logo
New Indy youth curfew would include fine for parents. Here's how much

New Indy youth curfew would include fine for parents. Here's how much

A stricter youth curfew in Marion County — with fines up to $7,500 for parents of violators — has moved one step closer to becoming law in Indianapolis.
An Indianapolis City-County Council committee voted unanimously July 16 to make the youth curfew two hours earlier, meaning children ages 15-17 won't be allowed in public unsupervised past 11 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and past 9 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays. Children under 15 will face a 9 p.m. curfew every day.
But the stricter curfew won't take effect until after a full council vote Aug. 11 and will remain in place for only 120 days, at which point the council will decide whether to extend or relax the policy.
Until then, including during this weekend's busy WNBA All-Star festivities, Indianapolis police will enforce the state law that sets youth curfews two hours later. This weekend, police will debut a downtown site where officers will take kids who violate curfew and connect them with their parents or guardians.
The change comes after hundreds of unsupervised teens lingered downtown in the hours following the Fourth of July fireworks show, culminating in a mass shooting after midnight that killed Xavion Jackson, 16, and Azareaon S. Cole, 15. Two other teens and three adults were also injured.
The curfew ordinance doesn't create a criminal offense for children, but it does grant police the authority to detain them. The policy allows several exceptions for kids who are returning home from work, a school activity or a religious event, among others.
The only possible penalty is fining the parents or guardians of repeat violators up to $2,500 for a first offense and up to $7,500 for a second offense, according to council attorney Brandon Beeler.
The council doesn't have the authority to require mandatory parenting classes as previously discussed, said Leroy Robinson, chair of the Public Safety Committee, which passed the new proposal.
Multiple councilors, particularly council Republicans, said they support harsh penalties for parents or guardians who neglect to look after their children.
"We don't want to make this punitive for the children particularly, we want to help them," Democratic Councilor Dan Boots said. "But we've tried various things for decades, and we're still having a big problem.
"Historically, we've whipped people with wet noodles," Boots added. "Our enforcement's been pretty weak. People don't feel the pain, so therefore they don't fix the problem."
While councilors tout the curfew as an important tool to keep children safe, critics say it will be ignored and even mocked by teens who are already willing to break the law by carrying guns.
Kids as young as 13 and 14 were charged with gun possession over the Fourth of July weekend, and a total of eight teens and three adults face charges in connection with the downtown mayhem, according to the Marion County Prosecutor's Office.
Fraternal Order of Police President Rick Snyder, who represents all IMPD officers, told councilors they need to demand harsher penalties from the prosecutor and the court system.
"We're talking about criminally violent offenders armed with guns who ... are laughing at what we're doing here tonight," Snyder said.
"They know nothing will happen to them in the juvenile justice system," Snyder added. "That's a huge red flag."
The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department hasn't enforced the state curfew for years because the juvenile court system was unwilling to process violations, IMPD Chief Chris Bailey said. That changed last year after a different downtown Indianapolis mass shooting wounded seven teens, and IMPD officers announced plans to enforce the curfew.
"Voluntary compliance is what we all want," Bailey said while speaking in support of the bill Wednesday night. "Keep your kids home so they stay alive, so they don't end up in our custody for some criminal charge, or they don't catch a stray round."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gasparino: Inside the enormous Biden effort to 'debank' Trump after Jan. 6
Gasparino: Inside the enormous Biden effort to 'debank' Trump after Jan. 6

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Gasparino: Inside the enormous Biden effort to 'debank' Trump after Jan. 6

