Big Docrra AGM turnout points to growing civic momentum
More than 200 residents rallied at the Salt Rock Country Club last week seeking a stronger voice in local governance.
The event, hosted by the Dolphin Coast Residents and Ratepayers Association (Docrra), underscored growing civic momentum on the North Coast, with residents increasingly engaged in shaping the future of their communities.
Docrra chairman Deon Viljoen reported an 85% increase in revenue, with about R500 000 in reserves, although expenses had also risen by 50%. The re-election of all committee members was uncontested.
He highlighted growing membership, increasing public engagement and Docrra's continued efforts to address municipal governance, infrastructure and financial accountability. The organisation grew from 23 to 34 estate members in the past year, and with individual homeowners included, now represents nearly 7 000 members.
Viljoen was critical of KwaDukuza mayor Ali Ngidi, accusing him of disrespecting residents and undermining the rule of law. He suggested leadership changes at KwaDukuza municipality (KDM) could be coming, citing a R35.7-million fraud and embezzlement case currently under investigation by the Saps Hawks, opened in January.
'We know a leadership change is imminent at KDM. We don't have to wait until 2026, something is going to happen before then,' said Viljoen.
He said Docrra's approach was to apply pressure on the municipality, but with the aim of co-governance is a way to engage constructively,' he said.
Viljoen also noted that R2-billion of KDM's R3-billion budget comes from Docrra-aligned estates and organisations.
'When the penny drops with the municipality oversight organisations, they give us the time and listen to us,' he said.
COO Mary Kassam hosted a panel discussion featuring Viljoen and subcommittee chairs Brian Pottinger (environment) and Flip Helberg (electricity), who addressed environmental concerns and the National Energy Regulator's audit of KDM.
The evening's keynote address was delivered by KwaDukuza Residents Forum chairman Warwick Chapman, who urged residents to vote strategically in upcoming elections, especially in Ballito's Ward 6 and 30.
'Real change is within our grasp,' Chapman said.
'Changing voting patterns is not simple, but it's essential. It's okay to change your vote to get the right kind of government.'
Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news.
Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The hidden cost of Eskom's electricity deals with smelters
Eskom, Nersa and the Ministry of Energy & Electricity must explain why energy-intensive smelters deserve these deals – and why other commercial, industrial, manufacturing and mining customers, and ordinary consumers, should foot the bill. A fierce debate has erupted over the preferential electricity pricing deals – known as Negotiated Pricing Agreements (NPAs) – that Eskom has struck with major industrial users like South32's Hillside aluminium smelter and ferrochrome producers. Government insists these deals are vital to protect jobs and exports, but critics say they lack transparency, impose costs on other customers and ordinary consumers, and contradict the principles of a fair and competitive electricity market. Hillside: South Africa's 'congealed electricity' South32's Hillside Aluminium smelter in Richards Bay is one of the largest of its kind globally, and a cornerstone of South Africa's aluminium industry. With no local bauxite reserves, Hillside relies on imported feedstock and vast amounts of electricity – 10.3 TWh per year, around 5.6% of Eskom's total sales. Under the 10-year NPA approved by Nersa in 2021, Hillside pays a discounted rate for electricity that currently amounts to around R10-billion per year less than it would pay on Eskom's standard Megaflex tariff for mines and large industry. The effective discount over the life of the agreement is about 50%. Interruptability vs affordability Eskom justifies this discount by pointing to Hillside's role in stabilising the grid. The smelter's operations can be interrupted briefly during supply shortfalls, providing a form of demand-side flexibility that Eskom can use instead of reserve generation. But according to a recent and critical analysis by Meridian Economics, this function could be replicated – more cheaply – using 1.2 GW of two-hour battery energy storage. Using current battery procurement prices from the IPP Office, such a solution would cost less than R3-billion per year, suggesting a net discount of R7-billion annually to Hillside. The case for socioeconomic value Supporters of the NPA argue it helps preserve jobs and downstream aluminium beneficiation. Hillside employs about 1,800 workers directly and supplies 27% of its output domestically. But critics say this argument is based on false binaries – that without the NPA, the smelter would close and jobs would vanish. Instead, the electricity used at Hillside could be reallocated to smaller businesses, potentially yielding broader and more resilient economic benefits. The real question, then, is not whether Hillside provides value, but whether that value exceeds what other sectors could generate with the same power. Nersa and the fog of regulation The National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) approved the Hillside NPA in 2021, but the process was opaque. The decision lacked detailed economic modelling, failed to evaluate alternatives like battery storage, and made no attempt to compare Hillside's benefit to that of alternative electricity uses. It would further appear that no other party in South Africa has done a proper economic analysis and calculation of the real socioeconomic benefits of the Hillside NPA. Furthermore, key economic inputs – like the pricing escalation clause and aluminium