US Fed poised to hold off on rate cuts, defying Trump pressure
Policymakers at the independent Federal Reserve have kept the benchmark lending rate steady since the start of the year as they monitor how Trump's sweeping tariffs are impacting the world's biggest economy.
With Trump's on-again, off-again tariff approach -- and the levies' lagged effects on inflation -- Fed officials want to see economic data from this summer to gauge how prices are being affected.
When mulling changes to interest rates, the central bank -- which meets on Tuesday and Wednesday -- seeks a balance between reining in inflation and the health of the jobs market.
But the bank's data-dependent approach has enraged the Republican president, who has repeatedly criticised Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates further, calling him a "numbskull" and "moron".
Most recently, Trump signalled he could use the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation project as an avenue to oust Powell, before backing off and saying that would be unlikely.
Trump visited the Fed construction site on Thursday, making a tense appearance with Powell in which the Fed chair disputed Trump's characterisation of the total cost of the refurbishment in front of the cameras.
But economists expect the Fed to look past the political pressure at its policy meeting.
"We're just now beginning to see the evidence of tariffs' impact on inflation," said Ryan Sweet, chief US economist at Oxford Economics.
"We're going to see it (too) in July and August, and we think that's going to give the Fed reason to remain on the sidelines," he told AFP.
- 'Trial balloon' -
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has imposed a 10% tariff on goods from almost all countries, as well as steeper rates on steel, aluminum and autos.
The effect on inflation has so far been limited, prompting the US leader to use this as grounds for calling for interest rates to be lowered by three percentage points.
Currently, the benchmark lending rate stands at a range between 4.25% and 4.50%.
Trump also argues that lower rates would save the government money on interest payments, and floated the idea of firing Powell. The comments roiled financial markets.
"Powell can see that the administration floated this trial balloon" of ousting him before walking it back on the market's reaction, Sweet said.
"It showed that markets value an independent central bank," the Oxford Economics analyst added, anticipating Powell will instead be more influenced by labour market concerns.
Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May 2026.
- Jobs market 'fissures' -
Analysts expect to see a couple of members break ranks if the Fed's rate-setting committee decides for a fifth straight meeting to keep interest rates unchanged.
Sweet cautioned that some observers may spin dissents as pushback on Powell but argued this is not necessarily the case.
"It's not out-of-line or unusual to see, at times when there's a high degree of uncertainty, or maybe a turning point in policy, that you get one or two people dissenting," said Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic.
Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman have both signalled openness to rate cuts as early as July, meaning their disagreement with a decision to hold rates steady would not surprise markets.
Bostjancic said that too many dissents could be "eyebrow-raising," and lead some to question if Powell is losing control of the board, but added: "I don't anticipate that to be the case."
For Sweet, "the big wild card is the labour market".
There has been weakness in the private sector, while the hiring rate has been below average and the number of permanent job losers is rising.
"There are some fissures in the labor market, but they haven't turned into fault lines yet," Sweet said.
If the labour market suddenly weakened, he said he would expect the Fed to start cutting interest rates sooner.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
6 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Gaza Strip pantomime ending at last
The coordinated chorus of despair by Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump and their various henchpersons and flacks was quite impressive. The message was that everybody should stop hoping for a negotiated peace. Mr Netanyahu has stared Mr Trump down once again, and the four-month pantomime search for a new ceasefire in Gaza is at an end. On July 19, Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's lead diplomatic negotiator, said: "Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith. We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza. It is a shame that Hamas has acted in this selfish way." Mr Trump himself was more colourful: "Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die. Now we're down to the final hostages, and they know what happens after you get the final hostages. And basically because of that, they really didn't want to make a deal." Of course, the surviving junior members of Hamas didn't want the only deal Israel is willing to offer them. A 60-day ceasefire during which all Israeli hostages are released, followed by a resumption of the war until the Hamas fighters are all dead or driven out of Gaza, was never a plausible offer. Might as well die fighting. Similarly, the current Israeli government would never offer Hamas a better deal. Most of its members share Mr Netanyahu's determination that the Gaza Strip should be largely or wholly "cleansed" of its Palestinian population, although there is not full agreement on what should follow: Israeli control and Jewish settlement, or Mr Trump's "Riviera on the Mediterranean". All the back-and-forth diplomacy of the past six months was just for show, and the only audience that mattered was Donald Trump. His naive belief that his personality alone could persuade bitter opponents in both Israel/Gaza and Russia/Ukraine to sign peace deals had to be indulged for a while, but it was never realistic. The last ceasefire in Gaza, declared one day before Mr Trump took office in late January, was a precautionary measure taken by both sides while they tried to make sense of what the new president intended. When Mr Netanyahu realised that Mr Trump was even easier to manage than Joe Biden was, he unilaterally broke that ceasefire in mid-March. Through March, April and most of May, Israel blocked all food, water, medicine and fuel from entering Gaza, most of whose 2.1 million civilians were near starvation by the time. Israel restarted deliveries. But now it was no longer international aid distributed from 400 neighbourhood locations in the Strip. Instead, it's the four massive centres of the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation", controlled by American mercenaries and Israel Defence Forces (IDF) soldiers. They are only open for a few minutes twice a day, people have to walk for hours to reach them, and every day some are shot by the IDF or the mercenaries. The number of Palestinians killed rarely exceeds a hundred a day and is often just a dozen or so, but the amount of food delivered by the new system since May 26 amounts to only one meal per person every second day. Since distribution is so erratic, moreover, many people are getting far less and the deaths from this artificial famine continue to grow. It's not clear whether this is random malevolence or mere incompetence, but it is accompanied by an IDF military campaign that has brought 89% of Gaza's land under direct Israeli military occupation. Mr Trump's last flailing attempt to bring Mr Netanuyahu to heel failed during the latter's recent visit to Washington, and Bibi is now off the leash. He no longer needs to pretend he is negotiating for a ceasefire to keep Mr Trump happy. The next three months is the summer recess of the Knesset (parliament), traditionally the time when Israeli governments make controversial decisions. It would be the ideal time to activate Mr Netanyahu's plans for the future of Gaza, if he has any. So what "alternative options" might he be considering? Is this when Defence Minister Israel Katz puts into action his plan to build a giant concentration camp (sorry, "humanitarian city") on the ruins of Rafah to hold 600,000 Palestinians? Will the "voluntary migration" of Palestinians to other countries willing to take them also start? Bribes will be available. Will Jewish settlement in the Strip start? Will Donald Trump reveal his plans for Gaza-sur-Med? Stay tuned.
