Will Europe's high-speed ‘Metro-style' rail network really happen?
Advertisement
'A truly integrated rail system is no longer just a matter of convenience; it's a strategic necessity for Europe's resilience in the 21st century," reads the 'Starline' report.
'Designed like a Metro system, Starline changes how Europeans perceive their own continent – not as a collection of distant capitals, but as a single, fast-moving network where every connection, whether for people or goods, is within easy reach.'
Sounds great, and the think-tank has published a map to demonstrate how 39 cities across Europe, from Dublin to Kyiv and Helsinki to Lisbon, could be connected - the map uses a common diagrammatic Metro map style, which is known to sometimes ignore real-world geography in favour of easier understanding for travellers.
So how realistic is this proposal?
Map of the proposed Starline European connections. Map: 21st Europe
Geography
Munich to Milan via Zurich is a straight vertical line on the map, which ignores the existence of Innsbruck and the minor geographical obstacle that is the Alps.
Advertisement
It also connects Estonia's capital Tallinn with Finland's Helsinki via a still-on-the-drawing-board €20 billion tunnel that – if it is completed, with earliest projections setting a date sometime in the 2030s – would be the longest rail tunnel in the world.
The project would also require a tunnel under the Irish Sea, which drops at its deepest point more than 300m below sea level, to connect Liverpool and Dublin.
A possible future direct link between Glasgow and Belfast, meanwhile, would face the same problems as former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's dead cat plan for a bridge or tunnel to connect Scotland and Northern Ireland.
What actually is it?
Starline's proposal appears to involve being a train operator - the trains would be blue, with 'quiet carriages' and family spaces - while also coordinating European ticketing systems and building quite a lot of new infrastructure.
In addition to the new tunnels and tracks required, the proposal specifies: "The trains will arrive at new stations built just outside major cities with connections to existing urban transport systems."
It would also create an 'open' ticketing system, where passengers could buy tickets for anywhere in Europe on a single platform - similar to the British online platform Trainline, which also sells tickets in Europe.
It is not specified exactly how this would fit in with the existing rail operators that already run services around Europe, many of whom are publicly funded, other than to say that national rail operators would be "responsible for specific routes under a common framework".
They add that "harmonised labour agreements" would be required for rail employees - we'll let them break that one to the famously militant French rail unions.
Advertisement
Who pays?
Which brings us to the question of funding.
According to its Starline blueprint, 21st Europe proposes 'central coordination for trains, passenger experience, and technology while allowing national rail operators to run routes under a franchise model.'
It adds: "Starline should be structured as a publicly funded, privately operated system, designed to maximise efficiency while ensuring strong public oversight".
Many European countries do, of course, already provide public funding for rail operators - such as France's SNCF, Spain's Renfe and Germany's Deutsche Bahn.
Advertisement
Starline's proposal would seem to involve the hundreds of billions in infrastructure spending being publicly funded, and operated by national rail companies – all overseen by an as-yet non-existent European Rail Authority (ERA).
'Now, we begin building the network to push for real change, bringing together policymakers, designers, and industry leaders to turn vision into action,' the think tank said.
Reasons for change
Some slight issues of practicality aside, the Starline report does identify many real problems with Europe's rail network.
Ticketing issues, a lack of co-ordination and integration across borders means travelling between countries in Europe can be 'fragmented, slow, and expensive'.
The think tank says unifying design is key to a cross-border travel network.
'Stations feel disconnected, trains vary wildly in design, and the journey itself is rarely considered as part of the experience,' it says of the current system.
And it is looking to build on an existing EU initiative to unify transport across the bloc, known as the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T).
TEN-T, which Starline lambasts as lacking in speed and ambition, seeks to develop a network of railways, inland waterways, short sea shipping routes and roads linking urban nodes, maritime and inland ports, airports and terminals for the 'efficient transportation for people and goods, ensures access to jobs and services, and enables trade and economic growth'.
It seeks to work with European state and private rail operators, offer funding for infrastructure projects and create Europe-wide systems such as a common rail signalling system.
Even with all these problems, cross-border rail travel is rapidly growing in popularity as travellers become more conscious of their environmental impact.
'A bold shift to high-speed rail might be Europe's best chance to meet its 2050 net-zero goals while ensuring mobility remains both fast and green,' the think tank said.
In 2022, the transport sector contributed approximately 29 per cent of the EU's total greenhouse gas emissions, according to the European Environment Agency.
There are good economic reasons for it too - 'When China expanded its high-speed rail network, cities with HSR connections experienced a 14.2 percent increase in GDP, and each new HSR line contributed an additional 7.2 percent to urban GDP growth,' the think tank explained in its online brochure.
