logo
Iran's defense minister thanks China for support on first foreign trip since Israel conflict

Iran's defense minister thanks China for support on first foreign trip since Israel conflict

Egypt Independent19 hours ago
Hong Kong
CNN —
Iran's defense minister has traveled to diplomatic and economic ally China on his first reported trip abroad since a 12-day clash with Israel that briefly dragged the US into a new regional conflict.
Aziz Nasirzadeh is one of nine defense ministers that Chinese state media say attended a gathering of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a China- and Russia-led regional security grouping that has grown in prominence as Beijing and Moscow look to build alternative international blocs to those backed by the United States.
The two-day gathering began Wednesday in the Chinese coastal city of Qingdao, a day after a ceasefire between Iran and Israel quelled what had been days of aerial assaults between the two, punctuated by a US strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
The SCO gathering coincided with a meeting of NATO leaders at The Hague, where US President Donald Trump said the US would meet with Iran 'next week' about a potential nuclear agreement.
Beijing's gathering, part of events for its rotating SCO chairmanship, spotlighted China's role as a key international player, even as it remained largely on the sidelines of the Israel-Iran conflict – and the importance Tehran places on its relationship with Beijing.
Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun did not directly address the conflict in remarks to gathering nations Wednesday, as reported by Chinese state media, but aimed to position China as a country with an alternative vision for global security.
'Unilateralism and protectionism are surging, while hegemonic, high-handed, and bullying acts severely undermine the international order, making these practices the biggest sources of chaos and harm,' Dong said, employing language typically used by Beijing to criticize the US.
The Chinese defense chief called for SCO countries – which, in addition to China and Russia, include India, Iran, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Belarus – to enhance coordination and 'defend international fairness and justice' and 'uphold global strategic stability.'
Attending countries 'expressed a strong willingness to consolidate and develop military collaboration,' according to China's official news agency Xinhua.
Iran's Nasirzadeh 'expressed gratitude to China for its understanding and support of Iran's legitimate stance,' Xinhua also reported.
The minister 'hopes that China will continue to uphold justice and play an even greater role in maintaining the current ceasefire and easing regional tensions,' he was quoted as saying.
Defense ministers including China's Dong Jun (second from right) gather for a group photo during the SCO defense minister's meeting on Wednesday.
Pedro Pardo/AFP/Getty Images
Chinese officials have condemned Israel's unprecedented June 13 attack on Iran, which took out top military leaders and sparked the recent conflict, as well as the subsequent US bombing. It's also backed a ceasefire and criticized Washington's foray into the conflict as a 'heavy blow to the international nuclear non-proliferation regime.'
A key diplomatic and economic backer of Iran, Beijing has moved to further deepen collaboration in recent years, including holding joint naval drills. Chinese officials have long voiced opposition to US sanctions on Iran and criticized the US withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.
China remains by far Iran's largest energy buyer, though it has not reported purchases of Iranian oil in its official customs data since 2022, according to analysts. Chinese-made chemicals needed to produce missile fuel have been delivered to Iran in recent months, CNN reporting shows.
In recent days, China has appeared unwilling to become further entangled in the conflict past its diplomatic efforts, analysts say, instead using the situation as another opportunity to paint itself as a responsible global player and the US as a force for instability.
When asked at a regular Chinese Defense Ministry press briefing Thursday whether Beijing would consider providing material military support to Iran as an SCO member, ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang told CNN that 'China is willing to work with all parties to play a constructive role in maintaining peace and stability in the Middle East.'
Founded in 2001 by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to combat terrorism and promote border security, the SCO has grown in recent years in line with Beijing and Moscow's shared ambition to push back against a US alliance system they see as suppressing them.
While not an alliance, the group says it aims to 'make joint efforts to maintain and ensure peace, security and stability in the region.'
The SCO has long been seen as limited, however, by overlapping interests and frictions between members, including Pakistan and India, which earlier this year engaged in a violent conflict, as well as China and India, which have longstanding border tensions.
The meet in Qingdao did not adopt a joint statement due to lack of consensus on referring to 'terrorism,' Reuters reported India's foreign ministry spokesman as saying.
Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh also attended the Qingdao meeting, the first visit from an Indian defense chief to China since a deadly 2020 border clash between the two countries.
CNN's Steven Jiang in Beijing and New Delhi bureau contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Iran war: Lessons learned
Israel-Iran war: Lessons learned

