'Salary Or Legacy?' Gautam Adani To Graduating Students At IIT Kharagpur
Addressing the institute's Platinum Jubilee celebrations, Gautam Adani said the choice facing young Indians today was stark: join multinational firms in safe jobs abroad or stay in India to build a nation that aspires to be a $25-trillion economy by 2050.
"One train takes you to a salary. The other takes you to a legacy. And only one train carries the pride of building Bharat," he said, recalling his own decision at 16 to leave Ahmedabad for Mumbai with little more than conviction in his future.
Tracing India's journey from political independence to technological dependence, Gautam Adani argued that true freedom in the 21st century would only come with self-reliance in semiconductors, energy, defence systems, and data sovereignty. "This is the freedom we must now fight for - the freedom of Atmanirbharta - if we are to be truly free," he said.
The Adani Group Chairman reminded students that the pace of technological disruption today is unlike any other period in history. "This is not transformation at 1X speed. It is 10X. It is 100X. And it is accelerating towards 1000X, as AI starts to build AI, LLMs start to write LLMs, robots start to build robots, and machines start to teach machines," he noted.
The billionaire industrialist admitted that Indian corporates, too, bear responsibility for the "innovation deficit" and called for industry to invest more in research and development. "If we corporates do not step up, we will remain users of foreign breakthroughs and never be originators. This is a future we cannot accept," he said.
Gautam Adani announced the Adani-IIT Platinum Jubilee Change Makers Fellowship, as well as the setting up of "living laboratories" in renewable energy, logistics and airports to allow IITians to test their ideas on real-world challenges.
The speech was peppered with anecdotes from his entrepreneurial journey - the building of Mundra Port against the odds, the expansion into energy, and the creation of India's largest airport network. "I talk about Mundra, Khavda, our airports, because they were born not just from my spirit of entrepreneurship, but also from my optimism that the India growth story is unstoppable," he said.
As he closed, Gautam Adani left the students with a four-point call to action: "Be the new freedom fighters of Bharat, build first for Bharat, fortify our foundations, and march as one team for Bharat."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Anatomy of the budding India-China bonhomie
Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi's just concluded visit to India and the agreement between the two sides on the India-China boundary question is an encouraging sign in mending the relationship between the two countries, which has been struggling to normalise since the border standoff in 2020. Wang Yi's visit to Delhi and the agreement outlining several measures to manage the contested border ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's planned trip to China for the annual Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit also reflect broader changes occurring in geopolitics. The India-China dynamics must also be read in conjunction with the engagement of the two countries with Russia. The three-way conversations involving Russia, India, and China are noteworthy as it is reflective of the broader regional geopolitical realignments in response to US policies towards them. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. (AFP) External affairs minister S Jaishankar is now in Russia. For both India and China (as also for Russia), the three-way conversations present an excellent opportunity to signal to Washington that there are possibilities of alternative global blocs and realignments outside of Washington's orbit and influence. What is perhaps more important and consequential are the underlying causes behind the current bonhomie between India and China. Beyond the optics, it is also evident that both India and China are eager to achieve a degree of normalcy in their relationship. The statement from the ministry of external affairs on the outcomes of Wang's India visit testifies to that. It is, therefore, possible to argue that there is a convergence between New Delhi and Beijing on the need to normalise bilateral relations. However, their respective definitions of normalcy are different. For China, normalcy means moving on from the current border impasse with India and focussing on the global balance of power. As Wang said, 'We (India and China) should never allow bilateral relations to be defined by the boundary question or specific differences to affect the overall picture of our bilateral ties.' Without normalcy with India, China knows that it will not be in a position to leverage Indian unhappiness with US President Donald Trump for its own larger geopolitical purposes. In other words, China seeks to exploit the current opportunity to challenge the US's global supremacy, and for that purpose, normalcy with India would be helpful. But the question is whether Beijing is willing to engage in sustained give-and-take negotiations with New Delhi to settle the border issue. For New Delhi, normalcy