Despite dramatic headlines, markets resume growth trajectory
Geopolitical trade tensions are happening alongside ongoing physical conflict between nations, while populations are feeling the effects of climate change as natural disasters strike communities unexpectedly and seemingly more often.
The state of the world feels increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous, as every event threatens to upend financial markets and rattle the global economy.
The reality, though, is that financial market movements are painting a more benign story underneath the dramatic headlines, especially when compared against the near-term impact of major historical events.
Today, the S&P 500 is at an all-time high, rallying more than 20 per cent since its drop in April and surpassing its last peak in February.
The continued growth in the market despite global events echoes the age-old phrase 'nothing ever happens', an expression originating from the depths of the online forum 4Chan to describe the lack of significant international developments in modern history. This phrase continues to be a popular meme among young investors today, when analysing the market impact of recent geopolitical tensions.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
A market apathetic to international events
History has shown that shocks from international developments cause knee-jerk reactions in the market, but their effects quickly taper off and markets continue their growth trajectory.
Take, for example, the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, when countries were locked down and travel was limited for an extended period. Despite that, the S&P 500 fell 5.9 per cent in March 2020 but rebounded 12.1 per cent in three months, reversing its dive and even gaining some ground.
The recent India-Pakistan skirmish is another case in point. Five days after the first conflict, markets recovered with the S&P 500 rising 0.2 per cent and 30 days after, markets rose 5.7 per cent.
The reality is that since World War II, less than 10 per cent of geopolitical shocks have significantly affected markets, with such impact from most global events being very short term.
Factors driving market apathy
Firstly, retail investors piling into stocks are driving markets. In the first half of 2025, they poured a record US$150 billion into US mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), while investor holdings of US index futures were near a three-year high.
Retail inflows were the highest in over a decade, indicative of investors' unwavering confidence in the market.
These funds flows reflected investors rebuilding their positions after a reduction in the most extreme tariff risks, and their confidence in the market after adopters and enablers of artificial intelligence indicated a strong outlook in their first-quarter results.
Secondly, globalisation has enabled technology and innovation to travel beyond borders, allowing supply chains to become diversified as countries invest into their capabilities to become self-sufficient.
Countries are no longer isolated in their technological progress. The globally connected innovation ecosystem enables knowledge sharing that accelerates development and fosters competition.
This diffusion of technology has directly impacted global supply chains, making them more diverse, adaptive and resilient, while allowing nations to localise segments of production more readily than in the past.
Countries are increasingly prioritising self-sufficiency in today's multipolar world, especially as more nationalistic tendencies emerge.
These factors effectively cushion today's financial markets and shorten impact from international events. As a result, investors who stayed calm through these developments and continued investing instead of divesting their portfolios benefitted as markets settled down and continued to climb.
What investors can do
Does this mean that investors can fully ignore these events and stick with their investment strategy regardless of what happens? I don't think so.
Instead, investors need to review their portfolios regularly to ensure it fits their financial needs and goals. They need to ensure their portfolios are diversified, and underlying holdings meet quality criteria. While diversification does not ensure profit or protection against loss, there are some strategies that investors can employ to ensure portfolio resilience in volatile times.
Suitable investors may want to consider asset classes that aim to reduce correlations to markets, such as alternative investments in the form of market-neutral funds, multi-strategy hedge funds, relative value arbitrage funds and private equity funds investing in key infrastructure assets.
However, it is also important to be aware that investing in alternative investments is intended for experienced and sophisticated investors who are willing to bear the risks of the investment.
Having different asset types within a portfolio works well as they respond differently to market shocks and developments.
Geographic diversification also makes sense, as emerging markets in Asia and parts of Europe outperform.
Portfolio diversification will also enable investors to weather political leadership changes. Political transitions and changes – especially during elections or regime shifts – can lead to new fiscal and tax policies, as well as shifts in world trade orders and regulations.
Markets often react sharply to these changes even if the impact may be transient. Some shifts may cause more lasting impact to portfolios, so investors will do well to not be overly exposed to any country or region, and expand beyond their bases so as not to double-down on domestic risks.
