logo
PS5 Finally Has More Players Than PS4, Almost Five Years After Launch

PS5 Finally Has More Players Than PS4, Almost Five Years After Launch

Newsweek16 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors
The current console generation has been a bit different than those that came before. While previous generations have seen releases for older consoles gradually discontinued, the current generation still sees a lot of high-profile games get PS4 versions, despite PS5 being far more powerful.
A PS5 on display
A PS5 on display
Photo byWe finally have a sense of why that is, as in a new business report from Sony, it has been revealed that the PS5 has more monthly players for the first time since the console's launch in November 2020, as reported by VGC. This is a step up from last year, where a similar report showed that the PS5 to PS4 monthly player ratio was an almost perfect 50/50 split at 49 million players each.
A slide from Sony showing a graph of PS5 vs PS4 monthly players and their spend per console.
A slide from Sony showing a graph of PS5 vs PS4 monthly players and their spend per console.
Sony
There are a lot of possible reasons behind this. Some critics say that Sony's lineup of PS5 exclusive titles has been weaker than previous generations, with plenty of PS4 versions of games, meaning older players don't feel the need to make the upgrade. Price is also a potential issue, as both games and consoles are getting more expensive as time goes on, with Sony most recently releasing the PS5 Pro at an eye-watering price point of $699.99, and prices are only expected to go up as we approach the PS6 in the next few years.
Either way, Sony is viewing a multi-generational player base as a positive, as CEO and SIE president Hideaki Nishino explained during the presentation, "We now have a large ecosystem of highly engaged players across both the PlayStation 5 and the PlayStation 4 generations, so naturally, therfore, there's a huge interest in our next generation console strategy."
This gives the impression that even when the PS6 does get revealed, Sony still has every intention of continuing to invest in the PS5, and possibly even the PS4 as well.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Saw 28 Years Later's First 28 Minutes, But It Turns Out That Wasn't The Director's Idea In The First Place
I Saw 28 Years Later's First 28 Minutes, But It Turns Out That Wasn't The Director's Idea In The First Place

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

I Saw 28 Years Later's First 28 Minutes, But It Turns Out That Wasn't The Director's Idea In The First Place

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. While we're a couple years shy of 28 Years Later's specified timeframe, that hasn't stopped director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland from returning to the horror franchise they first launched back in 2002. The first of a planned trilogy will be debuting on the 2025 movie schedule in a matter of weeks, and anticipation couldn't be greater for the full feature. So when I was invited to recently check out just the first 28 minutes of this picture, I was a bit bummed... despite loving what I saw. And in speaking with director Danny Boyle, I learned about a scene that may have played a part in Sony's decision to keep the film under a veil of secrecy. This afternoon, I was on hand for a screening of what's basically the first act of this upcoming horror movie. A lot of what we know about 28 Years Later was featured, but with more detail. Before we got started, Boyle introduced the footage with a huge amount of excitement, while also noting that he really wished the entire film was being shown to us. The filmmaker shared some thoughts on why we weren't getting the full experience: That's not my idea. I'd much prefer you to watch the whole movie, but … they don't want any spoilers about … well, you're not gonna see it. I was about to discuss the second half of the movie with you. You're not about to see that. … And I'm sorry you're not seeing the other 92 minutes or whatever the rest of it is. One quick note here, before we move on: despite my theory, we're not seeing the origins of 28 Days Later's church scene. However, if you've been worried about 28 Weeks Later's canonical standing, this opening will answer your questions once and for all - as that sequel is properly tied into the narrative fabric. And with that, let's get into a light overview of what was seen at the screening. Most of what we saw in 28 Years Later's sizzle reel deals with the community of Holy Island and introduced how it's run. Before we got to that point, we were shown the entirety of the Teletubbies flashback, with a boy watching his family overtaken by the first wave of Infected. Jumping head in time, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) prepares to take Spike (Alfie Williams) on his first Infected hunt. There's also a moment with the ailing Isla (Jodie Comer), who is supposedly not Infected... but is having moments of anger, a constant fever, and pain. Also, part of what was shown included the previous 28 Years Later clip that was included with the re-release of 28 Days Later where we see Spike's second kill, exploding the head of a hanging Infected. Throughout this final section of the presentation, father and son interact with the two new variants of Infected they know about: 'slow lows' and 'Alphas.' Both operate at different speeds and strengths, but they prove one thing: the Rage Virus' evolution has started to switch things up. And just as we get to the end of the reel, before abruptly smashing to the title card, an Alpha does something you wouldn't expect. It yells out a command: 'RUN!' 28 Years Later's promising start is just as chilling and horrific as you'd expect; and it certainly left me wanting more. Which brings us to the subject of why Danny Boyle thinks the rest of the movie is currently under lock and key. When I had the chance to speak with Danny Boyle about both the past and present of the franchise, the filmmaker shared a number of interesting anecdotes that fill in some of the history in the 28 franchise's past that points toward what waits for audiences. While I've omitted most of the defining details of this particular scene, it's a moment that the Sunshine helmer shared was based on a makeshift COVID-19 memorial in London. The details sounded akin to the scene where Jim (Cillian Murphy) finds his parents dead in his childhood home in 28 Days Later, which ties into how Boyle feels this particular moment is responsible for the hold up: I think the real reason they won't show you the rest of the film is because there's a bit in it that is very moving. And I think [that] they think if horror fans think it's too sentimental, they won't come along and watch it. And if it leaks out that it's, but for me, it's kind of all part of horror is all, it's, it is not just a limited [genre], it's not just horror. It's not just a slasher movie or something. It's about all the emotions that are within that, that contain within that. And you have that in the first film. Thinking back, this philosophy seems to share commonality with how 28 Days Later was marketed prior to its theatrical release. As you can see in the trailer below, the marketing went hard on haunting imagery and rock music, but light on the emotional moments that audiences still remember: Based on the 28 minutes we saw, what I can say for certain is that more of Danny Boyle's signature style is present – reteamed with the meticulous brutality Alex Garland has honed through his career from Ex Machina to Warfare. Knowing that the tender heart of the first film will be present is a huge tease for a die hard fan like myself, and it ensures that I'll partake in the finished feature as soon as possible. If you're of the same mind, I suggest you don't walk, but ruuuuun to get your tickets for 28 Years Later, once they go on sale June 3.

