Cash Isa limits set to be left untouched at next week's Mansion House speech
But the PA news agency understands that Ms Reeves will instead focus on new plans to provide consumers with the information and support they need to invest.
The Government is expected to continue talking to industry members and others about the options for reform, with a broad consensus that the UK's savings and investment culture needs to be encouraged.
Harriet Guevara, chief savings officer at Nottingham Building Society, said: 'This is positive news for savers and for lenders.
'We've consistently made the case, alongside others across the mutual and building society sector, for maintaining the full allowance, and welcome any decision to consult further with industry rather than rush through damaging reform that would disincentivise saving.
'Cash Isas remain a vital tool for millions to build financial resilience over time, particularly in the current economic climate.
'Our data shows more than half of our fixed Isa customers used the full £20,000 allowance last year, rising to 65% among those who save in-branch, underlining just how important this option is to those trying to get ahead financially.'
Some building societies reported seeing a jump in cash Isa applications last week, as speculation intensified over the future of the allowance.
Mutuals also warned that mortgages could become more costly and harder to access if the cash Isa limit was cut, with retail deposits being needed to fund mortgage lending.
The Government has been looking at how to help put more money in people's pockets. Earning stronger returns on savings by encouraging investing could be one way to do this, although the value of investments can go down as well as up.
The aim of a potential cut in the cash Isa allowance could have encouraged more investment in stocks and shares, some parts of the industry argued.
But some savings providers also argued that any cut to the cash Isa may simply encourage savers to park their money in taxable savings accounts, rather than the stock market.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently outlined plans to reduce the 'advice gap' with proposals to enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics.
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance, Hargreaves Lansdown, said that 'rushing into a change' would have been 'a real blow for savers and may not get more people to invest anyway'.
She said: 'Changing the boundary on advice and guidance will be truly transformational. Once companies can offer targeted support to their clients, it will help more people build their understanding and confidence, so they choose to branch out into investment because they know it's right for them – rather than feeling pushed into it to retain their Isa allowance.'
Ms Coles added: 'There is a real opportunity to simplify choice and open up investment opportunities. Dropping the 'stocks and shares' language and updating the Isa to call it an investment Isa would help overcome needless confusion.'
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'Our ambition is to ensure people's hard-earned savings are delivering the best returns and driving more investment into the UK economy.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Andrew Bailey risks making Reeves's Budget nightmare even worse
As the Parliamentary summer break is now in full flow, most ministers will be attempting to switch off temporarily from the daily grind of governing. The Chancellor will, however, be keeping a close eye on the Bank of England's next Monetary Policy Committee meeting this Thursday. That is because interest rates, inflation and UK gilt yields are all key components, or 'conditioning assumptions' as they are referred to in the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) economic and fiscal forecast. This is the key forecast that determines what fiscal headroom the Chancellor will have in the autumn Budget. At the moment, economists are expecting Rachel Reeves to miss her rules by somewhere between £10bn to £30bn. Everyone is therefore braced for further tax rises. But this figure could move significantly either up or down depending on what the Bank of England says and does on Thursday. The market is expecting another interest rate cut this week, and one more later in the year. So unless there is a big surprise, the Treasury will obviously be hoping for, and then welcoming, some rare good news. Most attention will therefore be on what is said about the pace of future cuts, and the Bank's forecasts for inflation, GDP and unemployment. But the most useful comparison we can make for determining how the Budget might look is not really assessing what the Bank says versus the market's expectations. Instead, we should look at how the Bank's actions on Thursday match up to the OBR's forecasts published alongside the Spring Statement back in March. At that point, the OBR thought that Bank Rate would average 4pc this year and then fall slightly to 3.8pc for the rest of the forecast. This would be in line with what markets are now expecting, and the interest rate cut likely on Thursday would bring the forecasts into line. So far so good for the Chancellor. Inflation tells a different story. The OBR forecasts the consumer prices index (CPI) measure of inflation to be 3.2pc this year, and then fall to 1.9pc next year before drifting back up to target for the rest of the Parliament. The latest figures published by the Office for National Statistics show inflation to be higher than this at 3.6pc at the moment. It is this upward pressure on inflation that would be worrying me most if I were still in the Treasury. While it will not be enough to stop this week's rate cut, if it persists over the next few months, it may bring into doubt further cuts. In May, the Bank predicted CPI would reach 3.7pc this year, so around about what we're at now. It will be interesting to see what they say in this week's policy report. Alongside inflation forecasts and what that might mean for future interest rate levels, Treasury officials will be watching gilt yields closely. I developed a bit of an obsession with these when I worked there, monitoring the daily and weekly updates provided to the Chancellor on how yields compared to the OBR forecast. If they are even slightly out, this can drive up government debt interest payments, and cost billions of pounds in fiscal headroom. Reflecting the significant amount of additional borrowing the Government has undertaken, the OBR has baked in average