
The housing market is shifting—here's where it's happening most rapidly
A few days after I launched ResiClub in October 2023, I wrote an article titled 'The key housing market metric heading into 2024.' In it, I reaffirmed a point I had also made at Fortune in 2022: that some traditional rules of thumb—i.e., months-of-supply thresholds for what constitutes a buyers' market versus a sellers' market—could struggle in this post–Pandemic Housing Boom environment, where there's downward pressure on prices.
For the time being, I suggested that an easy-to-create and useful metric for housing stakeholders to follow—one that helps gauge short-term pricing momentum and whether downside risk might manifest—is a local market's level of active inventory compared to that same market's inventory level in the same month of pre-pandemic 2019.
The thinking was that markets where active inventory remains well below 2019 levels would still exhibit some tightness, while those where inventory has surged back to or above pre-pandemic 2019 levels would experience a shift in the supply-demand equilibrium more in favor of homebuyers.
Heading into 2025, I recreated that analysis showing the dynamic was still holding true.
Fast-forward to today, and this particular data cut still proves useful (overtime ResiClub believes its usefulness will diminish—just not right now).
Generally speaking, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale has surged above pre-pandemic 2019 levels have experienced weaker or softer home price growth (or even outright home price declines) over the past 36 months. Conversely, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale remains far below pre-pandemic 2019 levels have, generally speaking, experienced more resilient home price growth over the past 36 months.
Indeed, just look at the scatter plot below showing 'Shift in home prices since their local 2022 peak' Vs. 'active inventory for sale now compared to the same month in 2019' for the nation's 250 largest metro area housing markets.
Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN).
Click here for an interactive version of the scatter plot below.
To see if this data cut still proves useful, let's swap out 'home price since their local 2022 peak' for 'year-over-year home price shift.'
The answer is yes—the trend still holds. (Recently, both the Wall Street Journal and John Burns Research and Consulting created their own versions of this longtime ResiClub scatter plot.)
Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN).
The current regional bifurcation—greater weakness in Sun Belt and Mountain West boomtowns and greater resiliency in the Northeast and Midwest—shouldn't be surprising to ResiClub readers. Given that we cover that regional bifurcation frequently, we're not going to spend time in this piece discussing what's driving that bifurcation.
Instead, let's discuss why this particular data cut is useful right now, and why overtime it could become less useful.
This data cut's usefulness—right now—explained
During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand surged rapidly amid ultralow interest rates, stimulus, and the remote work boom—which increased demand for space and unlocked 'WFH arbitrage' as high earners were able to keep their income from a job in, say, NYC or L.A., and buy in, say, Austin or Tampa. Federal Reserve researchers estimate 'new construction would have had to increase by roughly 300% to absorb the pandemic-era surge in demand.'
Unlike housing demand, housing stock supply isn't as elastic and can't ramp up as quickly. As a result, the heightened pandemic era demand drained the market of active inventory and overheated home prices, with U.S. home prices rising a staggering +43.2% between March 2020 and June 2022.
At the height of the Pandemic Housing Boom in spring 2022, most of the country had 60% to 75% less active inventory than in 2019. Once mortgage rates spiked, national housing demand cooled off.
While many commentators view active inventory and months of supply simply as measures of 'supply,' ResiClub sees them more as proxies for the supply-demand equilibrium. Large swings in active inventory or months of supply are usually driven by shifts in housing demand. For example, during the Pandemic Housing Boom, surging demand caused homes to sell faster—pushing active inventory down, even as new listings remained steady.
Conversely, in recent years, weakening demand has led to slower sales, causing active inventory to rise in many markets—even as new listings fell below trend.
For a market like Austin or Punta Gorda to surge from historically low active inventory levels in spring 2022 to now well above pre-pandemic 2019 levels, it has taken a significant shift in the balance of power—from sellers to buyers.
That shift has also coincided with those markets experiencing outright home price corrections. Conversely, despite the affordability shock, markets like Syracuse and Milwaukee still have active inventory levels well below 2019 levels and continue to see slightly positive year-over-year home price growth.
Inventory wasn't historically 'high' back in 2019—so why does climbing back to 2019 levels matter?
