After the revolution, Bangladesh warms to Pakistan, China as India fumes
One year since the protests, that realignment risks intensifying polarisation – and fears of external interference – as political parties in Bangladesh jostle for influence ahead of elections next year.
For the caretaker government, seeking domestic consensus for overhauling democratic institutions in the country of 170 million people, it is another challenge to juggle.
'India-Bangladesh relations have probably never experienced such intense strain before,' said New Delhi-based analyst Praveen Donthi, from the International Crisis Group.
There is deep resentment in Dhaka over the fate of fugitive ex-prime minister Hasina, who escaped a student-led uprising by helicopter in August 2024 and flew to New Delhi as thousands of protesters stormed her palace.
Interim leader Muhammad Yunus said popular anger in Muslim-majority Bangladesh had been 'transferred over to India' because Hasina was offered sanctuary by New Delhi's Hindu nationalist government.
Hasina, 77, has defied extradition orders to attend her crimes against humanity trial, and has already been convicted in absentia for contempt of court with a six-month sentence.
'Readjustment'
Md Touhid Hossain, who heads Bangladesh's foreign ministry, said that 'the relationship is now at the readjustment stage'.
Nobel Peace Prize winner Yunus's first state visit was to China in March, a trip that saw him secure $2.1 billion in investments, loans and grants.
Beijing has also courted leading politicians directly.
Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, a senior leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) – the expected election frontrunner – said China is 'keen' to work with the next elected government with 'sincerity, steadfastness, love, and affection'.
India has long been wary of China's growing regional clout and the world's two most populous countries compete for influence in South Asia, despite a recent diplomatic thaw.
Bangladesh has also moved closer to Pakistan, India's arch-enemy.
In May, more than 70 people were killed in four days of missile, drone and artillery fire between the forces of New Delhi and Islamabad, sparked by a deadly militant attack on civilians in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
The following month, officials from Dhaka and Islamabad met counterparts in China.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said the trio had agreed to 'cooperation programmes' including in trade, industry, education and agriculture.
Obaidul Haque, who teaches international relations at the University of Dhaka, said talks with Beijing had 'borne fruit', including alternative healthcare after once popular medical tourism to India was restricted.
'For example, China designated three hospitals for Bangladeshi patients when India made access difficult,' he said.
'Tread carefully'
Bangladesh and Pakistan – which split in 1971 after Dhaka's independence war – began trade by sea last year, with direct flights also slated.
That sparked worry in New Delhi.
'The current Indian political leadership, owing to its ideological foundations… are unwilling to accept Dhaka under a government they perceive as Islamist and hostile towards India,' Donthi said.
'The visible engagement between Dhaka, Islamabad, and Beijing enhances this perception further.'
Reviving Pak-BD ties
Both New Delhi and Bangladesh have imposed trade restrictions on each other.
India, which encircles much of Bangladesh by land, has imposed multiple trade restrictions – including tightening rules on Indian imports of jute fibres, ready-made garments, plastic products and food.
But trade between the neighbouring nations remains high, said Md Humayun Kabir, a former Bangladeshi ambassador to Washington, who has also served in India.
But he urged caution, saying Dhaka should 'tread carefully forming alliances', and seek to strengthen 'multilateral relations' as a balance.
'Cooperation still exists between the countries, but the warmth is gone,' he said.
'Attempts to undermine'
Separately, Bangladesh, the world's second-largest garment exporter, has also been caught in the global shakeup caused by US President Donald Trump's tariffs.
Dhaka is proposing to buy Boeing planes and boost imports of US wheat, cotton and oil in a bid to reduce the trade deficit, with Yunus in June telling US Secretary of State Marco Rubio of his 'commitment to strengthening' ties.
But in terms of regional tensions, analysts say little will change soon – and warn they have the potential to escalate.
'Things might change only if New Delhi is satisfied with the electoral process and sees somebody amenable to it come to power in Dhaka,' the Crisis Group's Donthi added.
'It is very unlikely that their position will change towards the current government in Dhaka,' he said.