The scale of the effort to 'debank' Donald Trump because of pressure from Biden administration regulators went far beyond JPMorgan and Bank of America, The Post has learned. At least 10 other financial institutions closed their windows to the billionaire real estate tycoon over his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill ­melee. The moves came in the months after Trump left the White House in 2021, sources inside the Trump Organization told me. The stunning scale of the blacklisting is being revealed here for the first time. 3 President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 8, 2025. REUTERS It should be reported as much as possible for the simple reason that if any big bank can cancel a former president over politics as opposed to illegality, then every American citizen is in danger of facing the same mistreatment. For expressing an opinion, or starting a business out of step with the progressive culture norms that have infected so much of society, you too can see your economic livelihood go up in smoke and ­'debanked.' Debanking is such an odd word for one of the most insidious parts of cancel culture, and its sponsors like it that way. It sanitizes, via clumsy, obtuse lingo, what is essentially something of dangerous ­Orwellian magnitude: negating an American citizen's ability to save, and conduct business through a big bank. That's why Trump and Republicans like South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott are taking steps to end the politicization of banking. Keep in mind, there are already laws preventing the likes of JPMorgan, BofA and Capital One — the banks Trump has publicly stated canceled him — from being conduits for drug kingpins and Mafiosi. (Trump has sued Capital One, which denied Trump's allegations.) Debanking takes it further. It forces banks to remove customers who might pose nothing more than 'reputational risk,' a flighty rule enforced by bank regulators in recent years to keep financial institutions from doing business with people like Jeffrey Epstein. The now-deceased convicted child sex predator was a JPMorgan customer for years, and in theory making it impossible for Epstein to finance his illegality sounds like what should be happening. That is until you dig deeper. Under pressure from the Biden administration, just after Trump lost the 2020 election and started to act out (which the last time I checked was his constitutional right), the enforcement of reputational risk took a decidedly political turn, bank officials tell me. If you believe people at the two largest banks, Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan and Brian Moynihan's BofA, the Biden administration ­unleashed its bank regulatory cops at the Office of Comptroller of Currency, the FDIC and the semi-independent Federal Reserve to go beyond nixing perverted financiers from their platform. 3 A Chase bank sign in Richmond, Virginia, Wednesday, June 2, 2021. AP They used the amorphous nature of what is reputational risk to enforce a political regime, the bank ­officials said. The Bidenistas hated crypto, thought it was an affront to their power to control the economy, and pressured banks from doing business with this somewhat heterodox emerging industry, according to the bank sources. So was anything related to guns and certain conservative religious organizations, they added. And most of all, anything MAGA, including the multibillion-dollar real estate and resort empire of Mr. MAGA himself, Donald J. Trump. Such an effort isn't easy to prove because there's no direct smoking gun, no memo (at least not yet) telling banks to cancel Trump from their system. 3 A general view of a Bank of America sign as seen in Wyckoff, New Jersey, on April 13, 2020. Christopher Sadowski The banks say the pressure was more subtle but still real: Failure to remove Trump or crypto types and others would result in heightened enforcement, ­harassment and possibly fines. The banks decided to drop customers, even rich ones like Trump, because it wasn't worth the hassle. I have covered finance for three decades now and thought I saw it all: Bernie Madoff, Epstein, the 2008 financial crisis, Wall Street scandals, penny stock scams and hedge fund implosions. But what happened to Trump in 2021 was truly surprising given the breadth of big banks dropping him as a client and scary given their rationale. As bad as the events of Jan. 6 were, Trump did tell the crowd that crazy afternoon to protest peacefully. Trump didn't break the law holding a rally. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters You may disagree with his rhetoric that day. He had just lost a closely fought election against Joe Biden. Trump said he really won it. Millions of people seemed to agree. He wouldn't be the first politician to pull that lever. Democrat Stacey Abrams never really fully conceded when she lost in her first attempt to become governor of Georgia against Republican Brian Kemp. How many times did Hillary Clinton say Trump was an 'illegitimate president' after she lost the 2016 contest to him? During the violent social justice protests of 2020, Gwen Walz, the wife of Minnesota Gov. and 2024 Democrat VP candidate Tim Walz, said she 'kept the windows' open to smell the burning debris. 'I felt like that was such a touchstone of what was happening,' she said. Or how about what Kamala Harris proudly said around the same time. The then-Biden VP candidate, who went on to get trounced by Trump in 2024, supported the defunding of the police movement that led to much more mayhem than what ­occurred on Jan. 6. Her rationale for the 'largely peaceful protests' that burned cities to the ground, delivered to fellow-traveler lefty late-night host Stephen Colbert, is at least as cringey as anything Trump said on Jan. 6. 'They're not going to stop,' she said during an appearance on the show. 'They're not. This is a movement. I'm telling you. They're not going to stop, and everyone, beware . . . That they're not going to let up. And they should not, and we should not.' Did Jamie Dimon tell Harris that her money isn't good at JPM?

