Vellappally under fire for remarks on Muslim population, but remains unfazed
However, an unrelenting SNDP Yogam general secretary asserted that he would continue to speak for social justice, 'even if Kanthapuram (A P Aboobacker Musliyar) throws a spear at me.'
Leader of Opposition V D Satheesan came down heavily on Vellappally, calling his remarks divisive and contrary to the ideals of Sree Narayana Guru. 'Kerala is home to people who respect the teachings of the Guru. What the SNDP general secretary is propagating is diametrically opposite to the Guru's teachings. These are not his (Vellappally's) words, they are being planted by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and other CPM leaders,' Satheesan told reporters.
The Opposition will firmly resist any campaign that spreads hatred or division, Satheesan said, adding it was no coincidence that such statements emerged just as the government faced public criticism over issues in the health and higher education sectors.
Vellappally's contentious statement came on Saturday at a meeting of SNDP union leaders in Kottayam. He claimed that Muslims would soon become the majority in Kerala and that the government would then have no choice but to 'listen to Kanthapuram and govern accordingly.'
The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) also lashed out, likening Vellappally to hardline Hindutva leaders. In a scathing editorial, its official organ Chandrika called Vellappally the 'Kerala Togadia'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
38 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Supreme Court declines to extend stay on release of ‘Udaipur Files'
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to extend the stay on the release of the Hindi film Udaipur Files, which is reportedly based on the 2022 killing of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, reported The Indian Express. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi told the petitioners to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Union government's order, which allowed the film to be released with six cuts, according to Live Law. The film was scheduled to be released on July 11. The Delhi High Court had stayed the release on June 10 and directed the Union government to examine the film's content. The Centre recommended that the film should be released with a disclaimer, The Indian Express reported. 'You first go to the High Court, the other side is satisfied with the central government order,' PTI quoted the bench as saying on Friday. 'So, please go to the High Court, why waste our time.' The Supreme Court also clarified that it was not commenting on the merits of the case and said that it was the High Court's domain. It requested the High Court to take up the matter on Monday. In June 2022, Lal, a tailor, was killed in Rajasthan's Udaipur for purportedly sharing a social media post in support of suspended Bharatiya Janata Party Spokesperson Nupur Sharma. She had made disparaging remarks about Prophet Muhammad during a television debate in May 2022. The assailants and several other persons accused in the matter were arrested by the Rajasthan Police. A video showed two men claiming responsibility for the killing of Lal as they brandished the cleavers used in the murder. The murder case was investigated by the National Investigation Agency and the persons accused in the matter were charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The trial is underway in a Special NIA Court in Jaipur. The High Court had stayed the release of Udaipur Files while hearing a batch of petitions, including one filed by Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, seeking a ban on the film. The petitioners had alleged that the film is communally provocative and vilifies the Muslim community. A day before the order, the Supreme Court had heard a writ petition filed by Mohammed Javed, one of the eight persons accused in the murder case. Javed argued that the release of the film would violate his right to a fair trial. He had sought that the release of the film be postponed until the trial in the matter concluded. The petitioner also argued that the film, based on its trailer, appeared to be communally provocative. In response, the Supreme Court said that the petition could be mentioned before the appropriate bench when the Supreme Court reopened on July 14 after the summer break. It added that the movie could be released in the meantime.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
UDF alleges errors in voters' list for local body polls; warns legal action
Last Updated: Thiruvananthapuram, Jul 26 (PTI) Leader of the Opposition in the Kerala assembly, V D Satheesan on Saturday criticised the recently published voters' list for the upcoming local body polls, alleging widespread irregularities, and warned that the UDF would take 'legal action" if the deadline to rectify the errors is not extended. The Congress-led UDF questioned how a free and fair election could be conducted using a voters' list that, according to them, 'is riddled with errors". Speaking to reporters, Satheesan said the UDF would initiate legal proceedings if the time to make corrections in the list, published on July 23, is not extended by at least 30 days. 'Many names of those who voted last time are missing. Names of people who died three or four years ago are still on the list," he alleged. The Congress leader also claimed that several voters' names had been moved from the wards they reside in and added to other wards. 'Even people from the same household have been included in different wards," he claimed. He further alleged that some officials who collected voter information had 'manipulated the list with the help of local CPM leaders". Satheesan pointed out that although the ward delimitation exercise has been completed and the voters' list published, the ward sketches have not yet been provided. 'Now, people are being asked to apply for corrections within 15 days—something that has never happened before," he claimed. 'In this situation, the time to rectify errors in the voters' list should be extended to at least 30 days. There is a deliberate attempt to prevent the correction of irregularities," he alleged. He charged that the Election Commission was 'acting in line with the wishes of the CPM leadership." 'The commission is trying to sabotage the election by ensuring that polling does not end even by 10 pm. If it refuses to reconsider its stand, the UDF will take legal action," he claimed. Satheesan also alleged that the division of wards was carried out 'in violation of a directive issued by the High Court." The date for the local body polls is yet to be announced. However, there was no immediate response from the LDF. PTI LGK SSK SSK ROH view comments First Published: July 26, 2025, 18:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Behind the 7/11 acquittals, a legal cell which worked quietly and tirelessly for 19 years
