
What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers
The main worry is the proposed absorption of the CAP under the National and Regional Partnerships Plans (NRPP). The European Commission advertises this move to be more efficient and have a stronger, impactful use of EU funding with agricultural policy 'at its core'.
Concerns have been raised revolving around whether money normally allocated to the CAP will be redirected and funnelled into other sections of the NRPP. Initially proposed for the NRPP is €865bn within the 2028-2034 EU budget.
Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: 'The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union.'
Another concern within the proposal is that the income support of €300bn ringfenced for EU farmers post 2027. This is a drop from the €387bn previously set aside for farmers within the current budget.
This would mean the nearly 120,000 farmers who avail of EU-funded supports such as Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) or Complimentary Redistributive Income Support for Sustainability (CRISS) could experience drops in the amount they receive.
Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said:
The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union…
"Perhaps it's a negotiating tactic to force member states to increase their national contributions or to agree on new own resources. Either way, it will make farmers deeply worried about their future viability,' said .
According to the 2024 National Farm Survey conducted by Teagasc, direct payments amounted to 60% contribution to a family farm income in 2024 across the sectors examined (dairy, cattle rearing, cattle other, sheep, and tillage).
This cut will have significant effects on farming families' incomes and livelihoods if a ringfence of €300bn is agreed.
A 'Unity Safety Net' of €900m per year of the budget — a total of €6.3bn — is proposed for emergencies within the sector. This is meant to help ensure stable markets and to assist in times of crisis such as extreme weather events, geopolitical situations or persistent structural challenges for EU-based farmers.
With the proposals of a single 'rule book', streamlined payments and a young and new farmers' 'starter pack' for targeted supports could benefit small enterprise farmers and young farmers entering or inheriting within the industry, reducing administrative burdens and offering lump sums.
Overview is vague on eco schemes
Notably vague within the proposal overview made public by the EU Commission was any mention of farming sustainability and eco schemes. Mentions of sustainability schemes and practices were made with no clear outline or budget proposed.
In contrast, a leaked document that was circulated before the initial official proposal made several mentions of eco and sustainability schemes with recommendations to enhance these and similar areas for farmers to receive support based on uptake of beneficial practices.
Areas outlined in this leaked document suggested support be provided for farmers or individuals who commit to climate change adaptations, climate change mitigations, soil health, preservation of biodiversity, and development of organic farming.
Ireland's presidency of the EU Council
With the uproar surrounding the proposed EU budget post-2027, the Irish presidency of the EU Council, occurring in the second semester of 2026, will take place throughout a period of finalisation of the 2028-2034 EU budget.
Ultimately, this will have farmers and their organisations alike watching the Department of Agriculture closely.
The Irish presidency of the EU Council will mean Irish ministers chairing council meetings, and our very own agriculture minister will chair talks that will focus on the finalisation of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) in the context of agriculture.
'We'll negotiate through this proposal line by line and we'll have a very significant role to play during our EU Presidency in the second half of next year,' said agricultural minister, Martin Heydon, in a recent press release regarding the formation of a CAP consultation committee.
The last Irish presidency occurred in 2013, which oversaw the agreement of the MFF of the time.
Agreements were also reached on the seventh Environmental Action Programme and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy.
Mr Heydon opened the first meeting of the CAP Consultation Committee, made up of key stakeholders, on July 17, to discuss the prospective CAP and EU Budget post-2027.
CAP consultation committee
The committee contains representatives from:
Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (including NPWS), the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation, the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment, the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht;
The Agricultural Consultants Association, An Taisce, Bord Bia, the County and City Management Association, the Environmental Pillar, the EPA, Ibec;
Irish Cattle & Sheep Farmers Association (ICSA), Irish Co-operative Organisation Society (ICOS), Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), Irish Farmers Association (IFA), Irish Grain Growers Association, Irish Natura & Hill Farmers Association, Irish Organic Association;
Irish Rural Link (also representing National Rural Network), Local Development Company Network, Macra na Feirme, National Biodiversity Data Centre, National CAP Network, academic members (UCD and UCC), Teagasc, and Women in Agriculture Stakeholder Group.
