MP urges relaxing criteria for rural road scheme citing ground realities in DK
Raising the issue under Rule 377 in the Lok Sabha on August 6, Capt. Chowta flagged the implementation challenges of PMGSY-IV with respect to the realities of ecologically sensitive and topographically complex regions like Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, Uttara Kannada, parts of Shivamogga, Chikkamagaluru, Hassan and Kodagu districts in Karnataka.
Acknowledging the transformative impact of PMGSY under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, Capt. Chowta praised the substantial gains in rural connectivity achieved through Phases I, II, and III of the scheme. However, he highlighted that Phase IV guidelines do not adequately account for the ground realities of coastal and Malnad districts.
What are these ground realities
The MP pointed out that while many habitations appear 'connected' in the Management Information System (MIS), ground verification in hilly and forested areas shows that several remote hamlets still lack reliable and all-weather motorable access. He pointed out that these districts have been incorrectly classified as 'plain areas' under PMGSY-IV, which affects eligibility, funding and design norms.
Capt. Chowta expressed concern that the population thresholds — 500+ for plain terrain and 250+ for hilly terrain — leave out scattered, but permanently inhabited hamlets located more than 1.5 km from the nearest road. These small settlements often remain cut off from essential services, like health and education.
He said, 'Our government has done transformative work in rural connectivity, including tribal settlements. Minor course correction in regions like the coastal and Malnad districts, particularly Dakshina Kannada, will ensure no village is left behind.' The MP urged the Ministry of Rural Development to reclassify these districts as 'hilly terrain', enable on-ground verification of connectivity status, and relax population thresholds. He also recommended a cluster-based planning approach for remote, dispersed habitations.
Connecting 25,000 habitations
PMGSY-IV aims to provide all-weather road connectivity to unconnected habitations. It was launched in September 2024 to connect 25,000 habitations prioritising tribal and aspirational areas on the basis of Census 2011 data. For the five-year period, the 2025 budget had sanctioned ₹70,125 crore to construct 62,500 km new roads in rural areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Over 2 Lakh Indians Renounced Citizenship In 2024 To Acquire Foreign Nationality
Last Updated: Over two lakh Indians renounced citizenship in 2024, Minister Kirti Vardhan Singh informed Lok Sabha. Over two lakh Indians gave up their citizenship in 2024, the government informed the Lok Sabha on Friday. While replying to queries by Congress MP K C Venugopal, Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said this in a written response to queries on the number of individuals who have renounced their Indian citizenship and taken citizenship of other countries during the last five years. 'As per the information available with the Ministry, the number of Indians who gave up their Indian citizenship was 85,256 in 2020, 1,63,370 in 2021, 2,25,620 in 2022, 2,16,219 in 2023 and 2,06,378 in 2024, Singh said. For reference, such cases were 1,22,819 in 2011, 1,20,923 in 2012, 1,31,405 in 2013 and 1,29,328 in 2014, he added. The government stated that the reasons for renouncing Indian citizenship or acquiring foreign citizenship are personal and known only to the individuals concerned. 'The government recognises the potential of the global workplace in an era of the knowledge economy. It has also brought about a transformational change in its engagement with the Indian diaspora," the MoS said. He said the government is also working to fully harness the potential of the Indian diaspora, including by facilitating the sharing of their knowledge and expertise. In response to another query, the government shared that according to available inputs, the population of overseas Indians is 3,43,56,193, out of which 1,71,81,071 are Persons of Indian Origin (PIOs) and 1,71,75,122 are Non-Resident Indians (NRIs). view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'I will surrender': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey after FIR filed over 'forcible' temple entry; 'booked for performing puja'
Nishikant Dubey (left) and Manoj Tiwari NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey on Friday slammed the Jharkhand Police after he and five others, including Delhi BJP MP Manoj Tiwari, were booked for allegedly 'forcibly' entering the sanctum sanctorum of the Baba Baidyanath temple in Deoghar, thereby 'hurting religious sentiments. ' Also Read: Deoghar's Shravani mela deserves national status, says BJP MP Nishikant Dubey 'I have been booked for performing 'puja.' So far, 51 cases have been registered against me. Tomorrow, I will go straight from Deoghar airport to the police station to get arrested,' the Lok Sabha member from Godda wrote on X. Nishikant Dubey X post The FIR, lodged as per a complaint by temple priest Kartik Nath Thakur, is under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. for 'forcibly entering the inner shrine on August 2 between 8:45 pm and 9 pm" despite a restriction on VVIP entries during the holy month of 'Shravan' in view of a large number of devotees. "An FIR has been lodged at Baba Baidyanath Mandir police station against Nishikant Dubey, Manoj Tiwari, Kanshikanat Dubey, Sheshadri Dubey and others for entering the inner shrine of the temple, hurting religious tradition and sentiments and causing obstacles in government work by entering into a scuffle with police persons deployed for security reasons," an officer told news agency PTI. Also Read: SC upholds HC's order to junk FIR against BJP MPs Dubey, Tiwari in Deoghar airport case The 'forcible entry' by the group and 'scuffle' with policemen resulted caused fear among the devotees present, besides leading to a stampede-like situation, according to the complaint. Thakur said he had lodged the FIR on August 7. About 55 lakh 'kanwariyas' (devotees of Lord Shiva) have offered holy water at the Baba Baidyanath temple during the ongoing month-long 'Shravan Mela' so far.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Reconciling the questions about voter-roll integrity