with China is centred on disengagement at the border so that it can focus on the larger geopolitical questions of India-China relations, India-China-Russia dynamics, and so on. For India, normalcy on the border and status quo ante bellum as of 2020 is key. China's global objectives behind the current warmth towards India should not be missed. Wang stated recently that 'as important members of the Global South, we have the responsibility to take the lead in opposing hegemonism and power politics'. There is little doubt that China would want to use India and Russia, and the Global South, to target the US-led world order. However, let's be clear. If Trump offers a G-2 with China, Beijing is likely to settle for it, sacrificing its secondary geopolitical equations. A similar logic extends to Russia as well. Moscow would vociferously promote the virtues of an alternative world order outside of the US orbit, but what it wants is to be recognised and treated by Washington and Europe as a great power and be accommodated within the European balance of power system, rather than being part of a China-led global order. As for India, it will continue to emphasise the importance of the Global South, multipolarity, and global alternatives, but New Delhi is not comfortable being part of a China-led, Russia-backed, non-American world order. If India is accommodated into a US-led world order as an important stakeholder, New Delhi is likely to accept that. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. However, since these options are not currently available, it is inclined to settle for underbalancing China, given its lack of capacity to balance Beijing on its own. In that sense, the three countries – India, China, and Russia – are hedging against geopolitical uncertainties and opting for their respective second-best options. This essential geopolitical dynamic should not be lost on our policymakers. In the meantime, and notwithstanding the deep mistrust between the two countries, India needs to engage with China for two key reasons. For India, conflict management with China is a key issue, as the fundamental contradictions in the relationship are unlikely to disappear soon. Therefore, it is essential to establish and strengthen confidence-building measures (CBMs) to manage Sino-Indian tensions. In that sense, the recent agreements are in the right direction. A no less important reason for India to engage with China on a sustained basis is that managing the relationship with Beijing — its rise as a global power and ambitions for superpower status, aggressive pursuit of its territorial ambitions, and attempts at unipolarity in Asia — is going to be India's most crucial task for the next several decades. From that perspective alone, New Delhi will need to engage productively with Beijing. Happymon Jacob is the founder and director of the Council for Strategic and Defense Research and the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
IBC as a preventive for funds diversion
The Supreme Court ruling annulling its earlier order on the liquidation of Bhushan Steel under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) reignited the debate on the credibility and transparency of the existing corporate debt resolution framework. On May 2, the Supreme Court ordered the liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd., marking one of the most significant tests of the IBC since its enactment in 2016. In that order, the court revoked the resolution plan by JSW Steel and directed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate liquidation proceedings. The order, which was based on the finding that the resolution plan had procedural flaws and violated the IBC, was annulled on July 31. With promoters and creditors locked in courtroom battles, a key question arises: Does the bankruptcy law have hidden benefits? The prophylactic effects of such legislation often go unnoticed. A well-implemented bankruptcy law can act as an effective deterrent because the penalties arising out of bankruptcy accrue privately to the managers and lead to a large reduction in the need to conduct deep financial audits. (Mint) An important consideration in the context of India is the effect of the IBC reforms on how managers divert resources. The last decade saw several high-profile cases of fund diversions, leading to financial distress at firms and adverse consequences for their lenders. Can stronger creditor rights reduce fund diversion? The standard approach of using large-scale financial audits to achieve reductions in fund diversions is very costly and is unlikely to work given the fact that auditors are hired by the firms. A well-implemented bankruptcy law can act as an effective deterrent because the penalties arising out of bankruptcy accrue privately to the managers and lead to a large reduction in the need to conduct deep financial audits. Such hidden effects would, therefore, be a panacea to any country that cannot conduct large-scale audits every so often. A well-functioning bankruptcy law is, therefore, a substitute for the costly, time-consuming, and highly uncertain process of financial audits. The effect and the underlying mechanisms are