Gagasan: What did Warisan achieve?
Published on: Monday, May 05, 2025
Published on: Mon, May 05, 2025 Text Size: 'They couldn't even last a full term. Yet now they appear as if they're the 'local heroes',' said Mohammad Bahrin. Kota Kinabalu: Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (Gagasan Rakyat) accused Parti Warisan of trying to divert public attention from their failures when they were given the mandate to govern. 'The people of Sabah placed their trust in Warisan during the last state election. 'But what did Warisan do? Empty promises, political instability and weak governance. 'They couldn't even last a full term. Yet now they appear as if they're the 'local heroes',' said Likas Gagasan Rakyat's Chief Mohammad Bahrin Abd Karim in a statement. He was responding to Warisan Assemblyman Justin Wong who called on the Chief Minister and several Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) assemblymen to resign if they loved Sabah. 'Calling for leaders to step down based solely on unverified documents and wild speculation is irresponsible. 'We respect the legal process and leave it entirely to the MACC to conduct their investigation fairly and professionally,' he said, referring to the alleged mining scandal implicating several GRS assemblymen. He said Hajiji had openly made his his stand on political funding, a common issue in any democratic system. * Follow us on Instagram and join our Telegram and/or WhatsApp channel(s) for the latest news you don't want to miss. * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Ukrainian drones force suspension of Russian electronics factory
MOSCOW: Work at an electronics factory in Russia's Chuvashia region, some 600 kilometres east of Moscow, was briefly suspended on Monday after a Ukrainian drone attack, local officials said. Moscow said falling debris from intercepted drones fell on the facility, while Ukraine claimed a direct hit on the site. 'This morning, Ukrainian attempts to use drones in Chuvashia were detected,' regional governor Oleg Nikolayev wrote on Telegram. 'Two drones fell on the territory of the VNIIR factory,' said Nikolayev, adding that there were no casualties. The site is one of the main factories producing electronic components in Russia. Ukraine's General Staff said in a statement that it had targeted 'a military-industrial complex facility, where antennas for Shahed (drones) were manufactured'. Russia fires dozens of Iranian-designed Shahed attack drones at Ukrainian cities on a daily basis. Ukraine regularly launches retaliatory drone strikes in response to Moscow's aerial bombardments, which began with its full-scale offensive into Ukrainian territory more than three years ago. 'Strikes on the facilities that support the armed aggression of the Russian Federation will continue until it is completely stopped,' Ukraine's General Staff added. Governor Nikolayev said that the decision had been taken to 'temporarily suspend production to ensure the safety of employees'. Russia's defence ministry said it intercepted 49 Ukrainian drones overnight. Ukraine said it shot down 'dozens' of Russian drones over its western Rivne region. The massive Russian attack saw Ukraine's western neighbour Poland scramble fighter jets to secure its airspace, Warsaw's Operational Command said in a statement on social media.
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Woman loses over RM600k to fake share investment scheme
A research officer lost more than RM600,000 after falling victim to a bogus share investment scheme. Pahang police chief Yahaya Othman said the 57-year-old woman was first lured into the scheme after being added to a WhatsApp group on March 21. She made an initial investment of RM14,000...
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
'See you in court': Fahmi Reza's fight over travel ban - What we know so far
SHAH ALAM - Activist and graphic designer Fahmi Reza has publicly disputed official explanations after being stopped from boarding a flight at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA), fuelling a public debate over whether his freedom of movement was improperly restricted. Here's what is known so far: The controversy began on June 7, when Fahmi posted on Facebook and Instagram claiming that he had been barred from leaving Malaysia while trying to board a flight to Singapore. An immigration officer reportedly told him that he was blacklisted. Fahmi also pointed out that he had recently been barred from entering Sabah. His post went viral, drawing public scrutiny and media coverage. In response, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim instructed Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay to investigate the matter. The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) issued a statement affirming that the government respects individual freedoms 'as long as they do not compromise national security or violate existing laws' and requested further clarification from the police. Later the same day, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain issued a statement clarifying that no official travel ban had been imposed on Fahmi Reza. Razarudin explained that Fahmi's name was on an internal police movement monitoring list due to ongoing investigations but that this list does not impose any legal restriction on travel. 'It must be emphasised that this list does not imply any restrictions but is part of the standard monitoring procedures implemented by the authorities,' the statement read. Razarudin added that a procedural error occurred during Fahmi's airport clearance process, resulting in an erroneous movement restriction order being triggered. 'The matter is being reviewed with appropriate steps to be taken to refine existing procedures,' he said. He also reaffirmed that the police remained committed to respecting the freedom of movement of all Malaysians. According to the police, Fahmi is free to travel in and out of Malaysia, subject to existing immigration regulations. However, Fahmi rejected the explanation and published a new statement on social media on June 8, responding directly to Anwar's and the IGP's statements. Fahmi responded directly to Anwar and the IGP in a new statement on social media on June 8. Photo: Fahmi's Facebook account. In an open letter addressed to the Madani Government, Fahmi wrote: "I have read Anwar Ibrahim's response blaming the police and the police blaming Immigration, saying 'no official restrictions' and that 'confusion occurred during the clearance process.'' "Do you know what I don't see? I don't see anyone in the government taking responsibility for the mistake that caused my right to freedom of movement to be blocked." "You can say 'no official restriction' easily. But in reality, I was blocked yesterday. I was not allowed to leave the country. I was denied my rights as a citizen." He went on to criticise what he sees as a lack of accountability, writing: 'I'm just an ordinary citizen. You blocked me, caused trouble, wasted my time and money and then wash your hands of it.' Fahmi ended his statement with a clear warning that he intends to take legal action: 'This time, it's the people's turn to take the authorities to court. The government and authorities are not immune. The people must be brave to fight back. You always tell us to 'use the right channels', right? Okay, we'll see you in court.' Malaysians on social media also weighed in on the issue. Instagram user @ urged, 'Please sue the government, we need it to happen.' Another user, @hizapizza, voiced support by saying, 'Yes, we have your back. The government is meant to serve the people, not the other way around.' @yixian_ong added, 'You are the check and balance we yearned for. It is unfortunate that it comes at such a cost. Power to the people!' Meanwhile, @syedddsolehin remarked, 'It does not matter whether it is Pakatan Harapan (PH) or Perikatan Nasional (PN) in power. We, the citizens, stay the same, left to accept whatever decisions are made on our behalf.'