The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, made serious allegations about the integrity of elections and electoral rolls in the country on Thursday. The Congress has alleged that some prima facie credible discrepancies in electoral rolls in a single assembly segment (Mahadevpura) made a critical difference to overall results in the Lok Sabha constituency of Bangalore Central, which was won by the Bharatiya Janata Party in the 2024 polls. Regions with a contested history of migration such as Assam have had long spells of unrest over electoral discrepancies, which led to controversial moves such as the NRC. (HT Photo) He also charged the Election Commission of India (ECI) — one of the most critical constitutional institutions which safeguards the sanctity of democratic competition and hence peaceful transfer of power — of colluding with the ruling dispensation. What is one to make of these allegations? Three things can be said. This is neither the first nor the last allegation of electoral rigging in India via various forms. These allegations are more likely to be levelled against a hegemonic political party that is difficult to dislodge from power. The Left Front and the Trinamool Congress in pre- and post-2011 West Bengal, Lalu Prasad Yadav's rule in Bihar in the 1990s — which brought the TN-Seshan-led ECI in direct conflict with the Bihar government — the BJP's allegations of rigged EVMs after its defeat in the 2009 elections, and the Congress's string of allegations against the BJP in the post-2019 period are some such instances. In many cases, the parties accused of such rigging eventually lost power, which suggests that even if there were irregularities, it was never strong enough to permanently subvert democratic sentiments. If one were to confine the argument to unscrupulously engineered electoral rolls — which is what Gandhi is alleging now — there is good reason to believe that these were never an epitome of integrity in the past. A data analysis in this newspaper found that the number of registered voters often exceeded the number of adults of voting age in the country (as seen in the census) in many past elections. All this, however, does not mean that Gandhi's allegations should be summarily dismissed. This is because the core of his demand is that ECI be more upfront and cooperative in sharing information about the electoral rolls, and their translation to actual voting, with political parties. While one might have to look carefully at the fine print of laws and rules vis-à-vis the mechanism of ECI sharing information with political parties, in principle, there is nothing wrong in raising such a demand. India has almost one billion voters now, and it is impractical to expect political parties to ascertain the integrity of electoral rolls without resorting to machine-based tools. ECI has to provide machine-readable electoral rolls for this to happen. The longer ECI stonewalls this demand, the more it will hurt its credibility. This brings us to the final point. Even if one were to accept, for the sake of argument, that political actors do try to contaminate electoral rolls to influence results — such allegations go back a long time in India — the question is: Can something be done at a systemic level to prevent this from happening? Regions with a contested history of migration such as Assam have had long spells of unrest over these issues, which in turn led to controversial moves such as the National Register of Citizens. In such instances, allegations about the lack of integrity of electoral rolls triggered mass unrest and often divisive and violent agitations, indicating that there was organic traction, justified or not, in the belief of large-scale vote tampering. Recent allegations about tampering have seen no such mass unrest, which suggests that they might not be as large in scale. Be that as it may, can ECI and the system as a whole do something about making electoral rolls more robust and immune to malfeasance? This is the proverbial elephant in the room. Should we move towards linking electoral rolls to other databases such as Aadhaar, which, theoretically, make it possible to eliminate discrepancies such as multiple entries for the same person or even prevent the same person voting more than once? Many voices driven by privacy concerns have opposed such moves, and there is some merit in their concerns about all this emboldening a larger surveillance State. However, it is also worth asking whether we are only protecting privacy on a de-jure basis while it is being blatantly violated by State and non-State actors colluding with each other to subvert it in a de-facto manner. Another option could be to resort to processes such as electoral-roll additions or deletions requiring mandatory approval of designated representatives of recognised political parties. As will be obvious to the discerning reader, neither of these processes can be deemed foolproof. The choice, as is always the case while making large databases, will be between wrongful inclusion and wrongful exclusion. The Opposition, with its attacks about fake voters, is emphasising wrongful inclusion. But, it is also protesting possible wrongful exclusion by opposing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, presently ongoing in Bihar. Logically, one cannot minimise one without letting the other increase. In an ideal world, ECI should have been a non-partisan body, making both the ruling party and Opposition realise the inherent tension between the concerns of wrong inclusion and exclusion in electoral rolls. But realpolitik and institutional propriety crossed the Rubicon of this ideal a long time ago, and it is condemned to veer towards the banks of one echo chamber or another. The views expressed are personal.
