Greenpeace Activists Disrupt Industrial Fishing Operation Ahead Of UN Ocean Conference
WATCH: PHOTO AND VIDEO HERE
With an expert team on a small boat releasing more than a dozen animals, crew aboard Greenpeace ship the Rainbow Warrior retrieved the entire longline and more than 210 baited hooks from a EU-flagged industrial fishing vessel, including an endangered longfin mako shark, eight near-threatened blue sharks and four swordfish. The crew also documented the vessel catching endangered sharks during its longlining operation.
The at-sea action follows new Greenpeace Australia Pacific analysis exposing the extent of shark catch from industrial longlining in parts of the Pacific Ocean. Latest fisheries data showed that almost 70% of EU vessels' catch was blue shark in 2023 alone. It comes ahead of next week's UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, where world leaders will discuss ocean protection and the Global Ocean Treaty.
Georgia Whitaker, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
"These longliners are industrial killing machines. Greenpeace Australia Pacific took peaceful and direct action to disrupt this attack on marine life. We saved important species that would otherwise have been killed or left to die on hooks."
"The scale of industrial fishing - still legal on the high seas - is astronomical. These vessels claim to be targeting swordfish or tuna, but we witnessed shark after shark being hauled up by these industrial fleets, including three endangered sharks in just half an hour. Greenpeace is calling on world leaders at the UN Ocean Conference to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030 from this wanton destruction."
GreenpeaceAotearoa is calling on the New Zealand Government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty and help create global ocean sanctuaries, including in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand signed the agreement in 2023.
More than two-thirds of sharks worldwide are endangered, and a third of those are at risk of extinction from overfishing. Over the last three weeks, the Rainbow Warrior has been documenting longlining vessels and practices off Australia's east coast, including from Spain and China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
‘Concessions do not persuade a killer' - Zelenskyy warns against capitulating to Russia's demands
'This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We're going to see what he has in mind and if it's a fair deal, I'll reveal it to the European Union leaders and to Nato leaders and also to President Zelenskyy,' Trump said. 'I may say - lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal.' Trump insists on swaps Zelenskyy has ruled out ceding territory seized by force. Trump - who publicly berated Zelenskyy at a White House meeting in February - said he was a 'little bothered' by Zelensky's stance and insisted land swaps would need to take place. 'There'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land,' he said. But Trump said he would also tell Putin that 'you've got to end this war'. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has invited the French, British and other European leaders and the EU and Nato chiefs to virtual talks. Merz's office said today that the video conference in various rounds of talks would discuss 'further options to exert pressure on Russia' and 'preparation of possible peace negotiations and related issues of territorial claims and security'. EU foreign ministers met in Brussels today with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha and also examined imposing a 19th package of sanctions on Russia since the invasion. Until Russia agrees to a 'full and unconditional ceasefire, we should not even discuss any concessions', EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said after the talks. 'It has never worked in the past with Russia, and will not work with Putin today.' Zelenskyy again warned against capitulating to Putin's demands. 'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits. And this is not just a moral position - it is a rational one,' Zelenskyy wrote in a statement published on social media. 'Concessions do not persuade a killer,' he added. Question on Zelensky role Asked yesterday on CNN if Zelenskyy could be present at the Alaska summit, US Ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker responded, 'Yes, I certainly think it's possible'. Trump, asked today about inviting Zelenskyy to Alaska, suggested the Ukrainian leader would be involved in talks at a future date. 'I'll be there if they need, but I want to have a meeting set up between the two leaders,' he said. It remains unclear if Putin would accept a meeting with Zelenskyy, who has publicly dared him to negotiate. As a prerequisite to a peace settlement, the Kremlin has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of several regions claimed by Moscow and embrace sweeping demands - including committing to being a neutral state excluded from Nato and shunning US and European military support. Both sides have stepped up aerial assaults, with Ukraine claiming to have hit a facility that produces missile components in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Local authorities said one person died in the attack and two were wounded. Russia's Defence Ministry said its forces had captured the village of Fedorivka, in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region. -Agence France-Presse
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
European leaders plan Ukraine talks with Trump before he meets Putin
Trump said he expected the meeting with Putin to be 'constructive' and expressed unhappiness with Zelenskyy for ruling out territorial concessions to Russia. 'I'm going to speak to Vladimir Putin and I'm going to be telling him 'you've got to end this war,'' Trump said at a White House press conference. As EU foreign ministers began an emergency meeting on Ukraine, Merz announced the initiative to keep Europe at the table. Merz's office said he would talk to leaders from 'Finland, France, the UK, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, the heads of the European Commission and Council, the secretary general of Nato, as well as the US president and his deputy'. According to Germany's Bild daily, a first conference call will include the European leaders, Zelenskyy, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen and Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. This would be followed by a joint call with Trump and Vice-President JD Vance, the newspaper said. The idea of a US-Russia meeting without Zelenskyy has raised concerns that a deal could require Ukraine to cede swathes of territory, which the EU has rejected. Over the weekend, several European leaders pushed Trump to exert more pressure on Russia in a joint statement and warned that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine'. 'Testing Putin' Before Monday's EU talks, Zelenskyy warned against capitulating to Putin's demands. 'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits. And this is not just a moral position – it is a rational one,' Zelenskyy wrote in a statement published on social media. 'Concessions do not persuade a killer,' he added. Asked if Zelenskyy could be present at the Alaska summit, US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker responded that 'yes, I certainly think it's possible'. 'Certainly, there can't be a deal that everybody that's involved in it doesn't agree to. And, I mean, obviously, it's a high priority to get this war to end.' The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, also said any US-Russia deal to end the war had to include Ukraine and the bloc. 'The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously,' she said. 'Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security.' As a prerequisite to a peace settlement, the Kremlin has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of several regions claimed by Moscow, commit to being a neutral state, shun US and EU military support and be excluded from joining Nato. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Both sides have meanwhile stepped up aerial assaults, with Ukraine claiming to have hit a facility that produces missile components in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Local authorities said one person was killed in the attack and two were wounded. Russia's defence ministry said on Monday its forces had captured the village of Fedorivka in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk. The village is northeast of the embattled towns of Pokrovsk and Myrnograd towards which Russia has been advancing. -Agence France-Presse
Newsroom
3 days ago
- Newsroom
How does NZ outrun the grizzly bear?