price 'upside' mechanisms – were based on unclear rationale. Although the NPA was touted as free of embedded derivatives, Meridian Economics argues that a call-option structure remains embedded in the deal. Cabinet's broader move — more NPAs are coming In a related development, the Cabinet has just approved a framework to extend NPAs to South Africa's ferrochrome and alloys smelters – long-time industrial electricity users struggling with soaring electricity tariffs. According to Energy and Electricity Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa, the aim is to protect energy-intensive exporters and maintain South Africa's industrial base. But this raises more questions than answers: Are these deals being driven by sound economic analysis and proper power planning, or by ad hoc industrial policy dressed up as regulation? A system at odds with reform Eskom is in financial distress. Other customers – particularly households and SMEs – are paying ever-higher prices for less reliable power. Load shedding, grid instability and rising tariffs have become hallmarks of the crisis. And yet, one of Eskom's biggest customers pays half-price for electricity – a situation kept under wraps until civil society group Open Secrets forced publication of the full Hillside NPA. That it took four years for civil society to scrutinise the deal signals how deeply broken the oversight processes are. Towards a transparent future The principle of cross-subsidisation can be legitimate, but only when clearly justified. Preferential electricity pricing must be scrutinised like any public subsidy: through open modelling, public hearings and clear metrics of cost-benefit. Right now, that is not happening. Eskom, Nersa and the Ministry of Energy & Electricity must explain why energy-intensive smelters deserve these deals – and why other commercial, industrial, manufacturing and mining customers, and ordinary consumers, should foot the bill. Without that, NPAs risk entrenching elite privilege at the expense of national equity, economic dynamism and the future of South Africa's energy system. DM
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
DA welcomes arrest of crime intelligence head, other top cops
The DA has welcomed the arrest of head of crime intelligence Lt-Gen Dumisani Khumalo and three other top figures in the crime intelligence division. The DA said others who had been arrested were Brig Daniel Ncube, Brig Nozipho Madondo and a Maj-Gen Gabela. 'This is a welcomed step in rescuing an organisation on the brink of collapse. This points to yet another serious breach of trust within a critical state institution tasked with performing our nation's policing functions and mandate,' DA spokesperson on state security Dianne Kohler Barnard said. She said the DA will undertake a watching brief on the case. 'In February of this year, the DA wrote to the inspector-general of intelligence, Imtiaz Fazel, after it was uncovered that crime intelligence allegedly spent R22.8m on the purchase of a highly questionable commercial property in Berea, Durban, and R22.7m on a luxury boutique hotel in Pretoria North.' She said these purchases were allegedly authorised by crime intelligence CFO Maj-Gen Philani Lushaba and Khumalo. 'These properties were purchased and seem to be just a tip of the iceberg which, being revealed, threatens to sink crime intelligence once and for all,' she said. Barnard said just over 10 days ago, Maj-Gen Lushaba, the CFO of the crime intelligence division, handed himself over to police after it emerged that a sex worker had allegedly stolen his state-issued firearm and laptop. He subsequently lied about the matter which led to his eventual arrest. 'We expect more arrests to follow of very high-ranking and senior police officials. After years of Zuma-era state capture and corruption Crime Intelligence essentially became a cash cow for Zuma-aligned cronies. 'We call on minister Senzo Mchunu to ensure that the full might of the law prevails and that these arrests lead to the imprisonment of those found guilty of wrongdoing. 'The DA hoped that at last crime intelligence was rising out of the Richard Mdluli era, but sadly for South Africa, that is not the case,' she said.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sassa grant recipients forced to repay thousands after income threshold breaches
One Sassa child grant recipient was told her income had pushed her above the qualifying threshold. Grant recipients who are working while receiving social assistance payments are being forced to repay thousands of rands after exceeding income thresholds, with some facing demands exceeding R3 000. The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has implemented strict repayment policies that are leaving beneficiaries financially strained and questioning its communication practices. Some Sassa grant recipients hit with massive bills Quincie Gama — whose name has been changed — is a working mother who has been receiving the Child Support Grant since January. However, she discovered she owed Sassa a substantial amount when her payments suddenly stopped in May and June. After being called in for verification, she was informed that her employment income had pushed her above the qualifying threshold. 'They said when I come I should have my bank statement, my ID copy and the baby's certificate. They also said if I'm working, I should bring my payslip. 'I recently went to their offices and they verified my information. When they were done, they said because I've been working since January and I still got the Sassa grant, they're going to stop the grant because my stipend is way above the Sassa grant means threshold,' Gama explained. The financial impact was immediate and severe. Sassa told Gama that she could make repayments of R560 per month as she had received grant amounts from January, totalling approximately R3 360. The agency offered her two options: pay the full amount immediately before the end of June, or spread the payment over six months at R560 per month. However, Gama said she was informed that choosing the installment option would incur interest charges. 