At late Shahid Azmi's behest, the cell which started giving legal aid to Muslims, represented select accused in several key terror cases, including the Akshardham attack, Malegaon 2006 blasts, Godhra railway burning, and Mumbai triple blasts, now sees one of its biggest victories. Tucked away in the narrow bylanes of Mumbai's crowded Bhendi Bazar Dongri area is the office of Jamiat Ulama-e-Maharashtra, the State chapter of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind. 'Madam, take a right opposite the Saboo Siddique hospital. In the first lane, leave the first iron gate and enter from the second one,' a shopkeeper tells me as I try to find my way through the maze amid the rush and the slush during the Mumbai outpour. Inside the 700 square feet office of one of the oldest Muslim organisations of India, established over a century ago, is the legal cell. This small room has provided hope, courage and justice to scores of Muslim men who have allegedly been wrongly arrested in false cases. And one of their biggest victories came this week when the Bombay High Court acquitted 12 accused in the 11 July, 2006, serial bomb blasts in Mumbai which had killed 187 people and injured over 800. The prosecution 'utterly failed' to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the Bombay High Court observed, setting aside the 2015 judgment of the Special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court, which had awarded death penalty to five and life imprisonment to seven others. Pending hearing, the judgement has since been stayed by the apex court, so it is not used as a precedence in other MCOCA cases, even as it will have no bearing on the acquittal of the 12 accused. Yet, six of those acquitted have already written to the Jamiat, seeking legal help for further hearings in the apex court, after notices are issued. Also read: Death sentence was for taking the last step: MCOCA court 'We aren't celebrating. We are relieved that there is justice for those who were wrongly implicated in this case. But there is no justice for the victims as yet. We still don't know who committed this heinous crime,' Shahid Nadeem, legal advisor, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind legal cell, says. Sitting amid a printer-copier machine, a wooden cupboard, his work table is full of files and folders with legal documents and petitions. A CCTV camera perched behind him monitors the small cabin. The legal cell provides free legal aid to approximately 500 Muslim men, including those accused in terror cases and booked under the stringent POTA (now repealed), MCOCA and UAPA. They have so far secured acquittals of some accused in the Akshardham temple attack case, in Malegaon 2006 blasts case, in the 7/11 serial train blasts case, among other cases. In 75 cases across the country so far, Jamaiat's legal cell has been able to secure the release of 318 accused in the last 19 years. 'So far, 227 accused have got bail in 52 cases across India,' says Nadeem. Shahid Azmi's role The cell started providing legal aid to Muslims after Shahid Azmi, a lawyer and human rights activist who was murdered in 2010, indicated to the Jamiat that innocent Muslim men were being implicated in the 2006 train blasts case. 'We had a legal cell before that. But that was functional primarily after independence when there were custodian issues about properties after the partition. Maulana Hizdur Rehman Seohari, who was also a parliamentarian, had taken lead in it. Jamiat was established in the year 1919, and during its participation in the freedom struggle movement, it had opposed the two-nation theory, partition of the country on religious basis. After independence, the organisation decided to withdraw from electoral politics and focus on social service instead. 'In 2006, there was terror atmosphere in the country. At that time, Hazrat Maulana Arshad Madani, who is currently the Jamiat Ulema president, told the Maharashtra unit that we should help those innocent Muslims who are poor, who can't afford judicial expenses,' says Maulana Haleem Ullah Qasmi, General Secretary of the Maharashtra wing of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind. 'This was the first case which came to us. Shahid Azmi told us that those who were arrested were daily wage labourers, and should be helped. We first went to the Supreme Court which sent us back to the trial court,' he adds. Selection process The Jamiat does not provide everyone who approaches them. 'We verify their antecedents first, and provide legal aid only if our verification process shows that the person is wrongfully arrested, and is in need of help,' says Nadeem. 'When someone comes to us, we take an application from them. That is how this case (7/11 train blasts) came to us,' says Maulana Maulana Haleem Ullah Qasmi. 'The selection process is quite stringent. When someone applies for legal aid, we read their charge sheet, and we confirm their background and whether they are history sheeters. That's why we don't provide legal aid to everyone who approaches us,' says Nadeem. Systemic accountability After the Bombay High Court verdict, the legal cell representatives call for the accountability of the system. 'In this case, from the beginning, the agencies have been errant. Their wrong deeds have come out now. These agencies should be made accountable. The real culprits should be arrested. Instead of working hard to do that, the government has now appealed in the Supreme Court,' says Maulana Qasmi. Raising the issue of justice for the family members of the victims, he says, 'Somone must have committed this dasdardly attack. The victims should get justice too. Agencies should enquire again and bring the real culprits to book. This case is incomplete without that. Justice is not yet served. The innocents were nabbed. We shudder at the pain of the victims. The accused should be arrested and brought to book. Justive will be served only then,' he says.
