No mention of Pak terror: Rajnath refuses to sign SCO joint statement
The SCO operates under the framework of consensus, and Singh's refusal to endorse the document resulted in the SCO defence ministers' conclave ending without a joint communique, people familiar with the matter said.
There was no clear-cut approach to combating terrorism, including cross-border terrorist activities, they said.
The Opposition launched a scathing attack, accusing the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government of failing diplomatically to rally international support against terrorism and to hold Pakistan accountable.
In his address, Singh said there should be "no double standards" in combating terrorism and urged the SCO member nations to condemn the menace with unity.
Besides India and China, the SCO comprises Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
In an oblique reference to Pakistan, Singh said some countries are using cross-border terrorism as an "instrument of policy" to provide shelter to terrorists.
"The biggest challenges that we are facing in our region are related to peace, security and trust-deficit," he said.
"And the root cause of these problems is increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism." Singh said peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups.
"Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action, and we must unite in our fight against these evils for our collective safety and security," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Chhattisgarh Cabinet Expansion Likely Tomorrow, These Leaders May Be Included
Raipur: Political activity has intensified in Chhattisgarh with Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai expected to expand his cabinet by Monday. On Saturday evening, Mr Sai met Governor Ramen Deka, a move being seen as a precursor to the swearing-in ceremony. According to sources, the BJP's top leadership has given a green signal for a 14-member cabinet. Two organizational leaders and one RSS-backed nominee are likely to be accommodated. At the same time, the existing ministers will retain their departments, quashing earlier speculation about reshuffling. The urgency stems from Mr Sai's scheduled visit to Japan and South Korea on Thursday. The oath ceremony of the new ministers is likely to be completed before his departure. Commenting on the development, Mr Sai said briefly, "Keep waiting, it can happen." Insiders suggest that the cabinet expansion may follow the Haryana model. Like Haryana, Chhattisgarh too has 90 assembly members. While only 13 ministers have traditionally been appointed since the state's formation, constitutional provisions allow up to 15 percent of the assembly strength to be in the council of ministers. This makes room for 14 ministers, including the Chief Minister. Currently, only 11 ministers are serving in the Sai cabinet after senior leader Brijmohan Agrawal's election as MP from Raipur. With three new appointments, the strength will reach the permissible limit of 14. The expansion is expected to balance caste equations, power centers, and regional representation. Prominent names being discussed include Amar Agrawal (Bilaspur), former three-time minister; Ajay Chandrakar (Raipur), former minister; Guru Khushwant Saheb (Arang MLA); Gajendra Yadav (Durg), associated with RSS; and Rajesh Agrawal (Ambikapur), who defeated former Deputy Chief Minister TS Singh Deo and represents the Vaishya community.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Israel says it has struck Houthi ‘energy infrastructure site' in Yemen
Israel's military said on Sunday (August 17, 2025) it struck an "energy infrastructure site" in Yemen used by the Houthi rebels, the latest action against the Iran-backed group which has launched attacks at Israel throughout the Gaza war. A military statement said Israeli forces "struck... deep inside Yemen, targeting an energy infrastructure site that served the Houthi terrorist regime" in the area of Yemen's rebel-held capital Sanaa, without naming the site. The Houthis' Al-Masirah TV, citing a civil defence source, reported 'an aggression targeting the Haziz power plant' south of Sanaa. Also Read | Israel intercepts Houthi missile fired from Yemen There were no immediate reports of casualties. Since the October 2023 start of the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, the Houthis have repeatedly fired missiles and drones at Israel, claiming to act in solidarity with the Palestinians. Most Houthi attacks have been intercepted but have prompted Israeli air strikes on rebel targets in Yemen. Also Read | Israeli military attacks Houthi targets in Yemen's Hodeidah port The military said its latest "strikes were conducted in response to repeated attacks" by the Houthis. On Thursday (August 14, 2025) Israel said it intercepted a missile fired from Yemen, with the Houthis later claiming responsibility for it. Beyond attacks on Israel, the Houthis have also targeted alleged Israeli-linked ships in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden off Yemen. Also Read | Will target all ships linked to Israel, say Yemen's Houthis The Iran-backed group broadened its campaign to target ships tied to the United States and Britain after the two countries began military strikes aimed at securing the waterway in January 2024. In May, the rebels cemented a ceasefire with the United States that ended weeks of intense U.S. strikes, but vowed to continue targeting Israeli ships.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Opinion: India's Anti-Terrorism Security Apparatus Is Robust
The messaging to the world is now more clear, i.e., India will always act in self-defence, which is a sharp shift from the past doctrine of strategic restraint Some recent reports have surfaced in the public domain suggesting that India's anti-terror operations in the thick and mostly inaccessible forests of Jammu and Kashmir have not been as successful as projected. Nothing could be further from the truth. The factual position on the ground reveals that while there have been casualties on both sides, be it Indian troops or the terrorists, the battle being played out in this inhospitable terrain reveals that the enemy is in a much weaker position today than it ever was in the past two-and-a-half decades. The fight is ongoing and far from over. Terrorism and insurgency in India are primarily linked to political, religious, ethnic, ideological, identity driven, linguistic or socio-economic grievances. It is broadly divided into three distinct categories, viz. cross border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir, terrorism in the hinterland and extreme violence being a part of ongoing insurgencies. India remains highly vulnerable to attacks by terrorists due to its porous borders in the west, north and northeast, besides its insufficiently