India's export loss due to higher US tariffs limited to 0.3 to 0.4 pc of GDP: Report
"Not only is India's overall export dependence relatively low, but its merchandise export exposure to the US is also low at around 2 per cent of GDP, offering additional resilience," the report contends.
Moreover, India's services exports remain outside the scope of these tariffs and should continue to support the external sector, the report states.
The report also projects the current account deficit (CAD) to remain manageable at 0.9 per cent of GDP in FY26.
Any diversification in India's oil imports away from Russia is expected to have a minimal impact on India's CAD, as the price differential between Russian Ural and the benchmark Brent Crude has significantly narrowed to around $3 per barrel from an average of $20 per barrel in 2023.
India's merchandise exports to the US stood at $87 billion in FY25. Electronic goods accounted for the largest share of exports at 17.6 per cent. This was followed by pharma products (11.8 per cent) and gems & jewellery (11.5 per cent).
The US accounts for 37 per cent of India's total electronic exports. Select items from this sector have been temporarily exempted from the 25 per cent US tariffs. Additionally, India's pharma exports to the US (accounting for 35 per cent of India's total pharma exports) have also been excluded from the tariffs, the report states.
However, the overarching risk of sector-specific tariff action remains. India has one of the highest numbers of US FDA-approved manufacturing facilities catering to the generic medicine requirements of the US. While tariff uncertainties persist, the sector's fundamental competitive advantages offer some resilience, the report observes.
India's relative tariff advantage for its exports to the US compared to several Asian peers, such as Vietnam, Indonesia, and South Korea, has effectively reversed following the 25 per cent US tariff, along with the possibility of an additional penalty linked to India's trade ties with Russia, according to the report.
However, India-US trade negotiations are expected to continue and could bring some relief. Still, India is likely to remain cautious about opening sensitive sectors such as agriculture and dairy, suggesting that the talks may take some time to conclude, the report said.
Against this backdrop, it is too early to determine the clear winners and losers from the evolving tariff landscape. Volatility in global financial markets is likely to persist, and tariff-related developments will be critical to watch in the coming months, the report added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A tribute to economist Shankar Acharya, A World in Flux, explores what needs to be done to achieve India's goal of becoming Viksit by 2047
A confession — I have known Shankar Acharya, a friend and fellow cricket junkie, far longer than he or I are willing to admit. It is an honour to review 'A World in Flux – India's Economic Priorities', a timely and deeply researched collection of essays in honour of Shankar's thinking and contributions. The book is about what change is needed to allow India to meet its tryst with a destiny that is viksit by its 100th anniversary in 2047. The contributors are much more than eminent scholars — they are acknowledged experts in their fields. The biggest — and the most well-deserved — tribute to Shankar is that the contributors have chosen to write a learned and expert commentary. Much of what they have written and advocated as policy is spot on, so what is a reviewer supposed to do? I can summarise the issues raised by the authors, but the editors, Amita Batra and AK Bhattacharya, provide a must-read analysis — a model introduction to a very distinguished economist, policy advisor and policy-maker. There has only been one major policy question on which Shankar and I have disagreed — and continue to disagree — and that is the danger that fiscal deficits pose to growth and inflation. He, of course, initiated India's long-term fiscal policy in the early 1980s, at a time when such a roadmap was very much needed. Before going further, I want to add that we have differences — differences that arise not out of a difference in expertise or analysis but differences in our genes. Shankar, by his own admission, gravitates towards pessimism; and when I have to err, I err on the side of my DNA++ disposition. The 'what should be done about fiscal deficits' debate is a good point ofdeparture for illustrating why 'yeh dil mange more' than offered by the experts in the volume. Does India have a high fiscal deficits problem or a problem of plenty, one which allows policy makers from doing nothing (at best) or actually implementing bad policies? Sajjid Chinoy in his tour de force essay ('Getting Rich Before Getting Old') speaks about raising India's tax/GDP ratio from an already high level of around 19 per cent today. It is quite the fashion among Indian commentators (I include myself in this galaxy) to point to China as a worthy example to follow — when in doubt, do what China does and thou shalt succeed. China's tax/GDP ratio of 14.5 per cent in 2024 suggests we should radically decrease our rate of taxation. But our experts do not advocate that. Why? India's fiscal problem is one oftoo high taxation, not too little. 