During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand overwhelmed the Denver metro housing market—pushing active housing inventory for sale down to just 2,288 homes by May 2021, down 69% from the 7,490 listings in May 2019.
Since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out, and mortgage rates spiked, active inventory for sale in Denver has spiked up to 12,354 active listings as of May 2025—65% above pre-pandemic May 2019 levels.
While active inventory for sale in Denver today isn't necessarily that high by historical comparison, the sharp jump from 2022 inventory levels to 2025 levels in such a short window reflects a pretty big shift in the supply-demand equilibrium. On the ground that shift should feel jarring.
That greater active inventory bounce up in Denver has coincided with a greater house price softening/weakening. Indeed, Denver metro area home prices as measured by ResiClub analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index are down 1.7% year-over-year, and down 7.3% since their 2022 peak.
Why, over time, this data cut could prove less useful
One of the common pushbacks I hear when comparing today's active inventory for sale to 2019 levels is that some markets—like Austin and Punta Gorda—have larger populations now than they did back in 2019.
It's true that some of the markets with higher inventory today compared to 2019 are also the ones that have experienced notable population growth in recent years. However, that actual population growth—i.e., a larger population base—isn't the sole reason inventory has jumped so quickly in places like Austin and Punta Gorda. Rather, it's because those markets have experienced a sharper weakening in their for-sale market since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out. And that has helped push up unsold inventory in those markets.
That said, over time, changes in market size—specifically population and total households—will naturally affect what constitutes a 'normal' level of active inventory. By 2035, for example, comparing active inventory to 2019 levels will be far less meaningful than it has been in 2021-2025.
Some traditional rules of thumb have fallen short this cycle
A rule of thumb in real estate is that anything below a six-month supply of inventory is considered a 'seller's market,' while anything above a six-month supply is a 'buyer's market.' However, that hasn't always held true this cycle, and ResiClub's view is that this rule of thumb is a bit outdated.
In many housing markets, including Austin's metro area, where house prices began to decline in June 2022 with only 2.1 months of inventory, that rule hasn't applied effectively. In fact, even though Austin's inventory only peaked at 5.2 months as of April 2025, according to Texas A&M University's Texas Real Estate Research Center, home prices in the Austin metro have already fallen 22.8% from their 2022 peak, based on our analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index.
A better measure of this incoming pricing weakness was the abrupt active inventory jump that occurred in Austin in spring/summer 2022 (going from 0.4 months of inventory in February 2022 to 2.1 in June 2022), which quickly pushed active listings near/above pre-pandemic 2019 levels.
Big picture: In today's post-Pandemic Housing Boom landscape, comparing a market's current level of active inventory to its same-month 2019 baseline remains a useful gauge for the shift in the supply-demand balance.
While imperfect, this simple metric captures the degree of tightness or softening better than some traditional measures. Markets where inventory has surged well above 2019 levels—like Austin or Punta Gorda—are typically the ones that have seen demand weaken most, restoring buyer leverage and, in some cases, producing home price corrections. Meanwhile, markets where inventory remains far below 2019 levels continue to exhibit greater pricing resiliency.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democrats frustrated over lack of a heads-up from Hakeem Jeffries on delaying Trump's spending bill
Democrats were flustered that they didn't get a heads-up that Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries would delay President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" on Thursday with an hours-long speech on the House floor. "No one is upset Hakeem wanted to do this, but to not tell members, 'be prepared, book multiple flights, be flexible,'" a House Democrat told Axios, who was reportedly upset about the challenge of rebooking flights so close to the Fourth of July. Another House Democrat told Axios that a "heads up would have been nice." On Thursday afternoon, Jeffries beat the record for a House floor speech, speaking for eight hours and 44 minutes, starting before 4 a.m. and ending around 1:30 p.m. Jeffries went over the record previously held by former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., which was eight hours and 32 minutes. During his remarks, the minority leader read from a binder that he said had stories of people who could lose their Medicaid coverage under Trump's spending bill that were compiled from constituents of states that have Republican lawmakers. "I think it's important for the American people to process… SNAP on average provides $6 per day," Jeffries said. "At the same time, Elon Musk, his federal contracts, as we understand it, amount to $8 million per day. Mr. Speaker, if Republicans were really serious about targeting waste, fraud and abuse in the United States of America, start there – $8 million per day, start right there." Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which passed the House on Thursday afternoon after Jeffries yielded the floor and now awaits the president's signature, advances his border security measures and permanently extends the income tax brackets lowered by his 2017 Tax Cuts Jobs Act (TCJA).


