BREAKING NEWS Bonnyrigg High School is plunged into lockdown and parents are told NOT to contact their children
A high school has been plunged into lockdown with students evacuated from the buildings.
Bonnyrigg High School, in western Sydney, evacuated the students onto the oval at 11.30am on Wednesday.
'Please be advised the school is currently being evacuated,' an urgent message read on social media.
'Please do not contact the school or your child. We will advise shortly.'
A NSW Police spokesman said the lockdown had been initiated as a precautionary search was carried out on the campus.
More than 1,600 students are understood to be enrolled at the high school.
more to come
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The mushroom murder trial: Bizarre case of a woman accused of killing her ex-husband's relatives with beef wellington
A jury is now deliberating whether a woman in Australia is guilty of murdering three people and attempting to kill another by serving them a lunch laced with poisonous mushrooms. Erin Patterson, 50, gave her estranged husband's parents and his aunt and uncle beef wellington at her home in July 2023. The next day all four guests were hospitalised with symptoms of death cap mushroom poisoning, and later three of them died. Patterson was arrested and charged with murder and attempted murder over the deaths, and is standing trial in a case that has gripped Australia and drawn international attention. Here's what you need to know about the trial. Who is Erin Patterson, and what is she accused of? Patterson is a mother-of-two from the Victorian town of Leongatha, east of Melbourne. She has been charged with murdering Don Patterson, Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. The defendant had also been charged with three counts of attempted murder relating to her husband Simon Patterson, but those charges were dropped on Tuesday, before the trial opened. In Australia, murder carries a maximum penalty of life in prison, while attempted murder has a maximum 25-year sentence. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all the charges. What happened at the lunch? On July 29, 2023, Patterson hosted her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson and Heather's husband, church pastor Ian Wilkinson. She had invited them all for lunch at her home two weeks prior. Patterson had also invited her husband, Simon, but he declined. The pair had been separated since 2015. She served her guests beef wellington, which is a beef fillet wrapped in a mushroom paste and covered with pastry, with a side of mashed potato and green beans. The day after the lunch, all four guests fell ill and went to hospital complaining of nausea and diarrhoea. Within days, Don, Gail and Heather had died, while Ian Wilkinson survived after receiving an organ transplant. What is the prosecution case? Prosecutor Nanette Rogers opened her case at the beginning of May in Victoria's Supreme Court, and the jury heard from witnesses including Patterson's estranged husband Simon, the lone survivor Ian Wilkinson, as well as medical experts and Patterson herself. The court heard that on the way to hospital, Heather told Simon she had been puzzled by Patterson eating from a plate that looked different to those she had given her guests. "I noticed that Erin put her food on a different plate to us. Her plate had colours on it. I wondered why that was. I've puzzled about it since lunch," she said, according to the prosecution. Simon told his aunt that Patterson might have run out of plates. The prosecutor said Patterson had not eaten poisonous mushrooms, and had also not fed her children, then aged nine and 14, any leftovers from the lunch. The prosecutor said she did not need to provide a motive for the killing, and the jury could make its finding without one. "You might be wondering now why would the accused do this? What is the motive? You might still be wondering this at the end of this trial," Rogers said. "You do not have to be satisfied what the motive was or even that there was a motive." What did Patterson say in her own defence? In her testimony, Patterson admitted to foraging for mushrooms and using them in her meals. She acknowledged lying after the fatal lunch but denied knowingly serving toxic mushrooms. She described her attempts at dehydrating mushrooms as an 'experiment'. In the final moments of her cross-examination, the chief prosecutor put three key accusations to Patterson: that she deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms, knowingly included them in the beef wellington and intended to kill her guests. To all three, Patterson responded: 'Disagree.' Prosecutors alleged that she had fabricated her foraging history, calling her a 'self-confessed liar' who had no supporting evidence such as books or messages about foraging, but her lawyers maintained that she was simply a mushroom enthusiast and 'a person of good character'. Patterson's defence team has argued the poisoning was a 'terrible mistake', with her barrister Colin Mandy SC telling the jury that while the guests had been poisoned by mushrooms, it had been accidental. "The defence case is what happened was a tragedy. A terrible accident," Mandy said. Her defence conceded Patterson had lied to police when she told them she had not foraged for wild mushrooms. "She did forage for mushrooms. Just so that we make that clear, she denies that she ever deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms," Mandy said. What has the judge said? Supreme Court justice Christopher Beale, who has presided over the trial in the regional Victorian town of Morwell, instructed the jurors to discount lies Patteson admitted to telling, including about her own health. 