market gilt rates of 4.5pc this year rising to 5pc by 2028-29. In actual fact, if you look at 10-year gilts since the February window the OBR used in their last forecast, yields have been higher than 4.5pc, reaching 4.75pc in recent months. If the market reacts to whatever the Bank says on Thursday by increasing yields still further, the Chancellor could have a major problem on her hands. Once the formal Budget process has kicked off by the Chancellor commissioning the OBR for their economic and fiscal forecast, a window is set for various market determinants to be taken from to inform this forecast. If yields are elevated when this window happens, then the public finances will be impacted significantly. An obvious point to state is that things can move in the opposite direction. If there are hints of a third cut to interest rates this year, then some of the fiscal issues the Chancellor is facing will be eased considerably. But with inflation remaining higher than hoped, and the Government demonstrating a complete inability to deliver any welfare or spending cuts, the pressure on gilt yields seems pretty one way to me. There remains a chance then that the Bank throws the Government's economic and fiscal plans into further disarray on Thursday. The short-term welcome of a rate cut could quickly be overtaken by increased worries about what else the Bank has said. With the OBR getting ready to produce its judgment, that might be enough to spoil the Chancellor's summer holiday.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotch whisky: 'No sign' US tariffs will increase to 25%
The US President has so far agreed a 10% tariffs on UK exports and 15% on EU ones. Across the Scotch whisky sector, there are concerns that this deal - which is believed to be costing the industry £4m a week - will lead to significant harm for businesses. READ MORE: Scotch whisky hopes rise after Trump pledges to talk tariffs Trump talks of 'great love' for Scotland during visit 'Scotland must switch whisky exports from America to Canada' The Secretary of State is currently leading a UK Government delegation to Germany this week to 'increase economic ties' with the EU. Mr Murray said it was important to point out that trade deals with the likes of EU and India, the largest growing economy in the world, will provide a 'great opportunity' for Scotch whisky. Yet, earlier on the programme, Scotland's public finance minister Ivan McKee warned that 25% tariffs could be imposed next year as a deal previously reached with America on temporary duty reliefs could be lifted. Between October 2019 and March 2021, the tariff imposed as a result of the Boeing dispute resulted in £600 million in lost Scotch whisky exports. A deal was eventually reached in 2021 to take the 25% tariff off the industry. However, Mr McKee said: 'That was done on a temporary basis and that runs out next year so it's really important that it is taken out of the picture permanently because when that was in place, that was a significant hamper to Scotch whisky exports. 'As the UK Government concludes the deal with the US Government, we would expect it to be 10% tariffs on whisky which is clearly something we wish wasn't there.' Mr McKee said he would hope this was not re-imposed but added: 'There's nothing but unpredictability when it comes to Donald Trump and tariffs so who knows what's happening.' However, Mr Murray insisted it is unlikely this would happen. Asked how likely it would be for 25% tariffs to be re-imposed on Scotch whisky, Mr Murray said: 'There is no sign of that at the moment.' He added: 'It's 10% tariffs on Scottish whisky. Yes, we would rather that was as close to zero as possible but ten percent is as low as anybody else in the world right now." Mr Murray said the Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been able to 'reset international relationships' to do a deal with the US on tariffs. He said: 'Many, including the First Minister, wanted us to walk away from the US president but it was really important in the national interest and in the Scottish national interest for us to have that relationship to do that deal. '10% is the lowest tariff in the world. We did the first trade deal it saved the steel industry, the car industry. 'Yes, 10% tariffs on Scotch whisky is disappointing and we will continue to champion the cause for the really unique position of whisky. "We don't want it to be subject to historic trade wars as it has been in the past. It is a really thriving industry.' Speaking about the US president's visit to Scotland, Mr Murray said it was a 'great privilege' to when he landed in the country last week. He said he was in 'no doubt' of Mr Trump's 'great love of Scotland', adding: 'That is something we should exploit in the national interest.' During his visit to Scotland, President Trump promised to 'take a look' at tariffs on Scotch whisky during his meeting with Starmer as he said he wanted Scotland "to thrive". Since then, however, no changes have been made to the current arrangement. Speaking on the radio today, the Secretary of State also said Mr Trump suggested he should join him at the press conference beside Air Force One when he arrived in the country, however, the Secretary of State declined. Mr Murray said: 'He did tap me on the shoulder and said, 'let's go and do this press conference together' which I declined…because it's not for me to do so. 'I don't think it was for me to speak to the American press pack who is travelling on Air Force One with the President of the United States.'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Reeves acknowledges voter disappointment amid fresh call for wealth tax
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says that Labour must deliver change to earn victory in the next election, acknowledging that some voters are disappointed with the party's progress. She said she is also 'impatient for change' but stressed that ministers cannot implement everything at once, highlighting her responsibility for financial prudence. These remarks coincide with growing public concern over Sir Keir Starmer 's government, whose approval rating recently reached an all-time low. Ms Reeves defended the government's tax policy, saying it has found the right balance despite the challenge of addressing public finance deficits. The discussion follows former Labour shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds' call for a wealth tax, as recent polling indicates a significant perception of chaos within Sir Keir's administration.