tested in a research paper by the author of this article, along with Prasanna Gai, Akshat Singh, and Asha Sundaram. We studied the impact of the IBC reform within Indian business groups, focusing on financially distressed firms. Indeed, IBC does reduce fund diversions (using suspect Related Party Transactions, or RPTs, as a proxy). The strongest effect of the reform was seen in the form of reduced related party loan outflows — a clear indication of a reduction in fund diversion. What explains this change? The IBC law contains provisions that act in both directions — for creditors to force firms to reduce diversions as well as for firms to willingly reduce diversions to avoid bankruptcy. On the creditors' side, higher and quicker expected recoveries would make them more willing to initiate insolvency proceedings against firms. A streamlined, time-bound resolution process and the establishment of specialised courts (NCLTs and the appellate courts) further increase creditors' hopes of higher recoveries. On the firms' side, the fact that the control of the company shifts to a professional resolution manager upon admission of insolvency disincentivises managers when it comes to fund diversion. This threat in itself makes pre-default fund diversion a much costlier proposition. The research finds that after IBC, firms voluntarily reduced fund diversions and repaid banks. This is an ideal outcome, given the lower costs associated with voluntary changes in behaviour. Firms relied on internal funds by cutting back on dividends and related-party payments to reduce bank debt. However, there was no improvement in firm profitability, sales or investment after the reform, indicating that the reduction in dividends and RPTs was a result of improved financial discipline rather than firm performance. For the policy to continue to generate sound financial behaviour over time, the threat of penalty under bankruptcy must be sustained. The fact that most cases under IBC do not adhere to the prescribed timelines is not ideal. In line with this hypothesis, in the study, the most pronounced effects were observed in the first two years following the reform. The signs of early deterrence were strong as financial RPTs ceased altogether in many cases. By 2019, the effect weakened, becoming smaller and more uncertain, hinting that the law's grip may have loosened over time. The early outcomes from the IBC are promising and encouraging, though they also highlight the areas that require sustained attention. Amidst this, allowing creditors to start the insolvency process outside the court system — under the new Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill — is a much welcome provision. Ensuring timely resolution, strengthening creditor rights, and addressing practices that undermine transparency can contribute to building a more resilient corporate insolvency framework. Gautham Udupa is with the Centre for Advanced Financial Research and Learning (CAFRAL), Mumbai. The views expressed are personal
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
AAP MP Raghav Chadha demands free ChatGPT, Gemini, for all Indians: ‘Next step towards digital democracy'
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Raghav Chadha on Wednesday called for the Centre to make the advanced versions AI tools including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and others free for Indians, citing that it could revolutionise farming, education, business and healthcare among others. Speaking at the Rajya Sabha, Chadha noted that countries like UAE, Singapore and China are already offering free access to advanced AI models to their citizens, while Indians are at a risk of losing the $15 trillion global AI race by 2030. AI is not 'not just a technology but an opportunity to dream big and accomplish those dreams,' the AAP MP from Punjab noted. He claimed it could revolutionise farming, education, business and healthcare, boost productivity, save time, and ensure that 'not a single Indian is left behind in this AI revolution.' Also Read | Is an AI winter upon us? There seems a chill in the air 'AI is not just a technology, it is an opportunity—an opportunity to move forward, to dream big, and to fulfil those dreams,' Chadha said. For farmers, AI can mean smart farming, for students it can act as a 24x7 tutor, for entrepreneurs it can be a business planner and so on, he said. 'Every question has an answer, every problem has a solution within AI,' Chadha told the Rajya Sabha. Raghav Chadha bats for Digital India using AI Calling upon the government to take steps, Raghav Chadha said, 'If the Government of India provides advanced generative AI tools—like ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude—to every citizen, across all age groups and social classes, in local languages, free of cost and in a safe manner, it can multiply our national productivity manifold and save people's precious time.' Terming it the 'next step towards digital democracy,' Chadha emphasised that in this revolution of AI, not a single Indian should be left behind. 'Only then can India truly become a Digital India. My appeal to the Government is to give this matter serious attention,' he added.