Prioritising companies with strong balance sheets, consistent earnings and low debt also is a defensive sleeve in investors' portfolios.
Investing in long-term structural themes that endure beyond short-term volatility is also useful as these themes can offer growth even in weak macro environments, and provide returns in the medium term.
Still, many traps remain for investors, and a credible management team can help them identify early winners and navigate the market.
Regularly occurring geopolitical turmoil makes investing feel risky and unstable, but history tells us that the market always recovers and stabilises.
The key for investors is to have a portfolio that will weather uncertain times, and allow them to hold out until the market recovers. That way, they can still rest easy while staying invested the next time everything everywhere occurs all at once.
The writer is the Asia South head of client investment advisory and market executive Singapore, Citi Private Bank
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
The AI race has big tech spending US$344 billion this year
[LONDON] If there's any lesson to take from the spending plans issued by the world's largest technology companies over the past two weeks, it's to never underestimate the fear of missing out. Microsoft, which set a US$24.2 billion capital spending record last quarter, plans to drop upwards of US$30 billion in the current period. similarly spent US$31.4 billion last quarter, almost double what it dropped a year ago, and is maintaining that level of investment. Google owner Alphabet raised its capital expenditures guidance this year to US$85 billion. Then there's Meta Platforms: The social networking giant lifted the low end of its forecast for 2025 capital expenditures and projected that costs will continue to grow at an even faster pace next year. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than US$344 billion for the year, with much of it going to the data centres necessary to run artificial intelligence (AI) models. 'We have basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said. The emphasis from virtually every company executive during this earnings season was on investing as quickly as possible to get ahead. 'We need the teams to execute at their very best to get the capacity in place as quickly and effectively as they can,' Microsoft chief financial officer Amy Hood told analysts in a call on Wednesday. Susan Li, Meta's CFO, said the goal of its own spend is to secure the advantage 'in developing the best AI models'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Wall Street's response has been mixed. Meta was rewarded – in large part because the company posted a strong second-quarter sales beat and issued a rosy revenue forecast, signalling that the billions it's spending on AI are paying off. 'On advertising, the strong performance this quarter is largely thanks to AI unlocking greater efficiency and gains across our ad system,' chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an analyst call. Zuckerberg has plans to build several massive data centres and has been luring top AI researchers with compensation packages valued at hundreds of millions of US dollars. The company recently restructured its internal AI division, now referred to as Meta Superintelligence Labs, in an effort to build human-level AI capabilities and apply that technology across its products. Shares of the company have gained more than 8 per cent since it reported earnings on Wednesday. Amazon, on the other hand, failed to convince investors that its lavish spending has been worth it. The stock was down as much as 8.1 per cent on Friday after the company reported tepid sales from its cloud division. The results were 'especially disappointing' given the strong performance from Google's and Microsoft's own cloud services, according to Bloomberg Intelligence (BI). And the ongoing capital costs will not help. The operating margin for Amazon's cloud unit will continue to face pressure 'through 2026 as capital spending ramps up', BI analysts Poonam Goyal and Anurag Rana said. Alphabet's shares are essentially unchanged from last week when it reported earnings and issued guidance. The company raised its capital expenditures outlook by US$10 billion and expects to ramp up spending even more in 2026. chief executive officer Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary to keep up with customer demand. 'Obviously, we are seeing strong momentum across our portfolio, and especially in cloud,' Pichai told analysts in a call on Jul 23. 'It's a tight supply environment, and we are investing more to expand.' Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester, put it another way: If Google wants to keep up with rivals, he said, it has little choice but to follow suit: 'Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications.' Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to a 39 per cent jump in sales for its Azure cloud-computing division, which came in ahead of analysts' estimates. 