Watani

time5 hours ago

  • Watani

Israel-Iran war: Lessons learned

June 2025 was witness to the Israel-Iran war that involved Israeli strikes aimed at eliminating Iran's military and nuclear prowess, and Iranian retaliatory attacks with the purpose of inflicting maximum possible destruction on Israel. The war involved lethal strikes by American weapons on Iranian nuclear reactor sites, followed by an Iranian strike against American bases in Qatar—a scenario coined up for Iran 'not to lose face'. Finally, Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire which we hope would prevail despite leaked news of both parties breaching the ceasefire. It is now time to contemplate and explore the events that led to the war, in an attempt to comprehend its magnitude and learn a few lessons. I believe that no one is better poised to do that than American political scientist and international relations scholar John Mearsheimer, 77, the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor at University of Chicago. Prof Mearsheimer was recently hosted on Youtube's Breaking Points, the podcast presented by Krystal and Saagar. Today I present excerpts of the views voiced by the Professor on Breaking Points. 'I think the argument that we have solved the nuclear problem with Iran is wrong, and if anything, it's more likely than ever that Iran will get nuclear weapons. Almost everybody I know argues that if Iran wants nuclear weapons there's nothing you can do to prevent them from getting nuclear weapon; they have so much capability, and even if we were to destroy all of the existing facilities, they could rebuild them underneath a bigger mountain and eventually have nuclear weapons. 'To talk about regime change is changing the objective. Trump initially said that this was simply about taking out Iran's nuclear capability; he probably now realises that we have not done that. So now we're talking about regime change on the assumption that if we put in a new regime, those new Iranian leaders are not going to want nuclear weapons. This too is delusional. What Iranian in his or her right mind doesn't want a nuclear deterrent at this point in time? Furthermore, we're not going to get regime change, in all likelihood if you look at what's happening inside Iran… People are coming together to support the regime… So I think this is not going to work to cause regime change any more than it's going to work to eliminate nuclear capability. 'I think this has done great damage to the nuclear proliferation regime with regard to our reputation around the world. I mean the United States is correctly seen as a rogue State. Even in East Asia today, allies like Japan and South Korea are basically condemning us for what we've done… First of all the duplicative diplomacy here, and then this idea that we have the right just to run around the world attacking countries whenever we see fit. Furthermore, let's not lose sight of the fact that the United States is supporting the Israeli genocide in Gaza… America's reputation is in tatters; sure we're the most powerful State on the planet, but I think almost everybody outside of Israel and the United States and a few European leaders understand that the United States is basically out of control. 'There's no question in my mind that the Israelis understood that if they started a war against Iran, the focus would be on Iran especially if they brought the Americans in, and that would leave them free to ramp up the genocide, and possibly drive the Palestinians out of Gaza. It's very clear that that is their goal… and it's quite clear to me that starting a major war with Iran goes a long way towards helping them cleanse Gaza. 'American policy makers believe that the principal threat that the United States faces today is from China; China is widely seen as a peer competitor, and the United States has been interested in pivoting to Asia since 2011 when Hillary Clinton who was then Secretary of State said 'We're going to pivot to Asia'. But we cannot pivot to Asia in any meaningful way in large part because of the Ukraine war and what's going on in the Middle East, and if you look at all the naval and air assets that we have in the Middle East now that should be in East Asia, you see that we have greatly weakened our strategic situation in East Asia and we are in a poor position at this point in time for purposes of containing China, this is not in our interest. 'Any policymaker or any politician or aspiring politician who criticises Israel will find out very quickly that that person has the lobby's gun sight on him or her…The lobby will go to great lengths to destroy that person's career and make sure that he or she never gets elected to office… If you support Israel hook, line and sinker, you'll get big-time support from the lobby… If you support Israel, if you back it, and you push the American military to do things that are said to be in Israel's interest, your job prospects once you retire will be much better. I could go on and on about this, but Israel lobby has enormous influence in the United States. 'I think that Obama fully understood that the lobby was powerful but nevertheless its policies were not good for the United States; he understood that Israel is an albatross around their neck. He would never say that publicly… But he understood that getting a deal with Iran made sense, and he worked overtime to fashion a deal, and had a number of European countries: the French, British and Germans, plus the Russians and Chinese on his side. He was able to barely push through the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action), the nuclear agreement with Iran. But he took tremendous heat along the way from the Israelis and from the lobby. Then when Trump came to power in 2017, he made it clear that he was going to do away with the JCPOA, and of course in the summer of 2018, he walked away from it… Then the Trump administration started dealing with this issue again a few months ago, and Trump himself was talking about working out a deal that looked like JCPOA. Then the lobby moved in unsurprisingly and made it clear to Trump that there was not going to be a deal like JCPOA… In May again, the Trump administration was maintaining 'we're going to negotiate with Iran, we're going to curtail their nuclear weapons programme that's all we want'… Then they shifted to early June saying 'no nuclear enrichment'… Witkoff and Trump both did 180-degree turn, said the Iranians cannot have any nuclear enrichment at all which was allowed in the original JCPOA, and the Iranians said that was unacceptable and here we are today. Bottom line is that common sense won a victory during the Obama period, but that was quickly overturned by Trump, then it looked like Trump might win a victory for common sense this time, and it was quickly overturned by the lobby. So, you see the power of the lobby at every turn, it's almost impossible for a president to have any manoeuvre room when it comes to dealing with issues that are dear to Israel's heart.' Watani International 4 July 2025 Comments comments Tags: Israel and IranProblems on holdYoussef Sidhom