'There may be attempts to undermine it rather than to collaborate.' afp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India feels the pinch as Trump doubles tariffs
U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands as they attend a joint press conference at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo Listen to article US President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, opening a new front in his trade wars just hours before another wave of duties takes effect. An additional 25-percent tariff on Indian goods, set to come into place in three weeks, stacks atop a separate 25-percent duty entering into force Thursday, taking the level to 50 percent for many products. Trump's order also threatens penalties on other countries who "directly or indirectly" import Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. Exemptions remain however for goods targeted under sector-specific duties such as steel and aluminum, and categories that could be hit later, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Smartphones are among this list of exempted products for now, notably shielding Apple from a major hit as the US tech titan shifts production from China to India. India's foreign ministry condemned Trump's tariff announcement Wednesday, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable." The ministry previously said India began importing oil from Russia as traditional supplies were diverted to Europe over the warnoting that Washington had "actively encouraged" such imports to strengthen "global energy market stability." But Trump recently raised pressure on India over the oil purchases, threatening new tariffs as part of a campaign to force Moscow into ending its devastating invasion of Ukraine. India's national security adviser was in Moscow on Wednesday, media in New Delhi reported, coinciding with US envoy Steve Witkoff's visit. The 25-percent additional tariff is notably lower than a 100-percent level Trump floated last month when he told Russia to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days or face massive new economic sanctions. The Republican said at the time that these would be "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, seeking to impede Moscow's ability to survive already sweeping Western sanctions. "This marks a low point in US-India relations," said Farwa Aamer, the Asia Society Policy Institute's director of South Asia Initiatives. She expects domestic pressure for India to accede to US demands, but said "this will be a tough road to navigate." Trump has also separately taken aim at Brazil over the trial of his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonarowho is accused of planning a coup. US tariffs on various Brazilian goods surged from 10 percent to 50 percent Wednesday, although broad exemptions including for orange juice and civil aircraft are expected to soften the blow. Brazil took the first formal step Wednesday at the World Trade Organization to begin dispute proceedings against the tariffs, government sources told AFP. Come Thursday, a new wave of tariffs impacting dozens of other economies, from the European Union to Taiwan, is set to kick in. These updated "reciprocal" tariffs, meant to address trade practices Washington deems unfair, go up to 41 percent for Syria. Major US trading partners face varying increases from a current 10-percent level, starting at 15 percent for economies like the EU, Japan and South Korea. Countries not targeted by these "reciprocal" tariff hikes continue facing a 10-percent levy Trump imposed in April. Trump's plans have sparked a rush to avert the steeper duties, with Switzerland's President Karin Keller-Sutter hurrying to Washington ahead of the Thursday deadline. Though she secured a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, it was unclear if she would meet Trump or any top economic officials. Her Alpine country faces a 39-percent duty on many exports. While Switzerland's key pharmaceutical sector has been spared for now, Trump has said a potential separate tariff could eventually rise to 250 percent. Some of Trump's sweeping tariffs face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers, with the cases likely to ultimately reach the Supreme Court.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump's Pakistan praise derailed India deal
US President Donald Trump speaks after signing the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act at the White House in Washington, DC, US, July 30, REUTERS Listen to article After five rounds of trade negotiations, Indian officials were so confident of securing a favourable deal with the United States that they even signalled to the media that tariffs could be capped at 15%. Indian officials expected US President Donald Trump to announce the deal himself weeks before the August 1 deadline. The announcement never came. New Delhi is now left with the surprise imposition of a 25% tariff on Indian goods from Friday, along with unspecified penalties over oil imports from Russia, while Trump has closed larger deals with Japan and the EU, and even offered better terms to arch-rival Pakistan. Interviews with four Indian government officials and two US government officials revealed previously undisclosed details