Felda to consult PMD on RM100,000 allocation for land scheme villages
Its chairman Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek said the move aims to ensure the funds are distributed efficiently and achieve the government's objectives.
"We will refer to PMD to establish the appropriate criteria for recipients to ensure that the assistance is properly utilised and achieves the intended goals," he said.
He said the allocation would be tailored to the needs of individual villages, some of which have Land Scheme Working Committees (JKTR), cooperatives, or youth councils.
Ahmad Shabery said this to reporters after launching the Felda Robo and Novate 2025 programme, themed 'Young Innovators, Global Future,' at the Mega 3D Carnival (MK3D) 2025 at the Malaysia International Trade and Exhibition Centre (Mitec).
Also present was Felda director-general Datuk Dr Suzana Idayu Wati Osman.
Yesterday, Anwar announced the RM100,000 allocation for each village under Felda to fund development projects decided by the local residents.
This initiative aligns with the Madani government's focus on consultation and empowering the people.
Regarding the delisting of FGV Holdings Bhd (FGV) from Bursa Malaysia, Ahmad Shabery said it should not be viewed negatively.
He said delisting will allow for a restructuring of the company without being constrained by the regulations governing public companies, ultimately enabling Felda to fully own FGV and run welfare activities for settlers more effectively.
Anwar had earlier confirmed that Felda would have control over FGV's direction once the delisting process is completed, which will begin on August 28.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Subscription squeeze
There was a time when entering into a contract was as simple as ABC. The company handed you a contract and you sign off if the terms were acceptable. When you wanted to end the service, you pay the current bill and that was it. But with competition getting intense, businesses have become creative by inventing the subscription contract that comes with a self-renewal clause, unless terminated with notice. And the auto-renewal clause comes with a termination penalty. As high as RM58,000 for quitting a wellness programme, as one complainant told the National Consumer Complaints Centre (NCCC). Herein lies a trap. When you try to unsubscribe from the service, it is like searching for a needle in a haystack. If you managed to do so, you end up paying a hefty penalty. Is this legal? Here, we come face to face with the "on the one hand and on the other hand" argument of lawyers. As a general legal principle, a contract is an agreement between parties. Were the terms made explicit to the consumer? If so, then the consumer's case ends there, except if the penalty is excessive, like the RM58,000 imposed by the wellness company. In such cases, it is best to proceed to the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. Vigilance is the key. But being vigilant isn't easy in a business environment where companies push the concept of consent to the edge of the law. Complaints to the NCCC tell us that the subscription contracts need regulatory intervention. Not that Malaysia doesn't have laws. It has several, but unlike the United Kingdom, not specific to subscription contracts. Do we need one? Certainly, but first, let's look at what we already have. The Contracts Act 1950 (CA) is one of several. Subscription agreements are contracts, they clearly fall under it. The CA makes consent of the parties a critical element. Another, and perhaps more relevant, is the Consumer Protection Act (1999), which specifically addresses unfair contract terms. Astronomical penalties, either made known or hidden, are likely to be treated as such. So will deceptive auto-renewals. Finally, the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA). Interestingly, the CMA imposes a duty to act reasonably on all service providers. If the auto-renewals and penalties are not made known to and agreed by the consumer, then the service providers could be found to have failed in their duty to act reasonably. A point needs to be made, though. Despite scores of complaints to the NCCC, there has been no litigation on such issues. Neither have the regulators acted on the complaints, Perhaps, they are waiting for the consumers to lodge a report with them. A report from the consumer shouldn't be the only way for regulators and enforcement agencies to act. Even the police are using viral videos to launch their investigations. The regulators must go where the complaints are: consumer associations, NCCC and media reports. Malaysia needs a specific law such as the UK's Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013. Proper consent of the consumer, together with a cooling-off period of 14 days, is a pillar of these regulations.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Subscription squeeze - Regulating the auto-renewal trap
THERE was a time when entering into a contract was as simple as ABC. The company handed you a contract and you sign off if the terms were acceptable. When you wanted to end the service, you pay the current bill and that was it. But with competition getting intense, businesses have become creative by inventing the subscription contract that comes with a self-renewal clause, unless terminated with notice. And the auto-renewal clause comes with a termination penalty. As high as RM58,000 for quitting a wellness programme, as one complainant told the National Consumer Complaints Centre (NCCC). Herein lies a trap. When you try to unsubscribe from the service, it is like searching for a needle in a haystack. If you managed to do so, you end up paying a hefty penalty. Is this legal? Here, we come face to face with the "on the one hand and on the other hand" argument of lawyers. As a general legal principle, a contract is an agreement between parties. Were the terms made explicit to the consumer? If so, then the consumer's case ends there, except if the penalty is excessive, like the