Kothari Industrial Corporation acquires Zodiz, Jeetlo to strengthen mass footwear presence
Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd had previously acquired noted overseas brands, including Kickers, and has set up a non-leather footwear park in Tamil Nadu's Perambalur district.
The acquisition of Zodiz and Jeetlo, along with their associated sub-brands, will come into effect from August 4, 2025, the company said in a statement on Saturday.The Zodiz brand is promoted by Coimbatore-based Zaimus Trends Pvt Ltd and is known for its affordable footwear offerings.Jeetlo, promoted by Haryana-based Jeetlo.Com India Pvt Ltd, has a strong presence across e-commerce platforms.
The acquisition is expected to provide KICL with a firm foothold in underserved and fast-growing consumer segments. Both brands retail products priced below Rs 1,000 per pair, catering to a quality-conscious and value-driven market.Citing industry data, KICL said that footwear priced under Rs 1,000 accounts for nearly 80 per cent of total consumption, with the sector estimated to be valued between Rs 80,000 crore and Rs 85,000 crore annually."This is not just an acquisition; it marks the beginning of a new chapter that will unlock value for consumers, partners, and stakeholders," said KICL executive chairman Jinnah Rafiq Ahmed.The company plans to focus its marketing strategy on tier-II and tier-III cities, offering products that align with evolving fashion sensibilities while ensuring comfort for daily wear, he added.
Ahmed noted that the Indian footwear market is undergoing a "profound transformation", with per capita consumption currently at 1.9 pairs per annum-a figure expected to double by 2030.
The domestic footwear industry is at a pivotal moment. India is witnessing a rapid shift in consumer preferences. Footwear is no longer seen as mere utility-it has evolved into a symbol of personal style and self-expression, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
9 minutes ago
- Mint
Pfizer Q2 Results: Pharma major's sales jump to $14.65 billion; firm raises profit forecast for 2025 over cost cuts
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Pfizer raised its full-year profit forecast on Tuesday after topping Wall Street expectations for second-quarter results as it expects to benefit from its cost-cutting efforts and a weaker dollar. The company said the new forecast absorbs a one-time charge of 20 cents per share related to its licensing deal with China's 3SBio for experimental cancer treatment. Shares of the New York-based company rose 2.8% to $24.19 in premarket trading. The company's shares have lost more than half their value from their pandemic-era highs as the drugmaker deals with waning revenue from COVID products and looming patent expirations for key drugs. In response, the company launched cost-saving measures last year across its manufacturing and research operations. Pfizer said it was on track to deliver $7.2 billion in net savings from the programs by the end of 2027, out of which about $4.5 billion will be delivered by the end of 2025. J.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott said that the quarterly beat and the forecast raise did not come as a surprise given the company's better-than-expected cost management. "We would not be surprised with additional upside to EPS as the year progresses," Schott said. The drugmaker now expects to earn $2.90 to $3.10 per share on an adjusted basis in 2025, compared with its previous expectations of $2.80 to $3.00 per share. Total quarterly sales topped estimates by $1 billion and came in at $14.65 billion, including a $22 million favorable impact from foreign exchange. Revenue from Pfizer's antiviral treatment, Paxlovid, was $427 million for the quarter, compared with analysts' expectations of $244.4 million. COVID vaccine Comirnaty, which Pfizer makes with German partner BioNTech, brought in sales of $381 million. Analysts were expecting sales of $188 million. On an adjusted basis, Pfizer earned 78 cents per share for the second quarter, compared with analysts' expectations of 58 cents. (Reporting by Bhanvi Satija and Mrinalika Roy in Bengaluru and Michael Erman in New York; Editing by Anil D'Silva)
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A reminder for Trump: US wanted India to buy Russian crude to keep oil market stable, prices in check
US President Donald Trump seems frustrated with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine, clearly wanting the over three-and-half-year-old war to end, while Putin appears unyielding. The American president, meanwhile, believes he has a lever the he can use to push Putin's buttons. That lever is India's significant oil imports from Russia. Trump has been berating India over its Russian oil imports and pressuring New Delhi into cutting down on imports from Moscow in the hope that threatening or penalising a key trade partner would force the Kremlin's hand into ending the war in Ukraine. While Trump evidently finds it convenient to go after India on the issue at a time when New Delhi and Washington are locked in tense trade pact negotiations, it is worth noting that the US had a major role to play in India ramping up oil imports from Russia, for which New Delhi is now being vilified by Trump and his administration. Over the course of the war in Ukraine, US officials have publicly stated that India's purchase of Russian oil had Washington's endorsement, at least implicitly. In his latest salvo, Trump on Monday said that threatened that he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on New Delhi for profiting from exporting fuels derived from Russian oil. Trump's latest attack came just days after he announced 25 per cent tariffs and an unspecified 'penalty' on India for its defence and energy imports from Russia. Responding sharply to Trump's remarks, India said that while it has been targeted by the US and the European Union for importing oil from Russia, these imports began as its traditional supplies were diverted to Europe, and the US at that time 'actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability'. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2024, Moscow's share in New Delhi's oil imports was less than 2 per cent. The reasons were obvious: Russia was a far-away geography and already had established markets where a bulk of its crude was exported. India, on the other hand, depended significantly on West Asian suppliers like Iraq and Saudi Arabia, which are located close by. With much of the West shunning Russian crude following the invasion, Russia began offering discounts on its oil to willing buyers. Indian refiners were quick to avail the opportunity, leading to Russia—earlier a peripheral supplier of oil to India—emerging as India's biggest source of crude within a matter of months, displacing the traditional West Asian suppliers. Russia now accounts for 35-40 per cent of India's total oil imports by volume. As Europe decided to stop the import of refined petroleum fuels from Russia, Indian refiners increased fuel exports to the continent. Apart from alleging that India was helping fund the war in Ukraine by buying Russian oil, critics of India's oil and fuel trade argued that the country's refiners were facilitating a backdoor entry into Europe for fuels made from Russian crude. There was, however, nothing illegitimate about this trade as there was no specific ban on fuel imports from countries that were buying Russian oil. That ban has now been announced by the EU, and is slated to take effect from January 2026. Despite the noise from sections of the West against India over the country's hefty purchases of Russian crude, this shift in oil and petroleum product trade had Washington's blessings, as the US wanted energy markets to remain stable and well-supplied. In a recent interaction with CNBC International, global energy expert and Rapidan Energy Group President Bob McNally said that it was the Biden administration that 'begged' India to buy Russian crude to keep global energy prices in check. 