'Easy' revenue allows the government (state and central) to indulge in ever more wasteful expenditure (freebies) which slows growth. Our slow growth, relative to potential, is the problem, not that fiscal deficits are causing inflation to be at a historic low. The IMF orthodoxy of 'when in doubt, raise tax revenue' is now hopelessly outdated. Another example of divergence between necessary policy, and one offered by experts, pertains to the low share of manufacturing (and even the ever lower share of manufactured exports). We all agree that something needs to be done, but what? One favourite solution (like raising the tax revenue) is to join the China-led RCEP. This is dictated by the specious reasoning that since China leads in manufactured export growth, by joining RCEP we will do so too. However, 13 of 15 RCEP countries have lower growth of manufactured exports than before (joining) RCEP. As far as policy analysis goes, why not note that our two 'global champions' — Ambani and Adani-led enterprises — produce zero manufactured goods (unless an intermediate good like polyester is considered a final manufactured good, like shirts)? And why, iflack of textile growth is a problem (it is!), our reform experts (except Amitabh Kant) don't point to the fact that a very very low hanging fruit is the reduction of high import duties on manmade fibres? Why don't the experts argue that the government should choose winners like Ambani and Adani? The government should appoint these global experts to lead the march on manufactured goods. Instead of Production Linked Incentives (PIL) we should have EIL — Export Linked Incentives. If subsidies are involved (as they will be), the government should provide them. Learn from China (again) how to sidestep WTO regulations. This is how Korea, China and the US have succeeded — we will succeed too. Bhattacharya also has a much-needed, must-read chapter on the political economy of reforms. AK notes that in the near-50-year history of economic reforms in India, an important pattern emerges. 'But once the immediate economic crisis was overcome, the pace of implementing subsequent reforms slowed considerably'. Phrased differently, the story of economic reforms in India is that reforms stop because our politicians (and the Deep State behind them) are not risk-takers, but comfort-zone seekers. They like the comfort zone of 'not rocking the boat', and thereby insure that Viksit Bharat 2047 might very well be no more than a dream. Before ending, I have a quibble with even this most worthy chapter. Bhattacharya's path to reform is via consensus-building (the mantra of every failed and defeated optimist). But AK fails to note that the path to consensus is littered with sabotage by the major groups (or group) hurt by the proposed reforms. Why, if everything is as well-known and as dutifully documented by all of us, are we still asking for basic reforms in agriculture, manufacturing, and governance? Note that a Supreme Court survey conducted after the withdrawal of farm-reform legislation, found an overwhelming consensus (87 per cent) among farmers wanting the proposed farm laws reform. Bhalla is chairperson of the Technical Expert Group for the first official Household Income Survey for India. Views are personal
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India lacks adequate risk capital to realise its $5 trillion economy ambition: Kamakodi
Synopsis City Union Bank's MD & CEO, N Kamakodi, stated that India needs to bolster its risk capital to achieve its USD 5 trillion economy goal, despite having sufficient capital. Sanatan Mishra of SBI highlighted the strength of Indian banks in funding growth and the transformative role of UPI in financial inclusion. He emphasized banks' readiness to finance capital expenditure. PTI India has the capital to support growth but lacks adequate risk capital to realise its USD 5 trillion economy ambition, City Union Bank MD and CEO N Kamakodi said on emphasised that while India is now the world's fourth-largest economy, its low per capita income due to a high population remains a major challenge. He was speaking at the launch of the banking and finance helpdesk at the Merchants' Chamber of Commerce & Industry (MCCI)."Entrepreneurs should lead and bankers should support," he said, noting that chambers of commerce play a pivotal role in driving the pointed out that while Germany relies on debt and the US on equity to fund their economies, India must focus on building its risk capital pool to meet long-term goals. State Bank of India General Manager (Network-II) Sanatan Mishra said Indian banks are currently at their strongest position to fund growth."UPI has become a game changer for low-ticket transactions and has enabled inclusive financial access," he said, adding that banks are well-capitalised and ready to finance capital expenditure, provided the private sector can absorb the credit.
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Kothari Industrial Corporation acquires Zodiz, Jeetlo to strengthen mass footwear presence
KICL, the flagship company of the diversified D C Kothari Group, acquired footwear brands Zodiz and Jeetlo for an undisclosed sum, further expanding its presence in the mass-market footwear segment, an official said. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd had previously acquired noted overseas brands, including Kickers, and has set up a non-leather footwear park in Tamil Nadu's Perambalur district. The acquisition of Zodiz and Jeetlo, along with their associated sub-brands, will come into effect from August 4, 2025, the company said in a statement on Zodiz brand is promoted by Coimbatore-based Zaimus Trends Pvt Ltd and is known for its affordable footwear promoted by Haryana-based India Pvt Ltd, has a strong presence across e-commerce platforms. The acquisition is expected to provide KICL with a firm foothold in underserved and fast-growing consumer segments. Both brands retail products priced below Rs 1,000 per pair, catering to a quality-conscious and value-driven industry data, KICL said that footwear priced under Rs 1,000 accounts for nearly 80 per cent of total consumption, with the sector estimated to be valued between Rs 80,000 crore and Rs 85,000 crore annually."This is not just an acquisition; it marks the beginning of a new chapter that will unlock value for consumers, partners, and stakeholders," said KICL executive chairman Jinnah Rafiq company plans to focus its marketing strategy on tier-II and tier-III cities, offering products that align with evolving fashion sensibilities while ensuring comfort for daily wear, he added. Ahmed noted that the Indian footwear market is undergoing a "profound transformation", with per capita consumption currently at 1.9 pairs per annum-a figure expected to double by 2030. The domestic footwear industry is at a pivotal moment. India is witnessing a rapid shift in consumer preferences. Footwear is no longer seen as mere utility-it has evolved into a symbol of personal style and self-expression, he said.