of the proposed deal and an exclusive account of how negotiations collapsed despite technical agreements on most issues. COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN "At one point, both sides were very close to signing the deal," said Mark Linscott, a former US Trade Representative who now works for a lobby group that is close to the discussions between the two nations. "The missing component was a direct line of communication between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi." A White House official strongly disputed this, noting other deals had been resolved without such intervention. An Indian government official involved in the talks said Modi could not have called, fearing a one-sided conversation with Trump that could put him on the spot. However, the other three Indian officials said Trump's repeated remarks about mediating the India-Pakistan conflict further strained negotiations and contributed to Modi not making a final call. "Trump's remarks on Pakistan didn't go down well," one of them said. "Ideally, India should have acknowledged the US role while making it clear the final call was ours." A senior Indian government official blamed the collapse on poor judgment, saying top Indian advisers mishandled the process. "We lacked the diplomatic support needed after the US struck better deals with Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan and the EU," the official said. "We're now in a crisis that could have been avoided." OVER-CONFIDENCE AND MISCALCULATION Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who visited Washington in February, agreed to target a deal by fall 2025, and more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. To bridge the $47 billion goods trade gap, India pledged to buy up to $25 billion in US energy and boost defence imports. But officials now admit India grew overconfident after Trump talked up a "big" imminent deal, taking it as a signal that a favourable agreement was in hand. New Delhi then hardened its stance, especially on agriculture and dairy, two highly sensitive areas for the Indian government. "We are one of the fastest growing economies, and the US can't ignore a market of 1.4 billion," one Indian official involved in the negotiations said in mid-July. Negotiators even pushed for relief from the 10% average US tariff announced in April, plus a rollback of steel, aluminium and auto duties. Later, India scaled back expectations after the US signed trade deals with key partners including Japan, and the European Union, hoping it could secure a similar 15% tariff rate with fewer concessions. That was unacceptable to the White House. "Trump wanted a headline-grabbing announcement with broader market access, investments and large purchases," said a Washington-based source familiar with the talks. An Indian official acknowledged New Delhi wasn't ready to match what others offered. South Korea, for example, struck a deal just before Trump's August 1 deadline, securing a 15% rate instead of 25% by offering $350 billion in investments, higher energy imports, and concessions on rice and beef. The officials on both sides said a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness broke down the deal between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion. The White House, the US Trade Representative office, and India's Prime Minister's Office, along with the External Affairs and Commerce ministries, did not respond to emailed requests for comment. India believed that after visits by Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal to Washington and US Vice President JD Vance to Delhi, it had made a series of deal-clinching concessions. New Delhi was offering zero tariffs on industrial goods that formed about 40% of US exports to India, two Indian government officials told Reuters. Despite domestic pressure, India would also gradually lower tariffs on US cars and alcohol with quotas and accede to Washington's main demand of higher energy and defence imports from the US, the officials said. "Most differences were resolved after the fifth round in Washington, raising hopes of a breakthrough," one of the officials said, adding negotiators believed the US would accommodate India's reluctance on duty-free farm imports and dairy products from the US. It was a miscalculation. Trump saw the issue differently and wanted more concessions. "A lot of progress was made on many fronts in India talks, but there was never a deal that we felt good about," said one White House official. "We never got to what amounted to a full deal — a deal that we were looking for." WAY FORWARD Talks are ongoing, with a US delegation expected in Delhi later this month and Indian government officials still believe the deal can be salvaged from here. "It's still possible," one White House official said. The Indian government is re-examining areas within the farm and dairy sectors where concessions can be made, the fourth official said. On Russian oil, India could reduce some purchases in favour of US supplies if pricing is matched. "It likely will require direct communication between the prime minister and the president," said Linscott. "Pick up the phone. Right now, we are in a lose-lose. But there is real potential for a win-win trade deal."