'The Indians must be having some confusion (due to Trump's stance) because Joe Biden went to India after the invasion of Russia and begged them to take Russian oil…they begged India, 'Please take the oil', so that crude prices would remain low, and they did. Now we're flipping around, saying, 'What are you doing taking all this Russian oil?' The point is Trump is serious…he is frustrated with Putin,' said McNally, who served as the Special Assistant to the President on the White House National Economic Council and Senior Director for International Energy on the National Security Council during George W Bush's first term as US President. India's actions in line with US policy: Biden era officials Various US government officials during the Biden presidency also publicly acknowledged that India's actions helped balance the international oil market, and were in line with what the US wanted in order to keep the global market well-supplied. Had most of the Russian oil gone off the market—as happened with Iran and Venezuela—international oil prices would have shot up, which would have hit the global economy that was still fragile coming out of the pandemic. At an event in May 2024, the then US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti said, 'Actually, they (India) bought Russian oil because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap. That was not a violation or anything. It was actually the design of the policy because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up, and they fulfilled that.' Garcetti was correct, as Rusian oil was and continues to be sanction-free, and only a price cap of $60 per barrel was introduced in December 2022 on seaborne Russian crude by the US and its allies. The cap prohibits export of Russian seaborne crude at over $60 per barrel if the trade involves Western shipping or insurance services. Oil importers like India, which are not part of the price cap coalition comprising G7 countries and their allies, are not bound by the price cap as long as their purchase of Russian oil does not involve any shipping or insurance service from providers in the coalition countries. In April last year, senior US officials had said at a New Delhi event that the US neither expected India to reduce its oil imports from Russia and had not even requested it to do so. The then US Treasury Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy Eric Van Nostrand had said that the objective of the sanctions and G7 price cap regime was not to push Russian crude out of the market, but to keep it flowing while limiting Kremlin's revenue from oil exports, which in turn impaired Russia's ability to fund the war in Ukraine. 'The price cap is designed to leave Russia with only bad options…We want him (Putin) to choose between three bad things: selling with coalition services under the price cap, selling outside the price cap, or shutting his oil in and not putting it to market. With a strong and robust price cap regime, Putin is going to prefer to sell as much as he can outside the price cap. But in order to maximise his sales outside the price cap, when a large part of the global coalition is already involved in the price cap, he is going to have to offer it cheaper,' Nostrand said. Anna Morris, the then US Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crime, said at the same event that from a technical standpoint, Russian oil once refined into petroleum fuels and products could no longer be considered of Russian origin, dismissing the argument that India refiners were facilitating Russian petroleum's entry into Europe. 'I also want to specify that once Russian oil is refined, from a technical perspective it is no longer Russian oil…If it is refined in a country and then sent forward, from a sanctions perspective that is an import from the country of purchase, it is not an import from Russia,' Morris said. While the Biden administration seemed satisfied with the price cap, while letting Russian oil flow, Trump has taken a much more aggressive stance, threatening financial costs on importers of Russian energy. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trucking aggregator Blackbuck logs 56% rise in Q1 revenue, net profit up 17%
Trucking aggregator Blackbuck saw a 56% rise in its revenue from operations for the first quarter (Q1) of financial year 2025-26 to Rs 143.6 crore from Rs 92 crore reported a year Bengaluru-based company's net profit rose just 17.5% year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 33.7 crore from Rs 28.67 crore. However, its net profit plunged 88% on a quarterly Q4 of FY2025, Blackbuck reported a net profit of Rs 280 crore on account of a reduction in total expenses as well as a deferred tax credit of Rs 247 the company's revenue increased by 56% YoY, its expenses also rose to Rs 114 crore in Q1 from Rs 92 crore reported a year earlier. For the June quarter, employee benefit expenses fell marginally to Rs 37 crore from Rs 39 crore, while all other expenses platform's average monthly transacting truck operators grew by 13.87% to 783,399.'Q1 and Q2 are typically the seasonal months in terms of the addition of truck operators and the whole movement of trucks,' the company said in an investors' call. 'Most of the growth typically comes from Q3 and Q4 because that's where the whole operating leverage extends not only to the contribution to Ebitda but also to the sales leverage.'Blackbuck's core business offerings include tolling, vehicle tracking, load platform, vehicle financing, and more. 'The core businesses are growing at 40.62%, leveraging the tailwinds of the trucking industry and strong execution excellence,' the company said in the investor the Q4 results announcement, the company informed the stock exchanges that its board of directors approved a proposal to change the company's name from 'Zinka Logistics Solutions Limited' to 'Blackbuck Limited' or any other name that the Union ministry of corporate affairs approves, subject to shareholder which is backed by Accel and Flipkart, was listed on the stock exchanges last November. The shares of Blackbuck's parent company rose 3.03% to close at Rs 484.45 on the BSE on Tuesday.