RM58,000 imposed by the wellness company. In such cases, it is best to proceed to the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. Vigilance is the key. But being vigilant isn't easy in a business environment where companies push the concept of consent to the edge of the law. Complaints to the NCCC tell us that the subscription contracts need regulatory intervention. Not that Malaysia doesn't have laws. It has several, but unlike the United Kingdom, not specific to subscription contracts. Do we need one? Certainly, but first, let's look at what we already have. The Contracts Act 1950 (CA) is one of several. Subscription agreements are contracts, they clearly fall under it. The CA makes consent of the parties a critical element. Another, and perhaps more relevant, is the Consumer Protection Act (1999), which specifically addresses unfair contract terms. Astronomical penalties, either made known or hidden, are likely to be treated as such. So will deceptive auto-renewals. Finally, the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA). Interestingly, the CMA imposes a duty to act reasonably on all service providers. If the auto-renewals and penalties are not made known to and agreed by the consumer, then the service providers could be found to have failed in their duty to act reasonably. A point needs to be made, though. Despite scores of complaints to the NCCC, there has been no litigation on such issues. Neither have the regulators acted on the complaints, Perhaps, they are waiting for the consumers to lodge a report with them. A report from the consumer shouldn't be the only way for regulators and enforcement agencies to act. Even the police are using viral videos to launch their investigations. The regulators must go where the complaints are: consumer associations, NCCC and media reports. Malaysia needs a specific law such as the UK's Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013. Proper consent of the consumer, together with a cooling-off period of 14 days, is a pillar of these regulations.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Wasco scales up global sustainability efforts
KUALA LUMPUR: Riding high on its recent win as Company of the Year (Energy Solutions) at the CSR Malaysia Awards 2025, Wasco Berhad is looking to scale up its global sustainability efforts, with a strong focus on deepening community engagement and driving forward Malaysia's energy transition goals. The group is expected to accelerate initiatives aligned with its net-zero target by 2026 while building long-term regional partnerships that strengthen green value chains across its operating markets. The award comes on the back of a milestone year for Wasco. In 2024, the group invested nearly RM800,000 in social and environmental programmes that collectively reached approximately 12,000 lives across Malaysia, Tanzania, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore and Indonesia. These efforts, anchored on healthcare, humanity and environmental protection, were not just CSR gestures, but integral to Wasco's broader decarbonisation and sustainability strategy. Among the 55 initiatives implemented were free health screenings, vaccination drives, food and disaster relief, school infrastructure upgrades and environmental awareness campaigns promoting circular economy practices. These community-driven projects were matched by strong internal participation, with Wasco employees collectively contributing more than 11,800 hours of volunteer time. 'Corporate responsibility is embedded in our DNA. It is part of our promise to deliver meaningful, measurable value for people, planet and progress,' said Wasco Berhad chief strategy officer Ariesza Noor. 'This award affirms our belief that sustainability is most powerful when it is people-powered. We will continue to elevate our efforts in line with our broader environmental, social and governance (ESG) ambitions.' Wasco's impact efforts are also closely tied to national and global frameworks. The group's initiatives reflect Malaysia's 12th Malaysia plan and the National Energy Transition Roadmap, while aligning with several United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs), including good health and well-being (SDG 3), responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13) and life on land (SDG 15). Beyond short-term outreach, Wasco has also committed to longer-term environmental restoration through its Wasco Forest initiative, launched in 2021. This project supports forest protection and carbon sequestration, forming part of the group's broader goal of achieving net-zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2026. These efforts are bolstered by Wasco's strong presence on ESG benchmarks, including the FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia Index and the FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia Syariah Index. Receiving the award on behalf of the group was Lily Rozita Mohamad Khairi, a board member and chairman of the board sustainability committee. She expressed that the recognition serves not only as validation of Wasco's ongoing work, but as motivation to push further. 'As we transition towards a low-carbon economy, the private sector must step up, not just to reduce emissions, but to build social resilience and empower local communities,' she said. 'Wasco believes in growing together with the communities we serve and this award reflects that shared journey.' Established in 1999, Wasco Berhad is a main market-listed company with a presence in 14 countries. Its operations are anchored in two core divisions: the energy services division, which specialises in advanced pipe coating, corrosion protection and engineering; and the bioenergy services division, which delivers biomass energy solutions to plantation, petrochemical and industrial clients. The group remains steadfast in its commitment to the United Nations global compact principles, particularly in areas concerning human rights, labour standards, environmental protection and anti-corruption.
