Top Chinese, U.S. trade officials huddle in Sweden for second day of thorny talks over tariffs
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng made no public comments to reporters after the first day of talks that lasted nearly five hours behind closed doors at the Swedish Prime Minister's office on Monday.
Before the talks resumed on Tuesday, Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson met with Bessent and U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer over breakfast.
The United States has struck deals over tariffs with some of its key trading partners — including Britain, Japan and the European Union — since President Donald Trump announced 'Liberation Day' tariffs against dozens of countries in April. China remains perhaps the biggest unresolved case.
'The Chinese have been very pragmatic," Mr. Greer said in comments posted on social media by his office late Monday.
Also Read | U.S. and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump's phone call with Xi
'Obviously we've had a lot of tensions over the years. We have tensions now, but the fact that we are regularly meeting with them to address these issues gives us a good footing for these negotiations.'
'Whether there will be a deal or not, I can't say,' Mr. Greer added in the clip posted on X from MSNBC's 'Morning Joe'. "Whether there's room for an extension, I can't say at this point. But the conversations are constructive and they're going in the right direction.'
Many analysts expect that the Stockholm talks, at a minimum, will result in an extension of current tariff levels that are far lower than the triple-digit percentage rates as the U.S.-China tariff tiff crescendoed in April, sending world markets into a temporary tailspin.
The two sides backed off the brink during bilateral talks in Geneva in May and agreed to a 90-day pause — which is set to end on Aug. 12 — of those sky-high levels. They currently stand at U.S. tariffs of 30% on Chinese goods, and China's 10% tariff on US products.
Other issues on the agenda include access of American businesses to the Chinese market; Chinese investment in the U.S.; components of fentanyl made in China that reach U.S. consumers; Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil; and American steps to limit exports of Western technology, like chips that help power artificial intelligence systems.
Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said that Mr. Trump's team would face challenges from 'a large and confident partner that is more than willing to retaliate against US interests.' Rollover of tariff rates 'should be the easy part,' she said, warning that Beijing has learned lessons since the first Trump administration and 'will not buy into a one-sided deal this time around.'
On Monday, police cordoned off a security zone along Stockholm's vast waterfront as rubbernecking tourists and locals sought a glimpse of the top-tier officials through a phalanx of TV news cameras lined up behind metal barriers.
Flagpoles at the Prime Minister's office were festooned with the American and Chinese flags.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump administration refers Harvard to Justice Department in civil rights probe
President Donald Trump's administration has sent a letter to Harvard University saying it has referred the university to the US Justice Department to address allegations of "Harvard's antisemitic discrimination." Donald Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. (File) In late June, the Trump administration said an investigation had concluded Harvard violated federal civil rights law for failing to address harassment of Jewish and Israeli students. Critics, rights experts and some faculty said such probes are a pretext to assert federal control over schools and threaten academic freedom and free speech. Harvard has been embroiled in talks and a legal fight with the Trump administration, seeking the restoration of billions of dollars of frozen federal funds for medical research and other programs. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. "The parties' several months' engagement has been fruitless," said the letter dated Wednesday from the US Department of Health and Human Services to Harvard's leadership. "OCR (Office for Civil Rights) therefore has no choice but to refer the matter to DOJ to initiate appropriate proceedings to address Harvard's antisemitic discrimination." Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities allowed antisemitism during last year's pro-Palestinian protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the Trump administration wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Campus protesters demanded an end to US backing for Israel and a commitment that their universities will cease investing in weapons makers and companies that support Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. Harvard had no immediate comment on Wednesday's letter. The university has said it aims to combat discrimination. Reports released in April by Harvard's antisemitism and Islamophobia task forces found fear and bigotry faced by Jewish, Muslim and Arab students. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. Last week, Columbia University agreed to pay over $220 million to resolve federal probes. The New York Times has reported Harvard was open to spending up to $500 million to end its dispute with the government.


Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Trading partners scramble to reach deals with US ahead of Trumps deadline for imposing new tariffs
WASHINGTON — With President Donald Trump's dramatic tariff hikes on the cusp of starting, countries around the world scrambled on Thursday to finalize their trade frameworks with the United States, figure out the tax rates their goods might face and prepare for the unknown. Shortly before Friday deadline for the tariffs beginning, Trump said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners, with the current 25% tariff rates staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier. 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Trump that he referred to as 'very successful' in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at Thursday's news briefing that Trump 'at some point this afternoon or later this evening' would sign an order to impose new rates starting at 12:01 a.m. EDT Friday. Countries that had not received a prior letter from Trump or negotiated a framework would be notified of their likely tariff rates, either by letter or executive order, she said. The unknowns created a sense of drama that have defined Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months, with the one consistency being his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by U.S. consumers and businesses. Trump imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled in April led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals. Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's 'Hannity' that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict. Among those uncertain about their trade status were wealthy Switzerland and Norway. Norwegian Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg said it was 'completely uncertain' whether a deal would be completed before Trump's deadline. But even the public announcement of a deal can offer scant reassurance for an American trading partner. EU officials are waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported autos and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Trump had announced a deal Sunday while he was in Scotland. 'The U.S. has made these commitments. Now it's up to the U.S. to implement them. The ball is in their court,' EU Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said. The document would not be legally binding. Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period. He said Mexico would end its 'Non Tariff Trade Barriers,' but he didn't provide specifics. Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term. But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year. U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country. The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office. Besides addressing fentanyl trafficking, Trump has made it a goal to close the trade gap. Associated Press writers Lorne Cook in Brussels and Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed to this report. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US job crisis deepens: 806,000 layoffs so far in 2025, worst since COVID crash - Is your company next on the chopping block?
Why are job cuts spiking across industries? Live Events Which sectors have been hit hardest by layoffs? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel There will be big changes in the American job market this year. There have been more mass layoffs in all industries, and in 2025 alone, more than 800,000 people lost their jobs. This is the worst start to a year for jobs since the economy fell apart because of industry seems to be safe, from tech to retail. Technology, retail, and government sectors lead the pack, with AI and federal budget cuts driving much of the firm Challenger, Gray, and Christmas reported Thursday that U.S.-based employers announced 62,075 job cuts in July, up 29% from June and 140% from 25,885 in July have announced 806,383 layoffs so far this year, the most since 2020, when COVID caused economic disruption. Compared to 460.5K job cuts in the first seven months of 2024, the year-to-date total is up 76%.Compared to the average of 23,584 job cuts since the pandemic, the July cuts are significantly to Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, "weare seeing the federal budget cuts implemented by DOGE impact non-profits and healthcare in addition to the government." "AI was cited for over 10,000 cuts last month, and tariff concerns have impacted nearly 6,000 jobs this year," as per a report by Seeking terms of hiring, American companies anticipate adding 86,132 positions through July 2025, compared to 73,596 during the same time last year. With 28,190 new positions announced, nearly a third of the hiring plans were in the entertainment and leisure terms of industry-specific job cuts, government organizations accounted for 3,666 layoffs in July, compared to 3,801 in of all sectors, job cuts totalled 292,294 so far this year. With 89,251 layoffs so far in 2025, a 36% increase from the same period in 2024, technology is the sector most responsible for the private sector's job to the same period last year, retail announced 80,487 job cuts through July, a 249% increase. Compared to the same period last year, nonprofits announced 17,826 job cuts in the first seven months of this year, a five-fold job crisis in the United States is getting worse. In 2025, there were more than 806,000 layoffs, the most in a single year since the COVID pandemic. In July, there were 29% more job cuts than in June. The technology, retail, and government sectors are the most affected, with AI and cuts to the federal budget being two of the main year, the technology, retail, government, and non-profit sectors have seen the most the last month alone, AI-driven changes have resulted in the loss of over 10,000 jobs.