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Importance of the Pezeshkian's visit to Pakistan
A couple of days ago, Islamabad hosted Dr Masoud Pezeshkian, the honourable President of Iran, and his accompanying delegation. This was Dr Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan. In April 2024, the then President Ebrahim Raisi made a three-day trip to Pakistan, receiving a warm welcome from the people and officials of the country. Shortly after Raisi's visit to Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif travelled to Tehran to pay his respects and attend the memorial ceremony for the late President Raisi. A year later, in May of this year, Sharif visited Tehran once again to express his appreciation on Iran's stance regarding the India-Pakistan conflict. Pezeshkian's recent visit was also at the invitation of Shehbaz Sharif and, in effect, a reciprocal response to Sharif's trip to Tehran. Thus, within less than two years, top officials from Iran and Pakistan have travelled to each other's countries four times in addition to their frequent meetings on the sidelines of major regional and international summits. These repeated meetings reflect the close ties between the two countries and underscore the importance of their relationship, particularly in the current context where the need to expand cooperation is being felt more than ever. Iran-Pakistan relations have enjoyed relative stability in recent decades, and visits and meetings between their officials have become a common occurrence. However, what added extra significance to the President's recent trip were the unique political circumstances and regional and global developments that have unfolded in recent months. The outbreak of war between India and Pakistan in May 2025, both nuclear-armed nations, placed the region in an extremely sensitive situation. Although the war was short-lived and lasted no more than four days, its consequences still linger for both countries and the broader region and world. Ongoing war in the occupied territories and the genocide in Gaza have also deeply impacted international politics. In this regard, the stances of Islamic countries, especially Iran and Pakistan, carry considerable weight. Both Tehran and Islamabad have taken firm, united positions, emphasizing full support for the Palestinian cause. Another issue is the tariff war initiated by Trump against many countries, which has drawn in most nations to some extent. Pakistan has not been spared, facing threats from Trump's policies. Most significantly, the recent 12-day imposed war launched by the Zionist regime against Iran has left wide-ranging effects on the region and fundamentally altered the geopolitics of the region and the Islamic world. Pakistan's stance as one of the most important and populous Muslim nations and a nuclear power holds particular importance. The President's visit to Pakistan came at a time when the country's stance regarding the 12-day imposed war was under intense scrutiny in Iran. Given that the Iran-Israel conflict erupted shortly after the India-Pakistan war, Pakistan's governmental and public reaction could have heavily influenced the Islamic Republic's position toward the India-Pakistan conflict. Available evidence suggests that Pakistan was satisfied with Iran's position. Shehbaz Sharif's visit to Tehran immediately after the India-Pakistan conflict — aimed at thanking Iran and other supporters — clearly attests to this. Islamabad's officials expressed appreciation for Iran's foreign minister's trip to both Pakistan and India and Iran's efforts to mediate between the two sides. Additionally, the Pakistani public's sensitivity toward the Palestinian issue and their strong aversion to the Zionist regime's criminal acts in Gaza significantly contributed to their support for Iran. There is also a growing concern in Pakistan about illegal joint actions by the Zionist regime and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, and a possibility that similar actions could one day be taken against other countries as well. All these factors led to Islamabad's broad and firm support for Tehran and the unequivocal condemnation of Israeli and US aggression. This condemnation was strongly voiced in the UN Security Council by Pakistan's permanent representative. Pakistan, as a non-permanent member and rotating president of the Security Council at the time, explicitly labelled the bombing of nuclear facilities as illegal. Furthermore, Islamabad supported dialogue and negotiation and endorsed Iran's right to nuclear knowledge. Simultaneously, inside Pakistan, there was comprehensive support from the army and political figures to the extent that Pakistan's Parliament passed a resolution in support of Iran against Israeli aggression. All of this indicates that Pakistan, as a neighbour and fellow Muslim country, strongly supported the Islamic Republic of Iran. Thus, the Iranian President's visit could be seen as a reciprocal response to Shehbaz Sharif's appreciative visit to Tehran. For decades, Iran-Pakistan relations have been influenced by security issues, particularly regarding the condition of their shared borders. In past visits by Pakistani prime ministers and military chiefs to Tehran and vice versa, a recurring theme has been upgrading border security to border economics. Over the years, both sides have developed mechanisms to enhance coordination in combating terrorism. As outlined in the President's itinerary, boosting economic and trade relations between the two nations was a major goal of the current trip. Considering the economic structures and capacities of Iran and Pakistan, there was broad consensus that their economic cooperation potential far exceeds current levels. On a larger scale, one crucial issue Tehran and Islamabad should consider is tapping into regional economic capacities. One such opportunity is connecting Pakistan to Turkey and Europe via Iran. Both Tehran and Islamabad can capitalize on the improved recent relations between Pakistan and Turkey. Additionally, interest from traders in operating through Chabahar port and its proximity to Gwadar port presents an opportunity to transform these two potentially rival ports into complementary nodes along Pakistan's trade route to Europe. All of this depends on the economic outlooks of Iran and Pakistan: whether they aim to use each other's economic potential and act as partners and complements. There is an ocean of untapped capacities in both countries, and activating them requires serious political will from both sides. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
