KTM 160 Duke teased ahead of launch in India
The KTM 160 Duke will be powered by a new 160cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine. Though official figures are awaited, it will likely deliver 19–20bhp, which would give it a performance edge over rivals like the Yamaha MT-15 (18.4bhp). This significant jump from the 125 Duke's 14.5bhp should translate into a noticeably more engaging ride experience.Unlike its global siblings, the KTM 160 Duke is being developed specifically for the Indian market. KTM has chosen to use the Gen-2 200 Duke platform instead of the more expensive Gen-3 architecture to keep costs in check. This cost-conscious approach, coupled with local manufacturing, should allow the brand to price the bike competitively.The official launch of the KTM 160 Duke is expected soon, right in time for the festive season. In essence, the KTM 160 Duke can shape up to be a well-balanced package, bringing together sharp design, hardware, and performance.Subscribe to Auto Today Magazine- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Trump tariffs impact? Viral Instagram video shows hike in clothing prices at Walmart
Mercedes Chandler, an Instagram user, has recently shared a video from inside a Walmart store in the United States, claiming that President Donald Trump's tariffs, which came into effect on 1 August, 2025 are directly causing price hikes across clothing sections and other items. In the video, which has now gone viral, Chandler walks through Walmart and shows price tags on clothes and other items with original, lower prices removed or covered up and new, higher prices marked. The video is captioned 'Donald Trump's tariffs are in full swing!" by the user who points to various products, including clothes of children and a backpack. 'Guys, the tariffs are in active effect," Chandler says. 'Look at these clothes in Walmart. All the tags have these bottom pieces ripped off, but then you find one with the bottom still on – $10.98. The price is raised to $11.98.' they said. 'This is the effect of Donald Trump's tariffs." Chandler continues, showing an outfit from the children's section marked up from $6.98 to $10.98, and a backpack that previously sold for $19.97, now priced at $24.97.' 'That is a $4 increase," Chandler points out, adding that many price tags have been covered with white stickers to hide the original price. 'If you don't believe me, go to your local, whether it be Walmart or Target and check this out for yourself," Chandler says in conclusion. Netizens flooded the comment section of the post with a wave of different reactions. While most of the users criticized this change, some comments also took a sarcastic turn. One user commented: 'Was it worth it? Are we great yet?" Another added sarcastically, 'Wasn't China supposed to pay those tariffs?" A supermarket employee shared their first hand experience of altering tags, 'When i am assigned to rip prices off of clothes I purposely leave a few price tags on so y'all can see the difference.' One user also said, 'So many clothes are coming from India and other countries and he raised tariffs to 50% so we have to suffer.' After Donald Trump assumed office in the White House, he reintroduced tariffs on a wide range of imports, arguing that these tariffs will make foreign goods more expensive which will give a competitive edge to American manufacturers. Within the last few weeks, Trump has imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on all Indian goods, bringing the total to 50 per cent. China also faces a 30 per cent tariff, even though it's comparatively lower than India. India's textile exports to the US stood at $35.87 billion in 2023-24. Readymade garments accounted for 41 per cent of that volume. The US is India's largest textile export market. In 2023-24, the US imported textiles worth $10.05 billion, accounting for 28 per cent of India's overall exports. Apparel makes up the largest share of the export pie, Mint reported earlier.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
New Instagram location sharing feature sparks privacy fears
Instagram users are warning about a new location sharing feature, fearing that the hugely popular app could be putting people in danger by revealing their whereabouts without their knowledge. The Meta-owned image sharing platform added an option on Wednesday which shares locations using an Instagram map, similar to a feature rival Snapchat has offered since 2017. Some users have since been shocked to discover that their location was being shared, viral posts have shown. "Mine was turned on and my home address was showing for all of my followers to see," Instagram user Lindsey Bell wrote in reply to a warning posted by "Bachelor" reality television personality Kelley Flanagan to her 300,000 TikTok followers. "Turned it off immediately once I knew but had me feeling absolutely sick about it." In a TikTok video, Flanagan called Instagram's new location sharing feature "dangerous" and gave step-by-step instructions on how to make sure it is turned off. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri fired off a post on Meta-owned Threads stressing that Instagram location sharing is off by default, meaning users need to opt in for it to be active. "Quick Friend Map clarification, your location will only be shared if you decide to share it, and if you do, it can only be shared with a limited group of people you choose," Mosseri wrote. "To start, location sharing is completely off." The feature was added as a way for friends to better connect with one another, sharing posts from "cool spots," Instagram said in a blog post. Users can be selective regarding who they share locations with, and can turn it off whenever they wish, according to Instagram. Wariness regarding whether Instagram is watching out for user privacy comes just a week after a federal jury in San Francisco sided with women who accused Meta of exploiting health data gathered by the Flo app, which tracks menstruation and efforts to get pregnant. A jury concluded that Meta used women's sensitive health data to better target money-making ads, according to law firm Labaton Keller Sucharow, which represented the plaintiffs. Evidence at trial showed Meta was aware it was getting confidential health data from the third-party app, and that some employees appeared to mock the nature of the information, the law firm contended. "This case was about more than just data -- it was about dignity, trust, and accountability," lead attorney Carol Villegas said in a blog post. Damages in the suit have yet to be determined.
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
"Turned It Off": Instagram's New Location Sharing Feature Sparks Privacy Concerns
Instagram users are warning about a new location sharing feature, fearing that the hugely popular app could be putting people in danger by revealing their whereabouts without their knowledge. The Meta-owned image sharing platform added an option on Wednesday which shares locations using an Instagram map, similar to a feature rival Snapchat has offered since 2017. Some users have since been shocked to discover that their location was being shared, viral posts have shown. "Mine was turned on and my home address was showing for all of my followers to see," Instagram user Lindsey Bell wrote in reply to a warning posted by "Bachelor" reality television personality Kelley Flanagan to her 300,000 TikTok followers. "Turned it off immediately once I knew but had me feeling absolutely sick about it." In a TikTok video, Flanagan called Instagram's new location sharing feature "dangerous" and gave step-by-step instructions on how to make sure it is turned off. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri fired off a post on Meta-owned Threads stressing that Instagram location sharing is off by default, meaning users need to opt in for it to be active. "Quick Friend Map clarification, your location will only be shared if you decide to share it, and if you do, it can only be shared with a limited group of people you choose," Mosseri wrote. "To start, location sharing is completely off." The feature was added as a way for friends to better connect with one another, sharing posts from "cool spots," Instagram said in a blog post. Users can be selective regarding who they share locations with, and can turn it off whenever they wish, according to Instagram. Wariness regarding whether Instagram is watching out for user privacy comes just a week after a federal jury in San Francisco sided with women who accused Meta of exploiting health data gathered by the Flo app, which tracks menstruation and efforts to get pregnant. A jury concluded that Meta used women's sensitive health data to better target money-making ads, according to law firm Labaton Keller Sucharow, which represented the plaintiffs. Evidence at trial showed Meta was aware it was getting confidential health data from the third-party app, and that some employees appeared to mock the nature of the information, the law firm contended. "This case was about more than just data -- it was about dignity, trust, and accountability," lead attorney Carol Villegas said in a blog post. Damages in the suit have yet to be determined.
