logo
Mother of murdered tot James Bulger outraged at ‘sick' AI videos of her son

Mother of murdered tot James Bulger outraged at ‘sick' AI videos of her son

Sunday World29-04-2025

'It's just weird and it shouldn't be done.'
Toddler James Bulger, who was bludgeoned to death in 1993
The mother of murdered toddler James Bulger has branded AI videos of her son as 'absolutely disgusting.'
AI-generated videos depicting the two-year-old talking about his fatal abduction surfaced on TikTok.
The video showed a child telling the story of James' brutal murder in the first person.
A spokesperson for the social media app said that videos flagged by the BBC had been removed for violating its rules.
"We do not allow harmful AI-generated content on our platform and we proactively find 96% of content that breaks these rules before it is reported to us,' they said in a statement to the broadcaster.
Bulger's mother, Denise Fergus, said she thought existing AI laws do not do enough to force online platforms to take down harmful content and prevent AI from being used to depict murder victims.
"It's just words at the moment, they should be acting on it,' she told the BBC, adding that the AI videos of her son were 'absolutely disgusting.'
She also said that those posting them to social media 'don't understand how much they're hurting people.'
'It plays on your mind. It's something that you can't get away from. When you see that image, it stays with you.'
"We go on social media and the person that's no longer with us is there, talking to us. How sick is that?
"It's just corrupt. It's just weird and it shouldn't be done,' she added.
Under the UK's Online Safety Act, such videos are considered illegal and should be removed from platforms, but Ms Fergus is urging for stronger laws to clamp down on deepfake videos of child murder victims.
She met with Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood to discuss the issue.
The toddler was abducted from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, Merseyside in February 1993.
He was taken by two ten-year-olds Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, who brought the little boy to a railway track four kilometres away before torturing and killing him.
The tragic case sparked outrage, and his killers became the youngest convicted murderers in modern British history.
Both were handed down an indefinite sentence and remained behind bars until they were granted life-long parole at the age of 18.
Venables was returned to prison in 2010 for breaching the terms of his licence and was rereleased in 2013.
Jon Venables (left) and Robert Thompson, who were given new identities after the murder of James Bulger
Less than four years later in 2017 he was returned to prison for possession of child sex abuse images, where he remains.
Venables has made numerous bids for parole, with his last one rejected in 2023.
'After considering the circumstances of his offending, the progress made while in custody and on licence, and the evidence presented in the dossier, the panel was not satisfied that release at this point would be safe for the protection of the public,' the board's decision read.
'It noted the risks as set out above, doubted Mr Venables' ability to be open and honest with professionals, and concluded that there remained a need for him to address outstanding levels of risk, and to develop his relationship with his probation officer.'
Robert Thompson is not known to have reoffended and is now living under a new identity.
Venebles also lives under an assumed name.
A court order has banned anyone from revealing their new identities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cabinet to discuss introducing three new terrorist offences
Cabinet to discuss introducing three new terrorist offences

Irish Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Cabinet to discuss introducing three new terrorist offences

Ireland will introduce three new terrorist offences under plans to be discussed by Cabinet on Tuesday morning. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan will discuss the publication of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 when Ministers meet in Government Buildings. The Terrorist Offences Bill will allow for the prosecution of a broader range of terrorist activities in light of the evolving nature of terrorism, sources said on Monday evening. The Bill provides for the addition of three new terrorist offences which are directed at what was branded the 'foreign terrorist fighter phenomenon'. This will make receiving training for terrorism, travelling for the purpose of terrorism and organising or facilitating travelling for the purpose of terrorism criminal offences. It will also permit courts to treat the fact that the offence was committed against a child as an aggravating factor when sentencing a person for recruiting or providing training. It is understood that these changes will bring Ireland's counter-terrorism laws into line with other EU member states and will facilitate Ireland's participation in enhanced counter-terrorism networks across the EU. This will give An Garda Síochána the ability to tap into those networks to respond to both domestic and cross-border terrorist threats. Elsewhere, Tánaiste Simon Harris will tell Cabinet that he is concerned about the EU's list of potential retaliatory tariffs on the US. The EU last month produced a list of counter tariffs it will impose on the US if President Donald Trump does not row back on proposed measures. He initially announced 20% tariffs on goods entering the US from the EU but then implemented a 90-day pause and said a 10% tariff would apply. President Trump then announced that a 50 per cent tariff would apply from June 1 after he suggested that negotiations with the EU were 'going nowhere'. However, he reinstated the 90-day pause following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It expires on July 8. At this morning's Cabinet meeting, the Tánaiste will tell his colleagues that Ireland has particular concerns about the list of proposed countermeasures in relation to the aviation, the medtech and agrifood sectors. These concerns are being conveyed to the Commission, including in a letter from the Tánaiste to EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič sent ahead of the closure of the EU's public consultation period today. The Tánaiste's letter will state that the countermeasures should not harm EU businesses and consumers more than the US, that the EU should be mindful to avoid unnecessarily escalating trade tensions and that the impact of measures must also not be implemented disproportionately, either on any one Member State, one sector or one individual company. Where possible, Mr Harris wrote, the EU should try to avoid imposing unnecessary costs on EU companies. The Tánaiste will tell colleagues that discussions on a possible trade deal between the EU and the US are advancing with technical talks taking place in Washington DC in recent days. If no solution is reached, the EU will implement its countermeasures on July 14. The Tánaiste will seek Cabinet approval for a plan designed to retain and incentivise highly skilled specialists in the Air Corps. Under the proposals, a Service Commitment Scheme, currently used by Air Corps pilots, will be extended to Air Traffic Control personnel. Elsewhere, new college places in the health, disability and education sectors will be created under a plan being brought by Higher Education Minister James Lawless, Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and Children's Minister Norma Foley. This funding will support the creation of 461 additional annual places in these priority professions each year from now on, with the majority of new places commencing in 2025. This immediate expansion will include Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Podiatry, Social Work, Medical Science, and Dietetics. Minister for Education Helen McEntee will update Cabinet on progress being made in providing new special education classes for the 2025/26 school year. She has asked for all timelines for the 2026/27 school year to ensure better planning and ensure that children are accepted into new special classes much earlier.