'The issue is not whether she is in some sense responsible for the tragic consequences of the lunch, but whether the prosecution has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she is criminally responsible,' he told the jury. 'Similarly, the fact that, on her own admission, Erin Patterson told lies and disposed of evidence must not cause you to be prejudiced against her,' he added. 'This is a court of law, not a court of morals.' The jurors have been sent out to deliberate until they can reach a unanimous verdict.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Manager sues for £250k after being thrown into luxury hotel pool
An events manager is suing her former bosses for more than £250,000 after she was thrown into a swimming pool by drunken salesmen at a hotel in Mauritius. Chloe Hewitt, 26, who claimed she landed on broken glass, sustained nerve damage and required two operations after being flung into the water at an after-party on June 4 2022. The party followed an event organised by Herbalife, a health drinks brand. Ms Hewitt, of Weybridge, Surrey, is suing the company's European arm for damages on the basis that it had not done enough to ensure the boozy event was safe. The Uxbridge-based Herbalife, which sells weight loss shakes and other nutritional products, denies liability, claiming the after-party was not organised by the company. Ms Hewitt, who began working for the company in June 2020 in its regional promotions department, was sent to Mauritius's five-star Paradis Hotel for a training and team-building event. Matthew Chapman KC, acting on behalf of Ms Hewitt, said her accident happened at the event's 'farewell party', which included dinner, a DJ and a free bar. 'At around midnight on 4 June 2022, the DJ continued to play music and the free bar continued to serve drinks,' he said. 'The dance floor was located next to the resort swimming pool. Drinks were provided in glasses, rather than plastic containers and there was broken glass on and around the dance floor. Some of the party-goers were exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication. There were no security staff on duty. 'The claimant was then pushed forcefully and unexpectedly from behind and back into the swimming pool. The claimant was completely submerged under the water and the force of her entry carried her to the base of the swimming pool where she caught her foot on an object lying there and felt an immediate, sharp pain. 'The claimant had caught her foot on broken glass debris, which was on the bottom of the swimming pool, having found its way there from glasses containing drinks served at the farewell party.' 'She could have gone to bed' Mr Chapman said his client had been left with 'significant pain and stiffness, loss of sensation and loss of movement' in her right foot, which is likely to be permanent. Herbalife claimed it is not responsible for its members, who run independent businesses selling its products, and that Ms Hewitt was off the clock when the accident occurred. Rory Holmes, representing Herbalife, said: 'Once the farewell party ended, the claimant's time was her own. She was no longer on duty. 'The claimant was naturally free to spend her personal time however she wanted – she could have gone to bed, she could have gone for a walk in the hotel grounds, she could have chosen to be on her own, she could have chosen to socialise with whomever she wished. 'The defendant does not condone the actions of the distributors who threw members of the group into the pool,' he added. The case is expected to go to trial later this year.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fraud victims among top crypto ATM users, Australian regulator says
June 25 (Reuters) - Australia's financial crimes monitoring agency said on Wednesday that it has identified 90 scam victims, money mules and suspected offenders as the top crypto ATM users in the country, amid efforts to address crimes enabled by digital currency. A nationwide operation led by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) examined the most prolific crypto ATM users in each state, and based on the transaction values, identified cases likely linked to scams or fraud. "We suspected that a large volume of crypto ATM transactions were probably illicit, but disturbingly, our law enforcement partners found that almost all of the transactions we referred involved victims rather than criminals," AUSTRAC CEO Brendan Thomas said. In one instance, AUSTRAC identified a woman in her 70s who had deposited more than A$430,000 into crypto ATMs after falling victim to romance and investment scams. Earlier this month, AUSTRAC had placed conditions and limits on crypto ATM providers after flagging compliance concerns, with the number of active machines exceeding 1,800. Lately, the Australian corporate regulator has been cracking down on cryptocurrency exchanges as well, with Binance and Blockchain Global coming under scrutiny.