‘It's super disrespectful': WNBA players exasperated after sex toy thrown onto court for second time in a week
‘It's super disrespectful': WNBA players exasperated after sex toy thrown onto court for second time in a week

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘It's super disrespectful': WNBA players exasperated after sex toy thrown onto court for second time in a week

WNBA players have spoken out after a second game this week was delayed due to a sex toy being thrown onto the court. In the third quarter of the Golden State Valkyries' 73-66 win over the Chicago Sky on Friday night, the bright green toy was thrown from the stands at Wintrust Arena in Chicago and landed just out of bounds underneath one of the baskets. With the Sky on the attack, the game was halted and an official kicked the object to the side, where it was picked up with a towel and removed. 'It's super disrespectful,' Sky center Elizabeth Williams told reporters afterward. 'I don't really get the point of it. It's really immature. Whoever's doing it just needs to grow up.' The incident came just three days after another sex toy was thrown onto the court during the Valkyries' 77-75 victory over the Atlanta Dream at Gateway Center Arena in College Park, Georgia. Following Friday's reoccurrence, a number of players from around the WNBA took to social media to comment on the incidents. 'ARENA SECURITY?! Hello??!' wrote New York Liberty forward Isabelle Harrison wrote on X. 'Please do better. It's not funny. never was funny. Throwing ANYTHING on the court is so dangerous.' Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham echoed Harrison's anger, writing: 'Stop throwing dildos on the court… you're going to hurt one of us.' The WNBA says any fan caught engaging in such behavior will face prosecution as well as a ban from the league. 'The safety and well-being of everyone in our arenas is a top priority for our league,' a WNBA spokesperson told CNN. 'Objects of any kind thrown onto the court or in the seating area can pose a safety risk for players, game officials, and fans. 'In line with WNBA Arena Security Standards, any fan who intentionally throws an object onto the court will be immediately ejected and face a minimum one-year ban in addition to being subject to arrest and prosecution by local authorities.' The individual involved in the incident in Atlanta was identified and arrested, according to the WNBA.

WNBA announces fan in Atlanta arrested for throwing sex toy on court
WNBA announces fan in Atlanta arrested for throwing sex toy on court

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

WNBA announces fan in Atlanta arrested for throwing sex toy on court

The post WNBA announces fan in Atlanta arrested for throwing sex toy on court appeared first on ClutchPoints. The WNBA is not playing around when it comes to respecting players and the audience. The WNBA shared the repercussions of a fan who threw a sex toy onto the court during the Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries game on Tuesday, July 29). 'The safety and well-being of everyone in our arenas is a top priority for our league. Objects of any kind thrown onto the court or in the seating area can pose a safety risk for players, game officials, and fans,' the league said in a statement per ESPN. 'In line with WNBA Arena Security Standards, any fan who intentionally throws an object onto the court will be immediately ejected and face a minimum one-year ban in addition to being subject to arrest and prosecution by local authorities.' The penalty for the fan from the Dream-Valkyries was exactly that, as they were arrested and now have a one-year ban from the league. The league addressing this issue follows a second incident of fans throwing a sex toy onto the court on Friday (Aug. 1) during the Chicago Sky and the Valkyries game. During this second incident, the toy was thrown under a basket and was later kicked over by an official during the third quarter. Several fans and WNBA players have spoken out about the interruptions. 'It's super disrespectful. I don't really get the point of it. It's really immature. Whoever is doing it needs to grow up,' Sky center Elizabeth Williams said after Friday's game. 'Stop throwing dildos on the court… you're going to hurt one of us,' Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham reacted on X. 'ARENA SECURITY?! Hello??!' New York Liberty forward Isabelle Harrison wrote on X. 'Please do better. It's not funny. never was funny. Throwing ANYTHING on the court is so dangerous.' The rules with bringing objects into the arena vary per venue where some allow clear bags and others implement a no-bag policy. The Atlanta Dream's next game is today at 3 pm against the Washington Mystics. Related: Dream's Shatori Walker-Kimbrough sends warning to rest of WNBA Related: Dream's Allisha Gray declares A'ja Wilson's 'A'Ones' the 'only shoe I'm rocking on court

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store