As A Millennial, Even I Was Surprised To Learn How 28 Days Later Got Its Title In The First Place
As A Millennial, Even I Was Surprised To Learn How 28 Days Later Got Its Title In The First Place

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

As A Millennial, Even I Was Surprised To Learn How 28 Days Later Got Its Title In The First Place

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the 2025 movie schedule pushes forward, there are still plenty of great titles to look forward to. One that particular piques my interest is Danny Boyle and Alex Garland's return to the 28 series by way of a long-awaited sequel that's a long time coming. Ahead of the film's release, I was able to attend 28 Years Later's footage presentation and was surprised to learn some new lore surrounding the first film, especially how it actually got its title. Being on hand for Sony's New York event that showed 28 minutes of 28 Years Later, I was able to hear an introduction from director Danny Boyle. Mixed in with the setup for what we saw of this new potential trilogy starter were some 28 Days Later trivia points that even I, a millennial, didn't know. Which included this story about that horror classic's title, as told to the audience that CinemaBlend was a part of: The title was based on … it used to be when you returned goods, that was what you always had. Now online shopping, it's all returned things. But [back] then it was like, you have 28 days in which to return this good, to get your money back, or stuff like that. It was a common usage [sort] of thing. It's sort of died out now, but that's where we got it from. Well now, that charming scene where Jim (Cillian Murphy) and his friends are gleefully looting the grocery store just might make more sense after learning this fact. Not to date myself, but I remember the run-up to the release of 28 Days Later rather well; which is part of why this random fact is so surprising to me. Fittingly enough, this tale came after a story I did remember, about how Danny Boyle needed to heavily disclaimer early screenings to festival audiences. The reason being that Fox Searchlight thought that audiences would mistake the origin film of the Rage Virus as a sequel to the Sandra Bullock rom-com 28 Days. Sadly, a lot of the news and marketing materials released from 2002 to 2003 are lost to the sands of time; much like tons of treasures from the era of Internet 1.0. So much like that Sandra Bullock story, any word on the title's origins is also buried in the digital wasteland. And, seeing as 28 Days Later's long out-of-print status has recently been remedied, this horror title (which belongs among the best 2000s movies) hasn't exactly been pushed as hard as some of its contemporaries. Much like a situation of confusing Hotel Artemis with a kids movie, this scenario could have left some people seriously bewildered. And, if you read some of the Amazon product reviews on the DVD for Ms. Bullock's movie, some still are. The good news is, much as Danny Boyle pointed out in his introduction to 28 Years Later's sizzle reel, you have more than a month to return said disc if you mistakenly bought it! I learned quite a bit that day about that 2002 franchise origin story, thanks to a one-on-one interview I took part in with the Slumdog Millionaire director. It was in that session that I found myself surprised to learn of some other actors who vied with Cillian Murphy for his eventual role in 28 Days Later. But, as some movie fans will tell you, sometimes the simplest facts from the past turn out to be the ones that give you the largest shocks. Speaking of shocks, we're closer to 28 Years Later than we've ever been; as the legacy-quel is about to debut in theaters on June 20th. And, if you're looking to revisit 28 Days Later or check it out for the first time, you can currently stream the film, free with ads, on PlutoTV.

Sony Teases PS6, PS5 ‘Multi-Generational' Plan
Sony Teases PS6, PS5 ‘Multi-Generational' Plan

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sony Teases PS6, PS5 ‘Multi-Generational' Plan

Sony Group held a business segment presentation earlier today, during which the company teased a 'multi-generational' plan for and . PlayStation CEO Hideaki Nishino pledged 'new and enhanced' ways for players to play games on both platforms. Nishino acknowledged that there's a lot of interest surrounding the PS6 already, and while he understandably couldn't divulge future plans, he did say that the upcoming console is 'top of mind' for Sony. However, seeing the high levels of engagement from PS4 players well beyond the launch of PS5, the company intends to disrupt traditional approach to console life cycles. What this essentially means is that unlike the switch from PS3 to PS4, the current generation validated Sony's new 'multi-generational' approach, and it plans to continue using that strategy going forward. 'We're still exploring what the future of our platform would look like,' added Sony Interactive Entertainment SVP Lynn Azar. 'We've reduced traditional cyclicality by establishing a large ecosystem of players across both the PS5 and PS4 generations. And as we continue to drive a multi-generational ecosystem into the future, we'll provide new ways for players to access the platform and experience our content and services.' PS6 is expected to launch by 2028 at the latest. The post Sony Teases PS6, PS5 'Multi-Generational' Plan appeared first on PlayStation LifeStyle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store