China Responds to EU Ban with Restrictions on Medical Device Imports
China Responds to EU Ban with Restrictions on Medical Device Imports

See - Sada Elbalad

time8 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

China Responds to EU Ban with Restrictions on Medical Device Imports

Taarek Refaat In an escalating trade dispute, China has announced new restrictions on the purchase of medical devices from the European Union, signaling a retaliatory move against EU sanctions imposed last month. The new measures, which will impact government purchases of medical devices valued at over 45 million yuan (approximately $6.3 million), come amid heightened tensions between the two economic giants. The Chinese Ministry of Finance made the announcement on Sunday, confirming that these restrictions would apply to the import of medical devices, including those with over 50% European-made components. The move follows the European Commission's decision in June to block Chinese companies from participating in public tenders for medical equipment worth nearly €60 billion ($70 billion) annually. The EU's ban on Chinese companies, implemented through the EU's international procurement mechanism which took effect in 2022, was designed to promote reciprocal access to markets. This mechanism aims to ensure that the European Union enjoys equal access to foreign public procurement markets, particularly with countries that impose restrictions on EU businesses. At the heart of this policy shift was the desire for fairness in international trade, a sentiment echoed by European officials at the time. However, the move quickly drew ire from Beijing, which saw it as a violation of the principles of open market access. In a separate statement, China's Ministry of Commerce expressed regret over the escalating conflict, stating, 'Despite China's goodwill and flexibility, the European Union insisted on imposing new restrictions and erecting protective barriers.' The ministry also emphasized that the Chinese government had 'no choice but to adopt similar measures in retaliation.' China's response underscores the growing economic rivalry between the two entities, as trade disputes between them intensify. This marks the latest in a series of retaliatory measures that Beijing has taken against European sanctions, particularly in the wake of EU tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The Chinese Ministry of Finance further elaborated on the scope of the new restrictions, revealing that they would extend to medical devices imported from other countries, provided that more than 50% of their components are of European origin. The new regulations are set to take effect immediately. However, Beijing clarified that medical products manufactured by European companies within China would be exempt from these measures, reflecting China's ongoing efforts to balance trade retaliation with its role as a global manufacturing hub. In a parallel move, China imposed additional tariffs of up to 34.9% on European brandy, particularly targeting French cognac, for a period of five years. This action is widely seen as another retaliatory gesture in response to the EU's electric vehicle tariffs. However, several major European liquor companies, including Pernod Ricard, LVMH, and Rémy Cointreau, have managed to avoid these tariffs by agreeing to sell their products at undisclosed lower prices, according to Chinese authorities. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean

BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions
BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions

Daily News Egypt

time14 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions

Leaders of the growing BRICS group of nations are gathering in Brazil for a summit overshadowed by United States President Donald Trump's new tariff policies, with the bloc aiming to present itself as a defender of multilateralism. The leaders, mainly from the developing world, will use the two-day summit beginning in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday to discuss ways to increase cooperation amid what they say are serious concerns over Western dominance. The event will be marked by the high-profile absences of two of the bloc's most influential leaders. For the first time since taking power in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping will not be attending in person, instead sending Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will also miss the in-person summit. He is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and Brazil, as a signatory to the Rome Statute that established the court, would be required to enforce the arrest warrant. Hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the talks will be attended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang, among others. Egypt's Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly will attend on behalf of President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi. Now chaired by Brazil, leaders at the summit are expected to criticise the Trump administration's 'indiscriminate' trade tariffs, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Global health policies, artificial intelligence and climate change will also be on the agenda. A Counterweight to the West The 17th BRICS Summit comes at a time of growing global volatility. Amid mounting geopolitical tensions and economic fragmentation, the bloc is positioning itself as a source of stability. The group sees itself as a forum for cooperation between countries of the Global South and a counterweight to the Group of Seven (G7), which is comprised of leading Western economic powers. Its creation has been described as a significant challenge to the US-led global political, economic and financial systems that have dominated since the Second World War. In a preview report for the summit, the Brazilian Centre for International Relations (CEBRI) last week labelled BRICS 'the first-ever transregional association of non-Western States'. The bloc's members have advocated for a multipolar world order and a greater voice for fast-developing countries of the Global South in world affairs. The theme of this year's summit is 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance'. Expansion and Economic Influence Originally an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India and China, the bloc held its first summit in 2009. South Africa was invited to join a year later, adding the 'S' to BRICS. The group has since undergone significant expansion. It now comprises 10 countries after Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia joined earlier this year. Saudi Arabia was slated to join last year and is listed as a member on the BRICS website, but it has not yet made a final decision. This expansion marks a qualitative leap in its representativeness and influence. The BRICS countries now account for almost half of the world's population, 36 percent of global land area, and more than 50 percent of global economic growth. With the addition of its new members, the bloc represents nearly 30 percent of global GDP. To challenge established financial institutions, BRICS created the New Development Bank (NDB) as an alternative to the World Bank. The NDB has approved over $39 billion for 120 projects, focusing on infrastructure, clean energy and sustainable development. The bloc has also established a mechanism to provide financial support during economic crises, partially rivalling the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). De-dollarisation and its Challenges BRICS nations continue to push for reform of global institutions like the United Nations Security Council, IMF and World Bank. They are also working to diversify from US dollar-denominated trade, a process known as de-dollarisation. Intra-BRICS trade is increasingly conducted in local currencies and through alternative payment systems to the Western-backed Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). Policymakers have also mooted the possibility of launching their own currency to challenge the US dollar, but progress has been slow. Plans have met resistance from some members, particularly India, over concerns about China's economic dominance. The plans were further stymied when Trump warned BRICS that the bloc would face 100% tariffs on imports to the US if a common currency were announced. Growing Interest in Membership According to the bloc's website, 44 nations have either formally applied for membership or made exploratory moves toward joining. This year, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Uganda and Uzbekistan became partner countries under the moniker BRICS+, seen as a prelude to formal membership. Other nations expressing interest include Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Honduras, Laos, Kuwait, Morocco, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe. However, expansion is not without its own political hurdles. Argentina had applied to join, but its application was withdrawn under President Javier Milei in December 2023, who cited a preference to maintain close ties with the West. Turkey's plan to join was vetoed by India, which cited Ankara's close ties with its foe Pakistan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store