'We continue to lead the AI infrastructure wave and took share every quarter this year,' chief executive officer Satya Nadella said in a call with analysts on Jul 30. 'In Microsoft's case, the returns are good,' Gil Luria, an analyst with DA Davidson, said. The only question now is whether Microsoft's customers are in turn seeing a decent return on investment, he said. 'That's where the test will be,' he said. 'If they don't, they are not going to increase that spend next year.' Apple's capital plans pale in comparison to its big tech peers. But the iPhone maker did raise its spending estimates, tying much of the increase to AI efforts. Apple's property, plant and equipment investments totalled US$9.47 billion in the nine months ended Jun 28, up nearly 45 per cent from a year ago. 'You are going to continue to see our capex grow,' chief financial officer Kevan Parekh told analysts on Thursday. 'It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow, substantially. And a lot of that's a function of the investments we are making in AI.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Wall Street banks lose ground in Europe as tariffs spook clients
AS US President Donald Trump has ratcheted up his rhetoric against trading partners in Europe, corporates across the continent are taking notice. Some companies have begun to diversify their banking relationships away from the giants of Wall Street, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That has been a boon for Europe's leading banks, which have been actively vying to win the extra business. 'Some players are saying that it's better to go to European or French investment banks for advice on financing or mergers and acquisitions,' said Arnaud Petit, managing director of Edmond de Rothschild's corporate finance business. Deutsche Bank chief executive officer Christian Sewing said he sees similar in potential clients' requests for proposals. 'It is happening every day with client wins and RFPs and new business that we put on.' So far this year, roughly half of the euro bond deals from non-US companies did not involve any of the five biggest US banks, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That is up five percentage points from a year earlier. For sterling bonds, the gap has widened even further. Wall Street banks were shut out of just 47 per cent of deals throughout all of last year. So far this year, though, they have been excluded from 64 per cent of them. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The emergence of the ability of a few European banks 'to be able to offer competitive services and advice to clients' has created a desire among clients to switch, according to UBS chief executive Sergio Ermotti. 'We believe we are well-placed to continue to benefit from that diversification.' 'Specific skills' Even before Trump's trade war kicked off in earnest, the biggest of the US banks warned that it was starting to see an impact. By April, JPMorgan Chase had already lost 'a couple' of bond deals tied to the tariff uncertainty, with companies opting for local banks instead, chief executive officer Jamie Dimon said in an interview with Fox Business at the time. He warned that the tumult was 'causing cumulative damage, including huge anger at the United States'. The latest example of a win for non-US banks came this week, when Zurich-based insurer Chubb issued an offshore yuan bond. It opted for Standard Chartered to help take on the deal. The bank was told: 'We want to bank with the regional champions, rather than just with global banks in general,' Standard Chartered chief financial officer Diego de Giorgi said. 'Because we think that you guys bring specific skills in a world that is fragmenting.' Chubb is not an exception. The effect is most pronounced in Asia, where economies are expected to be hard hit by the changing trade regimes and the re-routing of supply chains, said Ruchirangad Agarwal, head of corporate banking for Asia and the Middle East at research firm Coalition Greenwich. 'The willingness of companies in Asia to change their transaction bank is currently at a high: a third of them plan to issue a new (request for proposal) within the next 12 months,' Agarwal said. Already, US lenders' market share in financing trade for Chinese companies has dropped in recent years, from 12 per cent in 2017 to about 7 per cent share now, he added. Martin Smith, head of markets analysis at East & Partners, said: 'We expect to see heightened uncertainty and customer churn at US banks as large corporates take an active risk management stance on FX, interest rates, counterparty risk, geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions.' BNP Paribas, meanwhile, has gained more share than any other player in Asia, he added. 'There are clearly strategic opportunities in the tectonic shifts that the world has been seeing in recent months,' Societe Generale chief executive officer Slawomir Krupa said of companies looking to shift toward European banking partners. 'The logic behind this form of risk diversification has become more apparent for companies.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
iFast books S$50.3 million net institutional inflow in five sessions