Mr Heydon said: 'The committee will play a crucial role in ensuring that the CAP reform process is transparent, inclusive, and responsive to the needs of various stakeholders within the agricultural and rural community.'
He concluded: 'The Commission proposals for new CAP structures in a new MFF architecture will require careful analysis.
This seems like a very big change, but in fact this announcement marks the starting point in a long negotiating process.
"I will continue to work very closely with Commissioner Hansen, the European Parliament, and my EU counterparts to ensure that the end result delivers the best possible outcome for Irish farmers and the rural communities in which they live.'
Following the committee's meeting, a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine informed the Irish Examiner that: 'Committee members were briefed on the European Commission announcements, bearing in mind that the detailed CAP legislative proposals have not yet been published. Committee members gave their initial reactions to the announcements and outlined their priorities for the CAP negotiations.
Opening the meeting, Mr Heydon emphasised that the commission proposals are only the first step in a lengthy negotiation process. He emphasised that stakeholders on the committee will be essential partners in the process of working to secure a robust CAP that delivers for Ireland and for all member states.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
CAP proposals to hit the most productive farms hardest
There are fears for the strength of the EU's food industry, after analysis shows the biggest reduction in income aid for the most productive farmers in the new CAP proposals. For example, aid would be reduced for half of the farmers, and three quarters of the farmland in France, which is the EU's top food producing member state. The analysis was carried out by Farm Europe, a group of experts on agriculture and rural economies, many of whom previously held high positions in the EU Commission and Parliament. They looked at public data on the distribution of aid in 2022 to farmers in the EU, France, Italy and the Czech Republic, and how this aid would be affected by the commission's new post-2028 plan to significantly reduce the budget for the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), while capping aid at €100,000 per farm, and radically redistributing the aid from farmers paid more than €20,000 to lower paid farmers. Farm Europe found that in France, more than 50% of farmers now receiving more than €5,000 a year would have their aid reduced. These farmers have about 73% of the total agricultural area in France. Farm Europe said: "Such a formula would further increase the economic pressure on farms, which currently account for the bulk of EU production. There is no doubt that this approach would accelerate the process of agricultural restructuring across Europe, encouraging expansion and making it particularly difficult for young farmers to set up traditional family farms. It could also encourage EU farmers to focus their efforts on reducing costs rather than optimising production, which would seriously undermine the objective of agricultural sovereignty. Farm Europe found that in the Czech Republic, aid would be reduced for 85% of the productive sector. In Italy, the owners of 57% of hectares would be adversely affected by redistributing aid from farmers paid more than €20,000 to lower paid farmers. Farm Europe said: "On various scales, all member states would be severely affected by this proposal, which seems to be dictated more by a desire to save money than by a genuine desire for fairness or a vision for the future of the sector." Across the EU, more than half of the utilised agricultural area would be affected by the reduction in aid, rising to two-thirds when the smallest farms are excluded (those receiving less than €5,000 in aid). At EU level, one third of farmers with more than 12 hectares would see their subsidies reduced by redistributing aid from farmers paid more than €20,000 to lower paid farmers, according to the analysis by Farm Europe. If farmers respond negatively to the new CAP, annual production could fall from the 2024 level of €532.4bn, of which half is crops, and about two-fifths is animals and animal products. FoodDrinkEurope, which represents Europe's food and drink manufacturers, the buyers of 70% of EU agricultural output, said the European Commission's proposal to fold the CAP into a new cross-sectoral fund risks weakening one of the EU's most important strategic policies. FoodDrinkEurope said a proposed ring-fenced €302bn envelope for farmers marks a significant decrease from the current CAP budget of €386.6bn. "Member states are expected to provide additional national contributions, which risks creating unequal levels of support across the EU". The new CAP plan is part of the commission's proposal for the seven-year EU budget starting in 2028, of almost €2trn. The proposal will be negotiated with the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU, representing EU countries, before final adoption.


