My View with Lara Trump - Saturday, July 19
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pilot Wanted to Fly Solo Around World Again. She Shared One Last Message Before Fatal Flight
Anh-Thu Nguyen hoped to inspire other Asian female aviators through her travelsNEED TO KNOW A 44-year-old female pilot is dead after her small plane crashed in Indiana on July 30 In 2024, she became the 10th woman to fly solo around the globe, and was recreating that journey before the accident "I'm super excited today," the pilot told her followers on social media that same morningA 44-year-old female pilot died after her small plane crashed in Indiana as she was beginning another solo flight around the world. On Wednesday, July 30, at around 10:45 a.m. local time, a Lancair IVP crashed in Greenwood, killing the one person on board, according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 'Preliminary information indicates the airplane crashed shortly after departure from Indy South Greenwood Airport,' the lead investigating agency, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), confirms to PEOPLE in a statement on Thursday, July 31. An NTSB investigator is on the scene. The Johnson County Coroner's Office confirmed that the pilot who died was Anh-Thu Nguyen from Miami, according to a statement shared on Facebook on Wednesday. PEOPLE has contacted both the Greenwood Fire Department and Greenwood Police Department. In a now haunting Facebook reel, Nguyen posted a status of her journey on the morning of the fatal crash. 'I'm super excited today. I just completed the first leg of my solo flight around the world a few days ago from Oshkosh to Indiana,' said Nguyen, who became the 10th woman to fly solo around the globe in 2024, according to her alma mater Purdue University, where she earned her Master of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics in 2015. 'This is more than just a flight, okay?' she continued from the cockpit. 'It's a mission to inspire the next generation of Asian female pilots, aerospace engineers and STEM professionals.' For the second leg of her trip, Nguyen planned on flying from Indiana to Pennsylvania, she told her followers. 'Wish me luck, thank you and I will see you in Pennsylvania,' she said. 'Let's keep flying forward, together.' While an investigation into the crash is ongoing, witnesses shared what they saw that morning. 'The plane was kind of going like this and banking, and then it started to lower,' Amanda Landwerlen, who saw the crash, told FOX affiliate WSVN. 'The nose dove, she went into a spin and just came straight down,' another witness, Frank Williams, told the outlet. Nguyen's last public statement wasn't just words – it was a mission. She grew up in Vietnam, and was fascinated by the airplanes that would fly over her village, she told Purdue's School of Aeronautics and Astronautics publication, Aerogram. The aspiring aviator moved to the United States when she was 12. After earning her degrees, Nguyen founded the nonprofit Asian Women in Aerospace & Aviation (AWAA) in 2018. The pilot wanted to inspire other Asian women and young girls to join the field she loved so much. In a statement, the organization mourned their passionate leader. 'Anh-Thu was an inspiring pilot, instructor, and advocate for girls and women in aerospace, engineering, and aviation,' AWAA said. 'She lived with boldness, curiosity, and drive. She came from humble beginnings in Vietnam to becoming a beacon of hope to many.' In her home state of Florida, Nguyen also made an impact with the Dragon Flight Training Academym which she opened in Pembroke Pines five years ago. 'I love being a flight instructor because I'm able to share my knowledge while at the same time learning more about aviation myself,' she told Aerogram. According to the academy, Nguyen was an award-winning instructor with over 5,000 hours of experience. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In a GoFundMe created to fund Nguyen's flight around the world, the organizer spoke about how Nguyen had impacted her own life and dreams of flying. 'Her life stories are inspirational and have taught me and other women around her to dare to dream the impossible even when things are difficult,' the organizer wrote. 'She is truly my heroine and quite simply a living legend in my eyes.' Read the original article on People
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy?