[SINGAPORE] Over the five trading sessions from Jul 25 to 31, institutions were net sellers of Singapore stocks. The net institutional outflow of S$351 million was a reversal from the S$334 million net inflow in the preceding five sessions. This took the net institutional outflow for the 2025 year till Jul 31 to S$1.67 billion. Institutional flows Over the five trading sessions till Jul 31, the stocks that saw the highest net institutional outflow included Singapore Airlines , Singtel , OCBC , UOB , DBS , Singapore Post , Sembcorp Industries , CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust , Jardine Matheson Holdings and Keppel . Meanwhile, iFast Corp , Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings , City Developments Ltd , ComfortDelGro Corp , Yangzijiang Financial Holding , Jardine Cycle & Carriage , Venture Corp , Haw Par Corp , UOB-Kay Hian Holdings and StarHub led the net institutional inflow over the five sessions. This saw financial services leading the net institutional outflow over the five sessions, while technology booked the highest net institutional inflow. A notable divergence in net institutional flows was that, over the five sessions, the 20 stocks with the highest net outflows had an average market capitalisation of S$25.4 billion, while those with the highest net inflows averaged just S$3.7 billion. Among the stocks with sub-S$4 billion market capitalisation that were attracting the most net institutional inflows were Venture Corp, Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (Reit) , Yangzijiang Financial Holding, Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust , ComfortDelGro Corp, Haw Par Corp, iFast Corp, UOB-Kay Hian Holdings, Hutchison Port Holdings Trust , StarHub, CapitaLand India Trust , Frencken Group , Samudera Shipping Line , and CSE Global . BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up iFast Corp iFast Corp saw S$50.3 million of net institutional inflow over the five sessions, turning around its 2025 year-to-date net institutional outflow of S$8.6 million to net institutional inflow of S$42.9 million. On Jul 25, iFast Corp reported that its net profit for the first half of the 2025 financial year ended Jun 30 increased 34.7 per cent from H1 FY2024 to S$41.1 million, with expectations for stronger H2 FY2025 performance. The global digital banking and wealth management platform also reported that its second-quarter dividend per share (DPS) rose 33.3 per cent from that in Q2 FY2024, and that the FY2025 DPS is projected to grow at least 35.6 per cent from the previous year. Key revenue drivers included strong growth in the Hong Kong ePension business, a turnaround at iFast Global Bank, and record assets under administration of S$27.2 billion, with a record quarterly inflow of S$1.29 billion in the latest Q2. In Q2, the Hong Kong segment saw a 33.4 per cent gross revenue increase to S$45.6 million from the corresponding period in the prior year. Following its first profitable quarter in the fourth quarter of FY2024, iFast Global Bank posted a S$0.7 million net profit in Q2 FY2025, and a 124.2 per cent growth in customer deposits to S$1.45 billion from the previous corresponding quarter. The group's return on equity (ROE) in H1 stood at 24.6 per cent. The group expects its ROE to remain at healthy levels, supported by the ongoing growth of the core wealth management platform and the continued progress of iFast Global Bank, as both fee-based and net interest income scale with business expansion. Raffles Medical led share buybacks The five sessions through to Jul 31 saw six primary-listed companies file buybacks with a total consideration of S$4.7 million. Raffles Medical Group led the consideration tally, buying back 3.3 million of its shares at an average price of S$1.02 apiece. It also reported its results for H1 FY2025, ended Jun 30, last week. Its H1 profit after tax increased 5 per cent to S$32.5 million, supported by stable performance across core segments. At the same time, revenue rose 3.5 per cent to S$378.4 million, with hospital services contributing S$174 million and healthcare services, S$142.2 million. The group also reiterated that, reflecting its disciplined capital management and strong operating cash flow, it had revised its dividend policy in February to distribute at least 50 per cent of sustainable earnings annually and to buy back up to 100 million ordinary shares over the next two years. Keppel announces share buyback programme Keppel bought back 100,000 of its shares at an average price of S$8.56 each. Along with reporting its results for H1 ended Jun 30 last week, Keppel announced a S$500 million share buyback programme. It maintained that shares repurchased will be held as treasury shares that will be used in part for the annual vesting of employee share plans, as well as currency for future merger and acquisition (M&A) activities. During the week, Keppel chief executive officer Loh Chin Hua relayed that the M&A activity will include phase two of the acquisition of European real estate manager Aermont Capital that is due in 2028. The group