'A European project of similar scale could drive investment, unlock regional economies, and make the single market feel like a single market – physically, not just economically.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Sweden
a day ago
- Local Sweden
Centre Party calls for Sweden to bring in a tourist tax
Centre Party business spokesperson Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist has called for municipalities in Sweden to be allowed to impose an additional tourist tax to compensate for the burden of tourism on infrastructure and municipal finances. Advertisement Thand Ringqvist, who in 2023 was one of the contenders to lead the party, said that following Norway's example and allowing municipalities to charge visitors a fee would increase local acceptance for tourism. "About 60 percent of each tourist krona goes to the state. We have one of the world's most centralised tax systems," she said in a debate on Swedish public broadcaster SVT with financial markets minister Niklas Wykman. "So that's why it's important to find different ways to make sure municipalities get something back back. A municipal fee that municipalities can decide themsleves together with local businesses can do that." Norway's parliament in June agreed to allow muncipalities to levy a 3 percent tax on hotel, Airbnb and hostel stays, and also to levy a tax on visiting cruise ships, after areas like the Lofoten islands and most popular fjords have been overrun by excessive numbers of tourists. In the debate, Wykman likened a tourist tax to a tax on alcohol or tobacco, saying the only reason to bring in such a tax would be if you wanted to reduce the number of tourists, which no municipality in Sweden would really want to do. But Thand Ringqvist countered that this reflected the Stockholm-based perspective of the finance ministry. Advertisement "I see this from [visiting] the gravel roads in the Jämtland mountains and from Öland and I hear what local people are saying," Thand Ringqvist. "The minister sees it from the finance ministry, and there it's hard to see the piles or rubbish, or the parking chaos, or the traffic jams people experience locally." "A municipality would never want to scare away tourists, this is about winning the support of local people and reducing the opposition to tourism in some places."
Local Sweden
07-08-2025
- Local Sweden
Can Sweden really attract global talent while making citizenship harder?
Sweden's migration minister, Johan Forssell, has yet to explain how Sweden can attract highly skilled foreign workers at the same time as making citizenship rules ever stricter, argues Eric Peterson, the US software engineer behind a recent petition. Advertisement Migration Minister Johan Forssell recently claimed in SvD that the opposition lacks answers to questions the government is addressing with tougher citizenship requirements. But the question he himself should answer is how the government intends to reconcile these restrictions with its ambition to attract highly skilled foreign workers to Sweden. In the debate on labor migration, two crucial perspectives exist: employers and their need for expertise, and the foreign professionals meeting this need. The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise has repeatedly warned that the government's tightening measures, especially higher salary requirements, risk hindering Sweden's long-term growth. Only now is the government beginning to acknowledge that message. Despite repeated attempts, the government has yet to acknowledge concerns expressed by foreign workers. Our opinion pieces and our official response to the government's citizenship inquiry—signed by nearly 400 labour migrants in the tech sector—have gone unanswered. READ ALSO: Foreign tech workers campaign against new Swedish citizenship law In an interview with Sveriges Radio in January, Forssell made it clear, 'Only Swedish citizens have the unconditional right to stay in the country.' Advertisement We are well aware of this. Any shift in policy, economy, or at our employers could force us to leave Sweden at great personal and financial cost. A former Northvolt employee said it best in an interview with Norran last month: "There's nothing that beats stability when you're an immigrant abroad. If you don't have that, you're still in a fight or survival mode." That is exactly why the government's proposal to extend the residency requirement for citizenship—from five to at least eight years—is so problematic. It means nearly a quarter of a working life would be spent in legal and economic limbo. At the same time, developments in other European countries are moving in the opposite direction. Where does the government think highly skilled workers would prefer to settle: Sweden, with stricter rules, or Germany, where one can now obtain citizenship after five years—or as low as three with exceptional integration? To make matters worse, Forssell has argued that no transitional rules should apply. That means people who arrived five years ago, followed all regulations, and paid taxes could suddenly be denied citizenship simply because of the Migration Agency's lengthy processing times. Advertisement Increased economic and legal uncertainty will drive skilled workers to countries offering greater stability. Jobs they would have taken in Sweden will remain unfilled. For those already here, changing the rules in the middle of the game doesn't just undermine trust—it severs the fragile link between high-skilled migrants and Swedish society. That risks not just failed integration, but a real brain drain. Sweden naturally has the right to reform its laws. But the Swedish people deserve a government whose reforms are well thought out, economically sustainable, and strengthen Sweden's long-term competitiveness.
Local Sweden
30-07-2025
- Local Sweden
Can Kristersson convince Swedish voters to give him a second term?