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Committee calls for clarity on Government proposals to change triple lock
Further safeguards and clarity are needed in the Government's draft laws to change Ireland's system for deploying troops abroad, a committee has recommended. The Joint Committee on Defence and National Security published a report into the Government's proposals to change the 'triple lock', which is the requirement for Government, Dail and UN approval to send more than 12 Irish soldiers overseas. The main change would see the need for formal UN approval for such missions removed and replaced with a stipulation that the Defence Forces deployment would be in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. Irish troops on parade at Camp Shamrock near the border with Lebanon and Israel (Niall Carson/PA) The Government has argued this will prevent the permanent members of the UN Security Council — Russia, China, the UK, the US and France — from vetoing Irish peacekeeping missions. Critics see it as an erosion of Irish neutrality and a move towards European militarisation. The Government's Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 also looks to expand on the basis for Irish soldiers being dispatched outside the State. In its report published on Wednesday, the committee makes 27 recommendations asking for further safeguards or clarity on the draft changes. This includes a call to define what 'strengthening international security' means in the context of the Bill. It said that the legislation should specify that the phrase will not include the taking part in missions where cluster munitions or anti-personnel mines are used. 'The Joint Committee recommends that the legislation potentially explore definitions for how the terms 'conflict prevention' and 'strengthening international security' will be interpreted in Ireland and outline clear parameters and safeguards for deployment in these cases,' it said. It also recommended that 'at minimum' an independent legal review should be carried out before Irish troops are deployed abroad with an international force. The findings should be made available to Oireachtas members, and a version 'redacted where necessary' is made public. The committee also recommends that the proposals to increase the number of Irish troops allowed to be deployed without Dail approval from 12 to 50, should include 'at a minimum, oversight provisions' from two committees: defence and foreign affairs. Ireland has been taking part in UN peacekeeping missions since 1958 and the triple lock has been in place since 1960.


Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Committee calls for clarity on Government proposals to change triple lock
Further safeguards and clarity are needed in the Government's draft laws to change Ireland's system for deploying troops abroad, a committee has recommended. The Joint Committee on Defence and National Security published a report into the Government's proposals to change the 'triple lock', which is the requirement for Government, Dáil and UN approval to send more than 12 Irish soldiers overseas. The main change would see the need for formal UN approval for such missions removed and replaced with a stipulation that the Defence Forces deployment would be in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. The Government has argued this will prevent the permanent members of the UN Security Council – Russia, China, the UK, the US and France – from vetoing Irish peacekeeping missions. Critics see it as an erosion of Irish neutrality and a move towards European militarisation. The Government's Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 also looks to expand on the basis for Irish soldiers being dispatched outside the State. In its report published on Wednesday, the committee makes 27 recommendations asking for further safeguards or clarity on the draft changes. This includes a call to define what 'strengthening international security' means in the context of the Bill. It said that the legislation should specify that the phrase will not include the taking part in missions where cluster munitions or anti-personnel mines are used. 'The Joint Committee recommends that the legislation potentially explore definitions for how the terms 'conflict prevention' and 'strengthening international security' will be interpreted in Ireland and outline clear parameters and safeguards for deployment in these cases,' it said. It also recommended that, 'at minimum', an independent legal review should be carried out before Irish troops are deployed abroad with an international force. The findings should be made available to Oireachtas members and a version 'redacted where necessary' is made public. The committee also recommends that the proposals to increase the number of Irish troops allowed to be deployed without Dáil approval from 12 to 50, should include, 'at a minimum, oversight provisions' from two committees: defence and foreign affairs. Ireland has been taking part in UN peacekeeping missions since 1958 and the triple lock has been in place since 1960. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week