Comment: An old saying goes that to outrun a grizzly bear you don't need to run fast: you just have to run faster than the person running next to you. A similar unedifying spectacle has been on display in Washington DC recently with US trading partners racing to make sure they are not treated as 'least favoured nation' when it comes to tariffs. It's understandable given the economic stakes, but it doesn't do a lot for global co-operation. Diplomacy is mostly a long-term game. Alliances and partnerships require constant attention. Negotiations can take years not months to conclude. Abrupt decisions can have unintended and damaging consequences. Trust built up over time can be quickly eroded. Today's global environment is marked by an upending of the order (or imperfectly managed disorder) to which we had become accustomed since the end of the Cold War. Geopolitics is back and 'trumping' (sic) geoeconomics. The world now faces more military conflict than it has for some time – in Europe, Africa and the Middle East, as well as escalations in South Asia just recently – although the causes of these conflicts run deep across generations. The US-China relationship remains difficult, despite a trade deal and somewhat less bellicose commentary from Washington. But the fault lines are deeply entrenched and flash points in the South China Sea and Taiwan strait remain; an accident could easily lead to conflict. The world has been witness to 30 years of progressive trade liberalisation and economic integration – markets becoming more open, borders becoming more like bridges, sometimes with tolls, rather than high and impenetrable walls. But this new wave of protectionism is giving way to something different. The art of the deal is replacing the rule of trade law; a new licence has been given for protectionism, not just in the US but in other countries as well. We are also seeing a blurring of the lines between security and economic dimensions. Trade bans and tariffs are not just economic instruments but means of political coercion. Take for example China's trade actions against Australia, now thankfully removed, or in recent days the US threat of a 50 percent tariff on Brazil seemingly because of the Brazilian justice system's handling of a case against former president Jair Bolsonaro. What is a small, open and trade dependent economy, far away from overseas markets, to do? There's little doubt we are beginning to feel the cold winds of these developments, despite the distance. Over time we have proved ourselves remarkably adept at navigating a complex and changing world. We have long experience right back to colonial days in dealing with countries larger and more powerful. Apart from trade threats from France during the Rainbow Warrior affair, we have not experienced significant coercion, not even as a result of our principled anti-nuclear legislation. Our independent foreign policy, with Australia as our only formal ally, has served us well. While we have very little to offer trading partners in terms of access to our small market, around 80 percent of our trade now flows to markets where we have free trade agreements. Not all of them provide largely tariff-free market access, but some do, most importantly China. How we continue this delicate balancing act between competing political and economic partners is the key issue facing our foreign policy today. New Zealand has always sought to be a responsible global citizen, with soft power influence which belies our size. What we cannot contribute with hard power like arms or funding, we substitute with ideas and practical cooperation. We are willing to join new arrangements and attend to the plumbing of the international system by serving on bodies at the United Nations or the World Trade Organisation. It's not just altruism – smaller countries need the insurance of multilateral institutions to help protect them from the larger powers. We have for example won every dispute settlement case we have taken in the World Trade Organization. These institutions and processes are today under threat. The world risks paying a high price if they are permanently damaged. Because precisely at a time when trust between nation states is at an all-time low, we face some unprecedented challenges. The most pressing is the climate crisis which risks radically altering the way we live, or even the ability to live at all, certainly in some parts of the world not so far from Aotearoa. We are also in the midst of a technological revolution, with new technologies like artificial intelligence with potential to revolutionise the way we work. With such significant change come new threats for which we need to be prepared. Add to that a lack of economic and social development in numerous countries and the very real risk of another pandemic, it's easy to see that more international co-operation is required not less. In this conflicted and less trusting world, New Zealand is not without agency. We have a vital interest in preserving the international system which has served us so well: this means engaging proactively and respectfully with the United Nations, even if we ourselves may face criticism, and implementing, not questioning, the undertakings like the Paris Agreement we have entered into. This is exactly the time when our support matters. But the rules alone may not save us. While firmly anchored together with our Pacific whanaunga in our own neighbourhood, we are part of many different groupings of countries – now is the time to leverage and mobilise those relationships. We should of course continue to cooperate with the large powers where it makes sense to do so. At the same time, we should lend our independent voice and soft power to build new coalitions fostering peace and development: the recent multi-country statement on Gaza is welcome but could go further. Another is the Prime Minister's recent outreach to CPTPP partners and the EU calling for a new dialogue on global trade rules. Expanding and deepening CPTPP should also be on the agenda. The biggest risk to New Zealand today is that we could find ourselves trapped in one or other 'camp' based on others' interests and values. While some may play poker, raising the stakes at every turn, we should remain open to a range of views and partners as we play the long game of diplomacy. Mā te rongo, ka mōhio. From listening, comes knowledge.