It's been a tough couple of years for leaders of western democracies: incumbents in France, Germany, the UK and the US have all recently taken a whipping at the polls. As things stand, Sweden's Ulf Kristersson is in line for a similar beating when the country goes to the polls in September next year. Advertisement Kristersson came to power in 2022 amid rising anti-immigration sentiment, concern over gang violence and an expansionist Russia. Inflation was at its highest level for decades and growth was sluggish. Three years later and gang violence continues, the economy remains shaky and the world is no more stable, so it's perhaps not surprising that polls show an expanding lead for the four opposition parties, averaging around 9 points, up from 7 points a year ago. Yet Kristersson will be able to point to some key areas where his government could argue it has succeeded: Gang crime Getting a grip on gangland violence was at the heart of the government's agenda, and for good reason: murders involving firearms have been roughly three times higher in Sweden than the European average. The government has reacted by shovelling more money to the police, introducing stop-and-search zones, by making secret surveillance of criminals easier and by proposing tougher sentencing. Many of these measures are still to take effect: a proposal to double sentences for gang-related crimes won't be in place until after the election. So far it's hard to discern a clear impact of government policy on gang crime rates: the number of shootings so far in 2025 is lower both than in the same period last year and in 2021 (the year before the government took power), but the number of deaths is actually higher. Still, there are signs that secret surveillance has been effective and, thanks partly to structural changes in the police force, 70 percent of gangland murders now result in charges, compared to about 30 percent previously. All this is good news for Kristersson: according to pollster Novus his Moderate Party is most trusted on law and order issues, closely followed by the Sweden Democrats. Nonetheless, the government could be vulnerable to any upswing in gangland violence in the run-up to the election. Advertisement Immigration Immigration, judged on the government's own terms, has also ostensibly been a success story. In 2024 Sweden received fewer than 7,000 asylum seekers (excluding Ukrainians covered by the EU's Temporary Protection Directive). At just 0.6 asylum seekers per 1,000 inhabitants, this was a lower figure than most major western European countries. Asylum applications were down again in the first half of this year, thanks partly to a new law that prevents failed asylum seekers from making new applications. Government reforms to labour immigration have been more of a mixed bag, with government claims to want to promote high-skilled labour migration sometimes being undermined by poorly-designed rules. Frustratingly for many labour immigrants, voters are less exercised by the plight of skilled workers than they are about the perceived need to stop asylum seekers coming to Sweden. All this looks likely to benefit the Sweden Democrats: overall, voters rate Jimmie Åkesson's party most highly on the issue, with 31 percent telling Novus they have the best migration policies, followed by the Social Democrats on 19 percent, with the Moderates languishing on 11 percent. Kristersson would no doubt like to shave a few points off the Sweden Democrats' lead here — if the Sweden Democrats leapfrog the Moderates and become the largest right-wing party would severely dent the Moderates' self-image. Advertisement The economy The economy is a slightly cheerier story for the Moderates, with the party thought best by 27 percent. But they'll be frustrated that the Social Democrats pip them at the post, scoring 30 percent. The Social Democrats are also ahead on unemployment, which has remained persistently high, but the Moderates have a big lead when voters are asked who has the best policies for business. Moderate finance minister Elisabeth Svantesson will be hoping for some good news before the election: inflation might be down from its post-pandemic highs, but it's still above the Riksbank's 2 percent target. Growth, at 1 percent on an annual basis, is lower than many comparable European countries. The latest trade deal with the US, cementing tariffs at a relatively high 15 percent, might prove unhelpful to Sweden's export-dependent economy. The Moderates will hope a series of cuts to income tax and taxes on savings accounts — and the threat of tax rises from Magdalena Andersson — will get right-leaning voters to turn out for them. Defence One issue that the government will be pressing hard is defence: the government has overseen a massive increase in defence spending and took Sweden into Nato. Defence minister Pål Jonsson is one of the government's most effective performers and Swedes broadly back the government's strong pro-Ukraine stance. But while the Moderates have a handsome lead among voters on defence issues, the Social Democrats are unlikely to propose a radically different line, perhaps making it hard for Kristersson to press home the advantage. Advertisement Subjects to avoid: climate and healthcare A few crucial questions could prove particularly troublesome for the government if they become a focus of the election campaign. The Social Democrats have a commanding lead on healthcare questions, which voters consistently rate as their most important issue. On climate issues the Liberals' minister Romina Pourmouktari has seemingly failed to convince voters that her party has the answers, with just 3 percent saying they have the best policies, compared to the Greens who convinced 28 percent. With thirteen months left until the election, much can change in the polls. Ulf Kristersson and his party will be hoping voters will be ready to give them a hearing.