Bangkok Post
8 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump to resume trade talks with Cambodia, Thailand after truce
US President Donald Trump said he had asked US officials to resume trade negotiations with Cambodia and Thailand after the countries agreed to halt fighting along a disputed border. 'By ending this War, we have saved thousands of lives. I have instructed my Trade Team to restart negotiations on Trade,' Trump said in a social media post on Monday. The president said he had just spoken with both Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet to secure the ceasefire. Trump's remarks are the latest example of how the president has cast trade as a panacea for geopolitical flashpoints, claiming credit for pressuring trading partners to end conflicts if they wish to retain continued access to US markets. The United States in June brokered a deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda aimed at ending years of conflict. And Trump has similarly claimed credit for halting a clash between nuclear powers India and Pakistan earlier this year. Thailand and Cambodia agreed on Monday to halt five days of fighting after talks in Malaysia hosted by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Envoys from China and the US were also at the negotiations, though their roles were not immediately clear. Tensions between the southeast Asian neighbors erupted in recent days with fresh clashes that displaced more than 150,000 civilians on both sides of their 800-kilometre border. After separate calls with the leaders of those countries on Saturday, Trump had threatened to block trade deals with them if the violence did not stop. Thailand and Cambodia both face 36% levies on Friday if agreements with the US aren't reached. 'We're not going to make a trade deal unless you settle the war,' Trump had said. In their remarks after the meeting, both the Thai and Cambodian prime ministers thanked the Malaysian prime minister and US president, as well as China, for helping reach the ceasefire. While Pakistan hailed Trump after its conflict with India was paused, New Delhi has disputed Trump's claims that the prospect of securing trade deals helped clinch that ceasefire. Both India and Pakistan are engaged in trade talks with the US ahead of the Aug 1 deadline. Trump has said the US stands to get mineral rights from the DRC after brokering their deal. Congo is the second-biggest copper producer and largest source of cobalt, giving it prominence in Washington's efforts to reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains for minerals needed for a wide-range of cutting-edge technologies.
Bangkok Post
8 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump eyes 'world tariff' of 15-20% for most countries
TURNBERRY, Scotland - US President Donald Trump said on Monday most trading partners that do not negotiate separate trade deals would soon face tariffs of 15% to 20% on their exports to the United States, well above the broad 10% tariff he imposed in April. Trump told reporters his administration will notify some 200 countries soon of their new "world tariff" rate. "I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20% range," Trump told reporters, sitting alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at his luxury golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland. "Probably one of those two numbers." Trump, who has vowed to end decades of US trade deficits by imposing tariffs on nearly all trading partners, has already announced higher rates of up to 50% on some countries, including Brazil, starting on Friday. The announcements have spurred feverish negotiations by a host of countries seeking lower tariff rates, including India, Pakistan, Canada, and Thailand, among others. The US president on Sunday clinched a huge trade deal with the European Union that includes a 15% tariff on most EU goods, $600 billion of investments in the US by European firms, and $750 billion in energy purchases over the next three years. That followed a $550-billion deal with Japan last week and smaller agreements with Britain, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Other talks are ongoing, including with India, but prospects have dimmed for many more agreements before Friday, Trump's deadline for deals before higher rates take effect. Trump has repeatedly said he favours straightforward tariff rates over complex negotiations. "We're going to be setting a tariff for essentially, the rest of the world," he said again on Monday. "And that's what they're going to pay if they want to do business in the United States. Because you can't sit down and make 200 deals." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday trade talks with the US were at an intense phase, conceding that his country was still hoping to walk away with a tariff rate below the 35% announced by Trump on some Canadian imports.
