the rejection in court, arguing that she had studied in Nagaland, appeared for the examination under the state code, and should be considered eligible.
On Tuesday, the Principal Bench of the Gauhati High Court stayed the Kohima Bench's interim order and fixed the next hearing after two weeks.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Kavin Selva Ganesh's murder shows why the ‘creamy layer' is not protected from caste violence
Written by Aishwarya Prakash On July 27, in Tirunelveli, 27-year-old Kavin Selva Ganesh, a Dalit software engineer at TCS, was hacked to death in broad daylight. His alleged killer was the brother of the woman he loved, a man determined to enforce caste boundaries. Kavin had what many in India consider the markers of security: A degree, a respected white-collar job, financial stability. Yet none of these shielded him from caste violence. His murder is a stark reminder that in India, caste cannot simply be outrun by education or earning. This reality stands in sharp contrast to the assumptions embedded in parts of the Supreme Court's landmark August 1, 2024 judgment, which allowed state governments to create sub-quotas within Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe reservation. While the verdict itself addressed only the permissibility of such sub-classification, two judges, Justice Gavai and Justice Mithal, went further, expressing opinions on issues which were not in purview of the case presented in front of the court. The Judges endorsed the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to SC and ST social groups. Justice Gavai suggested excluding 'wealthier' and 'more advanced' members of these groups from reservation benefits, citing children of IAS officers as an example. In his view, such individuals could not be considered 'handicapped in the race of life.' Notably, as of August 12, the SC has also agreed to examine a petition seeking income-based distribution of reservation benefits within the quota for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) so that the poorest among them get preference. On paper, the logic put forth by Justice Gavai appears tidy: If reservation has helped you or your parents achieve upward mobility, you no longer need it. But Kavin's killing shows how dangerously this assumption misreads India's social reality. Caste stigma does not dissolve in the presence of a bank balance; it does not vanish when a Dalit man walks into an IT office or lives in an urban apartment. In fact, research suggests the opposite, as the economic gap between SC/STs and upper castes narrows, violent crimes against the former often increase. Visibility can provoke backlash. We have seen this before. In Rajasthan in 2022, the wedding procession of Dalit IPS officer Sunil Kumar Dhanwanta had to be taken out under police protection, because his family feared violent confrontation from dominant caste villagers. The message is clear: No matter how many exams one clears, promotions one earns, or assets one acquires, the caste hierarchy remains ready to police the boundaries of intimacy, visibility and assertiveness. Even if overt hostility were to vanish overnight, the generational disadvantages created by centuries of exclusion cannot be erased in one or two generations of reservation. As Suraj Yengde observes in Caste Matters, an emerging Dalit middle-class family may enjoy some protection from overt discrimination, but remains structurally disadvantaged in ways that are often covert, harder to identify, and harder to fight. As aptly reminded by Sukhdeo Thorat, Ambedkar saw reservation and legal safeguards as tools for securing a fair share for the oppressed in the present, but still insufficient to undo the consequences of the historic denial of property, education, and employment. Evidence from the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) shows that Dalits experience far higher rates of downward mobility than forward castes, even when starting from professional-class backgrounds (Ideas for India, 2017). Weakening protective measures on the belief that caste disadvantage evaporates with income risks reversing fragile gains. The idea that India is somehow 'post-caste' collapses under basic scrutiny. Ninety-five percent of Indians still marry within their caste (IHDS 2012). In the job market, discrimination persists even for the qualified. A famous 2007 study by Thorat and Attewell sent fictitious CVs with identical qualifications to employers, changing only the names to signal caste identity. The Dalit-named applicants received 33 per cent fewer interview callbacks than their upper-caste counterparts. These are not the patterns of a society where caste has lost its grip. The persistence of caste bias continues to be reflected in recent evidence from other domains. In higher education, nearly 80 per cent of OBC and 83 per cent of ST faculty posts in central universities remain vacant, with many qualified candidates rejected as 'Not Found Suitable.' If caste-based bias can block Dalits and Adivasis from staff rooms and office cubicles, it is no surprise that caste can also stalk a man in the street, even if he is a well-paid software engineer. Reservation was, of course, never designed to prevent murder. It is not a personal security guarantee. But it remains the strongest armour against the structural vulnerabilities