'I don't know which option to choose, because I definitely don't have R3 000, I didn't budget for it. But also paying in installments sounds draining and will cost more,' said Gama. ALSO READ: Sassa grants out next week: Here are the payment dates for July Income thresholds vary by Sassa grant type Sassa spokesperson Paseka Letsatsi explained that income thresholds differ depending on the specific grant and the applicant's marital status. For the Child Support Grant, single applicants must earn less than R5 600 per month or R67 200 annually, while married applicants face a threshold of R11 200 monthly or R134 400 annually. 'The income threshold varies according to the grant in question as well as the marital status of an applicant,' Letsatsi told The Citizen. Sassa grant values and thresholds. Image: Screenshot/Supplied Repayment process and policies When repayment is necessary, Sassa provides several options for beneficiaries. Letsatsi outlined the available methods: recipients can approach any Sassa local, district, or head office to make arrangements. Payment can be made at Sassa cash offices where available, through bank transfers to Sassa's regional accounts, or via stop orders arranged directly through the beneficiaries' banks. 'An individual can approach the Sassa local, district and head office to make an arrangement. The individual can pay at the Sassa cash office, however these are not available in all regions. He or she can also pay at the bank and in this case all Sassa regions have bank accounts. Lastly an individual can make a stop order by going to his or her bank and pay Sassa direct,' she explained. Letsatsi explained that the agency operates under the Department of Social Development's social assistance debtors policy that allows varying repayment periods. When beneficiaries cannot afford to pay within the standard timeframe, extensions can be approved by delegated authority. 'Sassa has an approved social assistance debtors policy where it allows different periods to repay and where an individual cannot afford to pay within that period, a decision to allow more time can be approved by the delegated authority,' Letsatsi said. ALSO READ: Are Sassa payments in the Eastern Cape at risk due to floods and a looming cold front? Interest and enforcement Interest charges on outstanding amounts depend on the type of debt, with some not accruing interest at all. When interest does apply, the rate follows National Treasury guidelines and fluctuates accordingly. Beneficiaries who fail to meet repayment deadlines receive statements and reminder letters, after which they must approach the agency to rearrange their payment plans. ALSO READ: Ten of 11 accused in Sassa R260 million fraud case granted bail Personal impact and communication concerns For Gama, who visited the Pretoria local office, the repayment demand created significant financial strain. Her experience highlighted concerns about Sassa's communication with beneficiaries regarding income changes and grant eligibility. 'I feel upset because I feel like it's something they should've communicated when you applied. They also could have included this fine line in the statement that they recently released regarding verification to warn beneficiaries.' If you are not paid your social grant for the month of May 2025 please visit your nearest SASSA office, you may be required to complete a verification process if affected. #SASSAVerification#SASSACARES #ProtectYourGrant — SASSA (@OfficialSASSA) May 2, 2025 Gama said she wasn't earning enough to be able to pull R3 000 from her own pocket. She added that the grant money being taken away from her was devastating and would set her back on her monthly budget. 'It is sad, you know, the money really helped a lot with the baby stuff, it really helped me push through the month, especially with covering things like baby porridge and purity and the likes.' The situation was further complicated by administrative issues. Despite not receiving payments for May and June, Gama was initially told she would need to pay for June as well, with a refund only possible after her bank statements confirmed non-receipt of those payments. ALSO READ: Bank surveillance and poverty risk: UBIC warns of devastating impact on Sassa beneficiaries Sassa grant eligibility requirements According to Sassa, the Child Support Grant requires that primary caregivers be South African citizens, permanent residents, or refugees permanently residing in the country. Both applicant and child must reside in South Africa, with the child being under 18 years of age. Documentation requirements include birth certificates for children and 13-digit barcoded identity documents for applicants and spouses. Applicants must serve as primary caregivers and cannot apply for more than six non-biological children. Furthermore, Sassa states that the child cannot be cared for in a state institution, and school-age children must attend school and provide proof of attendance, though failure to do so will not result in grant refusal. The means test, implemented in line with the Social Assistance Act of 2004, ensures grants reach eligible beneficiaries by examining income sources and assets. All grants, except foster care, undergo means testing, with requirements varying by grant type. 'The means test looks into sources of income and assets of the applicant,' Letsatsi confirmed. READ NEXT: Pensioners desperate for clarity after not receiving Sassa grants in June