protected long coastline. Terrorists and insurgents entering or residing in India continue to receive lavish material support and funds from many sources, especially from agencies located abroad. Over the last decade or more, India has demonstrated stronger political will to strengthen border security, giving a free hand to security and intelligence agencies to gather, collate, coordinate and act on information, enact stricter laws to combat terrorism. Internationally, India has reworked its strategy, to disprove foreign sceptics and address cross-border terrorism and prevent the financing of terrorists. We do not have to go too far back in time to see the success that India has achieved in countering terror. Three incidents stand out quite emphatically, sending out a firm message to regional inimical elements and to the larger international community that India is no pushover. In 2016, the Indian Army conducted a series of strikes in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) at the end of September. Those strikes were a calculated hard response to a Pakistan-trained terrorist attack on an Indian Army base in Uri, Jammu and Kashmir on September 18, 2016, which claimed the lives of 19 soldiers. Four terrorists linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed carried out the attack on the Uri army base. The Indian government decided to retaliate with surgical strikes to send out a message to Pakistan that India would not tolerate cross-border terrorism. New Delhi described the counter as a 'pre-emptive strike" to disrupt terrorist activities from across the LoC. The strikes were significant as they were the first of their kind against Pakistan. Crossing the LoC under the cover of darkness, Indian Army commandos targeted and eliminated seven terrorist launch pads. The Indian government confirmed the killing of 35-40 terrorists, a claim dismissed by Pakistan. On February 14, 2019, a bus carrying Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) troopers, which was part of a convoy of 78 vehicles, was targeted in Pulwama by a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) suicide bomber. He rammed his explosives-laden car into the bus, killing 40 CRPF personnel. Biding its time, the Indian government ordered the country's air force to carry out an air strike in Balakot, Pakistan, on February 26, targeting terror camps. It was the first such aerial action against Pakistan since the 1971 war, sparking retaliatory raids and an aerial dogfight. Fortunately, it did not escalate into a full-scale war, but it put an alarmed wider world on notice that India would not take attacks on its soil or on its people lightly. The third and most telling response to Pakistan's 'misadventures" has been 'Operation Sindoor". The operation was a balanced armed forces response to the killing of 26 innocent Indian civilians in Pahalgam, J&K on April 22, 2025. It reflected India's advanced technology, commitment to gathering precise intelligence and exhibited her self-reliance in defence. Nine terror training camps, including the headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, were damaged with precise missile strikes, without crossing the Line of Control or the International Border. When Pakistan responded by targeting Indian civilians and defence establishments, India effectively used its defence shields and drones to neutralise eleven Pakistani air bases, disrupting the mobility and operational momentum of Pakistan Air Force, and ensuring that Pakistan could not sustain a second or third wave of escalation. It used its advanced military technologies to send out a clear message to Islamabad that it would do well not to mess with New Delhi. Several factors are at the root of India's counter terrorism successes. These are enhanced intelligence gathering through multiple agencies, including the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) (internal intelligence); better inter-agency cooperation overseen by the Joint Intelligence Committee and the Intelligence Bureau; establishing specialized units like the National Security Guard (NSG) and Anti-Terrorism Squads (ATS) to handle specific terrorist threats; improved border security; giving more teeth to laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to strengthen punitive measures against terrorism and related activities. Establishing the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to investigate and prosecute terror-related offences; actively raising the issue of cross-border terrorism in various international forums, including the United Nations, G20, and FATF; promoting capacity building in other countries through training, experience sharing, and technical cooperation in counter-terrorism efforts; working with international partners to address the financing of terrorism. In addition, introducing de-radicalisation programs that focus on education, skills development and jobs; promoting public awareness and participation in counter-terrorism efforts; demonstrating the will to respond with punitive measures against sponsors of terrorism and using technology, including Artificial Intelligence, to neutralise terror threats. By combining these elements, India has created a comprehensive and effective counter-terrorism ecosystem that strikes at the very heart of violent anti-social activity. This has been emphatically demonstrated over the past more than two years through anti-terror operations in dense mountain belts, even if it has come at the cost of casualties. The Indian Army and other law enforcement agencies have pushed their full technological arsenal and might into ferreting out militants from mountain caves, deep forests and natural hideouts. Security experts admit to the changing colour of militancy, but are confident about striking hard and causing maximum damage to inimical forces. They are constantly aware of the need to adapt without walking into deadly traps. The fact of the matter is that any terrorist attack on India will be met with a strong and resolute response, with India retaliating on its own terms, targeting terror hubs at their root. top videos View all India is also on record as saying that it will not be intimidated by nuclear threats and warned that any terrorist safe haven operating under this pretext will face precise and decisive strikes. The messaging to the world is now more clear, i.e., India will always act in self-defence, which is a sharp shift from the past doctrine of strategic restraint. The author is Editor, Brighter Kashmir, author, TV commentator, political analyst and columnist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. view comments Location : Jammu and Kashmir, India, India First Published: August 17, 2025, 14:08 IST News opinion Opinion: India's Anti-Terrorism Security Apparatus Is Robust Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