that make Dalits easy targets. It provides steady protection by enabling access to stable jobs, political representation, and social visibility. Taking it away on the assumption that caste disappears with economic comfort is not just naïve; it is dangerous. Removing that armour will not make caste vanish. It will only leave people more exposed to its violence. Of course, time and again we are reminded that in a casteist society like India, no amount of upward mobility can ever be enough protection. Kavin Selva Ganesh's murder is not just a personal tragedy; it is a case study in the limits of economic advancement as a shield against caste. When caste can kill a man who 'made it', who had education, a secure job, and the opportunities that reservation is meant to create, then the argument that such people no longer 'need' this protection rings hollow. Reservation cannot protect against the knife, but it remains one of the few tools we have to blunt the system that gives it its edge. The writer is a research scholar at Centre for Development Studies
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Stop intimidation or face retaliation: FNCC to Kuki militants
Imphal: The Foothills Naga Co-ordination Committee (FNCC) has condemned what it described as 'escalating acts of intimidation and violence' by Kuki militants against Naga civilians in Manipur 's Ireng and nearby areas. FNCC said Kuki National Front (KNF-P) cadres entered Naga-inhabited areas twice with the second instance on Aug 15 and assaulted farmers who were working in their own fields and termed the incidents as "deliberate acts meant to spread fear and provoke unrest". FNCC alleged that the militants are moving freely with sophisticated weapons in broad daylight, with complete impunity and described the act as "an open display of terror" which not only endangered lives of civilians but also posed "a direct challenge" to the very existence of the Naga people. In a statement, FNCC claimed that Naga people in the area have consistently upheld peace and shown restraint. However, it warned that it would not remain passive if authorities failed to act. "We will enforce a total bandh, or shutdown, on the movement of Kukis in Naga-inhabited areas if govt forces did not intervene decisively," it warned. While stating that Naga people should live in fear in their own land, it has also cautioned that if the Kuki militants refused to respect the peaceful intent of the Nagas, they are "fully prepared to respond in a language they understand". Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
18 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sudershan Reddy's candidature strengthens our collective resolve to safeguard democracy, says Stalin
Chief Minister M.K. Stalin congratulated retired Supreme Court judge B. Sudershan Reddy on being named INDIA bloc's Vice-Presidential candidate. 'I wholeheartedly congratulate Thiru B. Sudershan Reddy on being chosen as the vice-presidential candidate of the Opposition,' he said. Mr. Reddy was a jurist of integrity and independence, and a champion of civil liberties and social justice, and upheld constitutional values throughout his career, Mr. Stalin said. 'At a time when our institutions are under strain, his candidature strengthens our collective resolve to safeguard democracy and protect the spirit of the Constitution,' he added. Contending that all the independent institutions meant to safeguard democracy had been turned into the 'subsidiary bodies of the ruling party', and that the Constitution was in danger, he said, 'In such a situation, the responsibility before us is to support only the one who believes in India's fundamental ideals of secularism, federalism, social justice, and unity in diversity.' Mr. Stalin alleged that the BJP-led government at the Centre was 'continuously inflicting injustice on Tamil Nadu' — refusing to accept the State's rightful demands such as exemption from NEET, recognition of Keeladi's antiquity, fairness in fund devolution, and release of educational funds. 'Through Governors, it has been running a parallel government and blocking the functioning of State governments, while engaging in efforts to weaken institutions of higher education.' The DMK was consistently and vociferously raising its voice in Parliament against the unconstitutional denial of the State rights, the centralisation of power, the rising tide of hate propaganda, and the relentless imposition of Hindi and Sanskrit — 'all of which dig a grave for the Constitution and attempt to bury it', Mr. Stalin said. The DMK president said 'secular-spirited people of Tamil Nadu' had, in successive elections, overwhelmingly voted for the MPs and MLAs of the DMK-led alliance to defend the rights of the State and safeguard the Constitution. 'This decision stands as both a reaffirmation of the people's faith and a mark of respect for their mandate and sentiment.' 'As someone who can create space for constructive debates in Parliament, conduct the House by giving the rightful place to the voice of the Opposition, and as a democrat who has faith in the Constitution and in the principles of federalism, pluralism, social justice, and linguistic rights — Mr. Sudershan Reddy stands. As the opposite of anti-federalism, authoritarianism, and the trend of spreading hatred — Mr. Sudershan Reddy stands,' he said.