Hey Mr! I hope you are doing well (if those thick thighs are a reflection of how well you are doing, you are doing well indeed). You're one of the only sensible voices in kink I know. What do you think about online dom/sub relations? I'm currently getting into one. I'm married, but he isn't into kink, so I have an agreed outlet online where there is a lot of fantasy but no touching. I guess my question is, do you think that's healthy? It gives me an outlet for my dominant tendencies. But at the same time, it makes me a bit uncomfortable to let this (my predilection for domination) out. I know you are not Dear Abby, but if you could offer me some advice, I would be grateful. If you can't, that's cool. Best! Hi mister, I am kinda like Dear Abby. Thanks for the 'thick thighs' compliment—you've seen my Instagram. (If anyone reading this would rather submit a question there than via email, it's @badalexcheves). Reading your question, I'm not sure what advice you need. Advice on being dominant? Or doing it online? What's the issue? I think it's great to let your dominant side out. But your question is not clear: Are you uncomfortable letting your dominant side out on the internet because it's the internet? Or does your discomfort lie in letting your dominant side out in any capacity? Related: I'm older & heavy. Will a muscular escort still be into me? I sense it's the latter. If so, is your hesitation rooted in ethics? Propriety? Social mores? Faith? These are real things you should ask yourself. You ask me specifically if I think it's 'healthy' to let your dominant side out, which could mean many things, but at its simplest, it suggests you believe doing so might be unhealthy in some way. I'd say that if you have any inclination to be sexually dominant, it's healthier to let that out with someone who willingly consents to it than to repress it or, worse, unleash it on someone who does not desire or consent to it, like your current partner. Many gay men, when they talk about 'unhealthy' sex, are talking about the in-person kind that involves the risk of sexually transmitted infections. But that risk is nonexistent in an online relationship. So, the 'unhealthy' aspect of it you're worried about must fall somewhere in moral or mental territory. 'Unhealthy' here, then, means something akin to 'wicked' or 'wrong.' To me, that's scratching at a moral feeling, a belief. I have a rule about those: It is not my job to change anyone's beliefs about sex. Let me explain that. Beliefs—religious and otherwise—dictate human sexuality. Across the world, beliefs shape and define what we do and don't allow ourselves to explore and experience. I think a sex writer should only offer encouragement (or, when necessary, discouragement) for things people already want to do, or have entertained the idea of doing, or are currently doing. Related: He gave me a 'pass' for sex with others. Should I take it? The ethical line, then, is drawn at encouraging something a reader does not want to do—something they do desire or do not believe is right. To me, that's wrong. Regardless of what I think, suggesting a reader change their beliefs or do something they don't honestly desire feels like a breach of the unspoken, unofficial contract between those who ask for help and those who provide it. I can give facts, tips, and advice, but I can't make you believe something you don't, because beliefs aren't rooted in facts—they're inner things, soul things. I once had little respect for those things, but that's changed. You must do what you believe is right. There is only so far a digital role-play, dom/sub thing can go. You can have video calls and tell him what to do. You can watch each other, wank to each other, talk to each other, perform on camera, and much else. You can connect deeply, confess, share things you've never shared with anyone else, and develop real, deep feelings. Findom (financial domination) setups are common online. You can consensually humiliate and degrade someone on Twitter by posting (mutually agreed-upon) photos of them from an anonymous account. I know subs who love that sort of thing. You can also get scammed, conned, abused, hacked, have your pictures uploaded to some site you're not aware of, and all sorts of sinister things. That's the internet, babe. So, if you choose to do it, remember common-sense safety measures regarding the internet and taking naked pictures that include your face (don't take or send them), showing recognizable tattoos or places in your photos (don't), and so on. If you're chatting on a site, don't create a username that's your real name. Don't send passwords. Be wary of suspicious links. Ultimately, interacting with strangers online is always a risk. Image sharing online can be a matter of mutual vulnerability: you can screenshot anything he sends you, and vice versa, so it behooves you both to respect the other's privacy. Even so, there are millions of bad actors online, and the potential that he is one is higher if you've never met him in person and never plan to. Regardless of where your hesitation is coming from, you at least seem aware that sexual self-expression is necessary in a long-term relationship, and you seem comfortable with the idea of pursuing it within the parameters set by you and your partner. That's a good start. I'd give it a shot. I hope it feeds your dominant urge. If not, I hope you at least entertain my belief that purely online dom/sub interactions are a poor substitute for the real thing. If there's any 'danger' here, it's that of liking it too much and wanting more. I don't think that's unhealthy at all, but it might pose a risk to your relationship. You might, at some point, need to ask yourself if the no-touching rule works for you—and what that means if it doesn't. I don't want