also detailed the role of the previous buyback programme in its initial 50 per cent acquisition of Aermont in April 2024. Keppel tendered treasury shares at S$7.16 apiece that had an average cost of S$5.80. This cost was based on the average purchase price of the treasury shares of approximately S$6.65, less the FY2022 and FY2023 cash dividends and dividend in-specie of Keppel Reit units paid to shareholders amounting to S$0.84 apiece. Loh added that while buyback timing details remain undisclosed, the company prefers buybacks over issuing new shares to avoid dilution, especially as it anticipates a re-rating and continued share-price performance. Hongkong Land Holdings continues buybacks Secondary-listed Hongkong Land Holdings also continued to conduct share repurchases, acquiring 1,193,000 shares at US$6.26 each. This takes its cumulative buyback consideration to US$137 million since Apr 24. It reported on Jul 29 that its underlying profit for H1, ended Jun 30, rose 11 per cent on the year to US$320 million, excluding China provisions. Meanwhile contributions from Hong Kong declined due to lower office rents and ongoing renovations at the commercial complex Landmark. It highlighted that capital recycling reached US$1.3 billion – 33 per cent of its 2027 target – highlighted by a landmark transaction with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. Director transactions Over the five trading sessions, more than 40 director interests and substantial shareholdings were filed. Across 25 primary-listed stocks, directors or CEOs filed seven acquisitions and five disposals, while substantial shareholders recorded five acquisitions and three disposals. This included director or CEO acquisitions in iWow Technology , Japan Foods Holding , Jason Marine Group , Micro-Mechanics (Holdings) , Stamford Land Corp and SunMoon Food Company . Share buybacks and director filings remained below typical levels, as the local market remained in a busy stretch of financial reporting. iWow Technology On Jul 25, iWow Technology's lead independent director Ang Swee Tian acquired 111,100 shares at S$0.188 apiece. This took his direct interest to 0.04 per cent. The past president of Singapore Exchange and the former Singapore International Monetary Exchange also currently serves as the lead independent director of Zheneng Jinjiang Environment Holding Company. The name iWow is an acronym for 'Inspiring the World Of Wireless'. The provider of integrated wireless Internet of Things and telecommunications infrastructure solutions delivers end-to-end services from hardware/software design to connectivity and operations. Its competitive edge lies in turnkey capabilities, enabling full-scale deployments through in-house research and development (R&D), proven manufacturing, and robust infrastructure. The group has been strengthening its core growth pillars with continued investment in scalable R&D. Following the success of the Buddy of Parents (BOP) Button introduced by its wholly owned subsidiary BOP Pte Ltd, the group has expanded its suite of agetech – hardware and software to address challenges of old age – with BOP Presence and BOP Monitor, while enhancing its electronic monitoring solutions for regional compatibility. As reported by The Business Times in May, the BOP Button is a wall-mounted emergency device designed for seniors living alone or without full-time care. With one press, it connects them to a 24/7 response centre. In June, the group also announced that BOP Pte Ltd had won the prestigious DBS Foundation Impact Beyond Award, securing a S$1 million grant to advance innovation in agetech and support seniors in ageing well at home. Japan Foods Holding On Jul 24, Japan Foods Holding non-executive vice-chairman Eugene Wong acquired 60,000 shares at S$0.19 apiece. This increased his total interest from 5.63 per cent to 5.66 per cent. His preceding acquisition was on Jun 24, with 38,000 shares acquired at S$0.26 per share. Japan Foods Holding is one of the leading Japanese restaurant chains in Singapore. Its franchised brands include Ajisen Ramen, Kageyama and Konjiki Hototogisu. The group currently sees Singapore's food and beverage sector shifting from expansion to profit recovery, thus prompting tighter monitoring of outlet performance and a focus on innovation and consumer needs. It has also been actively identifying and extending brands that enjoy greater customer loyalty and have stronger identity than others, while pruning any underperforming brand that may be draining resources. In addition, Wong acquired 9,900 shares in Jason Marine Group at S$0.15 apiece on Jul 24, where he also serves as deputy non-executive chairman. Stamford Land Corp Stamford Land Corp executive chairman Ow Chio Kiat bought 35,000 shares at S$0.435 each. This followed his acquisition of 41,000 shares over the preceding week. He maintains a total interest of 46.18 per cent in the independent owner-operator of luxury hotels in Australia and established real estate developer and investor. The writer is the market strategist at Singapore Exchange (SGX). To read SGX's market research reports, visit