Woman's ‘nightmare began as she woke up', US prosecutor tells rape trial of Dublin firefighter
Woman's ‘nightmare began as she woke up', US prosecutor tells rape trial of Dublin firefighter

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Woman's ‘nightmare began as she woke up', US prosecutor tells rape trial of Dublin firefighter

A US woman who has accused a Dublin firefighter of raping in her in a Boston hotel endured a 'nightmare' that began 'as she woke up', a US court was told. Jurors in a Boston courthouse heard opening statements and testimony from the 29-year-old complainant in the case against Dublin firefighter Terence Crosbie arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year . Mr Crosbie (39) is charged with assaulting the woman in a shared hotel room while his colleague Liam O'Brien slept in the other bed. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty in the trial, which started on Monday. READ MORE 'Our nightmares belong in our sleep and our nightmares and are supposed to end when we wake up,' the prosecuting lawyer, Suffolk Assistant District Attorney Daniela Mendes, said in her opening statement to the jury. 'Her nightmare began as she woke up.' Ms Mendes told jurors that the prosecution will present evidence 'that will prove beyond a reasonable doubt' that Mr Crosbie raped the woman as she slept and continued to do so after she woke up and tried to fight him off. Mr Crosbie's defence attorney, Patrick Garrity, told the jury 'the evidence will show you that there is a lot of doubt'. The woman claims she went with Mr O'Brien to room 610 of the Omni Parker House hotel on Thursday, March 14th, after meeting him at a nearby bar, The Black Rose. The couple then had sex and fell asleep in separate beds. She then woke up to a different man with 'an Irish accent' raping her. The key contention between the two sides presented to jurors was how the DNA evidence collected from the woman was interpreted. Forensic experts found 'two distinct male profiles', Ms Mendes told the court. Prosecutors claim the finding of two male profiles supports the complainant's allegation that she was assaulted by a second man after having consensual sex with Mr O'Brien. But Ms Mendes added that there was an insufficient amount of DNA to match the second profile 'to a known person'. Defence lawyers told the jury of eight men and six women that the only known male DNA profile belongs to Mr O'Brien. 'Not once did they find a trace of Terence Crosbie,' Mr Garrity told the court. The prosecution case is that the encounter with Mr O'Brien was consensual, Ms Mendes told the court – that was the night she signed up for. 'She did not sign up to be raped in her sleep by that man's hotel roommate,' the prosecuting lawyer said. Mr Crosbie met another woman at the bar, she said, but left the bar alone. Although he initially waited outside the hotel room on a chair in the hallway to give his friend privacy, shortly before 2am he 'was done waiting'. He saw that the complainant was 'defenceless' and asleep, and 'saw an opportunity', said the prosecutor. According to the prosecution, the woman awoke to a man with an Irish accent having sex with her. The man, later identified by the woman as Mr Crosbie, told the accuser that she 'wanted this', even as she struggled and told him to stop. When she broke free, he then cornered her against a wall, all while Mr O'Brien slept, oblivious, still snoring, the prosecuting lawyer said. Mr Garrity began opening statements with his hands on the defendant's shoulders, calling him 'Terry' as Mr Crosbie gazed directly at the jury. Mr Crosbie is 'seated here because this is the only avenue he has to deny these allegations', he told the jury. 'We don't convict people on 'maybes' or 'what-ifs.' We don't convict people on emotion, and this is going to be an emotional case,' he said. He told the jury they would hear 'how intoxicated' the woman was 'by the time she went back to the hotel room'. He said they would hear how the woman's statements were inconsistent, with her story changing 'as recently as two weeks ago'. The case, Mr Garrity said, 'boils down to the word of one person because Mr O'Brien was asleep and snoring through the alleged assault'. Mr Crosbie attempted to flee the county on an early flight after being questioned by Boston police, but detectives had told him he was a 'free man, you can do whatever you please', his lawyer told the court. Mr Crosbie was unfamiliar with American criminal and judicial customs, he said. This is 'not his world', added Mr Garrity, gesturing around the Boston courtroom. In her testimony to the court, the complainant described the hours prior to the assault and reviewed video taken from The Black Rose, occasionally wiping away tears as she spoke. She said she went with co-workers for drinks and met members of the Dublin Fire Brigade who had flown into Boston to march in the St Patrick's Day parade. The woman identified herself as 'dancing very awkwardly' in the video and trying to get other people at the bar to get up and dance. She described Mr O'Brien as 'about my height, maybe a little bit shorter, bald, white, Irish accent'. Mr O'Brien and his colleagues were wearing T-shirts identifying themselves as members of the Dublin Fire Brigade, she said.. After dancing with Mr O'Brien for about two hours, she said they kissed, he gave her his sweatshirt and they left together. The trial continues in Boston.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store