to speed anyone's journey along, but if you wish to fast-forward things a bit, consider discussing with your partner the possibility of opening up your relationship to include real, physical intimacy with others. You can agree on the terms of it—on when, where, and with whom it's allowed. You might not think you want that now, but that is something you should prepare for. Because getting bitched out as a quivering sub is better in real life, and being a brutal dom is too. I've done both. Trust me: You will want to take it offline and into the bedroom. Hey there! I'm Alexander Cheves. I'm a sex writer and former sex worker—I worked in the business for over 12 years. You can read my sex-and-culture column Last Call in Out and my book My Love Is a Beast: Confessions, from Unbound Edition Press. But be warned: Kirkus Reviews says the book is "not for squeamish readers.' In the past, I directed (ahem) adult videos and sold adult products. I have spoken about subjects like cruising, sexual health, and HIV at the International AIDS Conference, SXSW, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and elsewhere, and appeared on dozens of podcasts. Here, I'm offering sex and relationship advice to Out's readers. Send your question to askbeastly@ — it may get answered in a future post. This article originally appeared on Out: Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy? Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
20 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals
What's your elephant? Maybe you've heard that old saying: 'How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.' The idea is that the best way for tackling large, overwhelming tasks or projects is to break them down into smaller, more manageable steps. But that doesn't address the obvious problem: Nobody wants to actually 'eat the elephant.' So, how do you motivate yourself to actually get started? I learned a great trick some years ago from fellow Inc. columnist Jeff Haden, author of The Motivation Myth. It's a technique founded on principles of emotional intelligence, the ability to identify, understand, and manage emotions effectively. Best of all, it's far simpler than you might expect—as you can tell from its name: The Two-Week Rule. What's the Two-Week Rule, and how can it help you beat procrastination, find motivation, and reach your biggest goals? It all comes down to the psychology of how motivation works, and how that knowledge can help you manage your emotions. (Sign up here for my free email emotional intelligence course.) How to use the Two-Week Rule to reach your biggest goals Over the years, Haden's had the chance to interview successful people like Shark Tank investor and billionaire Mark Cuban, NBA superstar Shaquille O'Neal, and professional tennis great Venus Williams. Through those interviews, Haden learned some interesting things about the psychology of motivation. 'Motivation isn't something you get from the outside, nor is it something you find within,' Haden told me in a recent interview. 'Motivation is something you create through a cycle of a little bit of effort, a little bit of success that feels good—because it always feels good to get better at something—and that gives you enough motivation to get you to the next day.' 'That cycle just continues to repeat, and it can take you a really long way,' says Haden. In other words, while motivation is part of the cycle, it's not the beginning of the cycle. And here's where the two-week rule comes in. The two-week rule is about as simple as it sounds: Commit yourself to a project for two weeks. Then, evaluate your progress and decide whether you want to move forward. To illustrate, Haden uses the following example: Let's say you want to run a marathon. At the beginning, you may only be able to run a mile; still, you commit to training for two weeks. After day one, you're thinking there's no way you're ever going to be able to run the full race. This thing is hard, much harder than you anticipated. That fact alone is so overwhelming, you're tempted to give up. But you've committed to a full two weeks, so you force yourself to keep going. After a week, you still haven't seen much improvement. 'I'm sore,' you think to yourself. 'I'm tired. My knees hurt. I don't really enjoy this.' But you also think: 'Thank God I only have another week to go.' At the end of two weeks, though, things look different. You're a little faster. A little fitter. You've developed a new routine and you've found your flow. Now you say to yourself: 'Hey, I've actually gotten somewhere. I'm not at 26 miles yet, but I'm much better than when I started.' And that progress may be all you need to keep going. Why the Two-Week Rule works The beauty of this rule is you can commit to almost anything for two weeks. At the end of that time, you'll have data you can actually use to make a decision about moving forward—and many times, the motivation you need, too. But what if you can't even get yourself to commit for two weeks? Or, what if you try, and discover it's not really something you want to do? 'Then it's probably not a goal you wanted to achieve anyway,' Haden says. 'And that's a good thing—because if you try it and find out you don't really want it, it comes off your list of things you want to do. You get rid of the guilt associated with not doing it.' 'And now, you can focus on some of the things you really want to do instead.' So, whatever major project you're trying to tackle, try the two-week rule: Commit to doing it for just two weeks. Once you do, you'll finally have gotten started eating the elephant. And at the end of those two weeks, there's a good chance you'll have improved your efforts, you're starting to see progress, and most importantly, you've found the motivation to keep going.