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
If the Job Market's So Good, Why Do We Feel So Bad?
This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, the churn and growth opportunities that we expect from Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here. Today was Jobs Day, which is weird, because it's not the first Friday of the month. It's the first Thursday of the month, but since tomorrow is a federal holiday — happy 249th birthday, Uncle Sam! — we got the data a day early. Jonathan Levin — and nearly every other Fed-watcher on the planet — was pleasantly surprised by June's unemployment rate of 4.1%, a number that he says is 'just about as good as it gets.'


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Estate Planning And The Final OBBBA: Key Changes High-Net-Worth Individuals Must Know
Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, departs following a vote at the US Capitol in ... More Washington, DC, US, on Saturday, June 28, 2025. President Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax cut bill prevailed in a crucial Senate test vote, a sign that Republican leaders are resolving the infighting over portions of the legislation and moving toward meeting a July 4 deadline the president has set for passage. Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed by the Senate on July 1, 2025, and approved by the House just in time for the July 4 deadline, solidifies significant tax reforms from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). For high-net-worth families, collectors, and trustees, several crucial aspects stand out for estate planning: 1. Permanent, Inflation-Indexed Estate & Gift Tax Exemption The final bill permanently increases the unified federal estate and lifetime gift tax exemption to $15 million per individual ($30 million for married couples), indexed for inflation starting in 2026. This secures the elevated threshold, preventing a drop to approximately $7 million per individual, which was anticipated if the TCJA provisions expired. This stability allows ultra-high-net-worth individuals to accelerate lifetime gifting and fund dynasty trusts efficiently. 2. GST Tax Exemption Reinforced The generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption is now aligned with the $15 million per individual exemption, also indexed for inflation. This paves the way for robust multi-generational planning through dynasty trusts and other strategic vehicles. 3. Trust Income Tax Brackets Made Permanent The OBBBA retains the TCJA-era tax brackets for trusts and estates, with annual inflation adjustments, offering trustees long-term predictability in managing irrevocable trusts. 4. No SALT Deduction Expansion for High-Net-Worth Households The legislation maintains the $10,000 cap on State and Local Tax (SALT) deductions, a move endorsed by Senate leadership. This decision means wealthy individuals in high-tax states must continue to focus on other tax planning strategies rather than relying on expanded SALT benefits. 5. Other Significant Changes Impacting Estate Planning Strategic Estate Planning Moves to Consider Act Now: No Sunset Provision The permanent, inflation-indexed $15 million exemptions mean there is no longer a sunset provision. Delaying estate planning is riskier as assets expected to appreciate, such as art and collectibles, should be transferred or trust-funded sooner rather than later. Dynastic Asset Transfers Utilizing elevated GST allocations, families can establish dynasty trusts designed to transfer wealth and cultural assets across generations with minimal tax implications. Art & Collectible Planning Gifting during one's lifetime with the $15 million exemption keeps value out of estates. Valuation oversight is critical, particularly for illiquid or unique items. Trust structures should be tailored for artwork governance, including role assignments and liquidity funding . Income Tax Predictability for Trusts With permanent TCJA income brackets, fiduciaries can confidently model trust income and distributions, aiding in managing trusts that hold income-producing assets. Avoid Relying on SALT Cap Changes Estate plans should not depend on expanded SALT deductions. Instead, focus on strategies like Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), Charitable Lead Annuity Trusts (CLATs), and donor-advised funds for tax-efficient wealth transfers in high-tax states. Conclusion: A Strategic Window of Opportunity The OBBBA provides unprecedented permanence in estate and gift exemptions, presenting a well-defined planning window for high-net-worth families and fiduciaries. Revise estate plans to capitalize on the $15 million-per-individual exemptions, initiate or expand dynasty trusts, strengthen governance of holdings, augment liquidity reserves, and diversify planning strategies. This is a generationally significant moment—strategic action now can preserve and protect multigenerational wealth when it matters most.